Understanding the role of peace of mind in childhood vaccination: A qualitative study with members of the general public
Recent debates on the introduction of new childhood vaccines in the UK have suggested that ‘peace of mind’ (PoM) might influence decision making. The aim of this study is to ascertain the importance of ‘PoM’ in individuals’ decision making. Four focus groups were conducted in the UK. Participants we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2020-02, Vol.38 (10), p.2424-2432 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2432 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2424 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Lasseter, G. Al-Janabi, H. Trotter, C.L. Carroll, F.E. Christensen, H. |
description | Recent debates on the introduction of new childhood vaccines in the UK have suggested that ‘peace of mind’ (PoM) might influence decision making. The aim of this study is to ascertain the importance of ‘PoM’ in individuals’ decision making.
Four focus groups were conducted in the UK. Participants were 22 females and 2 males, aged 18–74 years, with a selection of non-parents, parents, guardians and foster carers. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic framework approach and conceptualised using the Health Belief Model, which provided an overview of participants’ perceptions and behaviours about childhood vaccinations.
Vaccine associated PoM was associated with individuals’ perceptions of disease severity, with individuals feeling more reassurance after obtaining vaccinations against diseases that they considered to be severe compared to relatively mild diseases. Conversely, concerns about vaccination side-effects reduced participants PoM, but the duration of this effect varied between individuals. Other factors, such as social pressure and the emotional anxiety related to children’s feelings, or physical reactions, to vaccinations also negatively impacted on participants’ vaccine associated PoM.
Vaccine associated PoM was a consideration for some participants seeking vaccinations but was only a minor motivating factor for these individuals. These differences stemmed from whether participants received PoM from the uptake of a vaccination because they perceived some intrinsic benefit from it or, conversely, they considered vaccinations as a routine health intervention. Overall, vaccine related PoM varied between participants in magnitude and fluctuated over time, even in the same individuals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352655063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X19316512</els_id><sourcerecordid>2352655063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-8d7d2cb0ecebb6ac8a1a79cb5a003e41b824e44dbcdbe2252237e8ad4389d6013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUlvFDEQRi0EIkPgJ4AsceHSTXnpjQuKIjYpUi6JxM3yUpPxqNue2O6B_Pv0MAMHLjmVS3r1quSPkLcMagas_bit99paH7DmwIaa8RpgeEZWrO9ExRvWPycr4K2sJIOfZ-RVzlsAaAQbXpIzwUGIXnYr8vs2OEy56OB8uKNlgzTFEWlc0x1q--cx-eCoD9Ru_Og2MTp6XK2Lj-ETvaD3sx59Wdo90lxm90B_-bKhE05mcR8UB-8dBkx6pLvZjN6-Ji_Wesz45lTPye3XLzeX36ur628_Li-uKisllKp3nePWAFo0ptW210x3gzWNBhAomem5RCmdsc4g5w3nosNeOyn6wbXAxDn5cPTuUryfMRc1-WxxHHXAOGfFRcPbpoFWLOj7_9BtnFNYrlNc8qYdBLR8oZojZVPMOeFa7ZKfdHpQDNQhGrVVp2jUIRrFuFqiWebeneyzmdD9m_qbxQJ8PgK4fMfeY1LZegwWnU9oi3LRP7HiEa-Lo3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425693062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the role of peace of mind in childhood vaccination: A qualitative study with members of the general public</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lasseter, G. ; Al-Janabi, H. ; Trotter, C.L. ; Carroll, F.E. ; Christensen, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasseter, G. ; Al-Janabi, H. ; Trotter, C.L. ; Carroll, F.E. ; Christensen, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent debates on the introduction of new childhood vaccines in the UK have suggested that ‘peace of mind’ (PoM) might influence decision making. The aim of this study is to ascertain the importance of ‘PoM’ in individuals’ decision making.
Four focus groups were conducted in the UK. Participants were 22 females and 2 males, aged 18–74 years, with a selection of non-parents, parents, guardians and foster carers. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic framework approach and conceptualised using the Health Belief Model, which provided an overview of participants’ perceptions and behaviours about childhood vaccinations.
Vaccine associated PoM was associated with individuals’ perceptions of disease severity, with individuals feeling more reassurance after obtaining vaccinations against diseases that they considered to be severe compared to relatively mild diseases. Conversely, concerns about vaccination side-effects reduced participants PoM, but the duration of this effect varied between individuals. Other factors, such as social pressure and the emotional anxiety related to children’s feelings, or physical reactions, to vaccinations also negatively impacted on participants’ vaccine associated PoM.
Vaccine associated PoM was a consideration for some participants seeking vaccinations but was only a minor motivating factor for these individuals. These differences stemmed from whether participants received PoM from the uptake of a vaccination because they perceived some intrinsic benefit from it or, conversely, they considered vaccinations as a routine health intervention. Overall, vaccine related PoM varied between participants in magnitude and fluctuated over time, even in the same individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32033847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Behavior ; Caregivers - psychology ; Child ; Childhood ; Children ; Committees ; Cost analysis ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Female ; Focus group ; Focus Groups ; Health Belief Model ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health promotion ; Humans ; Immunization ; Male ; Meningitis ; Middle Aged ; Mindfulness ; Motivation ; Parents ; Parents - psychology ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology ; Peace of mind ; Public opinion ; Qualitative ; Qualitative Research ; Questionnaires ; Vaccination ; Vaccination - psychology ; Vaccines ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2020-02, Vol.38 (10), p.2424-2432</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-8d7d2cb0ecebb6ac8a1a79cb5a003e41b824e44dbcdbe2252237e8ad4389d6013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-8d7d2cb0ecebb6ac8a1a79cb5a003e41b824e44dbcdbe2252237e8ad4389d6013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19316512$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasseter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Janabi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trotter, C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the role of peace of mind in childhood vaccination: A qualitative study with members of the general public</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Recent debates on the introduction of new childhood vaccines in the UK have suggested that ‘peace of mind’ (PoM) might influence decision making. The aim of this study is to ascertain the importance of ‘PoM’ in individuals’ decision making.
Four focus groups were conducted in the UK. Participants were 22 females and 2 males, aged 18–74 years, with a selection of non-parents, parents, guardians and foster carers. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic framework approach and conceptualised using the Health Belief Model, which provided an overview of participants’ perceptions and behaviours about childhood vaccinations.
Vaccine associated PoM was associated with individuals’ perceptions of disease severity, with individuals feeling more reassurance after obtaining vaccinations against diseases that they considered to be severe compared to relatively mild diseases. Conversely, concerns about vaccination side-effects reduced participants PoM, but the duration of this effect varied between individuals. Other factors, such as social pressure and the emotional anxiety related to children’s feelings, or physical reactions, to vaccinations also negatively impacted on participants’ vaccine associated PoM.
Vaccine associated PoM was a consideration for some participants seeking vaccinations but was only a minor motivating factor for these individuals. These differences stemmed from whether participants received PoM from the uptake of a vaccination because they perceived some intrinsic benefit from it or, conversely, they considered vaccinations as a routine health intervention. Overall, vaccine related PoM varied between participants in magnitude and fluctuated over time, even in the same individuals.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus group</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health Belief Model</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meningitis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mindfulness</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</subject><subject>Peace of mind</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Qualitative</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination - psychology</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUlvFDEQRi0EIkPgJ4AsceHSTXnpjQuKIjYpUi6JxM3yUpPxqNue2O6B_Pv0MAMHLjmVS3r1quSPkLcMagas_bit99paH7DmwIaa8RpgeEZWrO9ExRvWPycr4K2sJIOfZ-RVzlsAaAQbXpIzwUGIXnYr8vs2OEy56OB8uKNlgzTFEWlc0x1q--cx-eCoD9Ru_Og2MTp6XK2Lj-ETvaD3sx59Wdo90lxm90B_-bKhE05mcR8UB-8dBkx6pLvZjN6-Ji_Wesz45lTPye3XLzeX36ur628_Li-uKisllKp3nePWAFo0ptW210x3gzWNBhAomem5RCmdsc4g5w3nosNeOyn6wbXAxDn5cPTuUryfMRc1-WxxHHXAOGfFRcPbpoFWLOj7_9BtnFNYrlNc8qYdBLR8oZojZVPMOeFa7ZKfdHpQDNQhGrVVp2jUIRrFuFqiWebeneyzmdD9m_qbxQJ8PgK4fMfeY1LZegwWnU9oi3LRP7HiEa-Lo3A</recordid><startdate>20200228</startdate><enddate>20200228</enddate><creator>Lasseter, G.</creator><creator>Al-Janabi, H.</creator><creator>Trotter, C.L.</creator><creator>Carroll, F.E.</creator><creator>Christensen, H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200228</creationdate><title>Understanding the role of peace of mind in childhood vaccination: A qualitative study with members of the general public</title><author>Lasseter, G. ; Al-Janabi, H. ; Trotter, C.L. ; Carroll, F.E. ; Christensen, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-8d7d2cb0ecebb6ac8a1a79cb5a003e41b824e44dbcdbe2252237e8ad4389d6013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus group</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health Belief Model</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meningitis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mindfulness</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</topic><topic>Peace of mind</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Qualitative</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination - psychology</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasseter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Janabi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trotter, C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasseter, G.</au><au>Al-Janabi, H.</au><au>Trotter, C.L.</au><au>Carroll, F.E.</au><au>Christensen, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the role of peace of mind in childhood vaccination: A qualitative study with members of the general public</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2020-02-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2424</spage><epage>2432</epage><pages>2424-2432</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Recent debates on the introduction of new childhood vaccines in the UK have suggested that ‘peace of mind’ (PoM) might influence decision making. The aim of this study is to ascertain the importance of ‘PoM’ in individuals’ decision making.
Four focus groups were conducted in the UK. Participants were 22 females and 2 males, aged 18–74 years, with a selection of non-parents, parents, guardians and foster carers. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic framework approach and conceptualised using the Health Belief Model, which provided an overview of participants’ perceptions and behaviours about childhood vaccinations.
Vaccine associated PoM was associated with individuals’ perceptions of disease severity, with individuals feeling more reassurance after obtaining vaccinations against diseases that they considered to be severe compared to relatively mild diseases. Conversely, concerns about vaccination side-effects reduced participants PoM, but the duration of this effect varied between individuals. Other factors, such as social pressure and the emotional anxiety related to children’s feelings, or physical reactions, to vaccinations also negatively impacted on participants’ vaccine associated PoM.
Vaccine associated PoM was a consideration for some participants seeking vaccinations but was only a minor motivating factor for these individuals. These differences stemmed from whether participants received PoM from the uptake of a vaccination because they perceived some intrinsic benefit from it or, conversely, they considered vaccinations as a routine health intervention. Overall, vaccine related PoM varied between participants in magnitude and fluctuated over time, even in the same individuals.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32033847</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.009</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2020-02, Vol.38 (10), p.2424-2432 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352655063 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Behavior Caregivers - psychology Child Childhood Children Committees Cost analysis Data analysis Data collection Decision making Female Focus group Focus Groups Health Belief Model Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health promotion Humans Immunization Male Meningitis Middle Aged Mindfulness Motivation Parents Parents - psychology Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology Peace of mind Public opinion Qualitative Qualitative Research Questionnaires Vaccination Vaccination - psychology Vaccines Young Adult |
title | Understanding the role of peace of mind in childhood vaccination: A qualitative study with members of the general public |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A58%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20role%20of%20peace%20of%20mind%20in%20childhood%20vaccination:%20A%20qualitative%20study%20with%20members%20of%20the%20general%20public&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Lasseter,%20G.&rft.date=2020-02-28&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2424&rft.epage=2432&rft.pages=2424-2432&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2352655063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425693062&rft_id=info:pmid/32033847&rft_els_id=S0264410X19316512&rfr_iscdi=true |