An evaluation of a veterinary-specific mental health service

Abstract Background Veterinary professionals are at increased risk of suicide and mental health difficulties compared to the general population. Vetlife Health Support (VHS) is a mental health case management service for veterinarians with mental health difficulties. Aims To evaluate the VHS case ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Occupational medicine (Oxford) 2020-05, Vol.70 (3), p.169-175
Hauptverfasser: McKenzie, A, Allister, R, Humphrey, D, Moore, K, Greenberg, K, Greenberg, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 175
container_issue 3
container_start_page 169
container_title Occupational medicine (Oxford)
container_volume 70
creator McKenzie, A
Allister, R
Humphrey, D
Moore, K
Greenberg, K
Greenberg, N
description Abstract Background Veterinary professionals are at increased risk of suicide and mental health difficulties compared to the general population. Vetlife Health Support (VHS) is a mental health case management service for veterinarians with mental health difficulties. Aims To evaluate the VHS case management service from the service user’s perspective. Methods Service users (n = 98) completed questionnaires assessing their experience with VHS and current mental health status using the Kessler-6 Scale. A sub-sample was interviewed and the data qualitatively analysed (n = 14). Results The results show that 97% (n = 95) reported a positive experience with VHS and 98% (n = 96) reported VHS staff respected and listened to them. Participants reported significant improvements in relationships with others after VHS (P < 0.001) and were significantly more likely to be in receipt of formal mental health care after VHS than before (P < 0.01). The main emergent themes from the qualitative interviews were (i) positive communication between clinician and service users, (ii) veterinary-specific mental health services were regarded as important to understanding service users’ circumstances, (iii) knowing someone is supporting them positively impacted wellbeing and (iv) confusion with discharge status. Conclusions Most participants reported positive experiences with VHS. Quantitatively, data showed that participants reported significant improvements in relationships and access to formal mental health care after contact with VHS. Interviews with service users revealed that they felt speaking to a mental health professional with veterinary-specific knowledge was beneficial for their wellbeing. Further evaluation assessing whether VHS leads to a measurable impact on psychological wellbeing is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/occmed/kqaa017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2354150580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/occmed/kqaa017</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2354150580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d32d1969660cd1300385fab7fe36ea51edc48efb06133e0c523d3f1275f99a4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AQgBdRbK1ePUqOekg7-0wWvJTiCwpe9By2m1m6mlezScF_35S0Z08DwzcfzEfIPYU5Bc0XtbUl5ovfnTFAkwsypSKhcSpAXpIpaMXiRKQwITch_ABQJVJ2TSacgUg0l1PyvKwi3JuiN52vq6h2kYn22GHrK9P-xaFB6523UYlVZ4poi6botlHAdu8t3pIrZ4qAd6c5I9-vL1-r93j9-faxWq5jy5Xu4pyznGqllQKbUw7AU-nMJnHIFRpJMbciRbcBRTlHsJLxnDvKEum0NsLxGXkcvU1b73oMXVb6YLEoTIV1HzLGpaASZAoDOh9R29YhtOiypvXl8EpGITsWy8Zi2anYcPBwcveb4_6MnxMNwNMI1H3zn-wAN4Z20g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354150580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of a veterinary-specific mental health service</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McKenzie, A ; Allister, R ; Humphrey, D ; Moore, K ; Greenberg, K ; Greenberg, N</creator><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, A ; Allister, R ; Humphrey, D ; Moore, K ; Greenberg, K ; Greenberg, N</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Veterinary professionals are at increased risk of suicide and mental health difficulties compared to the general population. Vetlife Health Support (VHS) is a mental health case management service for veterinarians with mental health difficulties. Aims To evaluate the VHS case management service from the service user’s perspective. Methods Service users (n = 98) completed questionnaires assessing their experience with VHS and current mental health status using the Kessler-6 Scale. A sub-sample was interviewed and the data qualitatively analysed (n = 14). Results The results show that 97% (n = 95) reported a positive experience with VHS and 98% (n = 96) reported VHS staff respected and listened to them. Participants reported significant improvements in relationships with others after VHS (P &lt; 0.001) and were significantly more likely to be in receipt of formal mental health care after VHS than before (P &lt; 0.01). The main emergent themes from the qualitative interviews were (i) positive communication between clinician and service users, (ii) veterinary-specific mental health services were regarded as important to understanding service users’ circumstances, (iii) knowing someone is supporting them positively impacted wellbeing and (iv) confusion with discharge status. Conclusions Most participants reported positive experiences with VHS. Quantitatively, data showed that participants reported significant improvements in relationships and access to formal mental health care after contact with VHS. Interviews with service users revealed that they felt speaking to a mental health professional with veterinary-specific knowledge was beneficial for their wellbeing. Further evaluation assessing whether VHS leads to a measurable impact on psychological wellbeing is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-7480</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-8405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32047935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Case Management - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Health Services ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Veterinarians - psychology</subject><ispartof>Occupational medicine (Oxford), 2020-05, Vol.70 (3), p.169-175</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d32d1969660cd1300385fab7fe36ea51edc48efb06133e0c523d3f1275f99a4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d32d1969660cd1300385fab7fe36ea51edc48efb06133e0c523d3f1275f99a4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allister, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, N</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of a veterinary-specific mental health service</title><title>Occupational medicine (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Occup Med (Lond)</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Veterinary professionals are at increased risk of suicide and mental health difficulties compared to the general population. Vetlife Health Support (VHS) is a mental health case management service for veterinarians with mental health difficulties. Aims To evaluate the VHS case management service from the service user’s perspective. Methods Service users (n = 98) completed questionnaires assessing their experience with VHS and current mental health status using the Kessler-6 Scale. A sub-sample was interviewed and the data qualitatively analysed (n = 14). Results The results show that 97% (n = 95) reported a positive experience with VHS and 98% (n = 96) reported VHS staff respected and listened to them. Participants reported significant improvements in relationships with others after VHS (P &lt; 0.001) and were significantly more likely to be in receipt of formal mental health care after VHS than before (P &lt; 0.01). The main emergent themes from the qualitative interviews were (i) positive communication between clinician and service users, (ii) veterinary-specific mental health services were regarded as important to understanding service users’ circumstances, (iii) knowing someone is supporting them positively impacted wellbeing and (iv) confusion with discharge status. Conclusions Most participants reported positive experiences with VHS. Quantitatively, data showed that participants reported significant improvements in relationships and access to formal mental health care after contact with VHS. Interviews with service users revealed that they felt speaking to a mental health professional with veterinary-specific knowledge was beneficial for their wellbeing. Further evaluation assessing whether VHS leads to a measurable impact on psychological wellbeing is recommended.</description><subject>Case Management - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental Health Services</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Veterinarians - psychology</subject><issn>0962-7480</issn><issn>1471-8405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AQgBdRbK1ePUqOekg7-0wWvJTiCwpe9By2m1m6mlezScF_35S0Z08DwzcfzEfIPYU5Bc0XtbUl5ovfnTFAkwsypSKhcSpAXpIpaMXiRKQwITch_ABQJVJ2TSacgUg0l1PyvKwi3JuiN52vq6h2kYn22GHrK9P-xaFB6523UYlVZ4poi6botlHAdu8t3pIrZ4qAd6c5I9-vL1-r93j9-faxWq5jy5Xu4pyznGqllQKbUw7AU-nMJnHIFRpJMbciRbcBRTlHsJLxnDvKEum0NsLxGXkcvU1b73oMXVb6YLEoTIV1HzLGpaASZAoDOh9R29YhtOiypvXl8EpGITsWy8Zi2anYcPBwcveb4_6MnxMNwNMI1H3zn-wAN4Z20g</recordid><startdate>20200527</startdate><enddate>20200527</enddate><creator>McKenzie, A</creator><creator>Allister, R</creator><creator>Humphrey, D</creator><creator>Moore, K</creator><creator>Greenberg, K</creator><creator>Greenberg, N</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200527</creationdate><title>An evaluation of a veterinary-specific mental health service</title><author>McKenzie, A ; Allister, R ; Humphrey, D ; Moore, K ; Greenberg, K ; Greenberg, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d32d1969660cd1300385fab7fe36ea51edc48efb06133e0c523d3f1275f99a4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Case Management - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental Health Services</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Veterinarians - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allister, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Occupational medicine (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKenzie, A</au><au>Allister, R</au><au>Humphrey, D</au><au>Moore, K</au><au>Greenberg, K</au><au>Greenberg, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of a veterinary-specific mental health service</atitle><jtitle>Occupational medicine (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Occup Med (Lond)</addtitle><date>2020-05-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>169-175</pages><issn>0962-7480</issn><eissn>1471-8405</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Veterinary professionals are at increased risk of suicide and mental health difficulties compared to the general population. Vetlife Health Support (VHS) is a mental health case management service for veterinarians with mental health difficulties. Aims To evaluate the VHS case management service from the service user’s perspective. Methods Service users (n = 98) completed questionnaires assessing their experience with VHS and current mental health status using the Kessler-6 Scale. A sub-sample was interviewed and the data qualitatively analysed (n = 14). Results The results show that 97% (n = 95) reported a positive experience with VHS and 98% (n = 96) reported VHS staff respected and listened to them. Participants reported significant improvements in relationships with others after VHS (P &lt; 0.001) and were significantly more likely to be in receipt of formal mental health care after VHS than before (P &lt; 0.01). The main emergent themes from the qualitative interviews were (i) positive communication between clinician and service users, (ii) veterinary-specific mental health services were regarded as important to understanding service users’ circumstances, (iii) knowing someone is supporting them positively impacted wellbeing and (iv) confusion with discharge status. Conclusions Most participants reported positive experiences with VHS. Quantitatively, data showed that participants reported significant improvements in relationships and access to formal mental health care after contact with VHS. Interviews with service users revealed that they felt speaking to a mental health professional with veterinary-specific knowledge was beneficial for their wellbeing. Further evaluation assessing whether VHS leads to a measurable impact on psychological wellbeing is recommended.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32047935</pmid><doi>10.1093/occmed/kqaa017</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-7480
ispartof Occupational medicine (Oxford), 2020-05, Vol.70 (3), p.169-175
issn 0962-7480
1471-8405
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2354150580
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Case Management - organization & administration
Humans
Mental Disorders
Mental Health Services
Surveys and Questionnaires
Veterinarians - psychology
title An evaluation of a veterinary-specific mental health service
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T17%3A07%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20a%20veterinary-specific%20mental%20health%20service&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20medicine%20(Oxford)&rft.au=McKenzie,%20A&rft.date=2020-05-27&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=169-175&rft.issn=0962-7480&rft.eissn=1471-8405&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqaa017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354150580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354150580&rft_id=info:pmid/32047935&rft_oup_id=10.1093/occmed/kqaa017&rfr_iscdi=true