Comparison of theory and in situ observations for electron and ion distributions in the near wake of the explorer 31 and AE-C satellites

Measurements of electron density, plasma potential, and mean ion mass from the Explorer 31 satellite and measurements of ion current, plasma potential, and ion composition from the Atmosphere Explorer C (AE-C) satellite were used in a comparative study with theory regarding the charged particle dist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Planetary and space science 1981-09, Vol.29 (9), p.975-987
Hauptverfasser: Samir, Uri, Fontheim, Ernest G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 987
container_issue 9
container_start_page 975
container_title Planetary and space science
container_volume 29
creator Samir, Uri
Fontheim, Ernest G.
description Measurements of electron density, plasma potential, and mean ion mass from the Explorer 31 satellite and measurements of ion current, plasma potential, and ion composition from the Atmosphere Explorer C (AE-C) satellite were used in a comparative study with theory regarding the charged particle distribution in the near wake of an ionospheric satellite. The theoretical wake model of Parker (1976) has been used in the study. It is shown that theory and experiment agree fairly well in the angle-of-attack range between 90 and 135°. In that angular range even the neutral approximation (which treats ions as if they were neutral particles thus ignoring the influence of the electric field) gives fair agreement with the measurements. In the maximum rarefaction zone (145 < θ < 180°), however, the theoretical model overestimates the measured ion depletion (AE-C measurements) by several orders of magnitude. A similar conclusion is drawn from the comparison between theory and the Explorer 31 electron measurements where the theory also significantly overestimates the electron depletion. The study indicates that the discrepancies are mainly due to the use of a steady-state theory and of a single ion equation (using a mean ion mass). It is recommended that improved agreement between theory and experiment be obtained by the use of the timedependent Vlasov-Poisson equations with separate equations for the various ion species.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0032-0633(81)90057-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_23606453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>003206338190057X</els_id><sourcerecordid>23606453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424x-3d90287370f4b730929b67877823790d9fc65e92f800629231bf3a00eb61394b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKAzEUhoMoWC9v4CIr0cXoSTLNZSNIqRcQ3Ci4C5mZMxidTmoy9fIGPrZpKy5VCJzN9__knI-QAwYnDJg8BRC8ACnEkWbHBmCsiocNMmJaiWIMWm-S0Q-yTXZSegIAKbkakc9JmM1d9Cn0NLR0eMQQP6jrG-p7mvywoKFKGF_d4EOfaBsixQ7rIWZ-ReXZ-DREXy3WSM7lFtqji_TNPeN3LcX3eRciRirYKnk-LSY0uQG7zg-Y9shW67qE-99zl9xfTO8mV8XN7eX15PymqEtevheiMcDzXgraslICDDeVVFopzYUy0Ji2lmM0vNV5Q264YFUrHABWkglTVmKXHK575zG8LDANduZTnT_hegyLZLmQIMux-B8o8vsLZFroUoPJYLkG6xhSitjaefQzFz8sA7sUaZeW7NKS1cyuRNqHHDtbxzCf5dVjtKn22NfY-JhN2Cb43wu-AGtTpBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18384809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of theory and in situ observations for electron and ion distributions in the near wake of the explorer 31 and AE-C satellites</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Samir, Uri ; Fontheim, Ernest G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Samir, Uri ; Fontheim, Ernest G.</creatorcontrib><description>Measurements of electron density, plasma potential, and mean ion mass from the Explorer 31 satellite and measurements of ion current, plasma potential, and ion composition from the Atmosphere Explorer C (AE-C) satellite were used in a comparative study with theory regarding the charged particle distribution in the near wake of an ionospheric satellite. The theoretical wake model of Parker (1976) has been used in the study. It is shown that theory and experiment agree fairly well in the angle-of-attack range between 90 and 135°. In that angular range even the neutral approximation (which treats ions as if they were neutral particles thus ignoring the influence of the electric field) gives fair agreement with the measurements. In the maximum rarefaction zone (145 &lt; θ &lt; 180°), however, the theoretical model overestimates the measured ion depletion (AE-C measurements) by several orders of magnitude. A similar conclusion is drawn from the comparison between theory and the Explorer 31 electron measurements where the theory also significantly overestimates the electron depletion. The study indicates that the discrepancies are mainly due to the use of a steady-state theory and of a single ion equation (using a mean ion mass). It is recommended that improved agreement between theory and experiment be obtained by the use of the timedependent Vlasov-Poisson equations with separate equations for the various ion species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(81)90057-X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Planetary and space science, 1981-09, Vol.29 (9), p.975-987</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424x-3d90287370f4b730929b67877823790d9fc65e92f800629231bf3a00eb61394b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424x-3d90287370f4b730929b67877823790d9fc65e92f800629231bf3a00eb61394b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(81)90057-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samir, Uri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontheim, Ernest G.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of theory and in situ observations for electron and ion distributions in the near wake of the explorer 31 and AE-C satellites</title><title>Planetary and space science</title><description>Measurements of electron density, plasma potential, and mean ion mass from the Explorer 31 satellite and measurements of ion current, plasma potential, and ion composition from the Atmosphere Explorer C (AE-C) satellite were used in a comparative study with theory regarding the charged particle distribution in the near wake of an ionospheric satellite. The theoretical wake model of Parker (1976) has been used in the study. It is shown that theory and experiment agree fairly well in the angle-of-attack range between 90 and 135°. In that angular range even the neutral approximation (which treats ions as if they were neutral particles thus ignoring the influence of the electric field) gives fair agreement with the measurements. In the maximum rarefaction zone (145 &lt; θ &lt; 180°), however, the theoretical model overestimates the measured ion depletion (AE-C measurements) by several orders of magnitude. A similar conclusion is drawn from the comparison between theory and the Explorer 31 electron measurements where the theory also significantly overestimates the electron depletion. The study indicates that the discrepancies are mainly due to the use of a steady-state theory and of a single ion equation (using a mean ion mass). It is recommended that improved agreement between theory and experiment be obtained by the use of the timedependent Vlasov-Poisson equations with separate equations for the various ion species.</description><issn>0032-0633</issn><issn>1873-5088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctKAzEUhoMoWC9v4CIr0cXoSTLNZSNIqRcQ3Ci4C5mZMxidTmoy9fIGPrZpKy5VCJzN9__knI-QAwYnDJg8BRC8ACnEkWbHBmCsiocNMmJaiWIMWm-S0Q-yTXZSegIAKbkakc9JmM1d9Cn0NLR0eMQQP6jrG-p7mvywoKFKGF_d4EOfaBsixQ7rIWZ-ReXZ-DREXy3WSM7lFtqji_TNPeN3LcX3eRciRirYKnk-LSY0uQG7zg-Y9shW67qE-99zl9xfTO8mV8XN7eX15PymqEtevheiMcDzXgraslICDDeVVFopzYUy0Ji2lmM0vNV5Q264YFUrHABWkglTVmKXHK575zG8LDANduZTnT_hegyLZLmQIMux-B8o8vsLZFroUoPJYLkG6xhSitjaefQzFz8sA7sUaZeW7NKS1cyuRNqHHDtbxzCf5dVjtKn22NfY-JhN2Cb43wu-AGtTpBA</recordid><startdate>19810901</startdate><enddate>19810901</enddate><creator>Samir, Uri</creator><creator>Fontheim, Ernest G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19810901</creationdate><title>Comparison of theory and in situ observations for electron and ion distributions in the near wake of the explorer 31 and AE-C satellites</title><author>Samir, Uri ; Fontheim, Ernest G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424x-3d90287370f4b730929b67877823790d9fc65e92f800629231bf3a00eb61394b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samir, Uri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontheim, Ernest G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Planetary and space science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samir, Uri</au><au>Fontheim, Ernest G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of theory and in situ observations for electron and ion distributions in the near wake of the explorer 31 and AE-C satellites</atitle><jtitle>Planetary and space science</jtitle><date>1981-09-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>975</spage><epage>987</epage><pages>975-987</pages><issn>0032-0633</issn><eissn>1873-5088</eissn><abstract>Measurements of electron density, plasma potential, and mean ion mass from the Explorer 31 satellite and measurements of ion current, plasma potential, and ion composition from the Atmosphere Explorer C (AE-C) satellite were used in a comparative study with theory regarding the charged particle distribution in the near wake of an ionospheric satellite. The theoretical wake model of Parker (1976) has been used in the study. It is shown that theory and experiment agree fairly well in the angle-of-attack range between 90 and 135°. In that angular range even the neutral approximation (which treats ions as if they were neutral particles thus ignoring the influence of the electric field) gives fair agreement with the measurements. In the maximum rarefaction zone (145 &lt; θ &lt; 180°), however, the theoretical model overestimates the measured ion depletion (AE-C measurements) by several orders of magnitude. A similar conclusion is drawn from the comparison between theory and the Explorer 31 electron measurements where the theory also significantly overestimates the electron depletion. The study indicates that the discrepancies are mainly due to the use of a steady-state theory and of a single ion equation (using a mean ion mass). It is recommended that improved agreement between theory and experiment be obtained by the use of the timedependent Vlasov-Poisson equations with separate equations for the various ion species.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0032-0633(81)90057-X</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0633
ispartof Planetary and space science, 1981-09, Vol.29 (9), p.975-987
issn 0032-0633
1873-5088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_23606453
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title Comparison of theory and in situ observations for electron and ion distributions in the near wake of the explorer 31 and AE-C satellites
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A44%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20theory%20and%20in%20situ%20observations%20for%20electron%20and%20ion%20distributions%20in%20the%20near%20wake%20of%20the%20explorer%2031%20and%20AE-C%20satellites&rft.jtitle=Planetary%20and%20space%20science&rft.au=Samir,%20Uri&rft.date=1981-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=987&rft.pages=975-987&rft.issn=0032-0633&rft.eissn=1873-5088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0032-0633(81)90057-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E23606453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18384809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=003206338190057X&rfr_iscdi=true