Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster

Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evolutionary biology 2020-05, Vol.33 (5), p.694-713
Hauptverfasser: Vaught, Rebecca C., Voigt, Susanne, Dobler, Ralph, Clancy, David J., Reinhardt, Klaus, Dowling, Damian K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 713
container_issue 5
container_start_page 694
container_title Journal of evolutionary biology
container_volume 33
creator Vaught, Rebecca C.
Voigt, Susanne
Dobler, Ralph
Clancy, David J.
Reinhardt, Klaus
Dowling, Damian K.
description Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variation as mediators of phenotypic expression, two questions remain. Firstly, it remains unclear whether outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions will manifest differently across the sexes, as might be predicted given that cytoplasmic genomes are screened by natural selection only through females as a consequence of their maternal inheritance. Secondly, the relative contribution of mitochondrial genetic variation to other cytoplasmic sources of variation, such as Wolbachia infection, in shaping phenotypic outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions remains unknown. Here, we address these questions, creating a fully crossed set of replicated cyto‐nuclear populations derived from three geographically distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster, measuring the lifespan of males and females from each population. We observed that cyto‐nuclear interactions shape lifespan and that the outcomes of these interactions differ across the sexes. Yet, we found no evidence that placing the cytoplasms from one population alongside the nuclear background of others (generating putative cyto‐nuclear mismatches) leads to decreased lifespan in either sex. Although it was difficult to partition mitochondrial from Wolbachia effects, our results suggest at least some of the cytoplasmic genotypic contribution to lifespan was directly mediated by an effect of sequence variation in the mtDNA. Future work should explore the degree to which cyto‐nuclear interactions result in sex differences in the expression of other components of organismal life history. We explore the capacity for epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genotypes to shape the expression of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, leveraging a set of genetic strains in which the cytoplasms of three geographically distinct populations were translocated alongside the nuclear backgrounds of the same three populations, in all nine possible combinations. We also sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of these populations and determined the Wolbachia infection status of each, to assess whether cytoplasmic contributions to lifespan were primarily driven by mitochondrial sequence variation or Wolbachia infection. We then partiti
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jeb.13605
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2354739775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354739775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-46a20055428ec0580edb7c849b07452e5c5112f9a42de555a1a8ea711beefe3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c9u1DAQBnALgWgpHHgBZIkLHNKO_8wmOUIpUFSJC0jcLMc7Ll4ldrATlb3xCDwjT4JhCwckfLEPP32e0cfYYwGnop6zHQ2nQm0A77BjoSU0vQBxt75BQAMb8emIPShlByA2GvE-O1ISUEnsj9n-Mi6UrVtCioUPtNwQRe72S5pHW6bguI1bHlc3ks38mmKaqHCXoqfMC3398e17mckFXyV5T24pPEU-Bk9ltpGHyF_lVNL8OYyWTzTamK5tqX8-ZPe8HQs9ur1P2MfXFx_O3zZX799cnr-4apzqOmz0xkoARC07coAd0HZoXaf7AVqNktChENL3VsstIaIVtiPbCjEQeVKkTtizQ-6c05eVymKmUByNdRJKazFSoW5V37ZY6dN_6C6tOdbpjNQACtpWi6qeH5Sri5VM3sw5TDbvjQDzqw9T-zC_-6j2yW3iOky0_Sv_FFDB2QHchJH2_08y7y5eHiJ_AvW4lpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400307741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Vaught, Rebecca C. ; Voigt, Susanne ; Dobler, Ralph ; Clancy, David J. ; Reinhardt, Klaus ; Dowling, Damian K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaught, Rebecca C. ; Voigt, Susanne ; Dobler, Ralph ; Clancy, David J. ; Reinhardt, Klaus ; Dowling, Damian K.</creatorcontrib><description>Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variation as mediators of phenotypic expression, two questions remain. Firstly, it remains unclear whether outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions will manifest differently across the sexes, as might be predicted given that cytoplasmic genomes are screened by natural selection only through females as a consequence of their maternal inheritance. Secondly, the relative contribution of mitochondrial genetic variation to other cytoplasmic sources of variation, such as Wolbachia infection, in shaping phenotypic outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions remains unknown. Here, we address these questions, creating a fully crossed set of replicated cyto‐nuclear populations derived from three geographically distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster, measuring the lifespan of males and females from each population. We observed that cyto‐nuclear interactions shape lifespan and that the outcomes of these interactions differ across the sexes. Yet, we found no evidence that placing the cytoplasms from one population alongside the nuclear background of others (generating putative cyto‐nuclear mismatches) leads to decreased lifespan in either sex. Although it was difficult to partition mitochondrial from Wolbachia effects, our results suggest at least some of the cytoplasmic genotypic contribution to lifespan was directly mediated by an effect of sequence variation in the mtDNA. Future work should explore the degree to which cyto‐nuclear interactions result in sex differences in the expression of other components of organismal life history. We explore the capacity for epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genotypes to shape the expression of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, leveraging a set of genetic strains in which the cytoplasms of three geographically distinct populations were translocated alongside the nuclear backgrounds of the same three populations, in all nine possible combinations. We also sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of these populations and determined the Wolbachia infection status of each, to assess whether cytoplasmic contributions to lifespan were primarily driven by mitochondrial sequence variation or Wolbachia infection. We then partitioned the cytoplasmic, nuclear and cyto‐nuclear effects on lifespan of each sex. We report a statistically significant effect of the interaction between cytoplasmic genotype, nuclear genotype and sex on lifespan, thus demonstrating that cyto‐nuclear interactions affect each of the sexes differently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32053259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthropods ; Cytoplasm ; Drosophila melanogaster ; Epistasis ; Females ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; Genetic diversity ; Genomes ; Insects ; Life history ; Life span ; Maternal inheritance ; Mitochondria ; Mitochondrial DNA ; mito‐nuclear ; Mother’s Curse ; mtDNA ; Natural selection ; Nuclear interactions ; Nuclei (cytology) ; Phenotypes ; Phenotypic variations ; Populations ; Questions ; Sex ; Sex differences ; Sexes ; Wolbachia</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020-05, Vol.33 (5), p.694-713</ispartof><rights>2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><rights>2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.</rights><rights>Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-46a20055428ec0580edb7c849b07452e5c5112f9a42de555a1a8ea711beefe3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-46a20055428ec0580edb7c849b07452e5c5112f9a42de555a1a8ea711beefe3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0785-1022 ; 0000-0001-7200-4594 ; 0000-0003-2209-3458 ; 0000-0002-2544-9328 ; 0000-0003-1461-9106 ; 0000-0003-4354-6508</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjeb.13605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjeb.13605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaught, Rebecca C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobler, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clancy, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhardt, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowling, Damian K.</creatorcontrib><title>Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variation as mediators of phenotypic expression, two questions remain. Firstly, it remains unclear whether outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions will manifest differently across the sexes, as might be predicted given that cytoplasmic genomes are screened by natural selection only through females as a consequence of their maternal inheritance. Secondly, the relative contribution of mitochondrial genetic variation to other cytoplasmic sources of variation, such as Wolbachia infection, in shaping phenotypic outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions remains unknown. Here, we address these questions, creating a fully crossed set of replicated cyto‐nuclear populations derived from three geographically distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster, measuring the lifespan of males and females from each population. We observed that cyto‐nuclear interactions shape lifespan and that the outcomes of these interactions differ across the sexes. Yet, we found no evidence that placing the cytoplasms from one population alongside the nuclear background of others (generating putative cyto‐nuclear mismatches) leads to decreased lifespan in either sex. Although it was difficult to partition mitochondrial from Wolbachia effects, our results suggest at least some of the cytoplasmic genotypic contribution to lifespan was directly mediated by an effect of sequence variation in the mtDNA. Future work should explore the degree to which cyto‐nuclear interactions result in sex differences in the expression of other components of organismal life history. We explore the capacity for epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genotypes to shape the expression of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, leveraging a set of genetic strains in which the cytoplasms of three geographically distinct populations were translocated alongside the nuclear backgrounds of the same three populations, in all nine possible combinations. We also sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of these populations and determined the Wolbachia infection status of each, to assess whether cytoplasmic contributions to lifespan were primarily driven by mitochondrial sequence variation or Wolbachia infection. We then partitioned the cytoplasmic, nuclear and cyto‐nuclear effects on lifespan of each sex. We report a statistically significant effect of the interaction between cytoplasmic genotype, nuclear genotype and sex on lifespan, thus demonstrating that cyto‐nuclear interactions affect each of the sexes differently.</description><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Cytoplasm</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster</subject><subject>Epistasis</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Maternal inheritance</subject><subject>Mitochondria</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>mito‐nuclear</subject><subject>Mother’s Curse</subject><subject>mtDNA</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><subject>Nuclear interactions</subject><subject>Nuclei (cytology)</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Phenotypic variations</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Wolbachia</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10c9u1DAQBnALgWgpHHgBZIkLHNKO_8wmOUIpUFSJC0jcLMc7Ll4ldrATlb3xCDwjT4JhCwckfLEPP32e0cfYYwGnop6zHQ2nQm0A77BjoSU0vQBxt75BQAMb8emIPShlByA2GvE-O1ISUEnsj9n-Mi6UrVtCioUPtNwQRe72S5pHW6bguI1bHlc3ks38mmKaqHCXoqfMC3398e17mckFXyV5T24pPEU-Bk9ltpGHyF_lVNL8OYyWTzTamK5tqX8-ZPe8HQs9ur1P2MfXFx_O3zZX799cnr-4apzqOmz0xkoARC07coAd0HZoXaf7AVqNktChENL3VsstIaIVtiPbCjEQeVKkTtizQ-6c05eVymKmUByNdRJKazFSoW5V37ZY6dN_6C6tOdbpjNQACtpWi6qeH5Sri5VM3sw5TDbvjQDzqw9T-zC_-6j2yW3iOky0_Sv_FFDB2QHchJH2_08y7y5eHiJ_AvW4lpg</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Vaught, Rebecca C.</creator><creator>Voigt, Susanne</creator><creator>Dobler, Ralph</creator><creator>Clancy, David J.</creator><creator>Reinhardt, Klaus</creator><creator>Dowling, Damian K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-1022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-4594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2209-3458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-9328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1461-9106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4354-6508</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster</title><author>Vaught, Rebecca C. ; Voigt, Susanne ; Dobler, Ralph ; Clancy, David J. ; Reinhardt, Klaus ; Dowling, Damian K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-46a20055428ec0580edb7c849b07452e5c5112f9a42de555a1a8ea711beefe3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Cytoplasm</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster</topic><topic>Epistasis</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Maternal inheritance</topic><topic>Mitochondria</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>mito‐nuclear</topic><topic>Mother’s Curse</topic><topic>mtDNA</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><topic>Nuclear interactions</topic><topic>Nuclei (cytology)</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Phenotypic variations</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Wolbachia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaught, Rebecca C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobler, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clancy, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhardt, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowling, Damian K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaught, Rebecca C.</au><au>Voigt, Susanne</au><au>Dobler, Ralph</au><au>Clancy, David J.</au><au>Reinhardt, Klaus</au><au>Dowling, Damian K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>694-713</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Genetic variation outside of the cell nucleus can affect the phenotype. The cytoplasm is home to the mitochondria, and in arthropods often hosts intracellular bacteria such as Wolbachia. Although numerous studies have implicated epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic variation as mediators of phenotypic expression, two questions remain. Firstly, it remains unclear whether outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions will manifest differently across the sexes, as might be predicted given that cytoplasmic genomes are screened by natural selection only through females as a consequence of their maternal inheritance. Secondly, the relative contribution of mitochondrial genetic variation to other cytoplasmic sources of variation, such as Wolbachia infection, in shaping phenotypic outcomes of cyto‐nuclear interactions remains unknown. Here, we address these questions, creating a fully crossed set of replicated cyto‐nuclear populations derived from three geographically distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster, measuring the lifespan of males and females from each population. We observed that cyto‐nuclear interactions shape lifespan and that the outcomes of these interactions differ across the sexes. Yet, we found no evidence that placing the cytoplasms from one population alongside the nuclear background of others (generating putative cyto‐nuclear mismatches) leads to decreased lifespan in either sex. Although it was difficult to partition mitochondrial from Wolbachia effects, our results suggest at least some of the cytoplasmic genotypic contribution to lifespan was directly mediated by an effect of sequence variation in the mtDNA. Future work should explore the degree to which cyto‐nuclear interactions result in sex differences in the expression of other components of organismal life history. We explore the capacity for epistatic interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genotypes to shape the expression of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, leveraging a set of genetic strains in which the cytoplasms of three geographically distinct populations were translocated alongside the nuclear backgrounds of the same three populations, in all nine possible combinations. We also sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of these populations and determined the Wolbachia infection status of each, to assess whether cytoplasmic contributions to lifespan were primarily driven by mitochondrial sequence variation or Wolbachia infection. We then partitioned the cytoplasmic, nuclear and cyto‐nuclear effects on lifespan of each sex. We report a statistically significant effect of the interaction between cytoplasmic genotype, nuclear genotype and sex on lifespan, thus demonstrating that cyto‐nuclear interactions affect each of the sexes differently.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32053259</pmid><doi>10.1111/jeb.13605</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-1022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-4594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2209-3458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-9328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1461-9106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4354-6508</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-061X
ispartof Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020-05, Vol.33 (5), p.694-713
issn 1010-061X
1420-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2354739775
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Arthropods
Cytoplasm
Drosophila melanogaster
Epistasis
Females
Gender aspects
Gender differences
Genetic diversity
Genomes
Insects
Life history
Life span
Maternal inheritance
Mitochondria
Mitochondrial DNA
mito‐nuclear
Mother’s Curse
mtDNA
Natural selection
Nuclear interactions
Nuclei (cytology)
Phenotypes
Phenotypic variations
Populations
Questions
Sex
Sex differences
Sexes
Wolbachia
title Interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genomes confer sex‐specific effects on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T20%3A23%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactions%20between%20cytoplasmic%20and%20nuclear%20genomes%20confer%20sex%E2%80%90specific%20effects%20on%20lifespan%20in%20Drosophila%20melanogaster&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Vaught,%20Rebecca%20C.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=694-713&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jeb.13605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354739775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400307741&rft_id=info:pmid/32053259&rfr_iscdi=true