Test-Retest Precision of Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements With 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and Solid-State Detector Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

BACKGROUNDMeasurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is feasible using cardiac cameras with solid-state detectors. SPECT MBF has been shown to be accurate when compared with positron emission tomography MBF measured in the same patients. Howeve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e009769-e009769
Hauptverfasser: Wells, R. Glenn, Radonjic, Ivana, Clackdoyle, Duncan, Do, Jeffrey, Marvin, Brian, Carey, Clare, deKemp, Robert A., Ruddy, Terrence D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e009769
container_issue 2
container_start_page e009769
container_title Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
container_volume 13
creator Wells, R. Glenn
Radonjic, Ivana
Clackdoyle, Duncan
Do, Jeffrey
Marvin, Brian
Carey, Clare
deKemp, Robert A.
Ruddy, Terrence D.
description BACKGROUNDMeasurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is feasible using cardiac cameras with solid-state detectors. SPECT MBF has been shown to be accurate when compared with positron emission tomography MBF measured in the same patients. However, the value of a test result applied to an individual patient depends strongly on the precision or repeatability of the test. The purpose of our study is to measure the precision of SPECT MBF measurements using 99mTc-tetrofosmin and a solid-state cardiac camera. METHODSSPECT MBF was measured in 30 patients and repeated at a mean interval of 18 days. MBF was evaluated from images with and without attenuation correction based on a separately acquired CT scan. The dynamic images were processed independently by 2 operators using in-house kinetic analysis software that applied a 1-tissue-compartment model. The K1 rate constant was converted to MBF using previously determined extraction fraction corrections. Correction for patient body motion was applied manually. RESULTSThe average coefficient of variation (COV) in the differences between the 2 MBF measurements was between 28% and 31%. The interobserver COV was between 11% and 15%. Myocardial flow reserve is the ratio of MBF measured at stress and rest, and the COV is correspondingly higher. The COV for the difference in repeated myocardial flow reserve was 33% to 38%, whereas the interobserver COV was 13% to 22%. CONCLUSIONSThe COV for the difference in SPECT MBF measurements obtained on separate days is 28% to 31%. The corresponding COV for myocardial flow reserve is 33% to 38%.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009769
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wolte</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2358590725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2358590725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p786-da89541aad3731b6494029e5a71b67e0c123278f93d76172b82cd37517950be63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUF1r3DAQNKWFpmn_QtFjX5SuJMuyHlM3uR7k0pAz9PHQ2XuxW9l7lWSO_JH-3iofsDC7yzAzTFF8FnAhRCW-Nuv7Zr25XK1vV_lhLwCsqeyb4kzYUnKAGt4-74LbSov3xYcYfwNUCnR9VvxrMSZ-jykDuwvYjXGkmdGBbR6pc6EfnWffPFHPrj2d2AZdXAJOOKfIfo1pYNZObcdbTIEOFKdxZm7u2Zb82PNtcgnZ96zeJQpsO84PHtndQCl7XE1jfDZraDouCXvW0kQPwR2Hx4_Fu4PzET-94nnRXl-1zQ9-83O1bi5v-NHUFe9dbXUpnOuVUWJflbYEaVE7kw-D0AmppKkPVvWmEkbua9llqhbGathjpc6LLy-yx0B_l1zBLmfq0Hs3Iy1xJ5WutQUjdaaWL9QT-YQh_vHLCcNuQOfTsAOhlCltzSVIeBrIxT-V_B9g_Xz7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2358590725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Test-Retest Precision of Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements With 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and Solid-State Detector Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography</title><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wells, R. Glenn ; Radonjic, Ivana ; Clackdoyle, Duncan ; Do, Jeffrey ; Marvin, Brian ; Carey, Clare ; deKemp, Robert A. ; Ruddy, Terrence D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wells, R. Glenn ; Radonjic, Ivana ; Clackdoyle, Duncan ; Do, Jeffrey ; Marvin, Brian ; Carey, Clare ; deKemp, Robert A. ; Ruddy, Terrence D.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDMeasurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is feasible using cardiac cameras with solid-state detectors. SPECT MBF has been shown to be accurate when compared with positron emission tomography MBF measured in the same patients. However, the value of a test result applied to an individual patient depends strongly on the precision or repeatability of the test. The purpose of our study is to measure the precision of SPECT MBF measurements using 99mTc-tetrofosmin and a solid-state cardiac camera. METHODSSPECT MBF was measured in 30 patients and repeated at a mean interval of 18 days. MBF was evaluated from images with and without attenuation correction based on a separately acquired CT scan. The dynamic images were processed independently by 2 operators using in-house kinetic analysis software that applied a 1-tissue-compartment model. The K1 rate constant was converted to MBF using previously determined extraction fraction corrections. Correction for patient body motion was applied manually. RESULTSThe average coefficient of variation (COV) in the differences between the 2 MBF measurements was between 28% and 31%. The interobserver COV was between 11% and 15%. Myocardial flow reserve is the ratio of MBF measured at stress and rest, and the COV is correspondingly higher. The COV for the difference in repeated myocardial flow reserve was 33% to 38%, whereas the interobserver COV was 13% to 22%. CONCLUSIONSThe COV for the difference in SPECT MBF measurements obtained on separate days is 28% to 31%. The corresponding COV for myocardial flow reserve is 33% to 38%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-9651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-0080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e009769-e009769</ispartof><rights>American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wells, R. Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radonjic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clackdoyle, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marvin, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deKemp, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruddy, Terrence D.</creatorcontrib><title>Test-Retest Precision of Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements With 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and Solid-State Detector Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography</title><title>Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging</title><description>BACKGROUNDMeasurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is feasible using cardiac cameras with solid-state detectors. SPECT MBF has been shown to be accurate when compared with positron emission tomography MBF measured in the same patients. However, the value of a test result applied to an individual patient depends strongly on the precision or repeatability of the test. The purpose of our study is to measure the precision of SPECT MBF measurements using 99mTc-tetrofosmin and a solid-state cardiac camera. METHODSSPECT MBF was measured in 30 patients and repeated at a mean interval of 18 days. MBF was evaluated from images with and without attenuation correction based on a separately acquired CT scan. The dynamic images were processed independently by 2 operators using in-house kinetic analysis software that applied a 1-tissue-compartment model. The K1 rate constant was converted to MBF using previously determined extraction fraction corrections. Correction for patient body motion was applied manually. RESULTSThe average coefficient of variation (COV) in the differences between the 2 MBF measurements was between 28% and 31%. The interobserver COV was between 11% and 15%. Myocardial flow reserve is the ratio of MBF measured at stress and rest, and the COV is correspondingly higher. The COV for the difference in repeated myocardial flow reserve was 33% to 38%, whereas the interobserver COV was 13% to 22%. CONCLUSIONSThe COV for the difference in SPECT MBF measurements obtained on separate days is 28% to 31%. The corresponding COV for myocardial flow reserve is 33% to 38%.</description><issn>1941-9651</issn><issn>1942-0080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUF1r3DAQNKWFpmn_QtFjX5SuJMuyHlM3uR7k0pAz9PHQ2XuxW9l7lWSO_JH-3iofsDC7yzAzTFF8FnAhRCW-Nuv7Zr25XK1vV_lhLwCsqeyb4kzYUnKAGt4-74LbSov3xYcYfwNUCnR9VvxrMSZ-jykDuwvYjXGkmdGBbR6pc6EfnWffPFHPrj2d2AZdXAJOOKfIfo1pYNZObcdbTIEOFKdxZm7u2Zb82PNtcgnZ96zeJQpsO84PHtndQCl7XE1jfDZraDouCXvW0kQPwR2Hx4_Fu4PzET-94nnRXl-1zQ9-83O1bi5v-NHUFe9dbXUpnOuVUWJflbYEaVE7kw-D0AmppKkPVvWmEkbua9llqhbGathjpc6LLy-yx0B_l1zBLmfq0Hs3Iy1xJ5WutQUjdaaWL9QT-YQh_vHLCcNuQOfTsAOhlCltzSVIeBrIxT-V_B9g_Xz7</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Wells, R. Glenn</creator><creator>Radonjic, Ivana</creator><creator>Clackdoyle, Duncan</creator><creator>Do, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Marvin, Brian</creator><creator>Carey, Clare</creator><creator>deKemp, Robert A.</creator><creator>Ruddy, Terrence D.</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Test-Retest Precision of Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements With 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and Solid-State Detector Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography</title><author>Wells, R. Glenn ; Radonjic, Ivana ; Clackdoyle, Duncan ; Do, Jeffrey ; Marvin, Brian ; Carey, Clare ; deKemp, Robert A. ; Ruddy, Terrence D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p786-da89541aad3731b6494029e5a71b67e0c123278f93d76172b82cd37517950be63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wells, R. Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radonjic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clackdoyle, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marvin, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deKemp, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruddy, Terrence D.</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wells, R. Glenn</au><au>Radonjic, Ivana</au><au>Clackdoyle, Duncan</au><au>Do, Jeffrey</au><au>Marvin, Brian</au><au>Carey, Clare</au><au>deKemp, Robert A.</au><au>Ruddy, Terrence D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Test-Retest Precision of Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements With 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and Solid-State Detector Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography</atitle><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging</jtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e009769</spage><epage>e009769</epage><pages>e009769-e009769</pages><issn>1941-9651</issn><eissn>1942-0080</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDMeasurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is feasible using cardiac cameras with solid-state detectors. SPECT MBF has been shown to be accurate when compared with positron emission tomography MBF measured in the same patients. However, the value of a test result applied to an individual patient depends strongly on the precision or repeatability of the test. The purpose of our study is to measure the precision of SPECT MBF measurements using 99mTc-tetrofosmin and a solid-state cardiac camera. METHODSSPECT MBF was measured in 30 patients and repeated at a mean interval of 18 days. MBF was evaluated from images with and without attenuation correction based on a separately acquired CT scan. The dynamic images were processed independently by 2 operators using in-house kinetic analysis software that applied a 1-tissue-compartment model. The K1 rate constant was converted to MBF using previously determined extraction fraction corrections. Correction for patient body motion was applied manually. RESULTSThe average coefficient of variation (COV) in the differences between the 2 MBF measurements was between 28% and 31%. The interobserver COV was between 11% and 15%. Myocardial flow reserve is the ratio of MBF measured at stress and rest, and the COV is correspondingly higher. The COV for the difference in repeated myocardial flow reserve was 33% to 38%, whereas the interobserver COV was 13% to 22%. CONCLUSIONSThe COV for the difference in SPECT MBF measurements obtained on separate days is 28% to 31%. The corresponding COV for myocardial flow reserve is 33% to 38%.</abstract><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><doi>10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009769</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-9651
ispartof Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e009769-e009769
issn 1941-9651
1942-0080
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2358590725
source American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Test-Retest Precision of Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements With 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and Solid-State Detector Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T00%3A17%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wolte&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test-Retest%20Precision%20of%20Myocardial%20Blood%20Flow%20Measurements%20With%2099mTc-Tetrofosmin%20and%20Solid-State%20Detector%20Single%20Photon%20Emission%20Computed%20Tomography&rft.jtitle=Circulation.%20Cardiovascular%20imaging&rft.au=Wells,%20R.%20Glenn&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e009769&rft.epage=e009769&rft.pages=e009769-e009769&rft.issn=1941-9651&rft.eissn=1942-0080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009769&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wolte%3E2358590725%3C/proquest_wolte%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2358590725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true