Individual variation creates diverse migratory portfolios in native populations of a mountain ungulate

Ecological theory and empirical studies have demonstrated population-level demographic benefits resulting from a diversity of migratory behaviors with important implications for ecology, conservation, and evolution of migratory organisms. Nevertheless, evaluation of migratory portfolios (i.e., the v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2020-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1-14
Hauptverfasser: Lowrey, B., McWhirter, D. E., Proffitt, K. M., Monteith, K. L., Courtemanch, A. B., White, P. J., Paterson, J. T., Dewey, S. R., Garrott, R. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 30
creator Lowrey, B.
McWhirter, D. E.
Proffitt, K. M.
Monteith, K. L.
Courtemanch, A. B.
White, P. J.
Paterson, J. T.
Dewey, S. R.
Garrott, R. A.
description Ecological theory and empirical studies have demonstrated population-level demographic benefits resulting from a diversity of migratory behaviors with important implications for ecology, conservation, and evolution of migratory organisms. Nevertheless, evaluation of migratory portfolios (i.e., the variation in migratory behaviors across space and time among individuals within populations) has received relatively little attention in migratory ungulates, where research has focused largely on the dichotomous behaviors (e.g., resident and migrant) of partially migratory populations. Using GPS data from 361 female bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) across 17 (4 restored, 6 augmented, 7 native) populations in Montana and Wyoming, USA, we (1) characterized migratory portfolios based on behavioral and spatial migratory characteristics and (2) evaluated the relative influence of landscape attributes and management histories on migratory diversity. Native populations, which had been extant on the landscape for many generations, had more diverse migratory portfolios, higher behavioral switching rates, reduced seasonal range fidelity, and broad dispersion of individuals across summer and winter ranges. In contrast, restored populations with an abbreviated history on the landscape were largely non-migratory with a narrow portfolio of migratory behaviors, less behavioral switching, higher fidelity to seasonal ranges, and less dispersion on summer and winter ranges. Augmented populations were more variable and contained characteristics of both native and restored populations. Differences in migratory diversity among populations were associated with management histories (e.g., restored, augmented, or native). Landscape characteristics such as the duration and regularity of green-up, human landscape alterations, topography, and snow gradients were not strongly associated with migratory diversity. We suggest a two-pronged approach to restoring migratory portfolios in ungulates that first develops behavior- specific habitat models and then places individuals with known migratory behaviors into unoccupied areas in an effort to bolster migratory portfolios in restored populations, potentially with synergistic benefits associated with variation among individuals and resulting portfolio effects. Management efforts to restore diverse migratory portfolios may increase the abundance, resilience, and long-term viability of ungulate populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eap.2106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2363048893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26932466</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26932466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3716-ed0c353fec2c6e7a220f34ad3fa906b198cf9a7060b15b4e2197ae8ee68318b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFr2zAYQMVYabO0sD-wIeilF3eSPlu2jqWkXaDQHrqzkO1PRcG2PMnOyL-f0qQdDKqLhL6nh3iEfOXsmjMmfqAZrwVn8hNZcAUqK4pKfE5nVvCMlZKfkS8xblhaQohTcgaCKS6BL4hdD63bunY2Hd2a4Mzk_ECbgGbCSNMIQ0Tau5dgJh92dPRhsr5zPlI30CHhW0yX49y9vozUW2po7-dhMgmYh5f9BM_JiTVdxIvjviS_7lbPtz-zh8f79e3NQ9ZAyWWGLWugAIuNaCSWRghmITctWKOYrLmqGqtMySSreVHnKLgqDVaIsgJe1QKW5OrgHYP_PWOcdO9ig11nBvRz1AIksLyqFCT08j904-cwpN9pkQOTleQl_BM2wccY0OoxuN6EneZM79vr1F7v2yf0-1E41z227-Bb7ARkB-CP63D3oUivbp6Owm8HfhNT-3deSAUilxL-Av7Fl98</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430686173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual variation creates diverse migratory portfolios in native populations of a mountain ungulate</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Lowrey, B. ; McWhirter, D. E. ; Proffitt, K. M. ; Monteith, K. L. ; Courtemanch, A. B. ; White, P. J. ; Paterson, J. T. ; Dewey, S. R. ; Garrott, R. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lowrey, B. ; McWhirter, D. E. ; Proffitt, K. M. ; Monteith, K. L. ; Courtemanch, A. B. ; White, P. J. ; Paterson, J. T. ; Dewey, S. R. ; Garrott, R. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological theory and empirical studies have demonstrated population-level demographic benefits resulting from a diversity of migratory behaviors with important implications for ecology, conservation, and evolution of migratory organisms. Nevertheless, evaluation of migratory portfolios (i.e., the variation in migratory behaviors across space and time among individuals within populations) has received relatively little attention in migratory ungulates, where research has focused largely on the dichotomous behaviors (e.g., resident and migrant) of partially migratory populations. Using GPS data from 361 female bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) across 17 (4 restored, 6 augmented, 7 native) populations in Montana and Wyoming, USA, we (1) characterized migratory portfolios based on behavioral and spatial migratory characteristics and (2) evaluated the relative influence of landscape attributes and management histories on migratory diversity. Native populations, which had been extant on the landscape for many generations, had more diverse migratory portfolios, higher behavioral switching rates, reduced seasonal range fidelity, and broad dispersion of individuals across summer and winter ranges. In contrast, restored populations with an abbreviated history on the landscape were largely non-migratory with a narrow portfolio of migratory behaviors, less behavioral switching, higher fidelity to seasonal ranges, and less dispersion on summer and winter ranges. Augmented populations were more variable and contained characteristics of both native and restored populations. Differences in migratory diversity among populations were associated with management histories (e.g., restored, augmented, or native). Landscape characteristics such as the duration and regularity of green-up, human landscape alterations, topography, and snow gradients were not strongly associated with migratory diversity. We suggest a two-pronged approach to restoring migratory portfolios in ungulates that first develops behavior- specific habitat models and then places individuals with known migratory behaviors into unoccupied areas in an effort to bolster migratory portfolios in restored populations, potentially with synergistic benefits associated with variation among individuals and resulting portfolio effects. Management efforts to restore diverse migratory portfolios may increase the abundance, resilience, and long-term viability of ungulate populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32091631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Animal Migration ; Animals ; Behavior ; bighorn sheep ; Deer ; Dispersion ; Ecosystem ; Evolutionary conservation ; Female ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; green wave ; individual heterogeneity ; Landscape ; Management ; migration ; migratory diversity ; Montana ; mountain ungulate ; Mountains ; Ovis canadensis ; Population studies ; Populations ; portfolio effects ; Portfolios ; restoration ; Seasons ; Sheep ; Summer ; Switching ; Ungulates ; Variation ; Winter ; Wyoming ; Yellowstone</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2020-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2020 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3716-ed0c353fec2c6e7a220f34ad3fa906b198cf9a7060b15b4e2197ae8ee68318b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3716-ed0c353fec2c6e7a220f34ad3fa906b198cf9a7060b15b4e2197ae8ee68318b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4994-2117 ; 0000-0001-7405-7657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26932466$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26932466$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32091631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lowrey, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhirter, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proffitt, K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteith, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courtemanch, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewey, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrott, R. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Individual variation creates diverse migratory portfolios in native populations of a mountain ungulate</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Ecological theory and empirical studies have demonstrated population-level demographic benefits resulting from a diversity of migratory behaviors with important implications for ecology, conservation, and evolution of migratory organisms. Nevertheless, evaluation of migratory portfolios (i.e., the variation in migratory behaviors across space and time among individuals within populations) has received relatively little attention in migratory ungulates, where research has focused largely on the dichotomous behaviors (e.g., resident and migrant) of partially migratory populations. Using GPS data from 361 female bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) across 17 (4 restored, 6 augmented, 7 native) populations in Montana and Wyoming, USA, we (1) characterized migratory portfolios based on behavioral and spatial migratory characteristics and (2) evaluated the relative influence of landscape attributes and management histories on migratory diversity. Native populations, which had been extant on the landscape for many generations, had more diverse migratory portfolios, higher behavioral switching rates, reduced seasonal range fidelity, and broad dispersion of individuals across summer and winter ranges. In contrast, restored populations with an abbreviated history on the landscape were largely non-migratory with a narrow portfolio of migratory behaviors, less behavioral switching, higher fidelity to seasonal ranges, and less dispersion on summer and winter ranges. Augmented populations were more variable and contained characteristics of both native and restored populations. Differences in migratory diversity among populations were associated with management histories (e.g., restored, augmented, or native). Landscape characteristics such as the duration and regularity of green-up, human landscape alterations, topography, and snow gradients were not strongly associated with migratory diversity. We suggest a two-pronged approach to restoring migratory portfolios in ungulates that first develops behavior- specific habitat models and then places individuals with known migratory behaviors into unoccupied areas in an effort to bolster migratory portfolios in restored populations, potentially with synergistic benefits associated with variation among individuals and resulting portfolio effects. Management efforts to restore diverse migratory portfolios may increase the abundance, resilience, and long-term viability of ungulate populations.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Animal Migration</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>bighorn sheep</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Evolutionary conservation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>green wave</subject><subject>individual heterogeneity</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>migration</subject><subject>migratory diversity</subject><subject>Montana</subject><subject>mountain ungulate</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Ovis canadensis</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>portfolio effects</subject><subject>Portfolios</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Switching</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Wyoming</subject><subject>Yellowstone</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFr2zAYQMVYabO0sD-wIeilF3eSPlu2jqWkXaDQHrqzkO1PRcG2PMnOyL-f0qQdDKqLhL6nh3iEfOXsmjMmfqAZrwVn8hNZcAUqK4pKfE5nVvCMlZKfkS8xblhaQohTcgaCKS6BL4hdD63bunY2Hd2a4Mzk_ECbgGbCSNMIQ0Tau5dgJh92dPRhsr5zPlI30CHhW0yX49y9vozUW2po7-dhMgmYh5f9BM_JiTVdxIvjviS_7lbPtz-zh8f79e3NQ9ZAyWWGLWugAIuNaCSWRghmITctWKOYrLmqGqtMySSreVHnKLgqDVaIsgJe1QKW5OrgHYP_PWOcdO9ig11nBvRz1AIksLyqFCT08j904-cwpN9pkQOTleQl_BM2wccY0OoxuN6EneZM79vr1F7v2yf0-1E41z227-Bb7ARkB-CP63D3oUivbp6Owm8HfhNT-3deSAUilxL-Av7Fl98</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Lowrey, B.</creator><creator>McWhirter, D. E.</creator><creator>Proffitt, K. M.</creator><creator>Monteith, K. L.</creator><creator>Courtemanch, A. B.</creator><creator>White, P. J.</creator><creator>Paterson, J. T.</creator><creator>Dewey, S. R.</creator><creator>Garrott, R. A.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-2117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7405-7657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Individual variation creates diverse migratory portfolios in native populations of a mountain ungulate</title><author>Lowrey, B. ; McWhirter, D. E. ; Proffitt, K. M. ; Monteith, K. L. ; Courtemanch, A. B. ; White, P. J. ; Paterson, J. T. ; Dewey, S. R. ; Garrott, R. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3716-ed0c353fec2c6e7a220f34ad3fa906b198cf9a7060b15b4e2197ae8ee68318b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Animal Migration</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>bighorn sheep</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Evolutionary conservation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>green wave</topic><topic>individual heterogeneity</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>migration</topic><topic>migratory diversity</topic><topic>Montana</topic><topic>mountain ungulate</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Ovis canadensis</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>portfolio effects</topic><topic>Portfolios</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Switching</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Wyoming</topic><topic>Yellowstone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lowrey, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhirter, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proffitt, K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteith, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courtemanch, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewey, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrott, R. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lowrey, B.</au><au>McWhirter, D. E.</au><au>Proffitt, K. M.</au><au>Monteith, K. L.</au><au>Courtemanch, A. B.</au><au>White, P. J.</au><au>Paterson, J. T.</au><au>Dewey, S. R.</au><au>Garrott, R. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual variation creates diverse migratory portfolios in native populations of a mountain ungulate</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Ecological theory and empirical studies have demonstrated population-level demographic benefits resulting from a diversity of migratory behaviors with important implications for ecology, conservation, and evolution of migratory organisms. Nevertheless, evaluation of migratory portfolios (i.e., the variation in migratory behaviors across space and time among individuals within populations) has received relatively little attention in migratory ungulates, where research has focused largely on the dichotomous behaviors (e.g., resident and migrant) of partially migratory populations. Using GPS data from 361 female bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) across 17 (4 restored, 6 augmented, 7 native) populations in Montana and Wyoming, USA, we (1) characterized migratory portfolios based on behavioral and spatial migratory characteristics and (2) evaluated the relative influence of landscape attributes and management histories on migratory diversity. Native populations, which had been extant on the landscape for many generations, had more diverse migratory portfolios, higher behavioral switching rates, reduced seasonal range fidelity, and broad dispersion of individuals across summer and winter ranges. In contrast, restored populations with an abbreviated history on the landscape were largely non-migratory with a narrow portfolio of migratory behaviors, less behavioral switching, higher fidelity to seasonal ranges, and less dispersion on summer and winter ranges. Augmented populations were more variable and contained characteristics of both native and restored populations. Differences in migratory diversity among populations were associated with management histories (e.g., restored, augmented, or native). Landscape characteristics such as the duration and regularity of green-up, human landscape alterations, topography, and snow gradients were not strongly associated with migratory diversity. We suggest a two-pronged approach to restoring migratory portfolios in ungulates that first develops behavior- specific habitat models and then places individuals with known migratory behaviors into unoccupied areas in an effort to bolster migratory portfolios in restored populations, potentially with synergistic benefits associated with variation among individuals and resulting portfolio effects. Management efforts to restore diverse migratory portfolios may increase the abundance, resilience, and long-term viability of ungulate populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32091631</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2106</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-2117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7405-7657</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2020-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1-14
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2363048893
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Accuracy
Animal Migration
Animals
Behavior
bighorn sheep
Deer
Dispersion
Ecosystem
Evolutionary conservation
Female
Global positioning systems
GPS
green wave
individual heterogeneity
Landscape
Management
migration
migratory diversity
Montana
mountain ungulate
Mountains
Ovis canadensis
Population studies
Populations
portfolio effects
Portfolios
restoration
Seasons
Sheep
Summer
Switching
Ungulates
Variation
Winter
Wyoming
Yellowstone
title Individual variation creates diverse migratory portfolios in native populations of a mountain ungulate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20variation%20creates%20diverse%20migratory%20portfolios%20in%20native%20populations%20of%20a%20mountain%20ungulate&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Lowrey,%20B.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2106&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26932466%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430686173&rft_id=info:pmid/32091631&rft_jstor_id=26932466&rfr_iscdi=true