Sentinel node tumor burden in prediction of prognosis in melanoma patients

Recent data have demonstrated no survival benefit to immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for positive sentinel node (SN) disease in melanoma. It is important to identify parameters in positive SNs, which predict prognosis in melanoma patients. These might provide prognostic value in st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & experimental metastasis 2020-04, Vol.37 (2), p.365-376
Hauptverfasser: Palve, Johanna, Ylitalo, Leea, Luukkaala, Tiina, Jernman, Juha, Korhonen, Niina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 376
container_issue 2
container_start_page 365
container_title Clinical & experimental metastasis
container_volume 37
creator Palve, Johanna
Ylitalo, Leea
Luukkaala, Tiina
Jernman, Juha
Korhonen, Niina
description Recent data have demonstrated no survival benefit to immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for positive sentinel node (SN) disease in melanoma. It is important to identify parameters in positive SNs, which predict prognosis in melanoma patients. These might provide prognostic value in staging systems and risk models by guiding high-risk patients’ adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. In this retrospective study of university hospital melanoma database we analyzed tumor burden and prognosis in patients with positive SNs. Patients were stratified by the diameter of tumor deposit, distribution of metastatic focus in SN, ulceration and number of metastatic SNs. These were incorporated in Cox proportional hazard regression models. Predictive ability was assessed using Akaike information criterion and Harrell’s concordance index. A total of 110 patients had positive SN and 104 underwent CLND. Twenty-two (21%) patients had non-SN metastatic disease on CLND. The 5-year melanoma specific survival for CLND-negative patients was 5.00 years (IQR 3.23–5.00, range 0.72–5.00) compared to 3.69 (IQR 2.28–4.72, range 1.01–5.00) years in CLND-positive patients (HR 2.82 (95% CI 1.17–6.76, p = 0.020).The models incorporating distribution of metastatic focus and the largest tumor deposit in SN had highest predictive ability. According to Cox proportional hazard regression models, information criterions and c-index, the diameter of tumor deposit > 4 mm with multifocal location in SN despite of number of metastatic SN were the most important parameters. According to the diameter of tumor deposit and distribution of metastatic focus in SN, adequate stratification of positive SN patients was possible and risk classes for patients were identified.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10585-020-10028-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2359397652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2359397652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-71162dadf19aac694e2dded87655139280bd42f93838dde17dccc1f8132049d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYMoTs_oH3AhBW4EKc2zkmwEaXwNAy7UdUgnqTZDVdImVSP-e29Nja3jYjCbcLnfvTknB6EnBL8kGMtXlWChRIspbqGmqsX30IYIyVpJZXcfbTDtaIuVVifotNZLjDGXUj1EJ4xi2WksNuj8c0hTTGFoUvahmeYxl2Y3Fx9SE1NzKMFHN8WcmtxDlfcp11iX1hgGm_Jom4OdIiypj9CD3g41PL65z9DXd2-_bD-0F5_ef9y-uWgdl3xqJSEd9db3RFvrOs0D9T54JTshCNNU4Z3ntNdMMQUNIr1zjvSKgGiuPWFn6PW69zDvxuAdvF3sYA4ljrb8NNlGc7uT4jezz1dGEqakwrDg-c2Ckr_PoU5mjNWFAfyEPFdDmdBMgx4K6LN_0Ms8lwT2gFKScCGUBIqulCu51hL6oxiCzRKVWaMyEJW5jsosKp7-beM48jsbANQK_Ai73FcHn-zCEYMwBek453g5ZBsnu8S0zXOaYPTF_48CzVa6ApH2ofwxeYf-X1nMwCU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387145587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sentinel node tumor burden in prediction of prognosis in melanoma patients</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Palve, Johanna ; Ylitalo, Leea ; Luukkaala, Tiina ; Jernman, Juha ; Korhonen, Niina</creator><creatorcontrib>Palve, Johanna ; Ylitalo, Leea ; Luukkaala, Tiina ; Jernman, Juha ; Korhonen, Niina</creatorcontrib><description>Recent data have demonstrated no survival benefit to immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for positive sentinel node (SN) disease in melanoma. It is important to identify parameters in positive SNs, which predict prognosis in melanoma patients. These might provide prognostic value in staging systems and risk models by guiding high-risk patients’ adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. In this retrospective study of university hospital melanoma database we analyzed tumor burden and prognosis in patients with positive SNs. Patients were stratified by the diameter of tumor deposit, distribution of metastatic focus in SN, ulceration and number of metastatic SNs. These were incorporated in Cox proportional hazard regression models. Predictive ability was assessed using Akaike information criterion and Harrell’s concordance index. A total of 110 patients had positive SN and 104 underwent CLND. Twenty-two (21%) patients had non-SN metastatic disease on CLND. The 5-year melanoma specific survival for CLND-negative patients was 5.00 years (IQR 3.23–5.00, range 0.72–5.00) compared to 3.69 (IQR 2.28–4.72, range 1.01–5.00) years in CLND-positive patients (HR 2.82 (95% CI 1.17–6.76, p = 0.020).The models incorporating distribution of metastatic focus and the largest tumor deposit in SN had highest predictive ability. According to Cox proportional hazard regression models, information criterions and c-index, the diameter of tumor deposit &gt; 4 mm with multifocal location in SN despite of number of metastatic SN were the most important parameters. According to the diameter of tumor deposit and distribution of metastatic focus in SN, adequate stratification of positive SN patients was possible and risk classes for patients were identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0262-0898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10028-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32076905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biopsy ; Cancer Research ; Hematology ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Lymph nodes ; Medical prognosis ; Melanoma ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Nodes ; Oncology ; Parameter identification ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Research Paper ; Risk ; Risk groups ; Science &amp; Technology ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Clinical &amp; experimental metastasis, 2020-04, Vol.37 (2), p.365-376</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>6</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000516444000001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-71162dadf19aac694e2dded87655139280bd42f93838dde17dccc1f8132049d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-71162dadf19aac694e2dded87655139280bd42f93838dde17dccc1f8132049d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7528-6312 ; 0000-0003-2990-679X ; 0000-0003-4636-9586</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10585-020-10028-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10585-020-10028-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932,28255,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palve, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ylitalo, Leea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luukkaala, Tiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jernman, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, Niina</creatorcontrib><title>Sentinel node tumor burden in prediction of prognosis in melanoma patients</title><title>Clinical &amp; experimental metastasis</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Metastasis</addtitle><addtitle>CLIN EXP METASTAS</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Metastasis</addtitle><description>Recent data have demonstrated no survival benefit to immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for positive sentinel node (SN) disease in melanoma. It is important to identify parameters in positive SNs, which predict prognosis in melanoma patients. These might provide prognostic value in staging systems and risk models by guiding high-risk patients’ adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. In this retrospective study of university hospital melanoma database we analyzed tumor burden and prognosis in patients with positive SNs. Patients were stratified by the diameter of tumor deposit, distribution of metastatic focus in SN, ulceration and number of metastatic SNs. These were incorporated in Cox proportional hazard regression models. Predictive ability was assessed using Akaike information criterion and Harrell’s concordance index. A total of 110 patients had positive SN and 104 underwent CLND. Twenty-two (21%) patients had non-SN metastatic disease on CLND. The 5-year melanoma specific survival for CLND-negative patients was 5.00 years (IQR 3.23–5.00, range 0.72–5.00) compared to 3.69 (IQR 2.28–4.72, range 1.01–5.00) years in CLND-positive patients (HR 2.82 (95% CI 1.17–6.76, p = 0.020).The models incorporating distribution of metastatic focus and the largest tumor deposit in SN had highest predictive ability. According to Cox proportional hazard regression models, information criterions and c-index, the diameter of tumor deposit &gt; 4 mm with multifocal location in SN despite of number of metastatic SN were the most important parameters. According to the diameter of tumor deposit and distribution of metastatic focus in SN, adequate stratification of positive SN patients was possible and risk classes for patients were identified.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0262-0898</issn><issn>1573-7276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYMoTs_oH3AhBW4EKc2zkmwEaXwNAy7UdUgnqTZDVdImVSP-e29Nja3jYjCbcLnfvTknB6EnBL8kGMtXlWChRIspbqGmqsX30IYIyVpJZXcfbTDtaIuVVifotNZLjDGXUj1EJ4xi2WksNuj8c0hTTGFoUvahmeYxl2Y3Fx9SE1NzKMFHN8WcmtxDlfcp11iX1hgGm_Jom4OdIiypj9CD3g41PL65z9DXd2-_bD-0F5_ef9y-uWgdl3xqJSEd9db3RFvrOs0D9T54JTshCNNU4Z3ntNdMMQUNIr1zjvSKgGiuPWFn6PW69zDvxuAdvF3sYA4ljrb8NNlGc7uT4jezz1dGEqakwrDg-c2Ckr_PoU5mjNWFAfyEPFdDmdBMgx4K6LN_0Ms8lwT2gFKScCGUBIqulCu51hL6oxiCzRKVWaMyEJW5jsosKp7-beM48jsbANQK_Ai73FcHn-zCEYMwBek453g5ZBsnu8S0zXOaYPTF_48CzVa6ApH2ofwxeYf-X1nMwCU</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Palve, Johanna</creator><creator>Ylitalo, Leea</creator><creator>Luukkaala, Tiina</creator><creator>Jernman, Juha</creator><creator>Korhonen, Niina</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-6312</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2990-679X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-9586</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Sentinel node tumor burden in prediction of prognosis in melanoma patients</title><author>Palve, Johanna ; Ylitalo, Leea ; Luukkaala, Tiina ; Jernman, Juha ; Korhonen, Niina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-71162dadf19aac694e2dded87655139280bd42f93838dde17dccc1f8132049d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palve, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ylitalo, Leea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luukkaala, Tiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jernman, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, Niina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical &amp; experimental metastasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palve, Johanna</au><au>Ylitalo, Leea</au><au>Luukkaala, Tiina</au><au>Jernman, Juha</au><au>Korhonen, Niina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sentinel node tumor burden in prediction of prognosis in melanoma patients</atitle><jtitle>Clinical &amp; experimental metastasis</jtitle><stitle>Clin Exp Metastasis</stitle><stitle>CLIN EXP METASTAS</stitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Metastasis</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>365-376</pages><issn>0262-0898</issn><eissn>1573-7276</eissn><abstract>Recent data have demonstrated no survival benefit to immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for positive sentinel node (SN) disease in melanoma. It is important to identify parameters in positive SNs, which predict prognosis in melanoma patients. These might provide prognostic value in staging systems and risk models by guiding high-risk patients’ adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. In this retrospective study of university hospital melanoma database we analyzed tumor burden and prognosis in patients with positive SNs. Patients were stratified by the diameter of tumor deposit, distribution of metastatic focus in SN, ulceration and number of metastatic SNs. These were incorporated in Cox proportional hazard regression models. Predictive ability was assessed using Akaike information criterion and Harrell’s concordance index. A total of 110 patients had positive SN and 104 underwent CLND. Twenty-two (21%) patients had non-SN metastatic disease on CLND. The 5-year melanoma specific survival for CLND-negative patients was 5.00 years (IQR 3.23–5.00, range 0.72–5.00) compared to 3.69 (IQR 2.28–4.72, range 1.01–5.00) years in CLND-positive patients (HR 2.82 (95% CI 1.17–6.76, p = 0.020).The models incorporating distribution of metastatic focus and the largest tumor deposit in SN had highest predictive ability. According to Cox proportional hazard regression models, information criterions and c-index, the diameter of tumor deposit &gt; 4 mm with multifocal location in SN despite of number of metastatic SN were the most important parameters. According to the diameter of tumor deposit and distribution of metastatic focus in SN, adequate stratification of positive SN patients was possible and risk classes for patients were identified.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32076905</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10585-020-10028-0</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-6312</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2990-679X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-9586</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0262-0898
ispartof Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2020-04, Vol.37 (2), p.365-376
issn 0262-0898
1573-7276
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2359397652
source SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Biopsy
Cancer Research
Hematology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Lymph nodes
Medical prognosis
Melanoma
Metastases
Metastasis
Nodes
Oncology
Parameter identification
Patients
Prognosis
Regression analysis
Regression models
Research Paper
Risk
Risk groups
Science & Technology
Surgical Oncology
Survival
Tumors
title Sentinel node tumor burden in prediction of prognosis in melanoma patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T01%3A27%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentinel%20node%20tumor%20burden%20in%20prediction%20of%20prognosis%20in%20melanoma%20patients&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20experimental%20metastasis&rft.au=Palve,%20Johanna&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=365-376&rft.issn=0262-0898&rft.eissn=1573-7276&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10585-020-10028-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2359397652%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387145587&rft_id=info:pmid/32076905&rfr_iscdi=true