Optimization of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials to identify unilateral optic neuritis
•We determined optimal OCT and VEP indices to identify unilateral optic nerve lesion.•The inter-eye RNFL and GCIPL difference are both sensitive and specific.•The 95th percentile VEP latency value is sensitive and specific.•Optimization of OCT and VEP has diagnostic implications for multiple scleros...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multiple sclerosis and related disorders 2020-06, Vol.41, p.101988-101988, Article 101988 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101988 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101988 |
container_title | Multiple sclerosis and related disorders |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Behbehani, Raed Ali, Abdullah Al-Omairah, Hamd Rousseff, Rossen T |
description | •We determined optimal OCT and VEP indices to identify unilateral optic nerve lesion.•The inter-eye RNFL and GCIPL difference are both sensitive and specific.•The 95th percentile VEP latency value is sensitive and specific.•Optimization of OCT and VEP has diagnostic implications for multiple sclerosis.•Diagnosis of optic nerve lesion may improve early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Optic neuritis is a common manifestation of multiple sclerosis and frequently the presenting sign. The diagnosis of MS is heavily based on MRI findings but the latter is relatively insensitive in detecting optic nerve lesions. Identification of optic nerve lesion using ancillary tools such spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) by measuring the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and visual-evoked potentials latencies (VEP) may facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.
To determine the optimal of SDOCT measures in RFNL and GCIPL and the VEP latency value for the identification of a prior symptomatic optic nerve lesion.
Thirty patients with diagnosed clinically with optic neuritis and fifty healthy control subjects were tested with SDOCT and VEP and the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of optimal values from healthy controls and optic neuritis patients were determined of for the identification unilateral optic nerve lesion.
The inter-eye GCIPL difference of 3.5 µm is highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98%) in identifying unilateral optic nerve lesion, while lowest 5th percentile normal GCIPL threshold values of 71 µm was highly sensitive (100%) but less specific (83.3%). The inter-eye RNFL difference of 5.5 µm had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 90% in identifying optic nerve lesion while the lower 5th percentile normal RNFL value of 92.3 µm was poorly sensitive (40%). Finally, the 95th percentile normal VEP latency of 104.50 milliseconds had sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 76% in identifying optic nerve lesion.
The inter-eye GCIPL difference is a powerful index for identifying unilateral optic nerve lesion, while the inter-eye RNFL difference and 95th percentile normal VEP latency had very good sensitivity and specificity. These measures can be useful in the evaluation of the first demyelinating event of MS and therefor can facilitate early diagnosis and therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.msard.2020.101988 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2364038924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S221103482030064X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2364038924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-97b4285cbfdf480a9f3ed283440a75012158a0446b149f4c7d4a569f2f4f1d8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vGyEQQFHVqolc_4JIFcde7PC1a_bQQ2W1SaRIvrRnhGGIcXeXLbCW3Ev-elg78TFcYGbezIiH0A0lS0pofbtfdklHu2SEnTKNlB_QNWOULgiv6o-Xt5BXaJ7SnpRTV1TU9DO64ow0rCL8Gj1vhuw7_19nH3ocHE4DmBx1i23otC-pUjclNGEHEXoDOIcuPEU97I5Y9xYffBpLHQ7hL1g8hAx99rpNhcPeToE74rH3rc4wzT0NxD2M0WefvqBPrsAwf71n6M-vn7_X94vHzd3D-sfjwvCqyYtmtRVMVmbrrBOS6MZxsExyIYheVYQyWklNhKi3VDROmJUVuqobx5xw1ErgM_TtPHeI4d8IKavOJwNtq3sIY1KM14Jw2TBRUH5GTQwpRXBqiL7T8agoUZN8tVcn-WqSr87yS9fX1wXjtgN76XlTXYDvZwDKNw8eokrGT0Ktj0W5ssG_u-AFxUyZDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2364038924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials to identify unilateral optic neuritis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Behbehani, Raed ; Ali, Abdullah ; Al-Omairah, Hamd ; Rousseff, Rossen T</creator><creatorcontrib>Behbehani, Raed ; Ali, Abdullah ; Al-Omairah, Hamd ; Rousseff, Rossen T</creatorcontrib><description>•We determined optimal OCT and VEP indices to identify unilateral optic nerve lesion.•The inter-eye RNFL and GCIPL difference are both sensitive and specific.•The 95th percentile VEP latency value is sensitive and specific.•Optimization of OCT and VEP has diagnostic implications for multiple sclerosis.•Diagnosis of optic nerve lesion may improve early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Optic neuritis is a common manifestation of multiple sclerosis and frequently the presenting sign. The diagnosis of MS is heavily based on MRI findings but the latter is relatively insensitive in detecting optic nerve lesions. Identification of optic nerve lesion using ancillary tools such spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) by measuring the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and visual-evoked potentials latencies (VEP) may facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.
To determine the optimal of SDOCT measures in RFNL and GCIPL and the VEP latency value for the identification of a prior symptomatic optic nerve lesion.
Thirty patients with diagnosed clinically with optic neuritis and fifty healthy control subjects were tested with SDOCT and VEP and the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of optimal values from healthy controls and optic neuritis patients were determined of for the identification unilateral optic nerve lesion.
The inter-eye GCIPL difference of 3.5 µm is highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98%) in identifying unilateral optic nerve lesion, while lowest 5th percentile normal GCIPL threshold values of 71 µm was highly sensitive (100%) but less specific (83.3%). The inter-eye RNFL difference of 5.5 µm had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 90% in identifying optic nerve lesion while the lower 5th percentile normal RNFL value of 92.3 µm was poorly sensitive (40%). Finally, the 95th percentile normal VEP latency of 104.50 milliseconds had sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 76% in identifying optic nerve lesion.
The inter-eye GCIPL difference is a powerful index for identifying unilateral optic nerve lesion, while the inter-eye RNFL difference and 95th percentile normal VEP latency had very good sensitivity and specificity. These measures can be useful in the evaluation of the first demyelinating event of MS and therefor can facilitate early diagnosis and therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-0348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-0356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.101988</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32092503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Axonal loss ; Axons - pathology ; Early Diagnosis ; Electroencephalography ; Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology ; Female ; Ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer ; Humans ; Male ; Multiple Sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging ; Multiple Sclerosis - pathology ; Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology ; Optic neuritis ; Optic Neuritis - diagnosis ; Optic Neuritis - diagnostic imaging ; Optic Neuritis - pathology ; Optic Neuritis - physiopathology ; Optical coherence tomography ; Retina - diagnostic imaging ; Retina - pathology ; Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology ; Retinal nerve fiber layer ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - standards ; Visual evoked potentials ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2020-06, Vol.41, p.101988-101988, Article 101988</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-97b4285cbfdf480a9f3ed283440a75012158a0446b149f4c7d4a569f2f4f1d8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-97b4285cbfdf480a9f3ed283440a75012158a0446b149f4c7d4a569f2f4f1d8e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2076-5356 ; 0000-0002-6633-3567</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32092503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behbehani, Raed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Omairah, Hamd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseff, Rossen T</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials to identify unilateral optic neuritis</title><title>Multiple sclerosis and related disorders</title><addtitle>Mult Scler Relat Disord</addtitle><description>•We determined optimal OCT and VEP indices to identify unilateral optic nerve lesion.•The inter-eye RNFL and GCIPL difference are both sensitive and specific.•The 95th percentile VEP latency value is sensitive and specific.•Optimization of OCT and VEP has diagnostic implications for multiple sclerosis.•Diagnosis of optic nerve lesion may improve early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Optic neuritis is a common manifestation of multiple sclerosis and frequently the presenting sign. The diagnosis of MS is heavily based on MRI findings but the latter is relatively insensitive in detecting optic nerve lesions. Identification of optic nerve lesion using ancillary tools such spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) by measuring the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and visual-evoked potentials latencies (VEP) may facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.
To determine the optimal of SDOCT measures in RFNL and GCIPL and the VEP latency value for the identification of a prior symptomatic optic nerve lesion.
Thirty patients with diagnosed clinically with optic neuritis and fifty healthy control subjects were tested with SDOCT and VEP and the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of optimal values from healthy controls and optic neuritis patients were determined of for the identification unilateral optic nerve lesion.
The inter-eye GCIPL difference of 3.5 µm is highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98%) in identifying unilateral optic nerve lesion, while lowest 5th percentile normal GCIPL threshold values of 71 µm was highly sensitive (100%) but less specific (83.3%). The inter-eye RNFL difference of 5.5 µm had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 90% in identifying optic nerve lesion while the lower 5th percentile normal RNFL value of 92.3 µm was poorly sensitive (40%). Finally, the 95th percentile normal VEP latency of 104.50 milliseconds had sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 76% in identifying optic nerve lesion.
The inter-eye GCIPL difference is a powerful index for identifying unilateral optic nerve lesion, while the inter-eye RNFL difference and 95th percentile normal VEP latency had very good sensitivity and specificity. These measures can be useful in the evaluation of the first demyelinating event of MS and therefor can facilitate early diagnosis and therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Axonal loss</subject><subject>Axons - pathology</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Optic neuritis</subject><subject>Optic Neuritis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Optic Neuritis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Optic Neuritis - pathology</subject><subject>Optic Neuritis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Optical coherence tomography</subject><subject>Retina - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Retina - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal nerve fiber layer</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - standards</subject><subject>Visual evoked potentials</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2211-0348</issn><issn>2211-0356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1vGyEQQFHVqolc_4JIFcde7PC1a_bQQ2W1SaRIvrRnhGGIcXeXLbCW3Ev-elg78TFcYGbezIiH0A0lS0pofbtfdklHu2SEnTKNlB_QNWOULgiv6o-Xt5BXaJ7SnpRTV1TU9DO64ow0rCL8Gj1vhuw7_19nH3ocHE4DmBx1i23otC-pUjclNGEHEXoDOIcuPEU97I5Y9xYffBpLHQ7hL1g8hAx99rpNhcPeToE74rH3rc4wzT0NxD2M0WefvqBPrsAwf71n6M-vn7_X94vHzd3D-sfjwvCqyYtmtRVMVmbrrBOS6MZxsExyIYheVYQyWklNhKi3VDROmJUVuqobx5xw1ErgM_TtPHeI4d8IKavOJwNtq3sIY1KM14Jw2TBRUH5GTQwpRXBqiL7T8agoUZN8tVcn-WqSr87yS9fX1wXjtgN76XlTXYDvZwDKNw8eokrGT0Ktj0W5ssG_u-AFxUyZDA</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Behbehani, Raed</creator><creator>Ali, Abdullah</creator><creator>Al-Omairah, Hamd</creator><creator>Rousseff, Rossen T</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2076-5356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-3567</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Optimization of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials to identify unilateral optic neuritis</title><author>Behbehani, Raed ; Ali, Abdullah ; Al-Omairah, Hamd ; Rousseff, Rossen T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-97b4285cbfdf480a9f3ed283440a75012158a0446b149f4c7d4a569f2f4f1d8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Axonal loss</topic><topic>Axons - pathology</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Optic neuritis</topic><topic>Optic Neuritis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Optic Neuritis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Optic Neuritis - pathology</topic><topic>Optic Neuritis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Optical coherence tomography</topic><topic>Retina - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Retina - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal nerve fiber layer</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - standards</topic><topic>Visual evoked potentials</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behbehani, Raed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Omairah, Hamd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseff, Rossen T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Multiple sclerosis and related disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behbehani, Raed</au><au>Ali, Abdullah</au><au>Al-Omairah, Hamd</au><au>Rousseff, Rossen T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials to identify unilateral optic neuritis</atitle><jtitle>Multiple sclerosis and related disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Mult Scler Relat Disord</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>101988</spage><epage>101988</epage><pages>101988-101988</pages><artnum>101988</artnum><issn>2211-0348</issn><eissn>2211-0356</eissn><abstract>•We determined optimal OCT and VEP indices to identify unilateral optic nerve lesion.•The inter-eye RNFL and GCIPL difference are both sensitive and specific.•The 95th percentile VEP latency value is sensitive and specific.•Optimization of OCT and VEP has diagnostic implications for multiple sclerosis.•Diagnosis of optic nerve lesion may improve early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Optic neuritis is a common manifestation of multiple sclerosis and frequently the presenting sign. The diagnosis of MS is heavily based on MRI findings but the latter is relatively insensitive in detecting optic nerve lesions. Identification of optic nerve lesion using ancillary tools such spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) by measuring the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and visual-evoked potentials latencies (VEP) may facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.
To determine the optimal of SDOCT measures in RFNL and GCIPL and the VEP latency value for the identification of a prior symptomatic optic nerve lesion.
Thirty patients with diagnosed clinically with optic neuritis and fifty healthy control subjects were tested with SDOCT and VEP and the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of optimal values from healthy controls and optic neuritis patients were determined of for the identification unilateral optic nerve lesion.
The inter-eye GCIPL difference of 3.5 µm is highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98%) in identifying unilateral optic nerve lesion, while lowest 5th percentile normal GCIPL threshold values of 71 µm was highly sensitive (100%) but less specific (83.3%). The inter-eye RNFL difference of 5.5 µm had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 90% in identifying optic nerve lesion while the lower 5th percentile normal RNFL value of 92.3 µm was poorly sensitive (40%). Finally, the 95th percentile normal VEP latency of 104.50 milliseconds had sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 76% in identifying optic nerve lesion.
The inter-eye GCIPL difference is a powerful index for identifying unilateral optic nerve lesion, while the inter-eye RNFL difference and 95th percentile normal VEP latency had very good sensitivity and specificity. These measures can be useful in the evaluation of the first demyelinating event of MS and therefor can facilitate early diagnosis and therapy.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32092503</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.msard.2020.101988</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2076-5356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-3567</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2211-0348 |
ispartof | Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2020-06, Vol.41, p.101988-101988, Article 101988 |
issn | 2211-0348 2211-0356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2364038924 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Axonal loss Axons - pathology Early Diagnosis Electroencephalography Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology Female Ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer Humans Male Multiple Sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging Multiple Sclerosis - pathology Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology Optic neuritis Optic Neuritis - diagnosis Optic Neuritis - diagnostic imaging Optic Neuritis - pathology Optic Neuritis - physiopathology Optical coherence tomography Retina - diagnostic imaging Retina - pathology Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology Retinal nerve fiber layer Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, Optical Coherence - standards Visual evoked potentials Young Adult |
title | Optimization of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials to identify unilateral optic neuritis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A33%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20spectral%20domain%20optical%20coherence%20tomography%20and%20visual%20evoked%20potentials%20to%20identify%20unilateral%20optic%20neuritis&rft.jtitle=Multiple%20sclerosis%20and%20related%20disorders&rft.au=Behbehani,%20Raed&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=101988&rft.epage=101988&rft.pages=101988-101988&rft.artnum=101988&rft.issn=2211-0348&rft.eissn=2211-0356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.msard.2020.101988&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2364038924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2364038924&rft_id=info:pmid/32092503&rft_els_id=S221103482030064X&rfr_iscdi=true |