Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) Tex. 1979), 2020-03, Vol.75 (3), p.707-713
Hauptverfasser: Lurz, Philip, Kresoja, Karl-Patrik, Rommel, Karl-Philipp, von Roeder, Maximilian, Besler, Christian, Lücke, Christian, Gutberlet, Matthias, Schmieder, Roland E., Mahfoud, Felix, Thiele, Holger, Desch, Steffen, Fengler, Karl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 713
container_issue 3
container_start_page 707
container_title Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)
container_volume 75
creator Lurz, Philip
Kresoja, Karl-Patrik
Rommel, Karl-Philipp
von Roeder, Maximilian
Besler, Christian
Lücke, Christian
Gutberlet, Matthias
Schmieder, Roland E.
Mahfoud, Felix
Thiele, Holger
Desch, Steffen
Fengler, Karl
description Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort (P=0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m2, P=0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14310
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350347329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350347329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-75550fa3e7e3187ebfc7696dc7b4bb9011159e4d722f6345d5c188d8ee70df6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EokvhKyBz45Li8Z84RuKw2m67K5UWtQXBKXKcSTY0cYqdtOLbY9jCgQNipNFoRu_Nk36EvAJ2BJDDm82XD-vL6_X51fbifLlZpqM5AimAPSILUFxmUuXiMVkwMDIzAJ8PyLMYvzIGUkr9lBwIzlghuVkQu9pZ32KknadXUxhvkH4a-3lAumwmDPQSve3pMXoMd3bqRv-Wbn3s2t1ET8I40JUNdWcdfW9bj1PnkiGO3nqHdDvYtvPtc_KksX3EFw_zkHw8WV-vNtnZxel2tTzLnMgZy7RSijVWoEYBhcaqcTo3ee10JavKMABQBmWtOW9yIVWtHBRFXSBqVje5FYfk9f7vbRi_zRincuiiw763Hsc5llwoJqQW3CSp2UtdGGMM2JS3oRts-F4CK38SLv8inI6m_EU4eV8-xMzVgPUf52-kSfBuL7gf-0Qw3vTzPYZyh7afdv8VIP_hZ6kkz4uMsxQo0palhkL8AASam_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350347329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lurz, Philip ; Kresoja, Karl-Patrik ; Rommel, Karl-Philipp ; von Roeder, Maximilian ; Besler, Christian ; Lücke, Christian ; Gutberlet, Matthias ; Schmieder, Roland E. ; Mahfoud, Felix ; Thiele, Holger ; Desch, Steffen ; Fengler, Karl</creator><creatorcontrib>Lurz, Philip ; Kresoja, Karl-Patrik ; Rommel, Karl-Philipp ; von Roeder, Maximilian ; Besler, Christian ; Lücke, Christian ; Gutberlet, Matthias ; Schmieder, Roland E. ; Mahfoud, Felix ; Thiele, Holger ; Desch, Steffen ; Fengler, Karl</creatorcontrib><description>Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort (P=0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m2, P=0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-911X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14310</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32008429</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Blood Pressure ; Body Weight ; Catheter Ablation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glycopeptides - blood ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Rate ; Hematocrit ; Humans ; Hypertension - physiopathology ; Hypertension - surgery ; Kidney - innervation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Prospective Studies ; Single-Blind Method ; Stroke Volume ; Sympathectomy - methods ; Vascular Resistance</subject><ispartof>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 2020-03, Vol.75 (3), p.707-713</ispartof><rights>American Heart Association, Inc</rights><rights>2020 American Heart Association, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-75550fa3e7e3187ebfc7696dc7b4bb9011159e4d722f6345d5c188d8ee70df6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3674,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32008429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lurz, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kresoja, Karl-Patrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rommel, Karl-Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Roeder, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besler, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lücke, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutberlet, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmieder, Roland E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfoud, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desch, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fengler, Karl</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><title>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</title><addtitle>Hypertension</addtitle><description>Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort (P=0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m2, P=0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham.</description><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glycopeptides - blood</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Hematocrit</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hypertension - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney - innervation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Sympathectomy - methods</subject><subject>Vascular Resistance</subject><issn>0194-911X</issn><issn>1524-4563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EokvhKyBz45Li8Z84RuKw2m67K5UWtQXBKXKcSTY0cYqdtOLbY9jCgQNipNFoRu_Nk36EvAJ2BJDDm82XD-vL6_X51fbifLlZpqM5AimAPSILUFxmUuXiMVkwMDIzAJ8PyLMYvzIGUkr9lBwIzlghuVkQu9pZ32KknadXUxhvkH4a-3lAumwmDPQSve3pMXoMd3bqRv-Wbn3s2t1ET8I40JUNdWcdfW9bj1PnkiGO3nqHdDvYtvPtc_KksX3EFw_zkHw8WV-vNtnZxel2tTzLnMgZy7RSijVWoEYBhcaqcTo3ee10JavKMABQBmWtOW9yIVWtHBRFXSBqVje5FYfk9f7vbRi_zRincuiiw763Hsc5llwoJqQW3CSp2UtdGGMM2JS3oRts-F4CK38SLv8inI6m_EU4eV8-xMzVgPUf52-kSfBuL7gf-0Qw3vTzPYZyh7afdv8VIP_hZ6kkz4uMsxQo0palhkL8AASam_I</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Lurz, Philip</creator><creator>Kresoja, Karl-Patrik</creator><creator>Rommel, Karl-Philipp</creator><creator>von Roeder, Maximilian</creator><creator>Besler, Christian</creator><creator>Lücke, Christian</creator><creator>Gutberlet, Matthias</creator><creator>Schmieder, Roland E.</creator><creator>Mahfoud, Felix</creator><creator>Thiele, Holger</creator><creator>Desch, Steffen</creator><creator>Fengler, Karl</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><author>Lurz, Philip ; Kresoja, Karl-Patrik ; Rommel, Karl-Philipp ; von Roeder, Maximilian ; Besler, Christian ; Lücke, Christian ; Gutberlet, Matthias ; Schmieder, Roland E. ; Mahfoud, Felix ; Thiele, Holger ; Desch, Steffen ; Fengler, Karl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-75550fa3e7e3187ebfc7696dc7b4bb9011159e4d722f6345d5c188d8ee70df6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glycopeptides - blood</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Hematocrit</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hypertension - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney - innervation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Sympathectomy - methods</topic><topic>Vascular Resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lurz, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kresoja, Karl-Patrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rommel, Karl-Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Roeder, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besler, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lücke, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutberlet, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmieder, Roland E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfoud, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desch, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fengler, Karl</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lurz, Philip</au><au>Kresoja, Karl-Patrik</au><au>Rommel, Karl-Philipp</au><au>von Roeder, Maximilian</au><au>Besler, Christian</au><au>Lücke, Christian</au><au>Gutberlet, Matthias</au><au>Schmieder, Roland E.</au><au>Mahfoud, Felix</au><au>Thiele, Holger</au><au>Desch, Steffen</au><au>Fengler, Karl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle><addtitle>Hypertension</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>707-713</pages><issn>0194-911X</issn><eissn>1524-4563</eissn><abstract>Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort (P=0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m2, P=0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>32008429</pmid><doi>10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14310</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-911X
ispartof Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 2020-03, Vol.75 (3), p.707-713
issn 0194-911X
1524-4563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350347329
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Blood Pressure
Body Weight
Catheter Ablation
Follow-Up Studies
Glycopeptides - blood
Heart - diagnostic imaging
Heart Rate
Hematocrit
Humans
Hypertension - physiopathology
Hypertension - surgery
Kidney - innervation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Stroke Volume
Sympathectomy - methods
Vascular Resistance
title Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A35%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20Stroke%20Volume%20After%20Renal%20Denervation:%20Insight%20From%20Cardiac%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Hypertension%20(Dallas,%20Tex.%201979)&rft.au=Lurz,%20Philip&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=707-713&rft.issn=0194-911X&rft.eissn=1524-4563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14310&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350347329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350347329&rft_id=info:pmid/32008429&rfr_iscdi=true