Evaluation of different sponge types on the survival and infectivity of stored entomopathogenic nematodes

[Display omitted] •Sponges are used in the formulation of mass-produced nematodes.•Sponges are employed in laboratories to store nematodes or to transport them from one laboratory to another.•Different sponge types have different effects on the survival and infectivity of stored nematodes.•Polyureth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of invertebrate pathology 2020-03, Vol.171, p.107332-107332, Article 107332
Hauptverfasser: Touray, Mustapha, Gulcu, Baris, Ulug, Derya, Gulsen, Sebnem H., Cimen, Harun, Kaya, Harry K., Cakmak, Ibrahim, Hazir, Selcuk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107332
container_issue
container_start_page 107332
container_title Journal of invertebrate pathology
container_volume 171
creator Touray, Mustapha
Gulcu, Baris
Ulug, Derya
Gulsen, Sebnem H.
Cimen, Harun
Kaya, Harry K.
Cakmak, Ibrahim
Hazir, Selcuk
description [Display omitted] •Sponges are used in the formulation of mass-produced nematodes.•Sponges are employed in laboratories to store nematodes or to transport them from one laboratory to another.•Different sponge types have different effects on the survival and infectivity of stored nematodes.•Polyurethane, melamine, and cellulose sponges were the best for nematode storage.•Oasis floral sponge can be preferred for short-term IJ formulation and storage for field applications. Sponges are one of the cheapest and most suitable substrates used to formulate and/or store the infective juveniles (IJs) of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). Our study investigated the survival and infectivity of the IJs on five different sponges compared to that in an aqueous suspension (control). The sponges were Oasis® floral, Nanosponge, ScotchbriteTM, or Lysol® and natural sea sponge. EPN species tested were Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, Steinernema carpocapsae and S. feltiae. The recovery efficiency of the IJs from sponges was initially assessed. Subsequently, IJs were stored in the sponges and placed in plastic bags or Falcon tubes and incubated at 10° or 27 °C for 8 months or 11 weeks, respectively. IJ survival and infectivity were monitored monthly for the 10 °C and weekly for 27 °C in these sponge types. The IJs were recovered from the sponges, and their survival was based on observing their movement under a dissecting microscope, and infectivity was based on larval mortality in Galleria mellonella. Recovery efficiency of IJs was best for the Oasis floral sponge for all nematode species ranging between 83 and 91%. The survival and infectivity of stored IJs in all sponge types and control for both 10° and 27 °C gradually decreased over time. IJs stored in Scotchbrite, Lysol, and Nanosponge had the best survival and infectivity, whereas Oasis floral and natural sea sponges showed the poorest results. After 8 months at 10 °C in plastic bags, the survival ratio of all IJs in these three sponges (Scotchbrite, Lysol, and Nanosponge) was approximately 55%. IJs in Scotchbrite and Nanosponge were also able to survive and retain their infectivity at 27 °C for 3 months. IJs stored in Falcon tubes had survival that ranged from 26 to 53% at 27 °C and 55 to 77% at 10 °C. H. bacteriophora IJs lost their infectivity when stored at 27 °C after 10 weeks. However, S. carpocapsae and S. feltiae exhibited 85% infectivity when stored in Scotchbrite and 50% in Nanosponge, respectively. Overall, spon
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107332
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352640013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002220111930401X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2352640013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f24c7c9922ff0dea8f3ee3c4d59808bd75d97f06115621193e891ba678723c983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1uGyEURlHUqHaSPkA2FctuxuXHMwPqqoqSNFKkbpI1wnBJsDwwBcaS3z6Mxu2yq8sV5_ukexC6pWRDCe2-7zd7P24YYfPec84u0JoS2TVEkPYTWhPCWMMIpSt0lfOe1Ffbyc9oxWumF4Kukb8_6sOki48BR4etdw4ShILzGMMb4HIaIeP6Wd4B5ykdfeWxDhb74MAUf_TlNCdziQksrtE4xFGX9_gGwRscYNAlWsg36NLpQ4Yv53mNXh_uX-5-Nc-_H5_ufj43hre8NI5tTW-kZMw5YkELxwG42dpWCiJ2tm-t7B3p5lMYpZKDkHSnu170jBsp-DX6tvSOKf6ZIBc1-GzgcNAB4pQV4y3rttUFryhdUJNizgmcGpMfdDopStRsWO1VNaxmw2oxXDNfz_XTbgD7L_FXaQV-LADUI48eksrGQzBgfarClI3-P_UfMFWM-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352640013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different sponge types on the survival and infectivity of stored entomopathogenic nematodes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Touray, Mustapha ; Gulcu, Baris ; Ulug, Derya ; Gulsen, Sebnem H. ; Cimen, Harun ; Kaya, Harry K. ; Cakmak, Ibrahim ; Hazir, Selcuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Touray, Mustapha ; Gulcu, Baris ; Ulug, Derya ; Gulsen, Sebnem H. ; Cimen, Harun ; Kaya, Harry K. ; Cakmak, Ibrahim ; Hazir, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Sponges are used in the formulation of mass-produced nematodes.•Sponges are employed in laboratories to store nematodes or to transport them from one laboratory to another.•Different sponge types have different effects on the survival and infectivity of stored nematodes.•Polyurethane, melamine, and cellulose sponges were the best for nematode storage.•Oasis floral sponge can be preferred for short-term IJ formulation and storage for field applications. Sponges are one of the cheapest and most suitable substrates used to formulate and/or store the infective juveniles (IJs) of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). Our study investigated the survival and infectivity of the IJs on five different sponges compared to that in an aqueous suspension (control). The sponges were Oasis® floral, Nanosponge, ScotchbriteTM, or Lysol® and natural sea sponge. EPN species tested were Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, Steinernema carpocapsae and S. feltiae. The recovery efficiency of the IJs from sponges was initially assessed. Subsequently, IJs were stored in the sponges and placed in plastic bags or Falcon tubes and incubated at 10° or 27 °C for 8 months or 11 weeks, respectively. IJ survival and infectivity were monitored monthly for the 10 °C and weekly for 27 °C in these sponge types. The IJs were recovered from the sponges, and their survival was based on observing their movement under a dissecting microscope, and infectivity was based on larval mortality in Galleria mellonella. Recovery efficiency of IJs was best for the Oasis floral sponge for all nematode species ranging between 83 and 91%. The survival and infectivity of stored IJs in all sponge types and control for both 10° and 27 °C gradually decreased over time. IJs stored in Scotchbrite, Lysol, and Nanosponge had the best survival and infectivity, whereas Oasis floral and natural sea sponges showed the poorest results. After 8 months at 10 °C in plastic bags, the survival ratio of all IJs in these three sponges (Scotchbrite, Lysol, and Nanosponge) was approximately 55%. IJs in Scotchbrite and Nanosponge were also able to survive and retain their infectivity at 27 °C for 3 months. IJs stored in Falcon tubes had survival that ranged from 26 to 53% at 27 °C and 55 to 77% at 10 °C. H. bacteriophora IJs lost their infectivity when stored at 27 °C after 10 weeks. However, S. carpocapsae and S. feltiae exhibited 85% infectivity when stored in Scotchbrite and 50% in Nanosponge, respectively. Overall, sponges made from polyurethane (Scotchbrite) followed by melamine (Nanosponge) and cellulose (Lysol) are recommended for long-term nematode storage and transportation of nematode samples. However, Oasis floral sponge may be preferred for short-term IJ formulation for field applications because of easier recovery of IJs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32027881</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological control ; Entomopathogenic nematodes ; Formulation ; Heterorhabditis ; Insect Control - methods ; Larva - growth &amp; development ; Larva - parasitology ; Longevity ; Moths - growth &amp; development ; Moths - parasitology ; Pest Control, Biological - methods ; Rhabditida - physiology ; Specimen Handling - instrumentation ; Specimen Handling - methods ; Steinernema ; Storage</subject><ispartof>Journal of invertebrate pathology, 2020-03, Vol.171, p.107332-107332, Article 107332</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f24c7c9922ff0dea8f3ee3c4d59808bd75d97f06115621193e891ba678723c983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f24c7c9922ff0dea8f3ee3c4d59808bd75d97f06115621193e891ba678723c983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2020.107332$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32027881$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Touray, Mustapha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulcu, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulug, Derya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulsen, Sebnem H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimen, Harun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Harry K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmak, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazir, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different sponge types on the survival and infectivity of stored entomopathogenic nematodes</title><title>Journal of invertebrate pathology</title><addtitle>J Invertebr Pathol</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] •Sponges are used in the formulation of mass-produced nematodes.•Sponges are employed in laboratories to store nematodes or to transport them from one laboratory to another.•Different sponge types have different effects on the survival and infectivity of stored nematodes.•Polyurethane, melamine, and cellulose sponges were the best for nematode storage.•Oasis floral sponge can be preferred for short-term IJ formulation and storage for field applications. Sponges are one of the cheapest and most suitable substrates used to formulate and/or store the infective juveniles (IJs) of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). Our study investigated the survival and infectivity of the IJs on five different sponges compared to that in an aqueous suspension (control). The sponges were Oasis® floral, Nanosponge, ScotchbriteTM, or Lysol® and natural sea sponge. EPN species tested were Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, Steinernema carpocapsae and S. feltiae. The recovery efficiency of the IJs from sponges was initially assessed. Subsequently, IJs were stored in the sponges and placed in plastic bags or Falcon tubes and incubated at 10° or 27 °C for 8 months or 11 weeks, respectively. IJ survival and infectivity were monitored monthly for the 10 °C and weekly for 27 °C in these sponge types. The IJs were recovered from the sponges, and their survival was based on observing their movement under a dissecting microscope, and infectivity was based on larval mortality in Galleria mellonella. Recovery efficiency of IJs was best for the Oasis floral sponge for all nematode species ranging between 83 and 91%. The survival and infectivity of stored IJs in all sponge types and control for both 10° and 27 °C gradually decreased over time. IJs stored in Scotchbrite, Lysol, and Nanosponge had the best survival and infectivity, whereas Oasis floral and natural sea sponges showed the poorest results. After 8 months at 10 °C in plastic bags, the survival ratio of all IJs in these three sponges (Scotchbrite, Lysol, and Nanosponge) was approximately 55%. IJs in Scotchbrite and Nanosponge were also able to survive and retain their infectivity at 27 °C for 3 months. IJs stored in Falcon tubes had survival that ranged from 26 to 53% at 27 °C and 55 to 77% at 10 °C. H. bacteriophora IJs lost their infectivity when stored at 27 °C after 10 weeks. However, S. carpocapsae and S. feltiae exhibited 85% infectivity when stored in Scotchbrite and 50% in Nanosponge, respectively. Overall, sponges made from polyurethane (Scotchbrite) followed by melamine (Nanosponge) and cellulose (Lysol) are recommended for long-term nematode storage and transportation of nematode samples. However, Oasis floral sponge may be preferred for short-term IJ formulation for field applications because of easier recovery of IJs.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Entomopathogenic nematodes</subject><subject>Formulation</subject><subject>Heterorhabditis</subject><subject>Insect Control - methods</subject><subject>Larva - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Larva - parasitology</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Moths - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Moths - parasitology</subject><subject>Pest Control, Biological - methods</subject><subject>Rhabditida - physiology</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - instrumentation</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>Steinernema</subject><subject>Storage</subject><issn>0022-2011</issn><issn>1096-0805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1uGyEURlHUqHaSPkA2FctuxuXHMwPqqoqSNFKkbpI1wnBJsDwwBcaS3z6Mxu2yq8sV5_ukexC6pWRDCe2-7zd7P24YYfPec84u0JoS2TVEkPYTWhPCWMMIpSt0lfOe1Ffbyc9oxWumF4Kukb8_6sOki48BR4etdw4ShILzGMMb4HIaIeP6Wd4B5ykdfeWxDhb74MAUf_TlNCdziQksrtE4xFGX9_gGwRscYNAlWsg36NLpQ4Yv53mNXh_uX-5-Nc-_H5_ufj43hre8NI5tTW-kZMw5YkELxwG42dpWCiJ2tm-t7B3p5lMYpZKDkHSnu170jBsp-DX6tvSOKf6ZIBc1-GzgcNAB4pQV4y3rttUFryhdUJNizgmcGpMfdDopStRsWO1VNaxmw2oxXDNfz_XTbgD7L_FXaQV-LADUI48eksrGQzBgfarClI3-P_UfMFWM-w</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Touray, Mustapha</creator><creator>Gulcu, Baris</creator><creator>Ulug, Derya</creator><creator>Gulsen, Sebnem H.</creator><creator>Cimen, Harun</creator><creator>Kaya, Harry K.</creator><creator>Cakmak, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Hazir, Selcuk</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different sponge types on the survival and infectivity of stored entomopathogenic nematodes</title><author>Touray, Mustapha ; Gulcu, Baris ; Ulug, Derya ; Gulsen, Sebnem H. ; Cimen, Harun ; Kaya, Harry K. ; Cakmak, Ibrahim ; Hazir, Selcuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f24c7c9922ff0dea8f3ee3c4d59808bd75d97f06115621193e891ba678723c983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Entomopathogenic nematodes</topic><topic>Formulation</topic><topic>Heterorhabditis</topic><topic>Insect Control - methods</topic><topic>Larva - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Larva - parasitology</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Moths - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Moths - parasitology</topic><topic>Pest Control, Biological - methods</topic><topic>Rhabditida - physiology</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - instrumentation</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>Steinernema</topic><topic>Storage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Touray, Mustapha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulcu, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulug, Derya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulsen, Sebnem H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimen, Harun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Harry K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmak, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazir, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of invertebrate pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Touray, Mustapha</au><au>Gulcu, Baris</au><au>Ulug, Derya</au><au>Gulsen, Sebnem H.</au><au>Cimen, Harun</au><au>Kaya, Harry K.</au><au>Cakmak, Ibrahim</au><au>Hazir, Selcuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different sponge types on the survival and infectivity of stored entomopathogenic nematodes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of invertebrate pathology</jtitle><addtitle>J Invertebr Pathol</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>171</volume><spage>107332</spage><epage>107332</epage><pages>107332-107332</pages><artnum>107332</artnum><issn>0022-2011</issn><eissn>1096-0805</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Sponges are used in the formulation of mass-produced nematodes.•Sponges are employed in laboratories to store nematodes or to transport them from one laboratory to another.•Different sponge types have different effects on the survival and infectivity of stored nematodes.•Polyurethane, melamine, and cellulose sponges were the best for nematode storage.•Oasis floral sponge can be preferred for short-term IJ formulation and storage for field applications. Sponges are one of the cheapest and most suitable substrates used to formulate and/or store the infective juveniles (IJs) of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). Our study investigated the survival and infectivity of the IJs on five different sponges compared to that in an aqueous suspension (control). The sponges were Oasis® floral, Nanosponge, ScotchbriteTM, or Lysol® and natural sea sponge. EPN species tested were Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, Steinernema carpocapsae and S. feltiae. The recovery efficiency of the IJs from sponges was initially assessed. Subsequently, IJs were stored in the sponges and placed in plastic bags or Falcon tubes and incubated at 10° or 27 °C for 8 months or 11 weeks, respectively. IJ survival and infectivity were monitored monthly for the 10 °C and weekly for 27 °C in these sponge types. The IJs were recovered from the sponges, and their survival was based on observing their movement under a dissecting microscope, and infectivity was based on larval mortality in Galleria mellonella. Recovery efficiency of IJs was best for the Oasis floral sponge for all nematode species ranging between 83 and 91%. The survival and infectivity of stored IJs in all sponge types and control for both 10° and 27 °C gradually decreased over time. IJs stored in Scotchbrite, Lysol, and Nanosponge had the best survival and infectivity, whereas Oasis floral and natural sea sponges showed the poorest results. After 8 months at 10 °C in plastic bags, the survival ratio of all IJs in these three sponges (Scotchbrite, Lysol, and Nanosponge) was approximately 55%. IJs in Scotchbrite and Nanosponge were also able to survive and retain their infectivity at 27 °C for 3 months. IJs stored in Falcon tubes had survival that ranged from 26 to 53% at 27 °C and 55 to 77% at 10 °C. H. bacteriophora IJs lost their infectivity when stored at 27 °C after 10 weeks. However, S. carpocapsae and S. feltiae exhibited 85% infectivity when stored in Scotchbrite and 50% in Nanosponge, respectively. Overall, sponges made from polyurethane (Scotchbrite) followed by melamine (Nanosponge) and cellulose (Lysol) are recommended for long-term nematode storage and transportation of nematode samples. However, Oasis floral sponge may be preferred for short-term IJ formulation for field applications because of easier recovery of IJs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32027881</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jip.2020.107332</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2011
ispartof Journal of invertebrate pathology, 2020-03, Vol.171, p.107332-107332, Article 107332
issn 0022-2011
1096-0805
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352640013
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Biological control
Entomopathogenic nematodes
Formulation
Heterorhabditis
Insect Control - methods
Larva - growth & development
Larva - parasitology
Longevity
Moths - growth & development
Moths - parasitology
Pest Control, Biological - methods
Rhabditida - physiology
Specimen Handling - instrumentation
Specimen Handling - methods
Steinernema
Storage
title Evaluation of different sponge types on the survival and infectivity of stored entomopathogenic nematodes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A17%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20sponge%20types%20on%20the%20survival%20and%20infectivity%20of%20stored%20entomopathogenic%20nematodes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20invertebrate%20pathology&rft.au=Touray,%20Mustapha&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=171&rft.spage=107332&rft.epage=107332&rft.pages=107332-107332&rft.artnum=107332&rft.issn=0022-2011&rft.eissn=1096-0805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jip.2020.107332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2352640013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352640013&rft_id=info:pmid/32027881&rft_els_id=S002220111930401X&rfr_iscdi=true