Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) Tex. 1979), 2020-03, Vol.75 (3), p.707-713 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 713 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 707 |
container_title | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Lurz, Philip Kresoja, Karl-Patrik Rommel, Karl-Philipp von Roeder, Maximilian Besler, Christian Lücke, Christian Gutberlet, Matthias Schmieder, Roland E. Mahfoud, Felix Thiele, Holger Desch, Steffen Fengler, Karl |
description | Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort (P=0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m2, P=0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14310 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350347329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350347329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-75550fa3e7e3187ebfc7696dc7b4bb9011159e4d722f6345d5c188d8ee70df6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EokvhKyBz45Li8Z84RuKw2m67K5UWtQXBKXKcSTY0cYqdtOLbY9jCgQNipNFoRu_Nk36EvAJ2BJDDm82XD-vL6_X51fbifLlZpqM5AimAPSILUFxmUuXiMVkwMDIzAJ8PyLMYvzIGUkr9lBwIzlghuVkQu9pZ32KknadXUxhvkH4a-3lAumwmDPQSve3pMXoMd3bqRv-Wbn3s2t1ET8I40JUNdWcdfW9bj1PnkiGO3nqHdDvYtvPtc_KksX3EFw_zkHw8WV-vNtnZxel2tTzLnMgZy7RSijVWoEYBhcaqcTo3ee10JavKMABQBmWtOW9yIVWtHBRFXSBqVje5FYfk9f7vbRi_zRincuiiw763Hsc5llwoJqQW3CSp2UtdGGMM2JS3oRts-F4CK38SLv8inI6m_EU4eV8-xMzVgPUf52-kSfBuL7gf-0Qw3vTzPYZyh7afdv8VIP_hZ6kkz4uMsxQo0palhkL8AASam_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350347329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lurz, Philip ; Kresoja, Karl-Patrik ; Rommel, Karl-Philipp ; von Roeder, Maximilian ; Besler, Christian ; Lücke, Christian ; Gutberlet, Matthias ; Schmieder, Roland E. ; Mahfoud, Felix ; Thiele, Holger ; Desch, Steffen ; Fengler, Karl</creator><creatorcontrib>Lurz, Philip ; Kresoja, Karl-Patrik ; Rommel, Karl-Philipp ; von Roeder, Maximilian ; Besler, Christian ; Lücke, Christian ; Gutberlet, Matthias ; Schmieder, Roland E. ; Mahfoud, Felix ; Thiele, Holger ; Desch, Steffen ; Fengler, Karl</creatorcontrib><description>Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort (P=0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m2, P=0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-911X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14310</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32008429</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Blood Pressure ; Body Weight ; Catheter Ablation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glycopeptides - blood ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Rate ; Hematocrit ; Humans ; Hypertension - physiopathology ; Hypertension - surgery ; Kidney - innervation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Prospective Studies ; Single-Blind Method ; Stroke Volume ; Sympathectomy - methods ; Vascular Resistance</subject><ispartof>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 2020-03, Vol.75 (3), p.707-713</ispartof><rights>American Heart Association, Inc</rights><rights>2020 American Heart Association, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-75550fa3e7e3187ebfc7696dc7b4bb9011159e4d722f6345d5c188d8ee70df6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3674,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32008429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lurz, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kresoja, Karl-Patrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rommel, Karl-Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Roeder, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besler, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lücke, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutberlet, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmieder, Roland E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfoud, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desch, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fengler, Karl</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><title>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</title><addtitle>Hypertension</addtitle><description>Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort (P=0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m2, P=0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham.</description><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glycopeptides - blood</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Hematocrit</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hypertension - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney - innervation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Sympathectomy - methods</subject><subject>Vascular Resistance</subject><issn>0194-911X</issn><issn>1524-4563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EokvhKyBz45Li8Z84RuKw2m67K5UWtQXBKXKcSTY0cYqdtOLbY9jCgQNipNFoRu_Nk36EvAJ2BJDDm82XD-vL6_X51fbifLlZpqM5AimAPSILUFxmUuXiMVkwMDIzAJ8PyLMYvzIGUkr9lBwIzlghuVkQu9pZ32KknadXUxhvkH4a-3lAumwmDPQSve3pMXoMd3bqRv-Wbn3s2t1ET8I40JUNdWcdfW9bj1PnkiGO3nqHdDvYtvPtc_KksX3EFw_zkHw8WV-vNtnZxel2tTzLnMgZy7RSijVWoEYBhcaqcTo3ee10JavKMABQBmWtOW9yIVWtHBRFXSBqVje5FYfk9f7vbRi_zRincuiiw763Hsc5llwoJqQW3CSp2UtdGGMM2JS3oRts-F4CK38SLv8inI6m_EU4eV8-xMzVgPUf52-kSfBuL7gf-0Qw3vTzPYZyh7afdv8VIP_hZ6kkz4uMsxQo0palhkL8AASam_I</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Lurz, Philip</creator><creator>Kresoja, Karl-Patrik</creator><creator>Rommel, Karl-Philipp</creator><creator>von Roeder, Maximilian</creator><creator>Besler, Christian</creator><creator>Lücke, Christian</creator><creator>Gutberlet, Matthias</creator><creator>Schmieder, Roland E.</creator><creator>Mahfoud, Felix</creator><creator>Thiele, Holger</creator><creator>Desch, Steffen</creator><creator>Fengler, Karl</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><author>Lurz, Philip ; Kresoja, Karl-Patrik ; Rommel, Karl-Philipp ; von Roeder, Maximilian ; Besler, Christian ; Lücke, Christian ; Gutberlet, Matthias ; Schmieder, Roland E. ; Mahfoud, Felix ; Thiele, Holger ; Desch, Steffen ; Fengler, Karl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-75550fa3e7e3187ebfc7696dc7b4bb9011159e4d722f6345d5c188d8ee70df6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glycopeptides - blood</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Hematocrit</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hypertension - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney - innervation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Sympathectomy - methods</topic><topic>Vascular Resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lurz, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kresoja, Karl-Patrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rommel, Karl-Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Roeder, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besler, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lücke, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutberlet, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmieder, Roland E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfoud, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desch, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fengler, Karl</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lurz, Philip</au><au>Kresoja, Karl-Patrik</au><au>Rommel, Karl-Philipp</au><au>von Roeder, Maximilian</au><au>Besler, Christian</au><au>Lücke, Christian</au><au>Gutberlet, Matthias</au><au>Schmieder, Roland E.</au><au>Mahfoud, Felix</au><au>Thiele, Holger</au><au>Desch, Steffen</au><au>Fengler, Karl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle><addtitle>Hypertension</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>707-713</pages><issn>0194-911X</issn><eissn>1524-4563</eissn><abstract>Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort (P=0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m2, P=0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>32008429</pmid><doi>10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14310</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0194-911X |
ispartof | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 2020-03, Vol.75 (3), p.707-713 |
issn | 0194-911X 1524-4563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350347329 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Blood Pressure Body Weight Catheter Ablation Follow-Up Studies Glycopeptides - blood Heart - diagnostic imaging Heart Rate Hematocrit Humans Hypertension - physiopathology Hypertension - surgery Kidney - innervation Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prospective Studies Single-Blind Method Stroke Volume Sympathectomy - methods Vascular Resistance |
title | Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation: Insight From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A35%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20Stroke%20Volume%20After%20Renal%20Denervation:%20Insight%20From%20Cardiac%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Hypertension%20(Dallas,%20Tex.%201979)&rft.au=Lurz,%20Philip&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=707-713&rft.issn=0194-911X&rft.eissn=1524-4563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14310&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350347329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350347329&rft_id=info:pmid/32008429&rfr_iscdi=true |