Total Knee Replacement: The Inpatient-Only List and the Two Midnight Rule, Patient Impact, Length of Stay, Compliance Solutions, Audits, and Economic Consequences
In November 2017, CMS finalized the 2018 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule that removed TKA from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list. This action had significant and unexpected consequences. We looked at 3 levels of the IPO rule impact on TKA for Medicare beneficiaries: a nation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S28-S32 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S32 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | S28 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Iorio, Richard Barnes, C. Lowry Vitale, Matthew P. Huddleston, James I. Haas, Derek A. |
description | In November 2017, CMS finalized the 2018 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule that removed TKA from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list. This action had significant and unexpected consequences.
We looked at 3 levels of the IPO rule impact on TKA for Medicare beneficiaries: a national comparison of FFS inpatient and outpatient classification for 2017 vs 2018; a survey of AAHKS surgeons completed in April 2019; and an in-depth analysis of a large academic medical center experience. An analysis of change in admission classification of patients with TKA over time, number of QIO audits, compliance solutions for the new rule, and cost implications of those compliance solutions were evaluated.
Hospital reimbursement averages $10,122 in an outpatient facility but does not include the physician payment. Average hospital reimbursement in the inpatient setting is $11,760. The difference in hospital reimbursement varies widely (90th percentile decrease, $6725 vs 10th percentile $2048). Physician payments are the same in both settings (avg $1403). Patients with TKA not designated for inpatient admissions are not eligible for bundle payment programs. Patients designated as outpatients are subjected to higher out-of-pocket expenses. Patients may have an annual Medicare Part B Deductible ($185) and a 20% copay as well as prescription and durable medical equipment costs. An AAHKS survey demonstrated that 45.08% were with inpatient designation only, 17.62% were with outpatient designation only, 25.39% were designated as necessary, and 10.1% were designated by the hospital. This survey showed that 66 of 374 (17.65%) patients had undergone a QIO audit as a result of issues with the IPO rule. An evaluation of an AMC demonstrated that since January 1, 2018, 470 of 690 (68.1%) of CMS patients with TKA left in less than 2 midnights. The institution was subjected to 2 QIO audits.
There are many unintended consequences to the IPO rule application to TKA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2358582806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540320300255</els_id><sourcerecordid>2358582806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8b42fd404a595ffecf04dd023c79c3164d95def4337e7998912d9fc3e27f3a143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAPnLYBH_mA3GpVgVWLCpql7Pl2pOuV4kdYge0f4dfiqMtHDmNrHnmHY0fhF5TUlJCq3fHUk_pUDLCSEloSUj9BK2o5KxoBKmeohVpGl5IQfgFehHjkRBKpRTP0QVnpCaVrFfo9z4k3eMvHgDfwthrAwP49B7vD4C3ftTJ5Wdx4_sT3rmYsPYWp9zb_wr4q7PePRwSvp17WONvZxhvh1GbtMY78A_pgEOH75I-rfEmDGPvtDeA70I_Jxd8XOOr2bqU6xJ8bYIPgzMZ9RF-zJDZ-BI963Qf4dVjvUTfP17vN5-L3c2n7eZqVxguq1Q094J1VhChZSu7DkxHhLWEcVO3htNK2FZa6ATnNdRt27SU2bYzHFjdcU0Fv0Rvz7njFPLqmNTgooG-1x7CHBXjspENa0iVUXZGzRRinKBT4-QGPZ0UJWpxo45qcaMWN4pQld3koTeP-fP9APbfyF8ZGfhwBiBf-dPBpKJxyxdYN4FJygb3v_w_uF2g_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2358582806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Total Knee Replacement: The Inpatient-Only List and the Two Midnight Rule, Patient Impact, Length of Stay, Compliance Solutions, Audits, and Economic Consequences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Iorio, Richard ; Barnes, C. Lowry ; Vitale, Matthew P. ; Huddleston, James I. ; Haas, Derek A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard ; Barnes, C. Lowry ; Vitale, Matthew P. ; Huddleston, James I. ; Haas, Derek A.</creatorcontrib><description>In November 2017, CMS finalized the 2018 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule that removed TKA from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list. This action had significant and unexpected consequences.
We looked at 3 levels of the IPO rule impact on TKA for Medicare beneficiaries: a national comparison of FFS inpatient and outpatient classification for 2017 vs 2018; a survey of AAHKS surgeons completed in April 2019; and an in-depth analysis of a large academic medical center experience. An analysis of change in admission classification of patients with TKA over time, number of QIO audits, compliance solutions for the new rule, and cost implications of those compliance solutions were evaluated.
Hospital reimbursement averages $10,122 in an outpatient facility but does not include the physician payment. Average hospital reimbursement in the inpatient setting is $11,760. The difference in hospital reimbursement varies widely (90th percentile decrease, $6725 vs 10th percentile $2048). Physician payments are the same in both settings (avg $1403). Patients with TKA not designated for inpatient admissions are not eligible for bundle payment programs. Patients designated as outpatients are subjected to higher out-of-pocket expenses. Patients may have an annual Medicare Part B Deductible ($185) and a 20% copay as well as prescription and durable medical equipment costs. An AAHKS survey demonstrated that 45.08% were with inpatient designation only, 17.62% were with outpatient designation only, 25.39% were designated as necessary, and 10.1% were designated by the hospital. This survey showed that 66 of 374 (17.65%) patients had undergone a QIO audit as a result of issues with the IPO rule. An evaluation of an AMC demonstrated that since January 1, 2018, 470 of 690 (68.1%) of CMS patients with TKA left in less than 2 midnights. The institution was subjected to 2 QIO audits.
There are many unintended consequences to the IPO rule application to TKA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32070657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; bundled payment programs ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; inpatient-only rule ; Inpatients ; Length of Stay ; Medicare ; quality improvement opportunity (QIO) ; recovery audit contractor (RAC) ; total knee replacement ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S28-S32</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8b42fd404a595ffecf04dd023c79c3164d95def4337e7998912d9fc3e27f3a143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8b42fd404a595ffecf04dd023c79c3164d95def4337e7998912d9fc3e27f3a143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8083-8687</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540320300255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32070657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, C. Lowry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huddleston, James I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Derek A.</creatorcontrib><title>Total Knee Replacement: The Inpatient-Only List and the Two Midnight Rule, Patient Impact, Length of Stay, Compliance Solutions, Audits, and Economic Consequences</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>In November 2017, CMS finalized the 2018 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule that removed TKA from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list. This action had significant and unexpected consequences.
We looked at 3 levels of the IPO rule impact on TKA for Medicare beneficiaries: a national comparison of FFS inpatient and outpatient classification for 2017 vs 2018; a survey of AAHKS surgeons completed in April 2019; and an in-depth analysis of a large academic medical center experience. An analysis of change in admission classification of patients with TKA over time, number of QIO audits, compliance solutions for the new rule, and cost implications of those compliance solutions were evaluated.
Hospital reimbursement averages $10,122 in an outpatient facility but does not include the physician payment. Average hospital reimbursement in the inpatient setting is $11,760. The difference in hospital reimbursement varies widely (90th percentile decrease, $6725 vs 10th percentile $2048). Physician payments are the same in both settings (avg $1403). Patients with TKA not designated for inpatient admissions are not eligible for bundle payment programs. Patients designated as outpatients are subjected to higher out-of-pocket expenses. Patients may have an annual Medicare Part B Deductible ($185) and a 20% copay as well as prescription and durable medical equipment costs. An AAHKS survey demonstrated that 45.08% were with inpatient designation only, 17.62% were with outpatient designation only, 25.39% were designated as necessary, and 10.1% were designated by the hospital. This survey showed that 66 of 374 (17.65%) patients had undergone a QIO audit as a result of issues with the IPO rule. An evaluation of an AMC demonstrated that since January 1, 2018, 470 of 690 (68.1%) of CMS patients with TKA left in less than 2 midnights. The institution was subjected to 2 QIO audits.
There are many unintended consequences to the IPO rule application to TKA.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>bundled payment programs</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inpatient-only rule</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>quality improvement opportunity (QIO)</subject><subject>recovery audit contractor (RAC)</subject><subject>total knee replacement</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAPnLYBH_mA3GpVgVWLCpql7Pl2pOuV4kdYge0f4dfiqMtHDmNrHnmHY0fhF5TUlJCq3fHUk_pUDLCSEloSUj9BK2o5KxoBKmeohVpGl5IQfgFehHjkRBKpRTP0QVnpCaVrFfo9z4k3eMvHgDfwthrAwP49B7vD4C3ftTJ5Wdx4_sT3rmYsPYWp9zb_wr4q7PePRwSvp17WONvZxhvh1GbtMY78A_pgEOH75I-rfEmDGPvtDeA70I_Jxd8XOOr2bqU6xJ8bYIPgzMZ9RF-zJDZ-BI963Qf4dVjvUTfP17vN5-L3c2n7eZqVxguq1Q094J1VhChZSu7DkxHhLWEcVO3htNK2FZa6ATnNdRt27SU2bYzHFjdcU0Fv0Rvz7njFPLqmNTgooG-1x7CHBXjspENa0iVUXZGzRRinKBT4-QGPZ0UJWpxo45qcaMWN4pQld3koTeP-fP9APbfyF8ZGfhwBiBf-dPBpKJxyxdYN4FJygb3v_w_uF2g_A</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Iorio, Richard</creator><creator>Barnes, C. Lowry</creator><creator>Vitale, Matthew P.</creator><creator>Huddleston, James I.</creator><creator>Haas, Derek A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-8687</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Total Knee Replacement: The Inpatient-Only List and the Two Midnight Rule, Patient Impact, Length of Stay, Compliance Solutions, Audits, and Economic Consequences</title><author>Iorio, Richard ; Barnes, C. Lowry ; Vitale, Matthew P. ; Huddleston, James I. ; Haas, Derek A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8b42fd404a595ffecf04dd023c79c3164d95def4337e7998912d9fc3e27f3a143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>bundled payment programs</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inpatient-only rule</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>quality improvement opportunity (QIO)</topic><topic>recovery audit contractor (RAC)</topic><topic>total knee replacement</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, C. Lowry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huddleston, James I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Derek A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iorio, Richard</au><au>Barnes, C. Lowry</au><au>Vitale, Matthew P.</au><au>Huddleston, James I.</au><au>Haas, Derek A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Total Knee Replacement: The Inpatient-Only List and the Two Midnight Rule, Patient Impact, Length of Stay, Compliance Solutions, Audits, and Economic Consequences</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>S28</spage><epage>S32</epage><pages>S28-S32</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>In November 2017, CMS finalized the 2018 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule that removed TKA from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list. This action had significant and unexpected consequences.
We looked at 3 levels of the IPO rule impact on TKA for Medicare beneficiaries: a national comparison of FFS inpatient and outpatient classification for 2017 vs 2018; a survey of AAHKS surgeons completed in April 2019; and an in-depth analysis of a large academic medical center experience. An analysis of change in admission classification of patients with TKA over time, number of QIO audits, compliance solutions for the new rule, and cost implications of those compliance solutions were evaluated.
Hospital reimbursement averages $10,122 in an outpatient facility but does not include the physician payment. Average hospital reimbursement in the inpatient setting is $11,760. The difference in hospital reimbursement varies widely (90th percentile decrease, $6725 vs 10th percentile $2048). Physician payments are the same in both settings (avg $1403). Patients with TKA not designated for inpatient admissions are not eligible for bundle payment programs. Patients designated as outpatients are subjected to higher out-of-pocket expenses. Patients may have an annual Medicare Part B Deductible ($185) and a 20% copay as well as prescription and durable medical equipment costs. An AAHKS survey demonstrated that 45.08% were with inpatient designation only, 17.62% were with outpatient designation only, 25.39% were designated as necessary, and 10.1% were designated by the hospital. This survey showed that 66 of 374 (17.65%) patients had undergone a QIO audit as a result of issues with the IPO rule. An evaluation of an AMC demonstrated that since January 1, 2018, 470 of 690 (68.1%) of CMS patients with TKA left in less than 2 midnights. The institution was subjected to 2 QIO audits.
There are many unintended consequences to the IPO rule application to TKA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32070657</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.007</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-8687</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S28-S32 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2358582806 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee bundled payment programs Hospitalization Humans inpatient-only rule Inpatients Length of Stay Medicare quality improvement opportunity (QIO) recovery audit contractor (RAC) total knee replacement United States |
title | Total Knee Replacement: The Inpatient-Only List and the Two Midnight Rule, Patient Impact, Length of Stay, Compliance Solutions, Audits, and Economic Consequences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A21%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total%20Knee%20Replacement:%20The%20Inpatient-Only%20List%20and%20the%20Two%20Midnight%20Rule,%20Patient%20Impact,%20Length%20of%20Stay,%20Compliance%20Solutions,%20Audits,%20and%20Economic%20Consequences&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Iorio,%20Richard&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=S28&rft.epage=S32&rft.pages=S28-S32&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2358582806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2358582806&rft_id=info:pmid/32070657&rft_els_id=S0883540320300255&rfr_iscdi=true |