Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer

In patients with low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer, preliminary data suggest that a minimally invasive approach is not inferior to open surgery.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2020-06, Vol.149 (3), p.380-381
Hauptverfasser: Summers, Garth, Tierney, Brent, Crotzer, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 381
container_issue 3
container_start_page 380
container_title International journal of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 149
creator Summers, Garth
Tierney, Brent
Crotzer, David
description In patients with low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer, preliminary data suggest that a minimally invasive approach is not inferior to open surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijgo.13122
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2359393424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2359393424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2882-d5acdc7d16423c7846c1c0620cae3e97c44a0a7c96cd9c5b03d6024eb4536b2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9O20AQh1dVURPSXvoAaI9VhWH_xWsfESohCIkD7dnajCfphrU37NpGvvEIfUaepBtCOfY0M5pvfiN9hHzl7IwzJs7tduPPuORCfCBTXugyk0qXH8k0LVmmRSkm5DjGLWOMa84_kYkUTGtWFFMy3PdhsINx1Pcd-AYj9Wva2NY2xrmR2nYw0Q5IBwyxT8sdtjSY2kI6-T3GDgNC55uRrn2gzj-9PP8JNj6cUjTBjWmKndkgBUxv9jdg2tR_Jkdr4yJ-easz8uvqx8_L6-z2brG8vLjNQBSFyOq5gRp0zXMlJOhC5cCB5YKBQYmlBqUMMxrKHOoS5ism65wJhSs1l_lKgJyRb4fcXfCPPcauamwEdM606PtYCTkvZSmVUAn9fkAh-BgDrqtdSBLCWHFW7T1Xe8_Vq-cEn7zl9qsG63f0n9gE8APwZB2O_4mqljeLu0PoX3XKjM0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2359393424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Summers, Garth ; Tierney, Brent ; Crotzer, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Summers, Garth ; Tierney, Brent ; Crotzer, David</creatorcontrib><description>In patients with low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer, preliminary data suggest that a minimally invasive approach is not inferior to open surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32077088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cervical cancer ; Early stage ; Low‐risk ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Radical hysterectomy</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020-06, Vol.149 (3), p.380-381</ispartof><rights>2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2882-d5acdc7d16423c7846c1c0620cae3e97c44a0a7c96cd9c5b03d6024eb4536b2c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijgo.13122$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijgo.13122$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32077088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Summers, Garth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crotzer, David</creatorcontrib><title>Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>In patients with low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer, preliminary data suggest that a minimally invasive approach is not inferior to open surgery.</description><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Early stage</subject><subject>Low‐risk</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Radical hysterectomy</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9O20AQh1dVURPSXvoAaI9VhWH_xWsfESohCIkD7dnajCfphrU37NpGvvEIfUaepBtCOfY0M5pvfiN9hHzl7IwzJs7tduPPuORCfCBTXugyk0qXH8k0LVmmRSkm5DjGLWOMa84_kYkUTGtWFFMy3PdhsINx1Pcd-AYj9Wva2NY2xrmR2nYw0Q5IBwyxT8sdtjSY2kI6-T3GDgNC55uRrn2gzj-9PP8JNj6cUjTBjWmKndkgBUxv9jdg2tR_Jkdr4yJ-easz8uvqx8_L6-z2brG8vLjNQBSFyOq5gRp0zXMlJOhC5cCB5YKBQYmlBqUMMxrKHOoS5ism65wJhSs1l_lKgJyRb4fcXfCPPcauamwEdM606PtYCTkvZSmVUAn9fkAh-BgDrqtdSBLCWHFW7T1Xe8_Vq-cEn7zl9qsG63f0n9gE8APwZB2O_4mqljeLu0PoX3XKjM0</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Summers, Garth</creator><creator>Tierney, Brent</creator><creator>Crotzer, David</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer</title><author>Summers, Garth ; Tierney, Brent ; Crotzer, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2882-d5acdc7d16423c7846c1c0620cae3e97c44a0a7c96cd9c5b03d6024eb4536b2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Early stage</topic><topic>Low‐risk</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Radical hysterectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Summers, Garth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crotzer, David</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Summers, Garth</au><au>Tierney, Brent</au><au>Crotzer, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>380</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>380-381</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>In patients with low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer, preliminary data suggest that a minimally invasive approach is not inferior to open surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32077088</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijgo.13122</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7292
ispartof International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020-06, Vol.149 (3), p.380-381
issn 0020-7292
1879-3479
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2359393424
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cervical cancer
Early stage
Low‐risk
Minimally invasive surgery
Radical hysterectomy
title Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A27%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20outcomes%20of%20minimally%20invasive%20versus%20open%20radical%20hysterectomy%20for%20low%E2%80%90risk,%20early%E2%80%90stage%20cervical%20cancer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Summers,%20Garth&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=380&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=380-381&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijgo.13122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2359393424%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2359393424&rft_id=info:pmid/32077088&rfr_iscdi=true