Routine comprehensive Aspergillus screening of bronchoalveolar lavage samples in lung transplant recipients

Background Invasive aspergillosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Early diagnosis may improve outcome, yet is challenging. We assessed the diagnostic yield of a routine, comprehensive, prospectively employed Aspergillus screening strategy in LT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 2020-03, Vol.34 (3), p.e13811-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Unterman, Avraham, Izhakian, Shimon, Geffen, Yuval, Rosengarten, Dror, Shtraichman, Osnat, Pertzov, Barak, Vainshelboim, Baruch, Alon, Hagar, Raviv, Yael, Kramer, Mordechai R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page e13811
container_title Clinical transplantation
container_volume 34
creator Unterman, Avraham
Izhakian, Shimon
Geffen, Yuval
Rosengarten, Dror
Shtraichman, Osnat
Pertzov, Barak
Vainshelboim, Baruch
Alon, Hagar
Raviv, Yael
Kramer, Mordechai R.
description Background Invasive aspergillosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Early diagnosis may improve outcome, yet is challenging. We assessed the diagnostic yield of a routine, comprehensive, prospectively employed Aspergillus screening strategy in LTRs. Methods During a 6‐month period, all bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples (including post‐transplant surveillance) obtained from LTRs at our center were routinely tested for Aspergillus PCR, galactomannan (GM), and fungal culture. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) was defined using EORTC/MSG and ISHLT criteria for proven and probable aspergillosis. Results Ninety‐five consecutive BAL samples were tested. PCR, GM, and fungal culture were positive in 28.4%, 30.6%, and 7.4%, respectively. Five cases of IA (two proven, three probable) were identified. Fungal culture failed to detect 40% of IA cases, which were detected by a positive PCR and/or GM. However, the majority of positive PCR samples represented colonization (59.3%). Sensitivity of PCR, GM, and culture for IA was 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively, and specificity was 74%, 71%, and 96%. Conclusions In LTRs, a routine prospectively employed screening strategy in which all BAL samples were screened for Aspergillus PCR and GM, detected aspergillosis cases that were otherwise missed by a false‐negative fungal culture, but resulted in more cases of colonization being detected. Clinical judgment is thus warranted to avoid unnecessary treatment of colonization.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.13811
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350899354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350899354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-1151ff09d34cf7025dd9381988656684629979a4b30caca1891e6f3afebd73e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4A-gHOGwLWnarDlOE1_SJKRpnKs0dbdAmpSkHdq_J7DBDV9sWY9e2Q9C15RMaKyp6vyEspzSEzSkTIgxITQ5RUMiSBJnzgboIoS3uOWUZ-dowBJCZwnPhuh95fpOW8DKNa2HLdigd4DnoQW_0cb0AQflAay2G-xqXHpn1dZJswNnpMdG7uQGcJBNayBgbbHpI9l5aUNrpO2wB6VbDbYLl-islibA1bGP0OvD_XrxNF6-PD4v5suxYklGx5RmtK6JqFiq6hlJsqoS8TmR5zzjPE95IsRMyLRkREklaS4o8JrJGspqxoCxEbo95LbeffQQuqLRQYGJ54DrQ5GwjORCsCyN6N0BVd6F4KEuWq8b6fcFJcW32yK6LX7cRvbmGNuXDVR_5K_MCEwPwKc2sP8_qVisV4fIL6ychQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350899354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine comprehensive Aspergillus screening of bronchoalveolar lavage samples in lung transplant recipients</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Unterman, Avraham ; Izhakian, Shimon ; Geffen, Yuval ; Rosengarten, Dror ; Shtraichman, Osnat ; Pertzov, Barak ; Vainshelboim, Baruch ; Alon, Hagar ; Raviv, Yael ; Kramer, Mordechai R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Unterman, Avraham ; Izhakian, Shimon ; Geffen, Yuval ; Rosengarten, Dror ; Shtraichman, Osnat ; Pertzov, Barak ; Vainshelboim, Baruch ; Alon, Hagar ; Raviv, Yael ; Kramer, Mordechai R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Invasive aspergillosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Early diagnosis may improve outcome, yet is challenging. We assessed the diagnostic yield of a routine, comprehensive, prospectively employed Aspergillus screening strategy in LTRs. Methods During a 6‐month period, all bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples (including post‐transplant surveillance) obtained from LTRs at our center were routinely tested for Aspergillus PCR, galactomannan (GM), and fungal culture. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) was defined using EORTC/MSG and ISHLT criteria for proven and probable aspergillosis. Results Ninety‐five consecutive BAL samples were tested. PCR, GM, and fungal culture were positive in 28.4%, 30.6%, and 7.4%, respectively. Five cases of IA (two proven, three probable) were identified. Fungal culture failed to detect 40% of IA cases, which were detected by a positive PCR and/or GM. However, the majority of positive PCR samples represented colonization (59.3%). Sensitivity of PCR, GM, and culture for IA was 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively, and specificity was 74%, 71%, and 96%. Conclusions In LTRs, a routine prospectively employed screening strategy in which all BAL samples were screened for Aspergillus PCR and GM, detected aspergillosis cases that were otherwise missed by a false‐negative fungal culture, but resulted in more cases of colonization being detected. Clinical judgment is thus warranted to avoid unnecessary treatment of colonization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32017265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>aspergillosis ; Aspergillus ; galactomannan ; lung transplant ; polymerase chain reaction ; testing</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2020-03, Vol.34 (3), p.e13811-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-1151ff09d34cf7025dd9381988656684629979a4b30caca1891e6f3afebd73e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-1151ff09d34cf7025dd9381988656684629979a4b30caca1891e6f3afebd73e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1150-1057 ; 0000-0002-5173-0578 ; 0000-0003-0965-3326</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fctr.13811$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fctr.13811$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32017265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Unterman, Avraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izhakian, Shimon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geffen, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosengarten, Dror</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtraichman, Osnat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pertzov, Barak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vainshelboim, Baruch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alon, Hagar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raviv, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Mordechai R.</creatorcontrib><title>Routine comprehensive Aspergillus screening of bronchoalveolar lavage samples in lung transplant recipients</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Background Invasive aspergillosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Early diagnosis may improve outcome, yet is challenging. We assessed the diagnostic yield of a routine, comprehensive, prospectively employed Aspergillus screening strategy in LTRs. Methods During a 6‐month period, all bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples (including post‐transplant surveillance) obtained from LTRs at our center were routinely tested for Aspergillus PCR, galactomannan (GM), and fungal culture. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) was defined using EORTC/MSG and ISHLT criteria for proven and probable aspergillosis. Results Ninety‐five consecutive BAL samples were tested. PCR, GM, and fungal culture were positive in 28.4%, 30.6%, and 7.4%, respectively. Five cases of IA (two proven, three probable) were identified. Fungal culture failed to detect 40% of IA cases, which were detected by a positive PCR and/or GM. However, the majority of positive PCR samples represented colonization (59.3%). Sensitivity of PCR, GM, and culture for IA was 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively, and specificity was 74%, 71%, and 96%. Conclusions In LTRs, a routine prospectively employed screening strategy in which all BAL samples were screened for Aspergillus PCR and GM, detected aspergillosis cases that were otherwise missed by a false‐negative fungal culture, but resulted in more cases of colonization being detected. Clinical judgment is thus warranted to avoid unnecessary treatment of colonization.</description><subject>aspergillosis</subject><subject>Aspergillus</subject><subject>galactomannan</subject><subject>lung transplant</subject><subject>polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>testing</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4A-gHOGwLWnarDlOE1_SJKRpnKs0dbdAmpSkHdq_J7DBDV9sWY9e2Q9C15RMaKyp6vyEspzSEzSkTIgxITQ5RUMiSBJnzgboIoS3uOWUZ-dowBJCZwnPhuh95fpOW8DKNa2HLdigd4DnoQW_0cb0AQflAay2G-xqXHpn1dZJswNnpMdG7uQGcJBNayBgbbHpI9l5aUNrpO2wB6VbDbYLl-islibA1bGP0OvD_XrxNF6-PD4v5suxYklGx5RmtK6JqFiq6hlJsqoS8TmR5zzjPE95IsRMyLRkREklaS4o8JrJGspqxoCxEbo95LbeffQQuqLRQYGJ54DrQ5GwjORCsCyN6N0BVd6F4KEuWq8b6fcFJcW32yK6LX7cRvbmGNuXDVR_5K_MCEwPwKc2sP8_qVisV4fIL6ychQg</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Unterman, Avraham</creator><creator>Izhakian, Shimon</creator><creator>Geffen, Yuval</creator><creator>Rosengarten, Dror</creator><creator>Shtraichman, Osnat</creator><creator>Pertzov, Barak</creator><creator>Vainshelboim, Baruch</creator><creator>Alon, Hagar</creator><creator>Raviv, Yael</creator><creator>Kramer, Mordechai R.</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-1057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5173-0578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0965-3326</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Routine comprehensive Aspergillus screening of bronchoalveolar lavage samples in lung transplant recipients</title><author>Unterman, Avraham ; Izhakian, Shimon ; Geffen, Yuval ; Rosengarten, Dror ; Shtraichman, Osnat ; Pertzov, Barak ; Vainshelboim, Baruch ; Alon, Hagar ; Raviv, Yael ; Kramer, Mordechai R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-1151ff09d34cf7025dd9381988656684629979a4b30caca1891e6f3afebd73e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>aspergillosis</topic><topic>Aspergillus</topic><topic>galactomannan</topic><topic>lung transplant</topic><topic>polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Unterman, Avraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izhakian, Shimon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geffen, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosengarten, Dror</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtraichman, Osnat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pertzov, Barak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vainshelboim, Baruch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alon, Hagar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raviv, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Mordechai R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Unterman, Avraham</au><au>Izhakian, Shimon</au><au>Geffen, Yuval</au><au>Rosengarten, Dror</au><au>Shtraichman, Osnat</au><au>Pertzov, Barak</au><au>Vainshelboim, Baruch</au><au>Alon, Hagar</au><au>Raviv, Yael</au><au>Kramer, Mordechai R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine comprehensive Aspergillus screening of bronchoalveolar lavage samples in lung transplant recipients</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e13811</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13811-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Background Invasive aspergillosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Early diagnosis may improve outcome, yet is challenging. We assessed the diagnostic yield of a routine, comprehensive, prospectively employed Aspergillus screening strategy in LTRs. Methods During a 6‐month period, all bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples (including post‐transplant surveillance) obtained from LTRs at our center were routinely tested for Aspergillus PCR, galactomannan (GM), and fungal culture. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) was defined using EORTC/MSG and ISHLT criteria for proven and probable aspergillosis. Results Ninety‐five consecutive BAL samples were tested. PCR, GM, and fungal culture were positive in 28.4%, 30.6%, and 7.4%, respectively. Five cases of IA (two proven, three probable) were identified. Fungal culture failed to detect 40% of IA cases, which were detected by a positive PCR and/or GM. However, the majority of positive PCR samples represented colonization (59.3%). Sensitivity of PCR, GM, and culture for IA was 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively, and specificity was 74%, 71%, and 96%. Conclusions In LTRs, a routine prospectively employed screening strategy in which all BAL samples were screened for Aspergillus PCR and GM, detected aspergillosis cases that were otherwise missed by a false‐negative fungal culture, but resulted in more cases of colonization being detected. Clinical judgment is thus warranted to avoid unnecessary treatment of colonization.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>32017265</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.13811</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-1057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5173-0578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0965-3326</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-0063
ispartof Clinical transplantation, 2020-03, Vol.34 (3), p.e13811-n/a
issn 0902-0063
1399-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350899354
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects aspergillosis
Aspergillus
galactomannan
lung transplant
polymerase chain reaction
testing
title Routine comprehensive Aspergillus screening of bronchoalveolar lavage samples in lung transplant recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A38%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20comprehensive%20Aspergillus%20screening%20of%20bronchoalveolar%20lavage%20samples%20in%20lung%20transplant%20recipients&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Unterman,%20Avraham&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e13811&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13811-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.13811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350899354%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350899354&rft_id=info:pmid/32017265&rfr_iscdi=true