The effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy on ovarian reserve

Background Salpingectomy may damage ovarian reserve by direct vascular interruption to the ovary or thermal vascular injury from electrosurgery. It is plausible that this risk may increase in the context of salpingectomy conducted for ectopic pregnancy due to the distension of the fallopian tube and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology 2020-04, Vol.60 (2), p.278-283
Hauptverfasser: Rodgers, Rachael, Carter, Jonathan, Reid, Geoffrey, Krishnan, Surya, Ludlow, Joanne, Cooper, Michael, Abbott, Jason
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 283
container_issue 2
container_start_page 278
container_title Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology
container_volume 60
creator Rodgers, Rachael
Carter, Jonathan
Reid, Geoffrey
Krishnan, Surya
Ludlow, Joanne
Cooper, Michael
Abbott, Jason
description Background Salpingectomy may damage ovarian reserve by direct vascular interruption to the ovary or thermal vascular injury from electrosurgery. It is plausible that this risk may increase in the context of salpingectomy conducted for ectopic pregnancy due to the distension of the fallopian tube and vascular changes associated with pregnancy. Aim To report anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations before and after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy as an indicator of change in ovarian reserve. Materials and Methods Women aged 18–44 years scheduled for salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy were prospectively recruited. Serum AMH concentrations were measured immediately prior to surgery, then repeated four months post‐operatively. In all cases, salpingectomy was conducted laparoscopically using bipolar electrosurgery and mechanical scissors. A group of women scheduled for uterine curettage for first trimester miscarriage was recruited to ensure any observed change in AMH concentration in the women undergoing salpingectomy was secondary to surgery, rather than an effect of pregnancy. Results Paired pre‐ and post‐operative serum AMH concentrations were obtained from 32 women with tubal ectopic pregnancy. The mean age of the women was 33.6 ± 4.6 years. There was no significant difference in the median pre‐ and post‐operative AMH concentrations (13.00 pmol/L (range 5–67 pmol/L) vs 15.25 pmol/L (range 3–96 pmol/L), P = 0.575). Median AMH concentrations also remained stable in women experiencing a first trimester miscarriage (10.40 pmol/L (range 3.9–37.8 pmol/L) vs 13.67 pmol/L (range 2.8–30.5 pmol/L), P = 0.185). Conclusion Laparoscopic salpingectomy using electrosurgery and mechanical scissors does not damage ovarian reserve. AMH concentrations do not fluctuate from baseline in the first trimester of pregnancy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajo.13129
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2356591281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2356591281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-2f4c7b8f55e7eb4f774510fd42c8d979db08747350aac9d998df611a151f69f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk4v_AOSS73ols82uRzDTwZDmOBdSNNkdnRNTbZJ_72dnd55bs6B9-GF8wBwjdEYdzPRaz_GFBN5AoaYZTIRRLyfgiFCiCUiTdMBuIhxjRCWHLNzMKAEpZwKNgSvyw8LrXPWbKF3sNKNDj4a35QGRl01Zb3qIr9pofMBHs5D0gS7qnVtWuhr6Pc6lLqGwUYb9vYSnDldRXt13CPw9nC_nD0l88Xj82w6TwwlXCbEMZPlwnFuM5szl2WMY-QKRowoZCaLHImMZZQjrY0spBSFSzHWmGOXSkfpCNz2vU3wnzsbt2pTRmOrStfW76IilKdcYiJwh971qOl-i8E61YRyo0OrMFIHg6ozqH4MduzNsXaXb2zxR_4q64BJD3yVlW3_b1LTl0Vf-Q27tXrF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2356591281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy on ovarian reserve</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Rodgers, Rachael ; Carter, Jonathan ; Reid, Geoffrey ; Krishnan, Surya ; Ludlow, Joanne ; Cooper, Michael ; Abbott, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Rachael ; Carter, Jonathan ; Reid, Geoffrey ; Krishnan, Surya ; Ludlow, Joanne ; Cooper, Michael ; Abbott, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Background Salpingectomy may damage ovarian reserve by direct vascular interruption to the ovary or thermal vascular injury from electrosurgery. It is plausible that this risk may increase in the context of salpingectomy conducted for ectopic pregnancy due to the distension of the fallopian tube and vascular changes associated with pregnancy. Aim To report anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations before and after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy as an indicator of change in ovarian reserve. Materials and Methods Women aged 18–44 years scheduled for salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy were prospectively recruited. Serum AMH concentrations were measured immediately prior to surgery, then repeated four months post‐operatively. In all cases, salpingectomy was conducted laparoscopically using bipolar electrosurgery and mechanical scissors. A group of women scheduled for uterine curettage for first trimester miscarriage was recruited to ensure any observed change in AMH concentration in the women undergoing salpingectomy was secondary to surgery, rather than an effect of pregnancy. Results Paired pre‐ and post‐operative serum AMH concentrations were obtained from 32 women with tubal ectopic pregnancy. The mean age of the women was 33.6 ± 4.6 years. There was no significant difference in the median pre‐ and post‐operative AMH concentrations (13.00 pmol/L (range 5–67 pmol/L) vs 15.25 pmol/L (range 3–96 pmol/L), P = 0.575). Median AMH concentrations also remained stable in women experiencing a first trimester miscarriage (10.40 pmol/L (range 3.9–37.8 pmol/L) vs 13.67 pmol/L (range 2.8–30.5 pmol/L), P = 0.185). Conclusion Laparoscopic salpingectomy using electrosurgery and mechanical scissors does not damage ovarian reserve. AMH concentrations do not fluctuate from baseline in the first trimester of pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-828X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13129</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32065384</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>anti‐Müllerian hormone ; ectopic pregnancy ; ovarian reserve ; salpingectomy</subject><ispartof>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology, 2020-04, Vol.60 (2), p.278-283</ispartof><rights>2020 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2020 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-2f4c7b8f55e7eb4f774510fd42c8d979db08747350aac9d998df611a151f69f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-2f4c7b8f55e7eb4f774510fd42c8d979db08747350aac9d998df611a151f69f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3871-2815 ; 0000-0002-4406-3121 ; 0000-0002-8336-3055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajo.13129$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajo.13129$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32065384$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Surya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludlow, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy on ovarian reserve</title><title>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Background Salpingectomy may damage ovarian reserve by direct vascular interruption to the ovary or thermal vascular injury from electrosurgery. It is plausible that this risk may increase in the context of salpingectomy conducted for ectopic pregnancy due to the distension of the fallopian tube and vascular changes associated with pregnancy. Aim To report anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations before and after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy as an indicator of change in ovarian reserve. Materials and Methods Women aged 18–44 years scheduled for salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy were prospectively recruited. Serum AMH concentrations were measured immediately prior to surgery, then repeated four months post‐operatively. In all cases, salpingectomy was conducted laparoscopically using bipolar electrosurgery and mechanical scissors. A group of women scheduled for uterine curettage for first trimester miscarriage was recruited to ensure any observed change in AMH concentration in the women undergoing salpingectomy was secondary to surgery, rather than an effect of pregnancy. Results Paired pre‐ and post‐operative serum AMH concentrations were obtained from 32 women with tubal ectopic pregnancy. The mean age of the women was 33.6 ± 4.6 years. There was no significant difference in the median pre‐ and post‐operative AMH concentrations (13.00 pmol/L (range 5–67 pmol/L) vs 15.25 pmol/L (range 3–96 pmol/L), P = 0.575). Median AMH concentrations also remained stable in women experiencing a first trimester miscarriage (10.40 pmol/L (range 3.9–37.8 pmol/L) vs 13.67 pmol/L (range 2.8–30.5 pmol/L), P = 0.185). Conclusion Laparoscopic salpingectomy using electrosurgery and mechanical scissors does not damage ovarian reserve. AMH concentrations do not fluctuate from baseline in the first trimester of pregnancy.</description><subject>anti‐Müllerian hormone</subject><subject>ectopic pregnancy</subject><subject>ovarian reserve</subject><subject>salpingectomy</subject><issn>0004-8666</issn><issn>1479-828X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk4v_AOSS73ols82uRzDTwZDmOBdSNNkdnRNTbZJ_72dnd55bs6B9-GF8wBwjdEYdzPRaz_GFBN5AoaYZTIRRLyfgiFCiCUiTdMBuIhxjRCWHLNzMKAEpZwKNgSvyw8LrXPWbKF3sNKNDj4a35QGRl01Zb3qIr9pofMBHs5D0gS7qnVtWuhr6Pc6lLqGwUYb9vYSnDldRXt13CPw9nC_nD0l88Xj82w6TwwlXCbEMZPlwnFuM5szl2WMY-QKRowoZCaLHImMZZQjrY0spBSFSzHWmGOXSkfpCNz2vU3wnzsbt2pTRmOrStfW76IilKdcYiJwh971qOl-i8E61YRyo0OrMFIHg6ozqH4MduzNsXaXb2zxR_4q64BJD3yVlW3_b1LTl0Vf-Q27tXrF</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Rodgers, Rachael</creator><creator>Carter, Jonathan</creator><creator>Reid, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Krishnan, Surya</creator><creator>Ludlow, Joanne</creator><creator>Cooper, Michael</creator><creator>Abbott, Jason</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3871-2815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-3121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8336-3055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>The effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy on ovarian reserve</title><author>Rodgers, Rachael ; Carter, Jonathan ; Reid, Geoffrey ; Krishnan, Surya ; Ludlow, Joanne ; Cooper, Michael ; Abbott, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-2f4c7b8f55e7eb4f774510fd42c8d979db08747350aac9d998df611a151f69f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>anti‐Müllerian hormone</topic><topic>ectopic pregnancy</topic><topic>ovarian reserve</topic><topic>salpingectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Surya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludlow, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodgers, Rachael</au><au>Carter, Jonathan</au><au>Reid, Geoffrey</au><au>Krishnan, Surya</au><au>Ludlow, Joanne</au><au>Cooper, Michael</au><au>Abbott, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy on ovarian reserve</atitle><jtitle>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>278-283</pages><issn>0004-8666</issn><eissn>1479-828X</eissn><abstract>Background Salpingectomy may damage ovarian reserve by direct vascular interruption to the ovary or thermal vascular injury from electrosurgery. It is plausible that this risk may increase in the context of salpingectomy conducted for ectopic pregnancy due to the distension of the fallopian tube and vascular changes associated with pregnancy. Aim To report anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations before and after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy as an indicator of change in ovarian reserve. Materials and Methods Women aged 18–44 years scheduled for salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy were prospectively recruited. Serum AMH concentrations were measured immediately prior to surgery, then repeated four months post‐operatively. In all cases, salpingectomy was conducted laparoscopically using bipolar electrosurgery and mechanical scissors. A group of women scheduled for uterine curettage for first trimester miscarriage was recruited to ensure any observed change in AMH concentration in the women undergoing salpingectomy was secondary to surgery, rather than an effect of pregnancy. Results Paired pre‐ and post‐operative serum AMH concentrations were obtained from 32 women with tubal ectopic pregnancy. The mean age of the women was 33.6 ± 4.6 years. There was no significant difference in the median pre‐ and post‐operative AMH concentrations (13.00 pmol/L (range 5–67 pmol/L) vs 15.25 pmol/L (range 3–96 pmol/L), P = 0.575). Median AMH concentrations also remained stable in women experiencing a first trimester miscarriage (10.40 pmol/L (range 3.9–37.8 pmol/L) vs 13.67 pmol/L (range 2.8–30.5 pmol/L), P = 0.185). Conclusion Laparoscopic salpingectomy using electrosurgery and mechanical scissors does not damage ovarian reserve. AMH concentrations do not fluctuate from baseline in the first trimester of pregnancy.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>32065384</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajo.13129</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3871-2815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-3121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8336-3055</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8666
ispartof Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2020-04, Vol.60 (2), p.278-283
issn 0004-8666
1479-828X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2356591281
source Wiley Journals
subjects anti‐Müllerian hormone
ectopic pregnancy
ovarian reserve
salpingectomy
title The effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy on ovarian reserve
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A46%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20laparoscopic%20salpingectomy%20for%20ectopic%20pregnancy%20on%20ovarian%20reserve&rft.jtitle=Australian%20&%20New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=Rodgers,%20Rachael&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=278-283&rft.issn=0004-8666&rft.eissn=1479-828X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajo.13129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2356591281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2356591281&rft_id=info:pmid/32065384&rfr_iscdi=true