Macroinfauna responses and recovery trajectories after an oil spill differ from those following saltmarsh restoration

Given the severity of injuries to biota in coastal wetlands from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (DWH) and the resulting availability of funding for restoration, information on impacted salt marshes and biotic development of restored marshes may both help inform marsh restoration planning in the nea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine environmental research 2020-03, Vol.155, p.104881-104881, Article 104881
Hauptverfasser: Fleeger, J.W., Johnson, D.S., Zengel, S., Mendelssohn, I.A., Deis, D.R., Graham, S.A., Lin, Q., Christman, M.C., Riggio, M.R., Pant, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104881
container_issue
container_start_page 104881
container_title Marine environmental research
container_volume 155
creator Fleeger, J.W.
Johnson, D.S.
Zengel, S.
Mendelssohn, I.A.
Deis, D.R.
Graham, S.A.
Lin, Q.
Christman, M.C.
Riggio, M.R.
Pant, M.
description Given the severity of injuries to biota in coastal wetlands from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (DWH) and the resulting availability of funding for restoration, information on impacted salt marshes and biotic development of restored marshes may both help inform marsh restoration planning in the near term and for future spills. Accordingly, we performed a meta-analysis to model a restoration trajectory of total macroinfauna density in constructed marshes (studied for ~30 y), and with a previously published restoration trajectory for amphipods, we compared these to recovery curves for total macroinfauna and amphipods from DWH impacted marshes (over 8.5 y). Total macroinfauna and amphipod densities in constructed marshes did not consistently reach equivalency with reference sites before 20 y, yet in heavily oiled marshes recovery occurred by 4.5 y post spill (although it is unlikely that macroinfaunal community composition fully recovered). These differences were probably due to initial conditions (e.g., higher initial levels of belowground organic matter in oiled marshes) that were more conducive to recovery as compared to constructed marshes. Furthermore, we found that amphipod trajectories were distinctly different in constructed and oiled marshes as densities at oiled sites exceeded that of reference sites by as much as 20x during much of the recovery period. Amphipods may have responded to the rapid increase and high biomass of benthic microalgae following the spill. These results indicate that biotic responses after an oil spill may be quantitatively different than those following restoration, even for heavily oiled marshes that were initially denuded of vegetation. Our dual trajectories for oil spill recovery and restoration development for macroinfauna should help guide restoration planning and assessment following the DWH as well as for restoration scaling for future spills. •Macroinfauna density in restored salt marshes is slow to mature, >20 y.•Macroinfauna density recovery from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was much faster, ~4.5 y.•Densities were higher in heavily oiled marshes than references, 3–8 y post spill.•Improving initial soil quality and vegetation cover should aid restoration success.•These recovery trajectories may guide future restoration planning and assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104881
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2358573754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141113619307743</els_id><sourcerecordid>2358573754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4751ac3938ab014da7861b06add9088e3324afc270ae86416d7b94ba41e0ee463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCXwBLXLhksWMndo5VxZdUxAXOlhOPqSOvvdjJVv33TLSlBy6cbM88fufjJeQtZ3vOeP9h3h9sgXQqUPcta7eo1Jo_Izuu1dCwduDPyY5xyRvORX9BLmudGWOd4t1LciFaptpBdzuyfrNTySF5uyZLUe6YU4VKbXL4mvIJygNdip1hWnIJW8YvUDBPc4i0HkOM1AXvMeZLPtDlLlegPseY70P6RauNC_Za7zZxlLBLyOkVeeFtrPD68bwiPz99_HHzpbn9_vnrzfVtM4lhWBqpOm7xKrQdcRZnle75yHrr3MC0BiFaaf3UKmZB95L3To2DHK3kwABkL67I-7PuseTfK9Y3h1AniNEmyGs1reh0p4TqJKLv_kHnvJaE3SGllJBaCYaUOlO4tFoLeHMsAcd7MJyZzRkzmydnzOaMOTuDP9886q_jAdzTv79WIHB9BgAXcgpQTJ0CpAlcQCMW43L4b5E_n-Klqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2377348730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Macroinfauna responses and recovery trajectories after an oil spill differ from those following saltmarsh restoration</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Fleeger, J.W. ; Johnson, D.S. ; Zengel, S. ; Mendelssohn, I.A. ; Deis, D.R. ; Graham, S.A. ; Lin, Q. ; Christman, M.C. ; Riggio, M.R. ; Pant, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleeger, J.W. ; Johnson, D.S. ; Zengel, S. ; Mendelssohn, I.A. ; Deis, D.R. ; Graham, S.A. ; Lin, Q. ; Christman, M.C. ; Riggio, M.R. ; Pant, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Given the severity of injuries to biota in coastal wetlands from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (DWH) and the resulting availability of funding for restoration, information on impacted salt marshes and biotic development of restored marshes may both help inform marsh restoration planning in the near term and for future spills. Accordingly, we performed a meta-analysis to model a restoration trajectory of total macroinfauna density in constructed marshes (studied for ~30 y), and with a previously published restoration trajectory for amphipods, we compared these to recovery curves for total macroinfauna and amphipods from DWH impacted marshes (over 8.5 y). Total macroinfauna and amphipod densities in constructed marshes did not consistently reach equivalency with reference sites before 20 y, yet in heavily oiled marshes recovery occurred by 4.5 y post spill (although it is unlikely that macroinfaunal community composition fully recovered). These differences were probably due to initial conditions (e.g., higher initial levels of belowground organic matter in oiled marshes) that were more conducive to recovery as compared to constructed marshes. Furthermore, we found that amphipod trajectories were distinctly different in constructed and oiled marshes as densities at oiled sites exceeded that of reference sites by as much as 20x during much of the recovery period. Amphipods may have responded to the rapid increase and high biomass of benthic microalgae following the spill. These results indicate that biotic responses after an oil spill may be quantitatively different than those following restoration, even for heavily oiled marshes that were initially denuded of vegetation. Our dual trajectories for oil spill recovery and restoration development for macroinfauna should help guide restoration planning and assessment following the DWH as well as for restoration scaling for future spills. •Macroinfauna density in restored salt marshes is slow to mature, &gt;20 y.•Macroinfauna density recovery from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was much faster, ~4.5 y.•Densities were higher in heavily oiled marshes than references, 3–8 y post spill.•Improving initial soil quality and vegetation cover should aid restoration success.•These recovery trajectories may guide future restoration planning and assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-1136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104881</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32072985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amphipoda ; Aquatic crustaceans ; Benthos ; Biota ; Community composition ; Deep water ; Deepwater horizon oil spill ; Initial conditions ; Macroinfauna ; Meta-analysis ; Oil spills ; Organic matter ; Phytoplankton ; Recovery ; Recovery trajectory ; Restoration ; Restoration scaling ; Restored salt marshes ; Salt marshes ; Saltmarshes ; Scaling ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Marine environmental research, 2020-03, Vol.155, p.104881-104881, Article 104881</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4751ac3938ab014da7861b06add9088e3324afc270ae86416d7b94ba41e0ee463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4751ac3938ab014da7861b06add9088e3324afc270ae86416d7b94ba41e0ee463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104881$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleeger, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, D.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendelssohn, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deis, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christman, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggio, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Macroinfauna responses and recovery trajectories after an oil spill differ from those following saltmarsh restoration</title><title>Marine environmental research</title><addtitle>Mar Environ Res</addtitle><description>Given the severity of injuries to biota in coastal wetlands from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (DWH) and the resulting availability of funding for restoration, information on impacted salt marshes and biotic development of restored marshes may both help inform marsh restoration planning in the near term and for future spills. Accordingly, we performed a meta-analysis to model a restoration trajectory of total macroinfauna density in constructed marshes (studied for ~30 y), and with a previously published restoration trajectory for amphipods, we compared these to recovery curves for total macroinfauna and amphipods from DWH impacted marshes (over 8.5 y). Total macroinfauna and amphipod densities in constructed marshes did not consistently reach equivalency with reference sites before 20 y, yet in heavily oiled marshes recovery occurred by 4.5 y post spill (although it is unlikely that macroinfaunal community composition fully recovered). These differences were probably due to initial conditions (e.g., higher initial levels of belowground organic matter in oiled marshes) that were more conducive to recovery as compared to constructed marshes. Furthermore, we found that amphipod trajectories were distinctly different in constructed and oiled marshes as densities at oiled sites exceeded that of reference sites by as much as 20x during much of the recovery period. Amphipods may have responded to the rapid increase and high biomass of benthic microalgae following the spill. These results indicate that biotic responses after an oil spill may be quantitatively different than those following restoration, even for heavily oiled marshes that were initially denuded of vegetation. Our dual trajectories for oil spill recovery and restoration development for macroinfauna should help guide restoration planning and assessment following the DWH as well as for restoration scaling for future spills. •Macroinfauna density in restored salt marshes is slow to mature, &gt;20 y.•Macroinfauna density recovery from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was much faster, ~4.5 y.•Densities were higher in heavily oiled marshes than references, 3–8 y post spill.•Improving initial soil quality and vegetation cover should aid restoration success.•These recovery trajectories may guide future restoration planning and assessment.</description><subject>Amphipoda</subject><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Deep water</subject><subject>Deepwater horizon oil spill</subject><subject>Initial conditions</subject><subject>Macroinfauna</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Oil spills</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery trajectory</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Restoration scaling</subject><subject>Restored salt marshes</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Saltmarshes</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0141-1136</issn><issn>1879-0291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCXwBLXLhksWMndo5VxZdUxAXOlhOPqSOvvdjJVv33TLSlBy6cbM88fufjJeQtZ3vOeP9h3h9sgXQqUPcta7eo1Jo_Izuu1dCwduDPyY5xyRvORX9BLmudGWOd4t1LciFaptpBdzuyfrNTySF5uyZLUe6YU4VKbXL4mvIJygNdip1hWnIJW8YvUDBPc4i0HkOM1AXvMeZLPtDlLlegPseY70P6RauNC_Za7zZxlLBLyOkVeeFtrPD68bwiPz99_HHzpbn9_vnrzfVtM4lhWBqpOm7xKrQdcRZnle75yHrr3MC0BiFaaf3UKmZB95L3To2DHK3kwABkL67I-7PuseTfK9Y3h1AniNEmyGs1reh0p4TqJKLv_kHnvJaE3SGllJBaCYaUOlO4tFoLeHMsAcd7MJyZzRkzmydnzOaMOTuDP9886q_jAdzTv79WIHB9BgAXcgpQTJ0CpAlcQCMW43L4b5E_n-Klqg</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Fleeger, J.W.</creator><creator>Johnson, D.S.</creator><creator>Zengel, S.</creator><creator>Mendelssohn, I.A.</creator><creator>Deis, D.R.</creator><creator>Graham, S.A.</creator><creator>Lin, Q.</creator><creator>Christman, M.C.</creator><creator>Riggio, M.R.</creator><creator>Pant, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Macroinfauna responses and recovery trajectories after an oil spill differ from those following saltmarsh restoration</title><author>Fleeger, J.W. ; Johnson, D.S. ; Zengel, S. ; Mendelssohn, I.A. ; Deis, D.R. ; Graham, S.A. ; Lin, Q. ; Christman, M.C. ; Riggio, M.R. ; Pant, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4751ac3938ab014da7861b06add9088e3324afc270ae86416d7b94ba41e0ee463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Amphipoda</topic><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Deep water</topic><topic>Deepwater horizon oil spill</topic><topic>Initial conditions</topic><topic>Macroinfauna</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Oil spills</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery trajectory</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Restoration scaling</topic><topic>Restored salt marshes</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Saltmarshes</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleeger, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, D.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendelssohn, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deis, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christman, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggio, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Marine environmental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleeger, J.W.</au><au>Johnson, D.S.</au><au>Zengel, S.</au><au>Mendelssohn, I.A.</au><au>Deis, D.R.</au><au>Graham, S.A.</au><au>Lin, Q.</au><au>Christman, M.C.</au><au>Riggio, M.R.</au><au>Pant, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Macroinfauna responses and recovery trajectories after an oil spill differ from those following saltmarsh restoration</atitle><jtitle>Marine environmental research</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Environ Res</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>155</volume><spage>104881</spage><epage>104881</epage><pages>104881-104881</pages><artnum>104881</artnum><issn>0141-1136</issn><eissn>1879-0291</eissn><abstract>Given the severity of injuries to biota in coastal wetlands from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (DWH) and the resulting availability of funding for restoration, information on impacted salt marshes and biotic development of restored marshes may both help inform marsh restoration planning in the near term and for future spills. Accordingly, we performed a meta-analysis to model a restoration trajectory of total macroinfauna density in constructed marshes (studied for ~30 y), and with a previously published restoration trajectory for amphipods, we compared these to recovery curves for total macroinfauna and amphipods from DWH impacted marshes (over 8.5 y). Total macroinfauna and amphipod densities in constructed marshes did not consistently reach equivalency with reference sites before 20 y, yet in heavily oiled marshes recovery occurred by 4.5 y post spill (although it is unlikely that macroinfaunal community composition fully recovered). These differences were probably due to initial conditions (e.g., higher initial levels of belowground organic matter in oiled marshes) that were more conducive to recovery as compared to constructed marshes. Furthermore, we found that amphipod trajectories were distinctly different in constructed and oiled marshes as densities at oiled sites exceeded that of reference sites by as much as 20x during much of the recovery period. Amphipods may have responded to the rapid increase and high biomass of benthic microalgae following the spill. These results indicate that biotic responses after an oil spill may be quantitatively different than those following restoration, even for heavily oiled marshes that were initially denuded of vegetation. Our dual trajectories for oil spill recovery and restoration development for macroinfauna should help guide restoration planning and assessment following the DWH as well as for restoration scaling for future spills. •Macroinfauna density in restored salt marshes is slow to mature, &gt;20 y.•Macroinfauna density recovery from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was much faster, ~4.5 y.•Densities were higher in heavily oiled marshes than references, 3–8 y post spill.•Improving initial soil quality and vegetation cover should aid restoration success.•These recovery trajectories may guide future restoration planning and assessment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32072985</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104881</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-1136
ispartof Marine environmental research, 2020-03, Vol.155, p.104881-104881, Article 104881
issn 0141-1136
1879-0291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2358573754
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Amphipoda
Aquatic crustaceans
Benthos
Biota
Community composition
Deep water
Deepwater horizon oil spill
Initial conditions
Macroinfauna
Meta-analysis
Oil spills
Organic matter
Phytoplankton
Recovery
Recovery trajectory
Restoration
Restoration scaling
Restored salt marshes
Salt marshes
Saltmarshes
Scaling
Wetlands
title Macroinfauna responses and recovery trajectories after an oil spill differ from those following saltmarsh restoration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T21%3A35%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Macroinfauna%20responses%20and%20recovery%20trajectories%20after%20an%20oil%20spill%20differ%20from%20those%20following%20saltmarsh%20restoration&rft.jtitle=Marine%20environmental%20research&rft.au=Fleeger,%20J.W.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=155&rft.spage=104881&rft.epage=104881&rft.pages=104881-104881&rft.artnum=104881&rft.issn=0141-1136&rft.eissn=1879-0291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104881&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2358573754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2377348730&rft_id=info:pmid/32072985&rft_els_id=S0141113619307743&rfr_iscdi=true