Adherence to the distress screening through oncology nurses and integration of screening results into the nursing process to adapt psychosocial nursing care five years after implementation

Addressing psychosocial distress is an essential part of cancer care. Therefore, nurses at the University Hospital Zurich have been screening all cancer inpatients with the Distress Thermometer (DT) since 2012. Screening is ineffective without any form of psychosocial intervention. We aimed to ident...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society 2020-04, Vol.45, p.101725-101725, Article 101725
Hauptverfasser: Götz, Anna, Kröner, A., Jenewein, J., Spirig, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101725
container_issue
container_start_page 101725
container_title European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society
container_volume 45
creator Götz, Anna
Kröner, A.
Jenewein, J.
Spirig, R.
description Addressing psychosocial distress is an essential part of cancer care. Therefore, nurses at the University Hospital Zurich have been screening all cancer inpatients with the Distress Thermometer (DT) since 2012. Screening is ineffective without any form of psychosocial intervention. We aimed to identify adherence to the screening protocol and how the reported problems influenced the nursing process. We compared changes in the documentation before and after screening implementation. This retrospective descriptive study used screening data and documentation of psychosocial items in the nursing process of inpatients at an oncologic ward. These data were compared with data obtained before screening implementation and were collected from electronic health records. All data were analyzed descriptively. 65% (N = 1111) of the 2166 inpatients were screened. With the implementation, more psycho-oncological referrals were made (4.5% vs. 11.7%) and more psychosocial issues were described in the nursing process (24.6% vs. 51.2%). Inpatients mentioned emotional problems in 37.5% (N = 353) and physical problems in 47.4% (N = 504) of cases. 15.7% (147) had a psychosocial nursing diagnosis. Only 10.7% (N = 26) of patients who noted anxiety, also had a nursing diagnosis of “anxiety”. In contrast, 71.1% (N = 202) of patients who noted pain, had a nursing diagnosis of “pain”. Although nurses are more sensitised to psychosocial issues after DT implementation, they do not use screening results to adapt nursing documentation to the psychosocial needs of the patients. Further studies are needed to investigate how distress screening and psychosocial issues can be integrated into nurses’ daily work. •With the implementation of the Distress Thermometer nurses are more sensitised to psychosocial issues.•More psychosocial topics are mentioned in the nursing documentation.•Referral rate is higher but still low.•Nurses do not use screening results to adapt the nursing process.•Nursing diagnoses are not congruent with patient reported problems at the problem list.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101725
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353581548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1462388920300053</els_id><sourcerecordid>2353581548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ce3bf51cc7eff99b0f875008a1abbcfb9d4d261c921095b92f47a4f2d3ce7b5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhSMEog_4AyyQl2wy-BFPEolNVfGSKrGBteXY1zMeJXbwdSrNf-PH1WlKxYqVrePvnHutU1XvGN0xyvYfTzs4xbDjlD8KLZcvqksmBa854_xluTd7Xouu6y-qK8QTpbQXbfe6uhCcNk3L2WX158YeIUEwQHIk-QjEeswJEAmaBBB8OBQ5xeVwJDGYOMbDmYQlISDRwRIfMhySzj4GEt0_ppKxjBlXYAteTevDnKJZ84usrZ4zmfFsjhGj8Xp8poxOQJy_B3IGncoslyERP80jTBDy48A31SunR4S3T-d19evL55-33-q7H1-_397c1UbIfa4NiMFJZkwLzvX9QF3XSko7zfQwGDf0trF8z0zPGe3l0HPXtLpx3AoD7SBBXFcfttyy-u8FMKvJo4Fx1AHigooLKWTHZNMVlG-oSRExgVNz8pNOZ8WoWltTJ7W2ptbW1NZaMb1_yl-GCeyz5W9NBfi0AVB-ee8hKTR-Lc36BCYrG_3_8h8AnLivvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353581548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adherence to the distress screening through oncology nurses and integration of screening results into the nursing process to adapt psychosocial nursing care five years after implementation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Götz, Anna ; Kröner, A. ; Jenewein, J. ; Spirig, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Götz, Anna ; Kröner, A. ; Jenewein, J. ; Spirig, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Addressing psychosocial distress is an essential part of cancer care. Therefore, nurses at the University Hospital Zurich have been screening all cancer inpatients with the Distress Thermometer (DT) since 2012. Screening is ineffective without any form of psychosocial intervention. We aimed to identify adherence to the screening protocol and how the reported problems influenced the nursing process. We compared changes in the documentation before and after screening implementation. This retrospective descriptive study used screening data and documentation of psychosocial items in the nursing process of inpatients at an oncologic ward. These data were compared with data obtained before screening implementation and were collected from electronic health records. All data were analyzed descriptively. 65% (N = 1111) of the 2166 inpatients were screened. With the implementation, more psycho-oncological referrals were made (4.5% vs. 11.7%) and more psychosocial issues were described in the nursing process (24.6% vs. 51.2%). Inpatients mentioned emotional problems in 37.5% (N = 353) and physical problems in 47.4% (N = 504) of cases. 15.7% (147) had a psychosocial nursing diagnosis. Only 10.7% (N = 26) of patients who noted anxiety, also had a nursing diagnosis of “anxiety”. In contrast, 71.1% (N = 202) of patients who noted pain, had a nursing diagnosis of “pain”. Although nurses are more sensitised to psychosocial issues after DT implementation, they do not use screening results to adapt nursing documentation to the psychosocial needs of the patients. Further studies are needed to investigate how distress screening and psychosocial issues can be integrated into nurses’ daily work. •With the implementation of the Distress Thermometer nurses are more sensitised to psychosocial issues.•More psychosocial topics are mentioned in the nursing documentation.•Referral rate is higher but still low.•Nurses do not use screening results to adapt the nursing process.•Nursing diagnoses are not congruent with patient reported problems at the problem list.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-3889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2122</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101725</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32044721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Distress screening ; Distress thermometer ; Nursing ; Nursing documentation ; Nursing process ; Psycho-oncological referrals</subject><ispartof>European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 2020-04, Vol.45, p.101725-101725, Article 101725</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ce3bf51cc7eff99b0f875008a1abbcfb9d4d261c921095b92f47a4f2d3ce7b5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ce3bf51cc7eff99b0f875008a1abbcfb9d4d261c921095b92f47a4f2d3ce7b5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388920300053$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32044721$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Götz, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröner, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenewein, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spirig, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Adherence to the distress screening through oncology nurses and integration of screening results into the nursing process to adapt psychosocial nursing care five years after implementation</title><title>European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society</title><addtitle>Eur J Oncol Nurs</addtitle><description>Addressing psychosocial distress is an essential part of cancer care. Therefore, nurses at the University Hospital Zurich have been screening all cancer inpatients with the Distress Thermometer (DT) since 2012. Screening is ineffective without any form of psychosocial intervention. We aimed to identify adherence to the screening protocol and how the reported problems influenced the nursing process. We compared changes in the documentation before and after screening implementation. This retrospective descriptive study used screening data and documentation of psychosocial items in the nursing process of inpatients at an oncologic ward. These data were compared with data obtained before screening implementation and were collected from electronic health records. All data were analyzed descriptively. 65% (N = 1111) of the 2166 inpatients were screened. With the implementation, more psycho-oncological referrals were made (4.5% vs. 11.7%) and more psychosocial issues were described in the nursing process (24.6% vs. 51.2%). Inpatients mentioned emotional problems in 37.5% (N = 353) and physical problems in 47.4% (N = 504) of cases. 15.7% (147) had a psychosocial nursing diagnosis. Only 10.7% (N = 26) of patients who noted anxiety, also had a nursing diagnosis of “anxiety”. In contrast, 71.1% (N = 202) of patients who noted pain, had a nursing diagnosis of “pain”. Although nurses are more sensitised to psychosocial issues after DT implementation, they do not use screening results to adapt nursing documentation to the psychosocial needs of the patients. Further studies are needed to investigate how distress screening and psychosocial issues can be integrated into nurses’ daily work. •With the implementation of the Distress Thermometer nurses are more sensitised to psychosocial issues.•More psychosocial topics are mentioned in the nursing documentation.•Referral rate is higher but still low.•Nurses do not use screening results to adapt the nursing process.•Nursing diagnoses are not congruent with patient reported problems at the problem list.</description><subject>Distress screening</subject><subject>Distress thermometer</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing documentation</subject><subject>Nursing process</subject><subject>Psycho-oncological referrals</subject><issn>1462-3889</issn><issn>1532-2122</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhSMEog_4AyyQl2wy-BFPEolNVfGSKrGBteXY1zMeJXbwdSrNf-PH1WlKxYqVrePvnHutU1XvGN0xyvYfTzs4xbDjlD8KLZcvqksmBa854_xluTd7Xouu6y-qK8QTpbQXbfe6uhCcNk3L2WX158YeIUEwQHIk-QjEeswJEAmaBBB8OBQ5xeVwJDGYOMbDmYQlISDRwRIfMhySzj4GEt0_ppKxjBlXYAteTevDnKJZ84usrZ4zmfFsjhGj8Xp8poxOQJy_B3IGncoslyERP80jTBDy48A31SunR4S3T-d19evL55-33-q7H1-_397c1UbIfa4NiMFJZkwLzvX9QF3XSko7zfQwGDf0trF8z0zPGe3l0HPXtLpx3AoD7SBBXFcfttyy-u8FMKvJo4Fx1AHigooLKWTHZNMVlG-oSRExgVNz8pNOZ8WoWltTJ7W2ptbW1NZaMb1_yl-GCeyz5W9NBfi0AVB-ee8hKTR-Lc36BCYrG_3_8h8AnLivvQ</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Götz, Anna</creator><creator>Kröner, A.</creator><creator>Jenewein, J.</creator><creator>Spirig, R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Adherence to the distress screening through oncology nurses and integration of screening results into the nursing process to adapt psychosocial nursing care five years after implementation</title><author>Götz, Anna ; Kröner, A. ; Jenewein, J. ; Spirig, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ce3bf51cc7eff99b0f875008a1abbcfb9d4d261c921095b92f47a4f2d3ce7b5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Distress screening</topic><topic>Distress thermometer</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing documentation</topic><topic>Nursing process</topic><topic>Psycho-oncological referrals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Götz, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröner, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenewein, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spirig, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Götz, Anna</au><au>Kröner, A.</au><au>Jenewein, J.</au><au>Spirig, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adherence to the distress screening through oncology nurses and integration of screening results into the nursing process to adapt psychosocial nursing care five years after implementation</atitle><jtitle>European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Oncol Nurs</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><spage>101725</spage><epage>101725</epage><pages>101725-101725</pages><artnum>101725</artnum><issn>1462-3889</issn><eissn>1532-2122</eissn><abstract>Addressing psychosocial distress is an essential part of cancer care. Therefore, nurses at the University Hospital Zurich have been screening all cancer inpatients with the Distress Thermometer (DT) since 2012. Screening is ineffective without any form of psychosocial intervention. We aimed to identify adherence to the screening protocol and how the reported problems influenced the nursing process. We compared changes in the documentation before and after screening implementation. This retrospective descriptive study used screening data and documentation of psychosocial items in the nursing process of inpatients at an oncologic ward. These data were compared with data obtained before screening implementation and were collected from electronic health records. All data were analyzed descriptively. 65% (N = 1111) of the 2166 inpatients were screened. With the implementation, more psycho-oncological referrals were made (4.5% vs. 11.7%) and more psychosocial issues were described in the nursing process (24.6% vs. 51.2%). Inpatients mentioned emotional problems in 37.5% (N = 353) and physical problems in 47.4% (N = 504) of cases. 15.7% (147) had a psychosocial nursing diagnosis. Only 10.7% (N = 26) of patients who noted anxiety, also had a nursing diagnosis of “anxiety”. In contrast, 71.1% (N = 202) of patients who noted pain, had a nursing diagnosis of “pain”. Although nurses are more sensitised to psychosocial issues after DT implementation, they do not use screening results to adapt nursing documentation to the psychosocial needs of the patients. Further studies are needed to investigate how distress screening and psychosocial issues can be integrated into nurses’ daily work. •With the implementation of the Distress Thermometer nurses are more sensitised to psychosocial issues.•More psychosocial topics are mentioned in the nursing documentation.•Referral rate is higher but still low.•Nurses do not use screening results to adapt the nursing process.•Nursing diagnoses are not congruent with patient reported problems at the problem list.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32044721</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101725</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-3889
ispartof European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 2020-04, Vol.45, p.101725-101725, Article 101725
issn 1462-3889
1532-2122
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353581548
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Distress screening
Distress thermometer
Nursing
Nursing documentation
Nursing process
Psycho-oncological referrals
title Adherence to the distress screening through oncology nurses and integration of screening results into the nursing process to adapt psychosocial nursing care five years after implementation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A32%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adherence%20to%20the%20distress%20screening%20through%20oncology%20nurses%20and%20integration%20of%20screening%20results%20into%20the%20nursing%20process%20to%20adapt%20psychosocial%20nursing%20care%20five%20years%20after%20implementation&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20oncology%20nursing%20:%20the%20official%20journal%20of%20European%20Oncology%20Nursing%20Society&rft.au=G%C3%B6tz,%20Anna&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=101725&rft.epage=101725&rft.pages=101725-101725&rft.artnum=101725&rft.issn=1462-3889&rft.eissn=1532-2122&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101725&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353581548%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353581548&rft_id=info:pmid/32044721&rft_els_id=S1462388920300053&rfr_iscdi=true