Collaborative learning in practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research evidence in nurse education

Collaborative Learning in Practice is a model of placement learning for student nurses that is currently being implemented in the United Kingdom, apparently originating in Amsterdam. Potential benefits are reported to be increased placement capacity, reduced burdens on mentors as practice assessors,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nurse education in practice 2020-02, Vol.43, p.102706-102706, Article 102706
Hauptverfasser: Williamson, Graham R., Plowright, Hayley, Kane, Adele, Bunce, Jane, Clarke, Danny, Jamison, Caroline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102706
container_issue
container_start_page 102706
container_title Nurse education in practice
container_volume 43
creator Williamson, Graham R.
Plowright, Hayley
Kane, Adele
Bunce, Jane
Clarke, Danny
Jamison, Caroline
description Collaborative Learning in Practice is a model of placement learning for student nurses that is currently being implemented in the United Kingdom, apparently originating in Amsterdam. Potential benefits are reported to be increased placement capacity, reduced burdens on mentors as practice assessors, improvements in qualified nurses’ job satisfaction, recruitment and retention, and better-developed preparedness for registrant practice amongst student nurses. We conducted a thorough, rigorous systematic review between October and December 2018 of the literature on Collaborative Learning in Practice to discover whether there was a research evidence base for these claims. We found nothing published in English in peer reviewed journals. We found 14 related papers, although these were about the Dedicated Education Unit concept, and we have conducted a narrative synthesis of them. Key findings support the assertions related to Collaborative Learning in Practice, albeit in different models of placement learning. Further research is necessary with Collaborative Learning in Practice stakeholders including staff and students, and regarding patient care metrics, to demonstrate benefits or otherwise and until that research takes place potential gains remain unproven. •Collaborative Learning in Practice (CLIP) is being implemented in the UK.•CLIP apparently originated in Amsterdam.•We attempted to systematically review the research literature on CLIP.•We found that there is none in peer reviewed journals.•We argue that further research is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102706
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350096377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1471595319301362</els_id><sourcerecordid>2350096377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c93073971c4fbce64f68eb92514145fb4721390d77a1340acbb2c526a52c564e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVpqJ20f6CHIugll3X0tStvyMWYfBQCuSRnodXONjK25Ei7DiZ_PrPYzSGHnmYQz_tqZl5CfnI244xXF6tZgG2aCSbGB6FZ9YVM-VzLohRCfsVeaV6UdSkn5DTnFUMR09U3MpECeyXmU_K2jOu1bWKyvd8BXYNNwYe_1Ae6Tdb13sElXdC8zz1skHE0wc7DK7WhpcGmoy7vQ_8M2WcaO4odUhmt3DNFuoXgYHQMQ8pAoR0cqmL4Tk46u87w41jPyNPN9ePyrrh_uP2zXNwXDkfsC1dLpmWtuVNd46BSXTWHphYlV1yVXaO04LJmrdaWS8WsaxrhSlHZEkulQJ6R84PvNsWXAXJvNj47wL0DxCEbIUvG6kpqjejvT-gqDingdEYorhn-I2ukxIFyKeacoDPb5Dc27Q1nZozGrMwYjRmjMYdoUPTraD00G2g_JP-yQODqAADeAm-cTHZ-PF3rE7jetNH_z_8d-Xyf_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417039039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collaborative learning in practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research evidence in nurse education</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Williamson, Graham R. ; Plowright, Hayley ; Kane, Adele ; Bunce, Jane ; Clarke, Danny ; Jamison, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Graham R. ; Plowright, Hayley ; Kane, Adele ; Bunce, Jane ; Clarke, Danny ; Jamison, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Collaborative Learning in Practice is a model of placement learning for student nurses that is currently being implemented in the United Kingdom, apparently originating in Amsterdam. Potential benefits are reported to be increased placement capacity, reduced burdens on mentors as practice assessors, improvements in qualified nurses’ job satisfaction, recruitment and retention, and better-developed preparedness for registrant practice amongst student nurses. We conducted a thorough, rigorous systematic review between October and December 2018 of the literature on Collaborative Learning in Practice to discover whether there was a research evidence base for these claims. We found nothing published in English in peer reviewed journals. We found 14 related papers, although these were about the Dedicated Education Unit concept, and we have conducted a narrative synthesis of them. Key findings support the assertions related to Collaborative Learning in Practice, albeit in different models of placement learning. Further research is necessary with Collaborative Learning in Practice stakeholders including staff and students, and regarding patient care metrics, to demonstrate benefits or otherwise and until that research takes place potential gains remain unproven. •Collaborative Learning in Practice (CLIP) is being implemented in the UK.•CLIP apparently originated in Amsterdam.•We attempted to systematically review the research literature on CLIP.•We found that there is none in peer reviewed journals.•We argue that further research is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-5953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102706</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32001428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessors ; Attrition (Research Studies) ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical training ; Clinical trials ; Collaborative learning ; Collaborative learning in practice ; Cooperative Learning ; Doctoral Dissertations ; Dropout Research ; Educational Environment ; Employment ; Evidence ; Evidence-based nursing ; Health education ; Information Seeking ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Job satisfaction ; Literature Reviews ; Mentors ; Meta Analysis ; Narrative synthesis ; Narratives ; Nurse education ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Obstetrics ; Patients ; Peer Teaching ; Recruitment ; Search Strategies ; Student Attrition ; Student Evaluation ; Student Improvement ; Student retention ; Student Satisfaction ; Supervision ; Systematic review ; Teams ; Thinking Skills ; Units of Study</subject><ispartof>Nurse education in practice, 2020-02, Vol.43, p.102706-102706, Article 102706</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c93073971c4fbce64f68eb92514145fb4721390d77a1340acbb2c526a52c564e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c93073971c4fbce64f68eb92514145fb4721390d77a1340acbb2c526a52c564e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2417039039?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,12844,27922,27923,30997,45993,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32001428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Graham R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plowright, Hayley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunce, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamison, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Collaborative learning in practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research evidence in nurse education</title><title>Nurse education in practice</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><description>Collaborative Learning in Practice is a model of placement learning for student nurses that is currently being implemented in the United Kingdom, apparently originating in Amsterdam. Potential benefits are reported to be increased placement capacity, reduced burdens on mentors as practice assessors, improvements in qualified nurses’ job satisfaction, recruitment and retention, and better-developed preparedness for registrant practice amongst student nurses. We conducted a thorough, rigorous systematic review between October and December 2018 of the literature on Collaborative Learning in Practice to discover whether there was a research evidence base for these claims. We found nothing published in English in peer reviewed journals. We found 14 related papers, although these were about the Dedicated Education Unit concept, and we have conducted a narrative synthesis of them. Key findings support the assertions related to Collaborative Learning in Practice, albeit in different models of placement learning. Further research is necessary with Collaborative Learning in Practice stakeholders including staff and students, and regarding patient care metrics, to demonstrate benefits or otherwise and until that research takes place potential gains remain unproven. •Collaborative Learning in Practice (CLIP) is being implemented in the UK.•CLIP apparently originated in Amsterdam.•We attempted to systematically review the research literature on CLIP.•We found that there is none in peer reviewed journals.•We argue that further research is needed.</description><subject>Assessors</subject><subject>Attrition (Research Studies)</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical training</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>Collaborative learning in practice</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Doctoral Dissertations</subject><subject>Dropout Research</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Information Seeking</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Narrative synthesis</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Nurse education</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peer Teaching</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Search Strategies</subject><subject>Student Attrition</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Student retention</subject><subject>Student Satisfaction</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Units of Study</subject><issn>1471-5953</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVpqJ20f6CHIugll3X0tStvyMWYfBQCuSRnodXONjK25Ei7DiZ_PrPYzSGHnmYQz_tqZl5CfnI244xXF6tZgG2aCSbGB6FZ9YVM-VzLohRCfsVeaV6UdSkn5DTnFUMR09U3MpECeyXmU_K2jOu1bWKyvd8BXYNNwYe_1Ae6Tdb13sElXdC8zz1skHE0wc7DK7WhpcGmoy7vQ_8M2WcaO4odUhmt3DNFuoXgYHQMQ8pAoR0cqmL4Tk46u87w41jPyNPN9ePyrrh_uP2zXNwXDkfsC1dLpmWtuVNd46BSXTWHphYlV1yVXaO04LJmrdaWS8WsaxrhSlHZEkulQJ6R84PvNsWXAXJvNj47wL0DxCEbIUvG6kpqjejvT-gqDingdEYorhn-I2ukxIFyKeacoDPb5Dc27Q1nZozGrMwYjRmjMYdoUPTraD00G2g_JP-yQODqAADeAm-cTHZ-PF3rE7jetNH_z_8d-Xyf_Q</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Williamson, Graham R.</creator><creator>Plowright, Hayley</creator><creator>Kane, Adele</creator><creator>Bunce, Jane</creator><creator>Clarke, Danny</creator><creator>Jamison, Caroline</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Collaborative learning in practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research evidence in nurse education</title><author>Williamson, Graham R. ; Plowright, Hayley ; Kane, Adele ; Bunce, Jane ; Clarke, Danny ; Jamison, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c93073971c4fbce64f68eb92514145fb4721390d77a1340acbb2c526a52c564e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Assessors</topic><topic>Attrition (Research Studies)</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical training</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>Collaborative learning in practice</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Doctoral Dissertations</topic><topic>Dropout Research</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Information Seeking</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Narrative synthesis</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Nurse education</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peer Teaching</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Search Strategies</topic><topic>Student Attrition</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Student retention</topic><topic>Student Satisfaction</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Units of Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Graham R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plowright, Hayley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunce, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamison, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williamson, Graham R.</au><au>Plowright, Hayley</au><au>Kane, Adele</au><au>Bunce, Jane</au><au>Clarke, Danny</au><au>Jamison, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collaborative learning in practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research evidence in nurse education</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><spage>102706</spage><epage>102706</epage><pages>102706-102706</pages><artnum>102706</artnum><issn>1471-5953</issn><eissn>1873-5223</eissn><abstract>Collaborative Learning in Practice is a model of placement learning for student nurses that is currently being implemented in the United Kingdom, apparently originating in Amsterdam. Potential benefits are reported to be increased placement capacity, reduced burdens on mentors as practice assessors, improvements in qualified nurses’ job satisfaction, recruitment and retention, and better-developed preparedness for registrant practice amongst student nurses. We conducted a thorough, rigorous systematic review between October and December 2018 of the literature on Collaborative Learning in Practice to discover whether there was a research evidence base for these claims. We found nothing published in English in peer reviewed journals. We found 14 related papers, although these were about the Dedicated Education Unit concept, and we have conducted a narrative synthesis of them. Key findings support the assertions related to Collaborative Learning in Practice, albeit in different models of placement learning. Further research is necessary with Collaborative Learning in Practice stakeholders including staff and students, and regarding patient care metrics, to demonstrate benefits or otherwise and until that research takes place potential gains remain unproven. •Collaborative Learning in Practice (CLIP) is being implemented in the UK.•CLIP apparently originated in Amsterdam.•We attempted to systematically review the research literature on CLIP.•We found that there is none in peer reviewed journals.•We argue that further research is needed.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32001428</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102706</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-5953
ispartof Nurse education in practice, 2020-02, Vol.43, p.102706-102706, Article 102706
issn 1471-5953
1873-5223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350096377
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central
subjects Assessors
Attrition (Research Studies)
Clinical medicine
Clinical training
Clinical trials
Collaborative learning
Collaborative learning in practice
Cooperative Learning
Doctoral Dissertations
Dropout Research
Educational Environment
Employment
Evidence
Evidence-based nursing
Health education
Information Seeking
Interpersonal Relationship
Job satisfaction
Literature Reviews
Mentors
Meta Analysis
Narrative synthesis
Narratives
Nurse education
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing education
Obstetrics
Patients
Peer Teaching
Recruitment
Search Strategies
Student Attrition
Student Evaluation
Student Improvement
Student retention
Student Satisfaction
Supervision
Systematic review
Teams
Thinking Skills
Units of Study
title Collaborative learning in practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research evidence in nurse education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A02%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collaborative%20learning%20in%20practice:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20narrative%20synthesis%20of%20the%20research%20evidence%20in%20nurse%20education&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20in%20practice&rft.au=Williamson,%20Graham%20R.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=43&rft.spage=102706&rft.epage=102706&rft.pages=102706-102706&rft.artnum=102706&rft.issn=1471-5953&rft.eissn=1873-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102706&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350096377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417039039&rft_id=info:pmid/32001428&rft_els_id=S1471595319301362&rfr_iscdi=true