Diagnosing periodontal and dental indicators with horizontal and vertical bitewing radiographs
Objective The aim of this study is to compare information provided by the 2 orientations of bitewing radiographs, horizontal (HBW) and vertical (VBW) taken in a dental school. Methods and Materials Radiographic records were reviewed at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) for patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dental education 2020-05, Vol.84 (5), p.552-558 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 558 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 552 |
container_title | Journal of dental education |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Hong, Richard Y. Kwon, Stephen Steffensen, Bjorn Jain, Shruti Levi, Paul A. |
description | Objective
The aim of this study is to compare information provided by the 2 orientations of bitewing radiographs, horizontal (HBW) and vertical (VBW) taken in a dental school.
Methods and Materials
Radiographic records were reviewed at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) for patients showing posterior bone loss who had both HBW and VBW. 320 records were reviewed with 6 criteria: visibility of crestal bone from the distal of the cuspids to the distal of the most posterior tooth, visibility of horizontal or angular bone loss, the crestal density of bone, visibility of interproximal contact areas, visibility of the entire anatomical crown, and visibility of furcations.
Results
Significantly higher number of VBW compared with HBW (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jdd.12046 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2351491443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2351491443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-780b5c6097128ad425877c62a33bdac36d3cdd3c8f2efbdf6bf8383f646034c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PAjEURRujEUQX_gEzS10MtH2dr6UBP0PiRrc2nbYDJcMU20GCv97CoK5cvPQ19-Tk5SJ0SfCQYExHC6WGhGKWHqE-KQDHWQ7ZMeqHjMYYIOuhM-8X4VswRk9RD2hICpr10fvEiFljvWlm0Uo7Y5VtWlFHolGR0vvVNMpI0Vrno41p59HcOvP1R31q14a8jkrT6s3O44QydubEau7P0Uklaq8vDu8Avd3fvY4f4-nLw9P4dhpLoEka7sVlIlNcZITmQjGa5FkmUyoASiUkpAqkCpNXVFelqtKyyiGHKmUpBiYTGKDrzrty9mOtfcuXxktd16LRdu05hYSwgjAGAb3pUOms905XfOXMUrgtJ5jv6uShTr6vM7BXB-26XGr1S_70F4BRB2xMrbf_m_jzZNIpvwGnYYAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2351491443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosing periodontal and dental indicators with horizontal and vertical bitewing radiographs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hong, Richard Y. ; Kwon, Stephen ; Steffensen, Bjorn ; Jain, Shruti ; Levi, Paul A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hong, Richard Y. ; Kwon, Stephen ; Steffensen, Bjorn ; Jain, Shruti ; Levi, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The aim of this study is to compare information provided by the 2 orientations of bitewing radiographs, horizontal (HBW) and vertical (VBW) taken in a dental school.
Methods and Materials
Radiographic records were reviewed at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) for patients showing posterior bone loss who had both HBW and VBW. 320 records were reviewed with 6 criteria: visibility of crestal bone from the distal of the cuspids to the distal of the most posterior tooth, visibility of horizontal or angular bone loss, the crestal density of bone, visibility of interproximal contact areas, visibility of the entire anatomical crown, and visibility of furcations.
Results
Significantly higher number of VBW compared with HBW (P < 0.0001) showed the levels of alveolar bone loss (52.81% vs. 3.75%), the type of loss (angular or horizontal) (50.94% vs. 3.75%), the crestal bone density (28.75% vs. 0.63%), the contact areas (20.63% vs. 14.38%), and the furcations (43.44% vs. 1.25%). A greater number of HBW showed the entire anatomical crown compared with VBW. No significant difference was detected in the number of radiographs taken per HBW and VBW set.
Conclusion
For patients with alveolar bone loss, VBW are superior to HBW when assessing bone levels, density, morphology, tooth furcations, and evaluating interproximal contact areas for caries. It is recommended that the vertical bitewing technique be taught as a standard in dental, dental hygiene, and dental assisting schools for adult patients showing evidence of posterior interdental bone loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32022927</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alveolar Bone Loss ; bitewing radiographs ; bone loss ; Dental Caries ; Dentistry ; diagnostic aid ; Humans ; periodontal disease ; Radiography, Bitewing ; Tooth ; vertical bitewings</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental education, 2020-05, Vol.84 (5), p.552-558</ispartof><rights>2020 American Dental Education Association</rights><rights>2020 American Dental Education Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-780b5c6097128ad425877c62a33bdac36d3cdd3c8f2efbdf6bf8383f646034c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-780b5c6097128ad425877c62a33bdac36d3cdd3c8f2efbdf6bf8383f646034c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjdd.12046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjdd.12046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32022927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hong, Richard Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffensen, Bjorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosing periodontal and dental indicators with horizontal and vertical bitewing radiographs</title><title>Journal of dental education</title><addtitle>J Dent Educ</addtitle><description>Objective
The aim of this study is to compare information provided by the 2 orientations of bitewing radiographs, horizontal (HBW) and vertical (VBW) taken in a dental school.
Methods and Materials
Radiographic records were reviewed at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) for patients showing posterior bone loss who had both HBW and VBW. 320 records were reviewed with 6 criteria: visibility of crestal bone from the distal of the cuspids to the distal of the most posterior tooth, visibility of horizontal or angular bone loss, the crestal density of bone, visibility of interproximal contact areas, visibility of the entire anatomical crown, and visibility of furcations.
Results
Significantly higher number of VBW compared with HBW (P < 0.0001) showed the levels of alveolar bone loss (52.81% vs. 3.75%), the type of loss (angular or horizontal) (50.94% vs. 3.75%), the crestal bone density (28.75% vs. 0.63%), the contact areas (20.63% vs. 14.38%), and the furcations (43.44% vs. 1.25%). A greater number of HBW showed the entire anatomical crown compared with VBW. No significant difference was detected in the number of radiographs taken per HBW and VBW set.
Conclusion
For patients with alveolar bone loss, VBW are superior to HBW when assessing bone levels, density, morphology, tooth furcations, and evaluating interproximal contact areas for caries. It is recommended that the vertical bitewing technique be taught as a standard in dental, dental hygiene, and dental assisting schools for adult patients showing evidence of posterior interdental bone loss.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss</subject><subject>bitewing radiographs</subject><subject>bone loss</subject><subject>Dental Caries</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>diagnostic aid</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>periodontal disease</subject><subject>Radiography, Bitewing</subject><subject>Tooth</subject><subject>vertical bitewings</subject><issn>0022-0337</issn><issn>1930-7837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PAjEURRujEUQX_gEzS10MtH2dr6UBP0PiRrc2nbYDJcMU20GCv97CoK5cvPQ19-Tk5SJ0SfCQYExHC6WGhGKWHqE-KQDHWQ7ZMeqHjMYYIOuhM-8X4VswRk9RD2hICpr10fvEiFljvWlm0Uo7Y5VtWlFHolGR0vvVNMpI0Vrno41p59HcOvP1R31q14a8jkrT6s3O44QydubEau7P0Uklaq8vDu8Avd3fvY4f4-nLw9P4dhpLoEka7sVlIlNcZITmQjGa5FkmUyoASiUkpAqkCpNXVFelqtKyyiGHKmUpBiYTGKDrzrty9mOtfcuXxktd16LRdu05hYSwgjAGAb3pUOms905XfOXMUrgtJ5jv6uShTr6vM7BXB-26XGr1S_70F4BRB2xMrbf_m_jzZNIpvwGnYYAA</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Hong, Richard Y.</creator><creator>Kwon, Stephen</creator><creator>Steffensen, Bjorn</creator><creator>Jain, Shruti</creator><creator>Levi, Paul A.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Diagnosing periodontal and dental indicators with horizontal and vertical bitewing radiographs</title><author>Hong, Richard Y. ; Kwon, Stephen ; Steffensen, Bjorn ; Jain, Shruti ; Levi, Paul A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-780b5c6097128ad425877c62a33bdac36d3cdd3c8f2efbdf6bf8383f646034c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss</topic><topic>bitewing radiographs</topic><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>Dental Caries</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>diagnostic aid</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>periodontal disease</topic><topic>Radiography, Bitewing</topic><topic>Tooth</topic><topic>vertical bitewings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hong, Richard Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffensen, Bjorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dental education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hong, Richard Y.</au><au>Kwon, Stephen</au><au>Steffensen, Bjorn</au><au>Jain, Shruti</au><au>Levi, Paul A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosing periodontal and dental indicators with horizontal and vertical bitewing radiographs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental education</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent Educ</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>552-558</pages><issn>0022-0337</issn><eissn>1930-7837</eissn><abstract>Objective
The aim of this study is to compare information provided by the 2 orientations of bitewing radiographs, horizontal (HBW) and vertical (VBW) taken in a dental school.
Methods and Materials
Radiographic records were reviewed at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) for patients showing posterior bone loss who had both HBW and VBW. 320 records were reviewed with 6 criteria: visibility of crestal bone from the distal of the cuspids to the distal of the most posterior tooth, visibility of horizontal or angular bone loss, the crestal density of bone, visibility of interproximal contact areas, visibility of the entire anatomical crown, and visibility of furcations.
Results
Significantly higher number of VBW compared with HBW (P < 0.0001) showed the levels of alveolar bone loss (52.81% vs. 3.75%), the type of loss (angular or horizontal) (50.94% vs. 3.75%), the crestal bone density (28.75% vs. 0.63%), the contact areas (20.63% vs. 14.38%), and the furcations (43.44% vs. 1.25%). A greater number of HBW showed the entire anatomical crown compared with VBW. No significant difference was detected in the number of radiographs taken per HBW and VBW set.
Conclusion
For patients with alveolar bone loss, VBW are superior to HBW when assessing bone levels, density, morphology, tooth furcations, and evaluating interproximal contact areas for caries. It is recommended that the vertical bitewing technique be taught as a standard in dental, dental hygiene, and dental assisting schools for adult patients showing evidence of posterior interdental bone loss.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32022927</pmid><doi>10.1002/jdd.12046</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0337 |
ispartof | Journal of dental education, 2020-05, Vol.84 (5), p.552-558 |
issn | 0022-0337 1930-7837 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2351491443 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Alveolar Bone Loss bitewing radiographs bone loss Dental Caries Dentistry diagnostic aid Humans periodontal disease Radiography, Bitewing Tooth vertical bitewings |
title | Diagnosing periodontal and dental indicators with horizontal and vertical bitewing radiographs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A24%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosing%20periodontal%20and%20dental%20indicators%20with%20horizontal%20and%20vertical%20bitewing%20radiographs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20education&rft.au=Hong,%20Richard%20Y.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=552-558&rft.issn=0022-0337&rft.eissn=1930-7837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jdd.12046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2351491443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2351491443&rft_id=info:pmid/32022927&rfr_iscdi=true |