Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1
Purpose In this article we take a critical look at the key changes of the newest edition of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 (v2.1) and indicate future directions for further development of the system. Conclusion PI-RADS v2.1 addresses some of the shortcomings of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Abdominal imaging 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.3961-3968 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3968 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 3961 |
| container_title | Abdominal imaging |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Ullrich, T. Schimmöller, L. |
| description | Purpose
In this article we take a critical look at the key changes of the newest edition of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 (v2.1) and indicate future directions for further development of the system.
Conclusion
PI-RADS v2.1 addresses some of the shortcomings of its widely embraced precursor version 2, largely to simplify interpretation and improve interobserver agreement without changing the fundamental acquisition and scoring guidelines. Biparametric MRI is acknowledged in the newest version, but multiparametric MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging is still recommended for most scenarios. Management recommendations and guidance on evaluation of follow-up MRI’s are still not included in the system. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350352565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473356767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e726b26f4b46521676954907e2484d930b9f491e8949d07b9d642d4d5af4de733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MottR-AQ-y4MXL1snk1Xgr9VUoWHyAt7CPrGzp7tZkV_Dbm9pawYOHMIH5zX-GHyGnFEYUQF16AJQ0BoTwOPJYHZA-MiljADE-3P_5a48MvV8CAJWCUhTHpMcQQCOoPqEL6_zaZm35Ya-iJMpc2ZZZsooS7633la3bqCmixSx-nFw_RTiiJ-SoSFbeDnd1QF5ub56n9_H84W42nczjjCnRxlahTFEWPOVSIJVKasE1KIt8zHPNINUF19SONdc5qFTnkmPOc5EUPLeKsQG52OauXfPeWd-aqvSZXa2S2jadN8gEMIFCioCe_0GXTefqcJ1BHqJE2K4ChVsqc433zhZm7coqcZ-Ggtk4NVunJjg1307NZuhsF92llc33Iz8GA8C2gA-t-s26393_xH4Bazx8WQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473356767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ullrich, T. ; Schimmöller, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ullrich, T. ; Schimmöller, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In this article we take a critical look at the key changes of the newest edition of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 (v2.1) and indicate future directions for further development of the system.
Conclusion
PI-RADS v2.1 addresses some of the shortcomings of its widely embraced precursor version 2, largely to simplify interpretation and improve interobserver agreement without changing the fundamental acquisition and scoring guidelines. Biparametric MRI is acknowledged in the newest version, but multiparametric MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging is still recommended for most scenarios. Management recommendations and guidance on evaluation of follow-up MRI’s are still not included in the system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32009207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatology ; Imaging ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Radiology ; Special Section: Prostate cancer update</subject><ispartof>Abdominal imaging, 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.3961-3968</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e726b26f4b46521676954907e2484d930b9f491e8949d07b9d642d4d5af4de733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e726b26f4b46521676954907e2484d930b9f491e8949d07b9d642d4d5af4de733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9866-8898</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ullrich, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schimmöller, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1</title><title>Abdominal imaging</title><addtitle>Abdom Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><description>Purpose
In this article we take a critical look at the key changes of the newest edition of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 (v2.1) and indicate future directions for further development of the system.
Conclusion
PI-RADS v2.1 addresses some of the shortcomings of its widely embraced precursor version 2, largely to simplify interpretation and improve interobserver agreement without changing the fundamental acquisition and scoring guidelines. Biparametric MRI is acknowledged in the newest version, but multiparametric MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging is still recommended for most scenarios. Management recommendations and guidance on evaluation of follow-up MRI’s are still not included in the system.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Special Section: Prostate cancer update</subject><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MottR-AQ-y4MXL1snk1Xgr9VUoWHyAt7CPrGzp7tZkV_Dbm9pawYOHMIH5zX-GHyGnFEYUQF16AJQ0BoTwOPJYHZA-MiljADE-3P_5a48MvV8CAJWCUhTHpMcQQCOoPqEL6_zaZm35Ya-iJMpc2ZZZsooS7633la3bqCmixSx-nFw_RTiiJ-SoSFbeDnd1QF5ub56n9_H84W42nczjjCnRxlahTFEWPOVSIJVKasE1KIt8zHPNINUF19SONdc5qFTnkmPOc5EUPLeKsQG52OauXfPeWd-aqvSZXa2S2jadN8gEMIFCioCe_0GXTefqcJ1BHqJE2K4ChVsqc433zhZm7coqcZ-Ggtk4NVunJjg1307NZuhsF92llc33Iz8GA8C2gA-t-s26393_xH4Bazx8WQ</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Ullrich, T.</creator><creator>Schimmöller, L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9866-8898</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1</title><author>Ullrich, T. ; Schimmöller, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e726b26f4b46521676954907e2484d930b9f491e8949d07b9d642d4d5af4de733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Special Section: Prostate cancer update</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ullrich, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schimmöller, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ullrich, T.</au><au>Schimmöller, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1</atitle><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle><stitle>Abdom Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3961</spage><epage>3968</epage><pages>3961-3968</pages><issn>2366-004X</issn><eissn>2366-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose
In this article we take a critical look at the key changes of the newest edition of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 (v2.1) and indicate future directions for further development of the system.
Conclusion
PI-RADS v2.1 addresses some of the shortcomings of its widely embraced precursor version 2, largely to simplify interpretation and improve interobserver agreement without changing the fundamental acquisition and scoring guidelines. Biparametric MRI is acknowledged in the newest version, but multiparametric MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging is still recommended for most scenarios. Management recommendations and guidance on evaluation of follow-up MRI’s are still not included in the system.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32009207</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9866-8898</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2366-004X |
| ispartof | Abdominal imaging, 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.3961-3968 |
| issn | 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350352565 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Accuracy Gastroenterology Hepatology Imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Medical diagnosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Prostate Prostate cancer Radiology Special Section: Prostate cancer update |
| title | Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T12%3A33%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perspective:%20a%20critical%20assessment%20of%20PI-RADS%202.1&rft.jtitle=Abdominal%20imaging&rft.au=Ullrich,%20T.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3961&rft.epage=3968&rft.pages=3961-3968&rft.issn=2366-004X&rft.eissn=2366-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473356767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473356767&rft_id=info:pmid/32009207&rfr_iscdi=true |