A comparative study of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) challenge methods in Penaeus vannamei

•Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei challenge methods were compared to produce inoculum for research.•Reverse gavage and hepatopancreas injection initiated intense EHP infection in shrimp.•HP injection could be a robust and rapid means of amplifying EHP inoculum. The microsporidium Enterocytozoon hepatopen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of invertebrate pathology 2020-03, Vol.171, p.107336-107336, Article 107336
Hauptverfasser: Mai, Hung Nam, Cruz-Flores, Roberto, Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando, White, Brenda Noble, Dhar, Arun K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107336
container_issue
container_start_page 107336
container_title Journal of invertebrate pathology
container_volume 171
creator Mai, Hung Nam
Cruz-Flores, Roberto
Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando
White, Brenda Noble
Dhar, Arun K.
description •Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei challenge methods were compared to produce inoculum for research.•Reverse gavage and hepatopancreas injection initiated intense EHP infection in shrimp.•HP injection could be a robust and rapid means of amplifying EHP inoculum. The microsporidium Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) is considered as an emerging pathogen threating the shrimp industry worldwide. It is an intracellular parasite that has been associated with retarded growth syndrome and white feces syndrome in shrimp. Although the impact of EHP to the shrimp industry is well known, many aspects of host-pathogen interactions are not well understood. A major limitation in the study of EHP is the lack of a reliable method to produce large quantities of inoculum rapidly and reproducibly. The present study was designed to compare different challenge methods including intramuscular injection, oral administration, co-habitation, hepatopancreas (HP) injection and reverse gavage. The results showed that the HP injection and the reverse gavage are two promising methods to infect shrimp rapidly and generate inoculum in a reproducible manner starting with a limited amount of inoculum. Therefore, the HP injection and reverse gavage were chosen for a scale-up study. Histopathology results showed that EHP proliferated in the epithelial cells of the HP in shrimp challenged via direct injection of inoculum into HP and reverse gavage treatments. In accordance with the histopathology results, the qPCR data showed that EHP loads in the challenged shrimp increased significantly with the HP injection and reverse gavage methods. Furthermore, the histopathological and quantification results indicate that HP injection and reverse gavage are two novel methods that can be used in EHP-challenge studies and for rapidly generating viable EHP inoculum.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107336
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353581672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022201119303775</els_id><sourcerecordid>2353581672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c771c92692aa56c8d4a462d26f789d671638aae5b5a1fc430a915c888500e4c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KBAvlB_RS-UgP2fojdhJxQmj5kJDKob3WGpxJ16vEDraz0vbXk9UCR04zIz3vK81DyDfOlpxx_XOz3LhxKZjY35WU-gtZcNbogtVMHZEFY0IUgnF-Ss5S2rB5U7o5IadSsLKUmi3I32tqwzBChOy2SFOe2h0NHV35jDHYXQ7_Q_B0jSPkMKIHdPRydf_0g9o19D36f0gHzOvQJuo8fdoTU6Jb8B4GdF_JcQd9wou3eU7-3K5-39wXj7_uHm6uHwsrG50LW1XcNkI3AkBpW7cllFq0QndV3bS64lrWAKieFfDOlpJBw5Wt61oxhqVt5Dm5PPSOMbxMmLIZXLLY9-AxTMkIqaSqua7EjPIDamNIKWJnxugGiDvDmdlrNRszazV7reagdc58f6ufngdsPxLvHmfg6gDg_OTWYTTJOvQWWxfRZtMG90n9K15Lh30</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353581672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) challenge methods in Penaeus vannamei</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Mai, Hung Nam ; Cruz-Flores, Roberto ; Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando ; White, Brenda Noble ; Dhar, Arun K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mai, Hung Nam ; Cruz-Flores, Roberto ; Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando ; White, Brenda Noble ; Dhar, Arun K.</creatorcontrib><description>•Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei challenge methods were compared to produce inoculum for research.•Reverse gavage and hepatopancreas injection initiated intense EHP infection in shrimp.•HP injection could be a robust and rapid means of amplifying EHP inoculum. The microsporidium Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) is considered as an emerging pathogen threating the shrimp industry worldwide. It is an intracellular parasite that has been associated with retarded growth syndrome and white feces syndrome in shrimp. Although the impact of EHP to the shrimp industry is well known, many aspects of host-pathogen interactions are not well understood. A major limitation in the study of EHP is the lack of a reliable method to produce large quantities of inoculum rapidly and reproducibly. The present study was designed to compare different challenge methods including intramuscular injection, oral administration, co-habitation, hepatopancreas (HP) injection and reverse gavage. The results showed that the HP injection and the reverse gavage are two promising methods to infect shrimp rapidly and generate inoculum in a reproducible manner starting with a limited amount of inoculum. Therefore, the HP injection and reverse gavage were chosen for a scale-up study. Histopathology results showed that EHP proliferated in the epithelial cells of the HP in shrimp challenged via direct injection of inoculum into HP and reverse gavage treatments. In accordance with the histopathology results, the qPCR data showed that EHP loads in the challenged shrimp increased significantly with the HP injection and reverse gavage methods. Furthermore, the histopathological and quantification results indicate that HP injection and reverse gavage are two novel methods that can be used in EHP-challenge studies and for rapidly generating viable EHP inoculum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32044360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Animals ; Aquaculture ; Bioassay ; Co-habitation ; EHP ; Enterocytozoon - physiology ; Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei ; Hepatopancreas ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; Injections, Intramuscular ; Parasitology - methods ; Penaeidae - parasitology ; Reverse gavage ; Shrimp</subject><ispartof>Journal of invertebrate pathology, 2020-03, Vol.171, p.107336-107336, Article 107336</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c771c92692aa56c8d4a462d26f789d671638aae5b5a1fc430a915c888500e4c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c771c92692aa56c8d4a462d26f789d671638aae5b5a1fc430a915c888500e4c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2020.107336$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32044360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mai, Hung Nam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz-Flores, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Brenda Noble</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Arun K.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) challenge methods in Penaeus vannamei</title><title>Journal of invertebrate pathology</title><addtitle>J Invertebr Pathol</addtitle><description>•Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei challenge methods were compared to produce inoculum for research.•Reverse gavage and hepatopancreas injection initiated intense EHP infection in shrimp.•HP injection could be a robust and rapid means of amplifying EHP inoculum. The microsporidium Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) is considered as an emerging pathogen threating the shrimp industry worldwide. It is an intracellular parasite that has been associated with retarded growth syndrome and white feces syndrome in shrimp. Although the impact of EHP to the shrimp industry is well known, many aspects of host-pathogen interactions are not well understood. A major limitation in the study of EHP is the lack of a reliable method to produce large quantities of inoculum rapidly and reproducibly. The present study was designed to compare different challenge methods including intramuscular injection, oral administration, co-habitation, hepatopancreas (HP) injection and reverse gavage. The results showed that the HP injection and the reverse gavage are two promising methods to infect shrimp rapidly and generate inoculum in a reproducible manner starting with a limited amount of inoculum. Therefore, the HP injection and reverse gavage were chosen for a scale-up study. Histopathology results showed that EHP proliferated in the epithelial cells of the HP in shrimp challenged via direct injection of inoculum into HP and reverse gavage treatments. In accordance with the histopathology results, the qPCR data showed that EHP loads in the challenged shrimp increased significantly with the HP injection and reverse gavage methods. Furthermore, the histopathological and quantification results indicate that HP injection and reverse gavage are two novel methods that can be used in EHP-challenge studies and for rapidly generating viable EHP inoculum.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Bioassay</subject><subject>Co-habitation</subject><subject>EHP</subject><subject>Enterocytozoon - physiology</subject><subject>Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei</subject><subject>Hepatopancreas</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular</subject><subject>Parasitology - methods</subject><subject>Penaeidae - parasitology</subject><subject>Reverse gavage</subject><subject>Shrimp</subject><issn>0022-2011</issn><issn>1096-0805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KBAvlB_RS-UgP2fojdhJxQmj5kJDKob3WGpxJ16vEDraz0vbXk9UCR04zIz3vK81DyDfOlpxx_XOz3LhxKZjY35WU-gtZcNbogtVMHZEFY0IUgnF-Ss5S2rB5U7o5IadSsLKUmi3I32tqwzBChOy2SFOe2h0NHV35jDHYXQ7_Q_B0jSPkMKIHdPRydf_0g9o19D36f0gHzOvQJuo8fdoTU6Jb8B4GdF_JcQd9wou3eU7-3K5-39wXj7_uHm6uHwsrG50LW1XcNkI3AkBpW7cllFq0QndV3bS64lrWAKieFfDOlpJBw5Wt61oxhqVt5Dm5PPSOMbxMmLIZXLLY9-AxTMkIqaSqua7EjPIDamNIKWJnxugGiDvDmdlrNRszazV7reagdc58f6ufngdsPxLvHmfg6gDg_OTWYTTJOvQWWxfRZtMG90n9K15Lh30</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Mai, Hung Nam</creator><creator>Cruz-Flores, Roberto</creator><creator>Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando</creator><creator>White, Brenda Noble</creator><creator>Dhar, Arun K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>A comparative study of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) challenge methods in Penaeus vannamei</title><author>Mai, Hung Nam ; Cruz-Flores, Roberto ; Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando ; White, Brenda Noble ; Dhar, Arun K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-c771c92692aa56c8d4a462d26f789d671638aae5b5a1fc430a915c888500e4c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Bioassay</topic><topic>Co-habitation</topic><topic>EHP</topic><topic>Enterocytozoon - physiology</topic><topic>Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei</topic><topic>Hepatopancreas</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular</topic><topic>Parasitology - methods</topic><topic>Penaeidae - parasitology</topic><topic>Reverse gavage</topic><topic>Shrimp</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mai, Hung Nam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz-Flores, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Brenda Noble</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Arun K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of invertebrate pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mai, Hung Nam</au><au>Cruz-Flores, Roberto</au><au>Aranguren Caro, Luis Fernando</au><au>White, Brenda Noble</au><au>Dhar, Arun K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) challenge methods in Penaeus vannamei</atitle><jtitle>Journal of invertebrate pathology</jtitle><addtitle>J Invertebr Pathol</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>171</volume><spage>107336</spage><epage>107336</epage><pages>107336-107336</pages><artnum>107336</artnum><issn>0022-2011</issn><eissn>1096-0805</eissn><abstract>•Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei challenge methods were compared to produce inoculum for research.•Reverse gavage and hepatopancreas injection initiated intense EHP infection in shrimp.•HP injection could be a robust and rapid means of amplifying EHP inoculum. The microsporidium Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) is considered as an emerging pathogen threating the shrimp industry worldwide. It is an intracellular parasite that has been associated with retarded growth syndrome and white feces syndrome in shrimp. Although the impact of EHP to the shrimp industry is well known, many aspects of host-pathogen interactions are not well understood. A major limitation in the study of EHP is the lack of a reliable method to produce large quantities of inoculum rapidly and reproducibly. The present study was designed to compare different challenge methods including intramuscular injection, oral administration, co-habitation, hepatopancreas (HP) injection and reverse gavage. The results showed that the HP injection and the reverse gavage are two promising methods to infect shrimp rapidly and generate inoculum in a reproducible manner starting with a limited amount of inoculum. Therefore, the HP injection and reverse gavage were chosen for a scale-up study. Histopathology results showed that EHP proliferated in the epithelial cells of the HP in shrimp challenged via direct injection of inoculum into HP and reverse gavage treatments. In accordance with the histopathology results, the qPCR data showed that EHP loads in the challenged shrimp increased significantly with the HP injection and reverse gavage methods. Furthermore, the histopathological and quantification results indicate that HP injection and reverse gavage are two novel methods that can be used in EHP-challenge studies and for rapidly generating viable EHP inoculum.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32044360</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jip.2020.107336</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2011
ispartof Journal of invertebrate pathology, 2020-03, Vol.171, p.107336-107336, Article 107336
issn 0022-2011
1096-0805
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353581672
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Administration, Oral
Animals
Aquaculture
Bioassay
Co-habitation
EHP
Enterocytozoon - physiology
Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei
Hepatopancreas
Host-Parasite Interactions
Injections, Intramuscular
Parasitology - methods
Penaeidae - parasitology
Reverse gavage
Shrimp
title A comparative study of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) challenge methods in Penaeus vannamei
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A45%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20Enterocytozoon%20hepatopenaei%20(EHP)%20challenge%20methods%20in%20Penaeus%20vannamei&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20invertebrate%20pathology&rft.au=Mai,%20Hung%20Nam&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=171&rft.spage=107336&rft.epage=107336&rft.pages=107336-107336&rft.artnum=107336&rft.issn=0022-2011&rft.eissn=1096-0805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jip.2020.107336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353581672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353581672&rft_id=info:pmid/32044360&rft_els_id=S0022201119303775&rfr_iscdi=true