Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nippon Medical School 2020/10/25, Vol.87(5), pp.260-267
Hauptverfasser: Sano, Mihoro, Oshima, Yasushi, Murase, Kohei, Sasatani, Katsumi, Takai, Shinro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 267
container_issue 5
container_start_page 260
container_title Journal of Nippon Medical School
container_volume 87
creator Sano, Mihoro
Oshima, Yasushi
Murase, Kohei
Sasatani, Katsumi
Takai, Shinro
description Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this study was to identify factors that affect the distribution of stress on the proximal tibia after UKA. Methods: Two-dimensional finite-element analysis of the proximal tibia was used to assess four factors: 1) two types of implants-all ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and metal-backed implants, 2) postoperative alignment, 3) coverage of tibial bone, 4) level of the tibial osteotomy. Results: In cases of varus alignment, high stress values and large areas of deformation were observed on and beneath the implant. In cases of valgus alignment, stress was concentrated at the lateral portion of tibial tray. In comparison with the standard model, stress concentration was greater at the medial edge of the medial condyle in a narrow-coverage model. Stress distribution for the low-osteotomy-level model did not differ markedly differ from that for the standard model. Stress distribution was better for metal-backed implants than for UHMWPE implants. Conclusions: Proper postoperative alignment must be achieved in UKA. The osteotomy level should be set at the cancellous bone close to the joint line, and preservation of bone stock should be maximized.
doi_str_mv 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350353639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350353639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c723t-ad754cee10a6b9baeb806a7a4774d67234f408e4a1975c14c971050d1d13a1823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0A5csky_oqT46pqC7R8SG3PxnEmrFeOs9hewf57nGbZA5eZkeadd2aeonhLYEWopB-2foyrz1-_3K8oUFCNrATwZ8U5YVxWjEP7_KkWFa9lfVa8inELwJgQ9cvijFGAFiQ_L35cW28TVlcOR_SpXHvtDtHGchrK-xQw5sqXaYPl9zD9saN25YPtrC7XQ8JQPnprpnGnQ5qnc_PWI5brkDZh2jkd0-F18WLQLuKbY74oHq-vHi4_Vnffbj5dru8qIylLle6l4AaRgK67ttPYNVBrqbmUvK-zhA8cGuSatFIYwk0rCQjoSU-YJg1lF8X7xXcXpl97jEmNNhp0Tnuc9lFRJoAJVrM2S8UiNWGKMeCgdiF_Fg6KgJrhqhmumuGqI1yV4ea5d8cV-27E_jT1j2YW3CyC3LVGu8k761Ftp33IWKMyv8l2mq2fXAEaCSInpoDWMAfJ6paChOx0uzhtY9I_8bQqg7bG4XLgfNYc_j_0pDIbHRR69hfrDqhv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350353639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science &amp; Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><creator>Sano, Mihoro ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Murase, Kohei ; Sasatani, Katsumi ; Takai, Shinro</creator><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mihoro ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Murase, Kohei ; Sasatani, Katsumi ; Takai, Shinro ; Nippon Medical School ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery ; Center for Industry-University Collaboration ; Osaka University ; Graduate School of Engineering Science</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this study was to identify factors that affect the distribution of stress on the proximal tibia after UKA. Methods: Two-dimensional finite-element analysis of the proximal tibia was used to assess four factors: 1) two types of implants-all ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and metal-backed implants, 2) postoperative alignment, 3) coverage of tibial bone, 4) level of the tibial osteotomy. Results: In cases of varus alignment, high stress values and large areas of deformation were observed on and beneath the implant. In cases of valgus alignment, stress was concentrated at the lateral portion of tibial tray. In comparison with the standard model, stress concentration was greater at the medial edge of the medial condyle in a narrow-coverage model. Stress distribution for the low-osteotomy-level model did not differ markedly differ from that for the standard model. Stress distribution was better for metal-backed implants than for UHMWPE implants. Conclusions: Proper postoperative alignment must be achieved in UKA. The osteotomy level should be set at the cancellous bone close to the joint line, and preservation of bone stock should be maximized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1345-4676</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32009074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</publisher><subject>2-dimensional finite-element analysis (2D-FEA) ; alignment ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Finite Element Analysis ; Humans ; Metals ; Molecular Weight ; Osteotomy - methods ; Polyethylene ; Prostheses and Implants ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tibia - physiology ; Tibia - physiopathology ; Tibia - surgery ; tibial implant ; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nippon Medical School, 2020/10/25, Vol.87(5), pp.260-267</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c723t-ad754cee10a6b9baeb806a7a4774d67234f408e4a1975c14c971050d1d13a1823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c723t-ad754cee10a6b9baeb806a7a4774d67234f408e4a1975c14c971050d1d13a1823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1876,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mihoro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshima, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murase, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasatani, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Shinro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nippon Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center for Industry-University Collaboration</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osaka University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graduate School of Engineering Science</creatorcontrib><title>Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of Nippon Medical School</title><addtitle>J Nippon Med Sch</addtitle><description>Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this study was to identify factors that affect the distribution of stress on the proximal tibia after UKA. Methods: Two-dimensional finite-element analysis of the proximal tibia was used to assess four factors: 1) two types of implants-all ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and metal-backed implants, 2) postoperative alignment, 3) coverage of tibial bone, 4) level of the tibial osteotomy. Results: In cases of varus alignment, high stress values and large areas of deformation were observed on and beneath the implant. In cases of valgus alignment, stress was concentrated at the lateral portion of tibial tray. In comparison with the standard model, stress concentration was greater at the medial edge of the medial condyle in a narrow-coverage model. Stress distribution for the low-osteotomy-level model did not differ markedly differ from that for the standard model. Stress distribution was better for metal-backed implants than for UHMWPE implants. Conclusions: Proper postoperative alignment must be achieved in UKA. The osteotomy level should be set at the cancellous bone close to the joint line, and preservation of bone stock should be maximized.</description><subject>2-dimensional finite-element analysis (2D-FEA)</subject><subject>alignment</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Molecular Weight</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tibia - physiology</subject><subject>Tibia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>tibial implant</subject><subject>unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)</subject><issn>1345-4676</issn><issn>1347-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0A5csky_oqT46pqC7R8SG3PxnEmrFeOs9hewf57nGbZA5eZkeadd2aeonhLYEWopB-2foyrz1-_3K8oUFCNrATwZ8U5YVxWjEP7_KkWFa9lfVa8inELwJgQ9cvijFGAFiQ_L35cW28TVlcOR_SpXHvtDtHGchrK-xQw5sqXaYPl9zD9saN25YPtrC7XQ8JQPnprpnGnQ5qnc_PWI5brkDZh2jkd0-F18WLQLuKbY74oHq-vHi4_Vnffbj5dru8qIylLle6l4AaRgK67ttPYNVBrqbmUvK-zhA8cGuSatFIYwk0rCQjoSU-YJg1lF8X7xXcXpl97jEmNNhp0Tnuc9lFRJoAJVrM2S8UiNWGKMeCgdiF_Fg6KgJrhqhmumuGqI1yV4ea5d8cV-27E_jT1j2YW3CyC3LVGu8k761Ftp33IWKMyv8l2mq2fXAEaCSInpoDWMAfJ6paChOx0uzhtY9I_8bQqg7bG4XLgfNYc_j_0pDIbHRR69hfrDqhv</recordid><startdate>20201025</startdate><enddate>20201025</enddate><creator>Sano, Mihoro</creator><creator>Oshima, Yasushi</creator><creator>Murase, Kohei</creator><creator>Sasatani, Katsumi</creator><creator>Takai, Shinro</creator><general>The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201025</creationdate><title>Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty</title><author>Sano, Mihoro ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Murase, Kohei ; Sasatani, Katsumi ; Takai, Shinro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c723t-ad754cee10a6b9baeb806a7a4774d67234f408e4a1975c14c971050d1d13a1823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>2-dimensional finite-element analysis (2D-FEA)</topic><topic>alignment</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Molecular Weight</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tibia - physiology</topic><topic>Tibia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>tibial implant</topic><topic>unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mihoro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshima, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murase, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasatani, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Shinro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nippon Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center for Industry-University Collaboration</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osaka University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graduate School of Engineering Science</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nippon Medical School</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sano, Mihoro</au><au>Oshima, Yasushi</au><au>Murase, Kohei</au><au>Sasatani, Katsumi</au><au>Takai, Shinro</au><aucorp>Nippon Medical School</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery</aucorp><aucorp>Center for Industry-University Collaboration</aucorp><aucorp>Osaka University</aucorp><aucorp>Graduate School of Engineering Science</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nippon Medical School</jtitle><addtitle>J Nippon Med Sch</addtitle><date>2020-10-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>260-267</pages><issn>1345-4676</issn><eissn>1347-3409</eissn><abstract>Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this study was to identify factors that affect the distribution of stress on the proximal tibia after UKA. Methods: Two-dimensional finite-element analysis of the proximal tibia was used to assess four factors: 1) two types of implants-all ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and metal-backed implants, 2) postoperative alignment, 3) coverage of tibial bone, 4) level of the tibial osteotomy. Results: In cases of varus alignment, high stress values and large areas of deformation were observed on and beneath the implant. In cases of valgus alignment, stress was concentrated at the lateral portion of tibial tray. In comparison with the standard model, stress concentration was greater at the medial edge of the medial condyle in a narrow-coverage model. Stress distribution for the low-osteotomy-level model did not differ markedly differ from that for the standard model. Stress distribution was better for metal-backed implants than for UHMWPE implants. Conclusions: Proper postoperative alignment must be achieved in UKA. The osteotomy level should be set at the cancellous bone close to the joint line, and preservation of bone stock should be maximized.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</pub><pmid>32009074</pmid><doi>10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1345-4676
ispartof Journal of Nippon Medical School, 2020/10/25, Vol.87(5), pp.260-267
issn 1345-4676
1347-3409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350353639
source MEDLINE; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese
subjects 2-dimensional finite-element analysis (2D-FEA)
alignment
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
Finite Element Analysis
Humans
Metals
Molecular Weight
Osteotomy - methods
Polyethylene
Prostheses and Implants
Stress, Mechanical
Tibia - physiology
Tibia - physiopathology
Tibia - surgery
tibial implant
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)
title Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A03%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finite-Element%20Analysis%20of%20Stress%20on%20the%20Proximal%20Tibia%20After%20Unicompartmental%20Knee%20Arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nippon%20Medical%20School&rft.au=Sano,%20Mihoro&rft.aucorp=Nippon%20Medical%20School&rft.date=2020-10-25&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=260-267&rft.issn=1345-4676&rft.eissn=1347-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350353639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350353639&rft_id=info:pmid/32009074&rfr_iscdi=true