Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this stu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Nippon Medical School 2020/10/25, Vol.87(5), pp.260-267 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 267 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 260 |
container_title | Journal of Nippon Medical School |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Sano, Mihoro Oshima, Yasushi Murase, Kohei Sasatani, Katsumi Takai, Shinro |
description | Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this study was to identify factors that affect the distribution of stress on the proximal tibia after UKA. Methods: Two-dimensional finite-element analysis of the proximal tibia was used to assess four factors: 1) two types of implants-all ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and metal-backed implants, 2) postoperative alignment, 3) coverage of tibial bone, 4) level of the tibial osteotomy. Results: In cases of varus alignment, high stress values and large areas of deformation were observed on and beneath the implant. In cases of valgus alignment, stress was concentrated at the lateral portion of tibial tray. In comparison with the standard model, stress concentration was greater at the medial edge of the medial condyle in a narrow-coverage model. Stress distribution for the low-osteotomy-level model did not differ markedly differ from that for the standard model. Stress distribution was better for metal-backed implants than for UHMWPE implants. Conclusions: Proper postoperative alignment must be achieved in UKA. The osteotomy level should be set at the cancellous bone close to the joint line, and preservation of bone stock should be maximized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350353639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350353639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c723t-ad754cee10a6b9baeb806a7a4774d67234f408e4a1975c14c971050d1d13a1823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0A5csky_oqT46pqC7R8SG3PxnEmrFeOs9hewf57nGbZA5eZkeadd2aeonhLYEWopB-2foyrz1-_3K8oUFCNrATwZ8U5YVxWjEP7_KkWFa9lfVa8inELwJgQ9cvijFGAFiQ_L35cW28TVlcOR_SpXHvtDtHGchrK-xQw5sqXaYPl9zD9saN25YPtrC7XQ8JQPnprpnGnQ5qnc_PWI5brkDZh2jkd0-F18WLQLuKbY74oHq-vHi4_Vnffbj5dru8qIylLle6l4AaRgK67ttPYNVBrqbmUvK-zhA8cGuSatFIYwk0rCQjoSU-YJg1lF8X7xXcXpl97jEmNNhp0Tnuc9lFRJoAJVrM2S8UiNWGKMeCgdiF_Fg6KgJrhqhmumuGqI1yV4ea5d8cV-27E_jT1j2YW3CyC3LVGu8k761Ftp33IWKMyv8l2mq2fXAEaCSInpoDWMAfJ6paChOx0uzhtY9I_8bQqg7bG4XLgfNYc_j_0pDIbHRR69hfrDqhv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350353639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><creator>Sano, Mihoro ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Murase, Kohei ; Sasatani, Katsumi ; Takai, Shinro</creator><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mihoro ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Murase, Kohei ; Sasatani, Katsumi ; Takai, Shinro ; Nippon Medical School ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery ; Center for Industry-University Collaboration ; Osaka University ; Graduate School of Engineering Science</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this study was to identify factors that affect the distribution of stress on the proximal tibia after UKA. Methods: Two-dimensional finite-element analysis of the proximal tibia was used to assess four factors: 1) two types of implants-all ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and metal-backed implants, 2) postoperative alignment, 3) coverage of tibial bone, 4) level of the tibial osteotomy. Results: In cases of varus alignment, high stress values and large areas of deformation were observed on and beneath the implant. In cases of valgus alignment, stress was concentrated at the lateral portion of tibial tray. In comparison with the standard model, stress concentration was greater at the medial edge of the medial condyle in a narrow-coverage model. Stress distribution for the low-osteotomy-level model did not differ markedly differ from that for the standard model. Stress distribution was better for metal-backed implants than for UHMWPE implants. Conclusions: Proper postoperative alignment must be achieved in UKA. The osteotomy level should be set at the cancellous bone close to the joint line, and preservation of bone stock should be maximized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1345-4676</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32009074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</publisher><subject>2-dimensional finite-element analysis (2D-FEA) ; alignment ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Finite Element Analysis ; Humans ; Metals ; Molecular Weight ; Osteotomy - methods ; Polyethylene ; Prostheses and Implants ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tibia - physiology ; Tibia - physiopathology ; Tibia - surgery ; tibial implant ; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nippon Medical School, 2020/10/25, Vol.87(5), pp.260-267</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c723t-ad754cee10a6b9baeb806a7a4774d67234f408e4a1975c14c971050d1d13a1823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c723t-ad754cee10a6b9baeb806a7a4774d67234f408e4a1975c14c971050d1d13a1823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1876,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mihoro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshima, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murase, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasatani, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Shinro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nippon Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center for Industry-University Collaboration</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osaka University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graduate School of Engineering Science</creatorcontrib><title>Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of Nippon Medical School</title><addtitle>J Nippon Med Sch</addtitle><description>Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this study was to identify factors that affect the distribution of stress on the proximal tibia after UKA. Methods: Two-dimensional finite-element analysis of the proximal tibia was used to assess four factors: 1) two types of implants-all ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and metal-backed implants, 2) postoperative alignment, 3) coverage of tibial bone, 4) level of the tibial osteotomy. Results: In cases of varus alignment, high stress values and large areas of deformation were observed on and beneath the implant. In cases of valgus alignment, stress was concentrated at the lateral portion of tibial tray. In comparison with the standard model, stress concentration was greater at the medial edge of the medial condyle in a narrow-coverage model. Stress distribution for the low-osteotomy-level model did not differ markedly differ from that for the standard model. Stress distribution was better for metal-backed implants than for UHMWPE implants. Conclusions: Proper postoperative alignment must be achieved in UKA. The osteotomy level should be set at the cancellous bone close to the joint line, and preservation of bone stock should be maximized.</description><subject>2-dimensional finite-element analysis (2D-FEA)</subject><subject>alignment</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Molecular Weight</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tibia - physiology</subject><subject>Tibia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>tibial implant</subject><subject>unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)</subject><issn>1345-4676</issn><issn>1347-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0A5csky_oqT46pqC7R8SG3PxnEmrFeOs9hewf57nGbZA5eZkeadd2aeonhLYEWopB-2foyrz1-_3K8oUFCNrATwZ8U5YVxWjEP7_KkWFa9lfVa8inELwJgQ9cvijFGAFiQ_L35cW28TVlcOR_SpXHvtDtHGchrK-xQw5sqXaYPl9zD9saN25YPtrC7XQ8JQPnprpnGnQ5qnc_PWI5brkDZh2jkd0-F18WLQLuKbY74oHq-vHi4_Vnffbj5dru8qIylLle6l4AaRgK67ttPYNVBrqbmUvK-zhA8cGuSatFIYwk0rCQjoSU-YJg1lF8X7xXcXpl97jEmNNhp0Tnuc9lFRJoAJVrM2S8UiNWGKMeCgdiF_Fg6KgJrhqhmumuGqI1yV4ea5d8cV-27E_jT1j2YW3CyC3LVGu8k761Ftp33IWKMyv8l2mq2fXAEaCSInpoDWMAfJ6paChOx0uzhtY9I_8bQqg7bG4XLgfNYc_j_0pDIbHRR69hfrDqhv</recordid><startdate>20201025</startdate><enddate>20201025</enddate><creator>Sano, Mihoro</creator><creator>Oshima, Yasushi</creator><creator>Murase, Kohei</creator><creator>Sasatani, Katsumi</creator><creator>Takai, Shinro</creator><general>The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201025</creationdate><title>Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty</title><author>Sano, Mihoro ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Murase, Kohei ; Sasatani, Katsumi ; Takai, Shinro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c723t-ad754cee10a6b9baeb806a7a4774d67234f408e4a1975c14c971050d1d13a1823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>2-dimensional finite-element analysis (2D-FEA)</topic><topic>alignment</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Molecular Weight</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tibia - physiology</topic><topic>Tibia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>tibial implant</topic><topic>unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mihoro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshima, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murase, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasatani, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Shinro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nippon Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center for Industry-University Collaboration</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osaka University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graduate School of Engineering Science</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nippon Medical School</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sano, Mihoro</au><au>Oshima, Yasushi</au><au>Murase, Kohei</au><au>Sasatani, Katsumi</au><au>Takai, Shinro</au><aucorp>Nippon Medical School</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery</aucorp><aucorp>Center for Industry-University Collaboration</aucorp><aucorp>Osaka University</aucorp><aucorp>Graduate School of Engineering Science</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nippon Medical School</jtitle><addtitle>J Nippon Med Sch</addtitle><date>2020-10-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>260-267</pages><issn>1345-4676</issn><eissn>1347-3409</eissn><abstract>Background: Because the indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited, few patients have undergone the procedure. Therefore, it is difficult to decide the acceptable range of variation in the details of UKA on the basis of the available clinical data. The objective of this study was to identify factors that affect the distribution of stress on the proximal tibia after UKA. Methods: Two-dimensional finite-element analysis of the proximal tibia was used to assess four factors: 1) two types of implants-all ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and metal-backed implants, 2) postoperative alignment, 3) coverage of tibial bone, 4) level of the tibial osteotomy. Results: In cases of varus alignment, high stress values and large areas of deformation were observed on and beneath the implant. In cases of valgus alignment, stress was concentrated at the lateral portion of tibial tray. In comparison with the standard model, stress concentration was greater at the medial edge of the medial condyle in a narrow-coverage model. Stress distribution for the low-osteotomy-level model did not differ markedly differ from that for the standard model. Stress distribution was better for metal-backed implants than for UHMWPE implants. Conclusions: Proper postoperative alignment must be achieved in UKA. The osteotomy level should be set at the cancellous bone close to the joint line, and preservation of bone stock should be maximized.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</pub><pmid>32009074</pmid><doi>10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1345-4676 |
ispartof | Journal of Nippon Medical School, 2020/10/25, Vol.87(5), pp.260-267 |
issn | 1345-4676 1347-3409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350353639 |
source | MEDLINE; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese |
subjects | 2-dimensional finite-element analysis (2D-FEA) alignment Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Biomechanical Phenomena Finite Element Analysis Humans Metals Molecular Weight Osteotomy - methods Polyethylene Prostheses and Implants Stress, Mechanical Tibia - physiology Tibia - physiopathology Tibia - surgery tibial implant unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) |
title | Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A03%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finite-Element%20Analysis%20of%20Stress%20on%20the%20Proximal%20Tibia%20After%20Unicompartmental%20Knee%20Arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nippon%20Medical%20School&rft.au=Sano,%20Mihoro&rft.aucorp=Nippon%20Medical%20School&rft.date=2020-10-25&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=260-267&rft.issn=1345-4676&rft.eissn=1347-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350353639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350353639&rft_id=info:pmid/32009074&rfr_iscdi=true |