Patient-Reported Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology
Purpose The patient's perspective of their health is a core component of evidence-based practice (EBP) and person-centered care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), captured with PRO measures (PROMs), are the main way of formally soliciting and measuring the patient's perspective. Currently,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of speech-language pathology 2020-02, Vol.29 (1), p.357-370 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 370 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 357 |
container_title | American journal of speech-language pathology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Cohen, Matthew L Hula, William D |
description | Purpose The patient's perspective of their health is a core component of evidence-based practice (EBP) and person-centered care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), captured with PRO measures (PROMs), are the main way of formally soliciting and measuring the patient's perspective. Currently, however, PROs play a relatively small role in mainstream speech-language pathology practice. The purpose of this article is to raise important questions about how PROs could be applied to EBP in speech-language pathology for individuals with communication disorders and to propose preliminary approaches to address some of these questions. Method Based on a narrative review of the literature, this article introduces relevant terminology and broadly describes PRO applications in other health care fields. The article also raises questions related to PRO-informed clinical practice in speech-language pathology. To address some of these questions, the article explores previous research to provide suggestions for clinical administration, interpretation, and future research. Conclusion More routine measurement of subjective health constructs via PROMs-for example, constructs such as effort, participation, self-efficacy, and psychosocial functioning-may improve EBP. More routine use of PROMs could significantly expand the information that is available to clinicians about individual clients and add to the evidence base for the profession of speech-language pathology. However, careful consideration and more research are needed on how to capture and interpret PROs from individuals with cognitive and language disorders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00076 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350899943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350899943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d924f23e9ec7aff8b602076caeaab91d34267e0b7f6f1dc562b71da8753bb3173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwC5BQjlwMazsvHwsqL0Vq1cLZcuxNG5QmIU6Q-u8xtMBpR9qZWe1HyCWDGwZheMuBSTV9WWULyiQFgCQ-ImMWRSmVjMGx1-A1iBhG5My5d29hjPNTMhI-yyREY7Jc6L7EuqdLbJuuRxvMh940W3SBrm0w-ywt1gbpnXZ-t-i06UuDQVkHqxbRbGim6_Wg1xj4ok1TNevdOTkpdOXw4jAn5O1h9nr_RLP54_P9NKNGRNBTK3lYcIESTaKLIs1j4P4Fo1HrXDIrQh4nCHlSxAWzJop5njCr0yQSeS5YIibket_bds3HgK5X29IZrCpdYzM4xf2ZVEoZCm8Ve6vpGuc6LFTblVvd7RQD9Q1T_cNUXvzA9Kmrw4Eh36L9y_zSE18JbXBK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350899943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cohen, Matthew L ; Hula, William D</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Matthew L ; Hula, William D</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The patient's perspective of their health is a core component of evidence-based practice (EBP) and person-centered care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), captured with PRO measures (PROMs), are the main way of formally soliciting and measuring the patient's perspective. Currently, however, PROs play a relatively small role in mainstream speech-language pathology practice. The purpose of this article is to raise important questions about how PROs could be applied to EBP in speech-language pathology for individuals with communication disorders and to propose preliminary approaches to address some of these questions. Method Based on a narrative review of the literature, this article introduces relevant terminology and broadly describes PRO applications in other health care fields. The article also raises questions related to PRO-informed clinical practice in speech-language pathology. To address some of these questions, the article explores previous research to provide suggestions for clinical administration, interpretation, and future research. Conclusion More routine measurement of subjective health constructs via PROMs-for example, constructs such as effort, participation, self-efficacy, and psychosocial functioning-may improve EBP. More routine use of PROMs could significantly expand the information that is available to clinicians about individual clients and add to the evidence base for the profession of speech-language pathology. However, careful consideration and more research are needed on how to capture and interpret PROs from individuals with cognitive and language disorders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9110</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32011905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Speech-Language Pathology - standards</subject><ispartof>American journal of speech-language pathology, 2020-02, Vol.29 (1), p.357-370</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d924f23e9ec7aff8b602076caeaab91d34267e0b7f6f1dc562b71da8753bb3173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d924f23e9ec7aff8b602076caeaab91d34267e0b7f6f1dc562b71da8753bb3173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32011905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Matthew L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hula, William D</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology</title><title>American journal of speech-language pathology</title><addtitle>Am J Speech Lang Pathol</addtitle><description>Purpose The patient's perspective of their health is a core component of evidence-based practice (EBP) and person-centered care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), captured with PRO measures (PROMs), are the main way of formally soliciting and measuring the patient's perspective. Currently, however, PROs play a relatively small role in mainstream speech-language pathology practice. The purpose of this article is to raise important questions about how PROs could be applied to EBP in speech-language pathology for individuals with communication disorders and to propose preliminary approaches to address some of these questions. Method Based on a narrative review of the literature, this article introduces relevant terminology and broadly describes PRO applications in other health care fields. The article also raises questions related to PRO-informed clinical practice in speech-language pathology. To address some of these questions, the article explores previous research to provide suggestions for clinical administration, interpretation, and future research. Conclusion More routine measurement of subjective health constructs via PROMs-for example, constructs such as effort, participation, self-efficacy, and psychosocial functioning-may improve EBP. More routine use of PROMs could significantly expand the information that is available to clinicians about individual clients and add to the evidence base for the profession of speech-language pathology. However, careful consideration and more research are needed on how to capture and interpret PROs from individuals with cognitive and language disorders.</description><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Speech-Language Pathology - standards</subject><issn>1058-0360</issn><issn>1558-9110</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwC5BQjlwMazsvHwsqL0Vq1cLZcuxNG5QmIU6Q-u8xtMBpR9qZWe1HyCWDGwZheMuBSTV9WWULyiQFgCQ-ImMWRSmVjMGx1-A1iBhG5My5d29hjPNTMhI-yyREY7Jc6L7EuqdLbJuuRxvMh940W3SBrm0w-ywt1gbpnXZ-t-i06UuDQVkHqxbRbGim6_Wg1xj4ok1TNevdOTkpdOXw4jAn5O1h9nr_RLP54_P9NKNGRNBTK3lYcIESTaKLIs1j4P4Fo1HrXDIrQh4nCHlSxAWzJop5njCr0yQSeS5YIibket_bds3HgK5X29IZrCpdYzM4xf2ZVEoZCm8Ve6vpGuc6LFTblVvd7RQD9Q1T_cNUXvzA9Kmrw4Eh36L9y_zSE18JbXBK</recordid><startdate>20200207</startdate><enddate>20200207</enddate><creator>Cohen, Matthew L</creator><creator>Hula, William D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200207</creationdate><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology</title><author>Cohen, Matthew L ; Hula, William D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d924f23e9ec7aff8b602076caeaab91d34267e0b7f6f1dc562b71da8753bb3173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Speech-Language Pathology - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Matthew L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hula, William D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of speech-language pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Matthew L</au><au>Hula, William D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-Reported Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology</atitle><jtitle>American journal of speech-language pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Speech Lang Pathol</addtitle><date>2020-02-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>357-370</pages><issn>1058-0360</issn><eissn>1558-9110</eissn><abstract>Purpose The patient's perspective of their health is a core component of evidence-based practice (EBP) and person-centered care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), captured with PRO measures (PROMs), are the main way of formally soliciting and measuring the patient's perspective. Currently, however, PROs play a relatively small role in mainstream speech-language pathology practice. The purpose of this article is to raise important questions about how PROs could be applied to EBP in speech-language pathology for individuals with communication disorders and to propose preliminary approaches to address some of these questions. Method Based on a narrative review of the literature, this article introduces relevant terminology and broadly describes PRO applications in other health care fields. The article also raises questions related to PRO-informed clinical practice in speech-language pathology. To address some of these questions, the article explores previous research to provide suggestions for clinical administration, interpretation, and future research. Conclusion More routine measurement of subjective health constructs via PROMs-for example, constructs such as effort, participation, self-efficacy, and psychosocial functioning-may improve EBP. More routine use of PROMs could significantly expand the information that is available to clinicians about individual clients and add to the evidence base for the profession of speech-language pathology. However, careful consideration and more research are needed on how to capture and interpret PROs from individuals with cognitive and language disorders.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32011905</pmid><doi>10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00076</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-0360 |
ispartof | American journal of speech-language pathology, 2020-02, Vol.29 (1), p.357-370 |
issn | 1058-0360 1558-9110 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350899943 |
source | MEDLINE; Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Evidence-Based Medicine Humans Patient Reported Outcome Measures Speech-Language Pathology - standards |
title | Patient-Reported Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A20%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-Reported%20Outcomes%20and%20Evidence-Based%20Practice%20in%20Speech-Language%20Pathology&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20speech-language%20pathology&rft.au=Cohen,%20Matthew%20L&rft.date=2020-02-07&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=357-370&rft.issn=1058-0360&rft.eissn=1558-9110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350899943%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350899943&rft_id=info:pmid/32011905&rfr_iscdi=true |