Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evolutionary biology 2020-05, Vol.33 (5), p.694-713 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 713 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 694 |
container_title | Journal of evolutionary biology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Vaught, Rebecca C. Voigt, Susanne Dobler, Ralph Clancy, David J. Reinhardt, Klaus Dowling, Damian K. |
description | Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variation as mediators of phenotypic expression, two questions remain. Firstly, it remains unclear whether outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions will manifest differently across the sexes, as might be predicted given that cytoplasmic genomes are screened by natural selection only through females as a consequence of their maternal inheritance. Secondly, the relative contribution of mitochondrial genetic variation to other cytoplasmic sources of variation, such as Wolbachia infection, in shaping phenotypic outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions remains unknown. Here, we address these questions, creating a fully crossed set of replicated cyto‐nuclear populations derived from three geographically distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster, measuring the lifespan of males and females from each population. We observed that cyto‐nuclear interactions shape lifespan and that the outcomes of these interactions differ across the sexes. Yet, we found no evidence that placing the cytoplasms from one population alongside the nuclear background of others (generating putative cyto‐nuclear mismatches) leads to decreased lifespan in either sex. Although it was difficult to partition mitochondrial from Wolbachia effects, our results suggest at least some of the cytoplasmic genotypic contribution to lifespan was directly mediated by an effect of sequence variation in the mtDNA. Future work should explore the degree to which cyto‐nuclear interactions result in sex differences in the expression of other components of organismal life history.
We explore the capacity for epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genotypes to shape the expression of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, leveraging a set of genetic strains in which the cytoplasms of three geographically distinct populations were translocated alongside the nuclear backgrounds of the same three populations, in all nine possible combinations. We also sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of these populations and determined the Wolbachia infection status of each, to assess whether cytoplasmic contributions to lifespan were primarily driven by mitochondrial sequence variation or Wolbachia infection. We then partiti |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jeb.13605 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2354739775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354739775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-46a20055428ec0580edb7c849b07452e5c5112f9a42de555a1a8ea711beefe3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c9u1DAQBnALgWgpHHgBZIkLHNKO_8wmOUIpUFSJC0jcLMc7Ll4ldrATlb3xCDwjT4JhCwckfLEPP32e0cfYYwGnop6zHQ2nQm0A77BjoSU0vQBxt75BQAMb8emIPShlByA2GvE-O1ISUEnsj9n-Mi6UrVtCioUPtNwQRe72S5pHW6bguI1bHlc3ks38mmKaqHCXoqfMC3398e17mckFXyV5T24pPEU-Bk9ltpGHyF_lVNL8OYyWTzTamK5tqX8-ZPe8HQs9ur1P2MfXFx_O3zZX799cnr-4apzqOmz0xkoARC07coAd0HZoXaf7AVqNktChENL3VsstIaIVtiPbCjEQeVKkTtizQ-6c05eVymKmUByNdRJKazFSoW5V37ZY6dN_6C6tOdbpjNQACtpWi6qeH5Sri5VM3sw5TDbvjQDzqw9T-zC_-6j2yW3iOky0_Sv_FFDB2QHchJH2_08y7y5eHiJ_AvW4lpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400307741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Vaught, Rebecca C. ; Voigt, Susanne ; Dobler, Ralph ; Clancy, David J. ; Reinhardt, Klaus ; Dowling, Damian K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaught, Rebecca C. ; Voigt, Susanne ; Dobler, Ralph ; Clancy, David J. ; Reinhardt, Klaus ; Dowling, Damian K.</creatorcontrib><description>Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variation as mediators of phenotypic expression, two questions remain. Firstly, it remains unclear whether outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions will manifest differently across the sexes, as might be predicted given that cytoplasmic genomes are screened by natural selection only through females as a consequence of their maternal inheritance. Secondly, the relative contribution of mitochondrial genetic variation to other cytoplasmic sources of variation, such as Wolbachia infection, in shaping phenotypic outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions remains unknown. Here, we address these questions, creating a fully crossed set of replicated cyto‐nuclear populations derived from three geographically distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster, measuring the lifespan of males and females from each population. We observed that cyto‐nuclear interactions shape lifespan and that the outcomes of these interactions differ across the sexes. Yet, we found no evidence that placing the cytoplasms from one population alongside the nuclear background of others (generating putative cyto‐nuclear mismatches) leads to decreased lifespan in either sex. Although it was difficult to partition mitochondrial from Wolbachia effects, our results suggest at least some of the cytoplasmic genotypic contribution to lifespan was directly mediated by an effect of sequence variation in the mtDNA. Future work should explore the degree to which cyto‐nuclear interactions result in sex differences in the expression of other components of organismal life history.
We explore the capacity for epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genotypes to shape the expression of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, leveraging a set of genetic strains in which the cytoplasms of three geographically distinct populations were translocated alongside the nuclear backgrounds of the same three populations, in all nine possible combinations. We also sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of these populations and determined the Wolbachia infection status of each, to assess whether cytoplasmic contributions to lifespan were primarily driven by mitochondrial sequence variation or Wolbachia infection. We then partitioned the cytoplasmic, nuclear and cyto‐nuclear effects on lifespan of each sex. We report a statistically significant effect of the interaction between cytoplasmic genotype, nuclear genotype and sex on lifespan, thus demonstrating that cyto‐nuclear interactions affect each of the sexes differently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32053259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthropods ; Cytoplasm ; Drosophila melanogaster ; Epistasis ; Females ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; Genetic diversity ; Genomes ; Insects ; Life history ; Life span ; Maternal inheritance ; Mitochondria ; Mitochondrial DNA ; mito‐nuclear ; Mother’s Curse ; mtDNA ; Natural selection ; Nuclear interactions ; Nuclei (cytology) ; Phenotypes ; Phenotypic variations ; Populations ; Questions ; Sex ; Sex differences ; Sexes ; Wolbachia</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020-05, Vol.33 (5), p.694-713</ispartof><rights>2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><rights>2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.</rights><rights>Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-46a20055428ec0580edb7c849b07452e5c5112f9a42de555a1a8ea711beefe3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-46a20055428ec0580edb7c849b07452e5c5112f9a42de555a1a8ea711beefe3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0785-1022 ; 0000-0001-7200-4594 ; 0000-0003-2209-3458 ; 0000-0002-2544-9328 ; 0000-0003-1461-9106 ; 0000-0003-4354-6508</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjeb.13605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjeb.13605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaught, Rebecca C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobler, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clancy, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhardt, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowling, Damian K.</creatorcontrib><title>Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variation as mediators of phenotypic expression, two questions remain. Firstly, it remains unclear whether outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions will manifest differently across the sexes, as might be predicted given that cytoplasmic genomes are screened by natural selection only through females as a consequence of their maternal inheritance. Secondly, the relative contribution of mitochondrial genetic variation to other cytoplasmic sources of variation, such as Wolbachia infection, in shaping phenotypic outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions remains unknown. Here, we address these questions, creating a fully crossed set of replicated cyto‐nuclear populations derived from three geographically distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster, measuring the lifespan of males and females from each population. We observed that cyto‐nuclear interactions shape lifespan and that the outcomes of these interactions differ across the sexes. Yet, we found no evidence that placing the cytoplasms from one population alongside the nuclear background of others (generating putative cyto‐nuclear mismatches) leads to decreased lifespan in either sex. Although it was difficult to partition mitochondrial from Wolbachia effects, our results suggest at least some of the cytoplasmic genotypic contribution to lifespan was directly mediated by an effect of sequence variation in the mtDNA. Future work should explore the degree to which cyto‐nuclear interactions result in sex differences in the expression of other components of organismal life history.
We explore the capacity for epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genotypes to shape the expression of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, leveraging a set of genetic strains in which the cytoplasms of three geographically distinct populations were translocated alongside the nuclear backgrounds of the same three populations, in all nine possible combinations. We also sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of these populations and determined the Wolbachia infection status of each, to assess whether cytoplasmic contributions to lifespan were primarily driven by mitochondrial sequence variation or Wolbachia infection. We then partitioned the cytoplasmic, nuclear and cyto‐nuclear effects on lifespan of each sex. We report a statistically significant effect of the interaction between cytoplasmic genotype, nuclear genotype and sex on lifespan, thus demonstrating that cyto‐nuclear interactions affect each of the sexes differently.</description><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Cytoplasm</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster</subject><subject>Epistasis</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Maternal inheritance</subject><subject>Mitochondria</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>mito‐nuclear</subject><subject>Mother’s Curse</subject><subject>mtDNA</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><subject>Nuclear interactions</subject><subject>Nuclei (cytology)</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Phenotypic variations</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Wolbachia</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10c9u1DAQBnALgWgpHHgBZIkLHNKO_8wmOUIpUFSJC0jcLMc7Ll4ldrATlb3xCDwjT4JhCwckfLEPP32e0cfYYwGnop6zHQ2nQm0A77BjoSU0vQBxt75BQAMb8emIPShlByA2GvE-O1ISUEnsj9n-Mi6UrVtCioUPtNwQRe72S5pHW6bguI1bHlc3ks38mmKaqHCXoqfMC3398e17mckFXyV5T24pPEU-Bk9ltpGHyF_lVNL8OYyWTzTamK5tqX8-ZPe8HQs9ur1P2MfXFx_O3zZX799cnr-4apzqOmz0xkoARC07coAd0HZoXaf7AVqNktChENL3VsstIaIVtiPbCjEQeVKkTtizQ-6c05eVymKmUByNdRJKazFSoW5V37ZY6dN_6C6tOdbpjNQACtpWi6qeH5Sri5VM3sw5TDbvjQDzqw9T-zC_-6j2yW3iOky0_Sv_FFDB2QHchJH2_08y7y5eHiJ_AvW4lpg</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Vaught, Rebecca C.</creator><creator>Voigt, Susanne</creator><creator>Dobler, Ralph</creator><creator>Clancy, David J.</creator><creator>Reinhardt, Klaus</creator><creator>Dowling, Damian K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-1022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-4594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2209-3458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-9328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1461-9106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4354-6508</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster</title><author>Vaught, Rebecca C. ; Voigt, Susanne ; Dobler, Ralph ; Clancy, David J. ; Reinhardt, Klaus ; Dowling, Damian K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-46a20055428ec0580edb7c849b07452e5c5112f9a42de555a1a8ea711beefe3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Cytoplasm</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster</topic><topic>Epistasis</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Maternal inheritance</topic><topic>Mitochondria</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>mito‐nuclear</topic><topic>Mother’s Curse</topic><topic>mtDNA</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><topic>Nuclear interactions</topic><topic>Nuclei (cytology)</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Phenotypic variations</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Wolbachia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaught, Rebecca C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobler, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clancy, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhardt, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowling, Damian K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaught, Rebecca C.</au><au>Voigt, Susanne</au><au>Dobler, Ralph</au><au>Clancy, David J.</au><au>Reinhardt, Klaus</au><au>Dowling, Damian K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>694-713</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variation as mediators of phenotypic expression, two questions remain. Firstly, it remains unclear whether outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions will manifest differently across the sexes, as might be predicted given that cytoplasmic genomes are screened by natural selection only through females as a consequence of their maternal inheritance. Secondly, the relative contribution of mitochondrial genetic variation to other cytoplasmic sources of variation, such as Wolbachia infection, in shaping phenotypic outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions remains unknown. Here, we address these questions, creating a fully crossed set of replicated cyto‐nuclear populations derived from three geographically distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster, measuring the lifespan of males and females from each population. We observed that cyto‐nuclear interactions shape lifespan and that the outcomes of these interactions differ across the sexes. Yet, we found no evidence that placing the cytoplasms from one population alongside the nuclear background of others (generating putative cyto‐nuclear mismatches) leads to decreased lifespan in either sex. Although it was difficult to partition mitochondrial from Wolbachia effects, our results suggest at least some of the cytoplasmic genotypic contribution to lifespan was directly mediated by an effect of sequence variation in the mtDNA. Future work should explore the degree to which cyto‐nuclear interactions result in sex differences in the expression of other components of organismal life history.
We explore the capacity for epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genotypes to shape the expression of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, leveraging a set of genetic strains in which the cytoplasms of three geographically distinct populations were translocated alongside the nuclear backgrounds of the same three populations, in all nine possible combinations. We also sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of these populations and determined the Wolbachia infection status of each, to assess whether cytoplasmic contributions to lifespan were primarily driven by mitochondrial sequence variation or Wolbachia infection. We then partitioned the cytoplasmic, nuclear and cyto‐nuclear effects on lifespan of each sex. We report a statistically significant effect of the interaction between cytoplasmic genotype, nuclear genotype and sex on lifespan, thus demonstrating that cyto‐nuclear interactions affect each of the sexes differently.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32053259</pmid><doi>10.1111/jeb.13605</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-1022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-4594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2209-3458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-9328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1461-9106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4354-6508</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-061X |
ispartof | Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020-05, Vol.33 (5), p.694-713 |
issn | 1010-061X 1420-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2354739775 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Arthropods Cytoplasm Drosophila melanogaster Epistasis Females Gender aspects Gender differences Genetic diversity Genomes Insects Life history Life span Maternal inheritance Mitochondria Mitochondrial DNA mito‐nuclear Mother’s Curse mtDNA Natural selection Nuclear interactions Nuclei (cytology) Phenotypes Phenotypic variations Populations Questions Sex Sex differences Sexes Wolbachia |
title | Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T20%3A23%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactions%20between%20cytoplasmic%20and%20nuclear%20genomes%20confer%20sex%E2%80%90specific%20effects%20on%20lifespan%20in%20Drosophila%20melanogaster&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Vaught,%20Rebecca%20C.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=694-713&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jeb.13605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354739775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400307741&rft_id=info:pmid/32053259&rfr_iscdi=true |