CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives The current dentistry scenario is showing an increase in the availability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental offices. Oral surgeons are using three-dimensional information as an additional tool to assess preoperative data for lower third molar (LTM) removal in moderate and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral investigations 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.1137-1149
Hauptverfasser: de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel, Peralta-Mamani, Mariela, Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia, de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza, Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer, Honório, Heitor Marques, Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1149
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1137
container_title Clinical oral investigations
container_volume 24
creator de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel
Peralta-Mamani, Mariela
Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia
de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza
Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer
Honório, Heitor Marques
Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer
description Objectives The current dentistry scenario is showing an increase in the availability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental offices. Oral surgeons are using three-dimensional information as an additional tool to assess preoperative data for lower third molar (LTM) removal in moderate and high-risk cases of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury diagnosed through the panoramic radiography (PR). The aim of this study is to identify whether CBCT examination reduces neurosensoric disturbances (ND) following the removal of the LTM when compared to PR. Materials and Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus electronic databases were searched for studies published up to February 2019. The gray literature was also searched including papers that eventually met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the comprehensive meta-analysis software, p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00784-020-03231-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2354735671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354735671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f493a7bc06b9ed8e88f0ce297d69aa02a1c57248ea1f4c116c0458a692058213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsDP6L7bCDK_6kSmzK2prrTNpUiR1spyiPwRvje28BiQUbj6X5zhl7TtM85-w1Z8y8yfWwijLBKJNCcqofNOdcSU2lMfzh8S6o7iw_a57kfMsYV9rIx82ZFKwV3Njz5ufu_e6K9BEzCbGQhP3qkQRcU8wYckwb6cdc1rSH4CsEQ8FEys2YejLHCVKVzPEOJuLjvEDVkxLJAiEmmEdPEvRjvE6w3GxvCZC85YIzlEMH70b8QSBUIyxAIcC05TE_bR4NMGV8dl8vmm8fP1ztPtPLr5--7N5dUi9NW6gaVCfB7D3T-w57i9YOzKPoTK87ACaA-9YIZRH4oDzn2jPVWtBd_bsVXF40r06-S4rfV8zFzWP2OE0QMK7ZCdkqI1ttDujLf9DbuKb63iPVcdkJxSolTpSvu8sJB7ekcYa0Oc7cITB3CszVwNwxMKer6MW99bqfsf8j-Z1QBeQJyLUVrjH9nf0f21_CKaKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2359139240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel ; Peralta-Mamani, Mariela ; Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia ; de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza ; Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer ; Honório, Heitor Marques ; Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer</creator><creatorcontrib>de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel ; Peralta-Mamani, Mariela ; Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia ; de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza ; Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer ; Honório, Heitor Marques ; Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The current dentistry scenario is showing an increase in the availability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental offices. Oral surgeons are using three-dimensional information as an additional tool to assess preoperative data for lower third molar (LTM) removal in moderate and high-risk cases of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury diagnosed through the panoramic radiography (PR). The aim of this study is to identify whether CBCT examination reduces neurosensoric disturbances (ND) following the removal of the LTM when compared to PR. Materials and Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus electronic databases were searched for studies published up to February 2019. The gray literature was also searched including papers that eventually met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the comprehensive meta-analysis software, p  &lt; 0.05 considered significant. Results Among the search, 6 studies met all eligibility criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (PR and CBCT) in all six studies regarding reducing ND (95%. Confidence interval, 0,788–1734; heterogeneity: Q = 10,361; I 2  = 22.788%). Conclusions CBCT was not superior to PR in avoiding ND. However, further studies are necessary with standardized parameters for a better comparability between variables in the studies. Clinical Relevance To better understand the CBCT clinical applicability in LTM removal to avoid unnecessary extra radiation when compared to PR to the patient and to improve patient’s prognosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03231-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32052178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Alveoli ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Mandibular Nerve ; Mandibular Nerve Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Medicine ; Meta-analysis ; Molar, Third ; Radiography ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Review ; Statistical analysis ; Tooth Extraction</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.1137-1149</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Clinical Oral Investigations is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f493a7bc06b9ed8e88f0ce297d69aa02a1c57248ea1f4c116c0458a692058213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f493a7bc06b9ed8e88f0ce297d69aa02a1c57248ea1f4c116c0458a692058213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5069-9433</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-020-03231-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-020-03231-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052178$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta-Mamani, Mariela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honório, Heitor Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer</creatorcontrib><title>CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives The current dentistry scenario is showing an increase in the availability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental offices. Oral surgeons are using three-dimensional information as an additional tool to assess preoperative data for lower third molar (LTM) removal in moderate and high-risk cases of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury diagnosed through the panoramic radiography (PR). The aim of this study is to identify whether CBCT examination reduces neurosensoric disturbances (ND) following the removal of the LTM when compared to PR. Materials and Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus electronic databases were searched for studies published up to February 2019. The gray literature was also searched including papers that eventually met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the comprehensive meta-analysis software, p  &lt; 0.05 considered significant. Results Among the search, 6 studies met all eligibility criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (PR and CBCT) in all six studies regarding reducing ND (95%. Confidence interval, 0,788–1734; heterogeneity: Q = 10,361; I 2  = 22.788%). Conclusions CBCT was not superior to PR in avoiding ND. However, further studies are necessary with standardized parameters for a better comparability between variables in the studies. Clinical Relevance To better understand the CBCT clinical applicability in LTM removal to avoid unnecessary extra radiation when compared to PR to the patient and to improve patient’s prognosis.</description><subject>Alveoli</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandibular Nerve</subject><subject>Mandibular Nerve Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Molar, Third</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsDP6L7bCDK_6kSmzK2prrTNpUiR1spyiPwRvje28BiQUbj6X5zhl7TtM85-w1Z8y8yfWwijLBKJNCcqofNOdcSU2lMfzh8S6o7iw_a57kfMsYV9rIx82ZFKwV3Njz5ufu_e6K9BEzCbGQhP3qkQRcU8wYckwb6cdc1rSH4CsEQ8FEys2YejLHCVKVzPEOJuLjvEDVkxLJAiEmmEdPEvRjvE6w3GxvCZC85YIzlEMH70b8QSBUIyxAIcC05TE_bR4NMGV8dl8vmm8fP1ztPtPLr5--7N5dUi9NW6gaVCfB7D3T-w57i9YOzKPoTK87ACaA-9YIZRH4oDzn2jPVWtBd_bsVXF40r06-S4rfV8zFzWP2OE0QMK7ZCdkqI1ttDujLf9DbuKb63iPVcdkJxSolTpSvu8sJB7ekcYa0Oc7cITB3CszVwNwxMKer6MW99bqfsf8j-Z1QBeQJyLUVrjH9nf0f21_CKaKg</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel</creator><creator>Peralta-Mamani, Mariela</creator><creator>Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia</creator><creator>de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza</creator><creator>Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer</creator><creator>Honório, Heitor Marques</creator><creator>Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-9433</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel ; Peralta-Mamani, Mariela ; Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia ; de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza ; Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer ; Honório, Heitor Marques ; Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f493a7bc06b9ed8e88f0ce297d69aa02a1c57248ea1f4c116c0458a692058213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alveoli</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandibular Nerve</topic><topic>Mandibular Nerve Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Molar, Third</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta-Mamani, Mariela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honório, Heitor Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Toledo Telles-Araújo, Gabriel</au><au>Peralta-Mamani, Mariela</au><au>Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia</au><au>de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva, Aneliza</au><au>Rubira, Cássia Maria Fischer</au><au>Honório, Heitor Marques</au><au>Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1137</spage><epage>1149</epage><pages>1137-1149</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives The current dentistry scenario is showing an increase in the availability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental offices. Oral surgeons are using three-dimensional information as an additional tool to assess preoperative data for lower third molar (LTM) removal in moderate and high-risk cases of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury diagnosed through the panoramic radiography (PR). The aim of this study is to identify whether CBCT examination reduces neurosensoric disturbances (ND) following the removal of the LTM when compared to PR. Materials and Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus electronic databases were searched for studies published up to February 2019. The gray literature was also searched including papers that eventually met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the comprehensive meta-analysis software, p  &lt; 0.05 considered significant. Results Among the search, 6 studies met all eligibility criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (PR and CBCT) in all six studies regarding reducing ND (95%. Confidence interval, 0,788–1734; heterogeneity: Q = 10,361; I 2  = 22.788%). Conclusions CBCT was not superior to PR in avoiding ND. However, further studies are necessary with standardized parameters for a better comparability between variables in the studies. Clinical Relevance To better understand the CBCT clinical applicability in LTM removal to avoid unnecessary extra radiation when compared to PR to the patient and to improve patient’s prognosis.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32052178</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-020-03231-6</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-9433</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-6981
ispartof Clinical oral investigations, 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.1137-1149
issn 1432-6981
1436-3771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2354735671
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Alveoli
Computed tomography
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dentistry
Humans
Mandibular Nerve
Mandibular Nerve Injuries - prevention & control
Medicine
Meta-analysis
Molar, Third
Radiography
Radiography, Panoramic
Review
Statistical analysis
Tooth Extraction
title CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CBCT%20does%20not%20reduce%20neurosensory%20disturbances%20after%20third%20molar%20removal%20compared%20to%20panoramic%20radiography:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=de%20Toledo%20Telles-Ara%C3%BAjo,%20Gabriel&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1137&rft.epage=1149&rft.pages=1137-1149&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-020-03231-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354735671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2359139240&rft_id=info:pmid/32052178&rfr_iscdi=true