In Vitro Evaluation of Aerosol Performance and Delivery Efficiency During Mechanical Ventilation Between Soft Mist Inhaler and Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler

Soft mist inhalers (SMIs) generate aerosols with a smaller particle size than pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). However, the whole-span particle size distribution (PSD) of SMIs and the optimal delivery method of SMIs during mechanical ventilation have not been fully investigated. This study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory care 2020-07, Vol.65 (7), p.1001-1010
Hauptverfasser: Ke, Wei-Ren, Wang, Wei-Jhen, Lin, Tzu-Hsuan, Wu, Chao-Ling, Huang, Sheng-Hsiu, Wu, Huey-Dong, Chen, Chih-Chieh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1010
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1001
container_title Respiratory care
container_volume 65
creator Ke, Wei-Ren
Wang, Wei-Jhen
Lin, Tzu-Hsuan
Wu, Chao-Ling
Huang, Sheng-Hsiu
Wu, Huey-Dong
Chen, Chih-Chieh
description Soft mist inhalers (SMIs) generate aerosols with a smaller particle size than pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). However, the whole-span particle size distribution (PSD) of SMIs and the optimal delivery method of SMIs during mechanical ventilation have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to measure the PSD of the SMI alone and the SMI coupled to an inhalation aid (eg, a spacer, a valved holding chamber), as well as the delivery efficiency of SMI in different actuation timings and circuit positions during mechanical ventilation. As a suitable comparison, the pMDI was chosen for the same measurement. SMIs (2.5 μg/actuation of tiotropium) were compared with pMDIs (100 μg/actuation of salbutamol). A microorifice uniform deposit impactor was utilized for the particle sizing of drug aerosols generated by inhalers alone, inhalers with a spacer, and inhalers with a valved holding chamber. To optimize the delivery efficiency of both inhalers during mechanical ventilation, the operating parameters included the circuit positions and actuation timings in the ventilator circuit. Particle sizes and inhaled doses were measured with an optical particle sizer and filters used to collect and quantify the drug, respectively. The SMI generated a smaller mass medium aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) than that from the pMDI. The extrafine-particle fraction (EFPF, < 1 μm) of the SMI was significantly higher than that of the pMDI. With the use of either inhalation aid, the MMAD of both inhalers decreased, and both inhalers with inhalation aid showed significant increases in EFPF. During mechanical ventilation, the optimum way to deliver the SMI and pMDI was at 15 cm from the Y-piece and actuated at the end of expiration and the onset of inspiration, respectively. The SMI with an inhalation aid showed marginal improvement on the PSD. The inhaler type, actuation timing, and position within the circuit also played important roles in delivery efficiency during mechanical ventilation.
doi_str_mv 10.4187/respcare.06993
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2358592615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629606975</galeid><sourcerecordid>A629606975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-bd0598dc3ce50065f2c0686db945c49b79289e1b85cd879aae2da461651a6b033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEYhQdR7Fq99VICgngzazL5mMnl2l11ocWC2tshk3mnG8kka5KpbP9M_6rZblcUSi5CwnMOeXNOUbwmeM5IU38IELdaBZhjISV9UsyIZLSkgrOnxQzjCpeEVuykeBHjz3wUjMvnxQmtcE0IZbPibu3QlUnBo9WNspNKxjvkB7SA4KO36BLC4MOonAakXI-WYM0NhB1aDYPRBpzeoeUUjLtGF6A3yhmtLLoCl4w9mH2E9BvAoW9-SOjCxITWbqMshHu_yzxAzPpb6LNBggB9ufQRjtDL4tmgbIRXD_tp8ePT6vvZl_L86-f12eK81IzSVHY95rLpNdXAMRZ8qDQWjeg7ybhmsqtl1UggXcN139RSKah6xQQRnCjRYUpPi_cH323wvyaIqR1N1GCtcuCn2FaUN1xWgvCMvj2g1_mBrXGDT0HpPd4uRCVFTqLeU_NHqLx6GI32DgaT7_8TvPtHsAFl0yYnMO0_MT7qrHNEMcDQboMZVdi1BLf7UrTHUrT3pciCNw-zTd0I_V_82AL6B7LTtIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2358592615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro Evaluation of Aerosol Performance and Delivery Efficiency During Mechanical Ventilation Between Soft Mist Inhaler and Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ke, Wei-Ren ; Wang, Wei-Jhen ; Lin, Tzu-Hsuan ; Wu, Chao-Ling ; Huang, Sheng-Hsiu ; Wu, Huey-Dong ; Chen, Chih-Chieh</creator><creatorcontrib>Ke, Wei-Ren ; Wang, Wei-Jhen ; Lin, Tzu-Hsuan ; Wu, Chao-Ling ; Huang, Sheng-Hsiu ; Wu, Huey-Dong ; Chen, Chih-Chieh</creatorcontrib><description>Soft mist inhalers (SMIs) generate aerosols with a smaller particle size than pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). However, the whole-span particle size distribution (PSD) of SMIs and the optimal delivery method of SMIs during mechanical ventilation have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to measure the PSD of the SMI alone and the SMI coupled to an inhalation aid (eg, a spacer, a valved holding chamber), as well as the delivery efficiency of SMI in different actuation timings and circuit positions during mechanical ventilation. As a suitable comparison, the pMDI was chosen for the same measurement. SMIs (2.5 μg/actuation of tiotropium) were compared with pMDIs (100 μg/actuation of salbutamol). A microorifice uniform deposit impactor was utilized for the particle sizing of drug aerosols generated by inhalers alone, inhalers with a spacer, and inhalers with a valved holding chamber. To optimize the delivery efficiency of both inhalers during mechanical ventilation, the operating parameters included the circuit positions and actuation timings in the ventilator circuit. Particle sizes and inhaled doses were measured with an optical particle sizer and filters used to collect and quantify the drug, respectively. The SMI generated a smaller mass medium aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) than that from the pMDI. The extrafine-particle fraction (EFPF, &lt; 1 μm) of the SMI was significantly higher than that of the pMDI. With the use of either inhalation aid, the MMAD of both inhalers decreased, and both inhalers with inhalation aid showed significant increases in EFPF. During mechanical ventilation, the optimum way to deliver the SMI and pMDI was at 15 cm from the Y-piece and actuated at the end of expiration and the onset of inspiration, respectively. The SMI with an inhalation aid showed marginal improvement on the PSD. The inhaler type, actuation timing, and position within the circuit also played important roles in delivery efficiency during mechanical ventilation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1324</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06993</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32071134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Aerosols ; Analysis ; Bronchodilator Agents ; Dosage and administration ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Metered Dose Inhalers ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers ; Particle Size ; Respiration, Artificial ; Tiotropium</subject><ispartof>Respiratory care, 2020-07, Vol.65 (7), p.1001-1010</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-bd0598dc3ce50065f2c0686db945c49b79289e1b85cd879aae2da461651a6b033</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32071134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ke, Wei-Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei-Jhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Tzu-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chao-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Sheng-Hsiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Huey-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chih-Chieh</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro Evaluation of Aerosol Performance and Delivery Efficiency During Mechanical Ventilation Between Soft Mist Inhaler and Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler</title><title>Respiratory care</title><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><description>Soft mist inhalers (SMIs) generate aerosols with a smaller particle size than pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). However, the whole-span particle size distribution (PSD) of SMIs and the optimal delivery method of SMIs during mechanical ventilation have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to measure the PSD of the SMI alone and the SMI coupled to an inhalation aid (eg, a spacer, a valved holding chamber), as well as the delivery efficiency of SMI in different actuation timings and circuit positions during mechanical ventilation. As a suitable comparison, the pMDI was chosen for the same measurement. SMIs (2.5 μg/actuation of tiotropium) were compared with pMDIs (100 μg/actuation of salbutamol). A microorifice uniform deposit impactor was utilized for the particle sizing of drug aerosols generated by inhalers alone, inhalers with a spacer, and inhalers with a valved holding chamber. To optimize the delivery efficiency of both inhalers during mechanical ventilation, the operating parameters included the circuit positions and actuation timings in the ventilator circuit. Particle sizes and inhaled doses were measured with an optical particle sizer and filters used to collect and quantify the drug, respectively. The SMI generated a smaller mass medium aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) than that from the pMDI. The extrafine-particle fraction (EFPF, &lt; 1 μm) of the SMI was significantly higher than that of the pMDI. With the use of either inhalation aid, the MMAD of both inhalers decreased, and both inhalers with inhalation aid showed significant increases in EFPF. During mechanical ventilation, the optimum way to deliver the SMI and pMDI was at 15 cm from the Y-piece and actuated at the end of expiration and the onset of inspiration, respectively. The SMI with an inhalation aid showed marginal improvement on the PSD. The inhaler type, actuation timing, and position within the circuit also played important roles in delivery efficiency during mechanical ventilation.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metered Dose Inhalers</subject><subject>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Tiotropium</subject><issn>0020-1324</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEYhQdR7Fq99VICgngzazL5mMnl2l11ocWC2tshk3mnG8kka5KpbP9M_6rZblcUSi5CwnMOeXNOUbwmeM5IU38IELdaBZhjISV9UsyIZLSkgrOnxQzjCpeEVuykeBHjz3wUjMvnxQmtcE0IZbPibu3QlUnBo9WNspNKxjvkB7SA4KO36BLC4MOonAakXI-WYM0NhB1aDYPRBpzeoeUUjLtGF6A3yhmtLLoCl4w9mH2E9BvAoW9-SOjCxITWbqMshHu_yzxAzPpb6LNBggB9ufQRjtDL4tmgbIRXD_tp8ePT6vvZl_L86-f12eK81IzSVHY95rLpNdXAMRZ8qDQWjeg7ybhmsqtl1UggXcN139RSKah6xQQRnCjRYUpPi_cH323wvyaIqR1N1GCtcuCn2FaUN1xWgvCMvj2g1_mBrXGDT0HpPd4uRCVFTqLeU_NHqLx6GI32DgaT7_8TvPtHsAFl0yYnMO0_MT7qrHNEMcDQboMZVdi1BLf7UrTHUrT3pciCNw-zTd0I_V_82AL6B7LTtIg</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Ke, Wei-Ren</creator><creator>Wang, Wei-Jhen</creator><creator>Lin, Tzu-Hsuan</creator><creator>Wu, Chao-Ling</creator><creator>Huang, Sheng-Hsiu</creator><creator>Wu, Huey-Dong</creator><creator>Chen, Chih-Chieh</creator><general>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>In Vitro Evaluation of Aerosol Performance and Delivery Efficiency During Mechanical Ventilation Between Soft Mist Inhaler and Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler</title><author>Ke, Wei-Ren ; Wang, Wei-Jhen ; Lin, Tzu-Hsuan ; Wu, Chao-Ling ; Huang, Sheng-Hsiu ; Wu, Huey-Dong ; Chen, Chih-Chieh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-bd0598dc3ce50065f2c0686db945c49b79289e1b85cd879aae2da461651a6b033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metered Dose Inhalers</topic><topic>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Tiotropium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ke, Wei-Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei-Jhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Tzu-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chao-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Sheng-Hsiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Huey-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chih-Chieh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ke, Wei-Ren</au><au>Wang, Wei-Jhen</au><au>Lin, Tzu-Hsuan</au><au>Wu, Chao-Ling</au><au>Huang, Sheng-Hsiu</au><au>Wu, Huey-Dong</au><au>Chen, Chih-Chieh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro Evaluation of Aerosol Performance and Delivery Efficiency During Mechanical Ventilation Between Soft Mist Inhaler and Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1001</spage><epage>1010</epage><pages>1001-1010</pages><issn>0020-1324</issn><eissn>1943-3654</eissn><abstract>Soft mist inhalers (SMIs) generate aerosols with a smaller particle size than pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). However, the whole-span particle size distribution (PSD) of SMIs and the optimal delivery method of SMIs during mechanical ventilation have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to measure the PSD of the SMI alone and the SMI coupled to an inhalation aid (eg, a spacer, a valved holding chamber), as well as the delivery efficiency of SMI in different actuation timings and circuit positions during mechanical ventilation. As a suitable comparison, the pMDI was chosen for the same measurement. SMIs (2.5 μg/actuation of tiotropium) were compared with pMDIs (100 μg/actuation of salbutamol). A microorifice uniform deposit impactor was utilized for the particle sizing of drug aerosols generated by inhalers alone, inhalers with a spacer, and inhalers with a valved holding chamber. To optimize the delivery efficiency of both inhalers during mechanical ventilation, the operating parameters included the circuit positions and actuation timings in the ventilator circuit. Particle sizes and inhaled doses were measured with an optical particle sizer and filters used to collect and quantify the drug, respectively. The SMI generated a smaller mass medium aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) than that from the pMDI. The extrafine-particle fraction (EFPF, &lt; 1 μm) of the SMI was significantly higher than that of the pMDI. With the use of either inhalation aid, the MMAD of both inhalers decreased, and both inhalers with inhalation aid showed significant increases in EFPF. During mechanical ventilation, the optimum way to deliver the SMI and pMDI was at 15 cm from the Y-piece and actuated at the end of expiration and the onset of inspiration, respectively. The SMI with an inhalation aid showed marginal improvement on the PSD. The inhaler type, actuation timing, and position within the circuit also played important roles in delivery efficiency during mechanical ventilation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</pub><pmid>32071134</pmid><doi>10.4187/respcare.06993</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1324
ispartof Respiratory care, 2020-07, Vol.65 (7), p.1001-1010
issn 0020-1324
1943-3654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2358592615
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Aerosols
Analysis
Bronchodilator Agents
Dosage and administration
Equipment Design
Humans
Metered Dose Inhalers
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Particle Size
Respiration, Artificial
Tiotropium
title In Vitro Evaluation of Aerosol Performance and Delivery Efficiency During Mechanical Ventilation Between Soft Mist Inhaler and Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20Evaluation%20of%20Aerosol%20Performance%20and%20Delivery%20Efficiency%20During%20Mechanical%20Ventilation%20Between%20Soft%20Mist%20Inhaler%20and%20Pressurized%20Metered-Dose%20Inhaler&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20care&rft.au=Ke,%20Wei-Ren&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1001&rft.epage=1010&rft.pages=1001-1010&rft.issn=0020-1324&rft.eissn=1943-3654&rft_id=info:doi/10.4187/respcare.06993&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA629606975%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2358592615&rft_id=info:pmid/32071134&rft_galeid=A629606975&rfr_iscdi=true