Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate
Correspondence to Professor John McMillan, Bioethics centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; john.r.mcmillan68@gmail.com The Journal of Medical Ethics has published a few papers over recent years that explore the ethical implications of ectogenesis.1–4 It is an as yet undeveloped but...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical ethics 2020-02, Vol.46 (2), p.65-65 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 65 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 65 |
| container_title | Journal of medical ethics |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | McMillan, John |
| description | Correspondence to Professor John McMillan, Bioethics centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; john.r.mcmillan68@gmail.com The Journal of Medical Ethics has published a few papers over recent years that explore the ethical implications of ectogenesis.1–4 It is an as yet undeveloped but theoretically possible method by which a fetus can be gestated outside of the womb, and while the prospects of ‘full’ ectogenesis seem some way off, there are techniques that suggest ‘partial’ ectogenesis could be closer. [...]that it might be that risks of ectogenesis to public policy and abortion (it could mean that otherwise nonviable foetuses become viable) should be weighed in an assessment of its permissibility. Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/medethics-2020-106094 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352655356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2352655356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3304-c9250957a6133901df473cdc908ac544999857e0912a7c952642737125c5d4463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-BCXgxk30zjuzlOILKm50PUxmJjYlj5pJQP-9U1MruBDv5m6-73A4CJ1iuMSYiqvaO98vSxtSAgRSDAIU20NTzCRNGeFyH02BgkhFBjBBRyGsIB7J1CGaUAKUYcyniD56V1pTJWNYYhqX5F1rnG_K5jXplz6xbdP79z5pi8T53PT-GB0Upgr-ZPtn6OX25nl-ny6e7h7m14s0pxRYahXhoLg0AlOqALsiVrPOKsiM5YwppTIuPShMjLSKE8GIpBITbrljTNAZuhhz1137NvjQ67oM1leVaXw7BE1odDinfIOe_0JX7dA1sd0XRYTEGYsUHynbtSF0vtDrrqxN96Ex6M2qereq3qyqx1Wjd7ZNH_JI7KzvGSMAI5DXq39n4h9lV_Zv5xNPlJBJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352267184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>McMillan, John</creator><creatorcontrib>McMillan, John</creatorcontrib><description>Correspondence to Professor John McMillan, Bioethics centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; john.r.mcmillan68@gmail.com The Journal of Medical Ethics has published a few papers over recent years that explore the ethical implications of ectogenesis.1–4 It is an as yet undeveloped but theoretically possible method by which a fetus can be gestated outside of the womb, and while the prospects of ‘full’ ectogenesis seem some way off, there are techniques that suggest ‘partial’ ectogenesis could be closer. [...]that it might be that risks of ectogenesis to public policy and abortion (it could mean that otherwise nonviable foetuses become viable) should be weighed in an assessment of its permissibility. Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-6800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32034115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Bioethics ; Concise argument ; Equality ; ethics ; Fetuses ; Medical ethics ; Reproductive technologies ; Siblings</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ethics, 2020-02, Vol.46 (2), p.65-65</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3304-c9250957a6133901df473cdc908ac544999857e0912a7c952642737125c5d4463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32034115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMillan, John</creatorcontrib><title>Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate</title><title>Journal of medical ethics</title><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><description>Correspondence to Professor John McMillan, Bioethics centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; john.r.mcmillan68@gmail.com The Journal of Medical Ethics has published a few papers over recent years that explore the ethical implications of ectogenesis.1–4 It is an as yet undeveloped but theoretically possible method by which a fetus can be gestated outside of the womb, and while the prospects of ‘full’ ectogenesis seem some way off, there are techniques that suggest ‘partial’ ectogenesis could be closer. [...]that it might be that risks of ectogenesis to public policy and abortion (it could mean that otherwise nonviable foetuses become viable) should be weighed in an assessment of its permissibility. Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Concise argument</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Siblings</subject><issn>0306-6800</issn><issn>1473-4257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-BCXgxk30zjuzlOILKm50PUxmJjYlj5pJQP-9U1MruBDv5m6-73A4CJ1iuMSYiqvaO98vSxtSAgRSDAIU20NTzCRNGeFyH02BgkhFBjBBRyGsIB7J1CGaUAKUYcyniD56V1pTJWNYYhqX5F1rnG_K5jXplz6xbdP79z5pi8T53PT-GB0Upgr-ZPtn6OX25nl-ny6e7h7m14s0pxRYahXhoLg0AlOqALsiVrPOKsiM5YwppTIuPShMjLSKE8GIpBITbrljTNAZuhhz1137NvjQ67oM1leVaXw7BE1odDinfIOe_0JX7dA1sd0XRYTEGYsUHynbtSF0vtDrrqxN96Ex6M2qereq3qyqx1Wjd7ZNH_JI7KzvGSMAI5DXq39n4h9lV_Zv5xNPlJBJ</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>McMillan, John</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate</title><author>McMillan, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3304-c9250957a6133901df473cdc908ac544999857e0912a7c952642737125c5d4463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Concise argument</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Siblings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMillan, John</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMillan, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Med Ethics</stitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>65-65</pages><issn>0306-6800</issn><eissn>1473-4257</eissn><abstract>Correspondence to Professor John McMillan, Bioethics centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; john.r.mcmillan68@gmail.com The Journal of Medical Ethics has published a few papers over recent years that explore the ethical implications of ectogenesis.1–4 It is an as yet undeveloped but theoretically possible method by which a fetus can be gestated outside of the womb, and while the prospects of ‘full’ ectogenesis seem some way off, there are techniques that suggest ‘partial’ ectogenesis could be closer. [...]that it might be that risks of ectogenesis to public policy and abortion (it could mean that otherwise nonviable foetuses become viable) should be weighed in an assessment of its permissibility. Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</pub><pmid>32034115</pmid><doi>10.1136/medethics-2020-106094</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0306-6800 |
| ispartof | Journal of medical ethics, 2020-02, Vol.46 (2), p.65-65 |
| issn | 0306-6800 1473-4257 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352655356 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Abortion Bioethics Concise argument Equality ethics Fetuses Medical ethics Reproductive technologies Siblings |
| title | Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A26%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical%20ethics%20and%20broadening%20the%20context%20of%20debate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ethics&rft.au=McMillan,%20John&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=65-65&rft.issn=0306-6800&rft.eissn=1473-4257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/medethics-2020-106094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2352655356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352267184&rft_id=info:pmid/32034115&rfr_iscdi=true |