Comparison of drug survival between infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease

Background Conventional therapy of inflammatory bowel disease with traditional immunosuppressant medication is increasingly being replaced by biological agents. However, the response to these biological agents may be lost over time, with discontinuation being a marker of loss of effectiveness. There...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical pharmacy 2020-04, Vol.42 (2), p.500-507
Hauptverfasser: Gil-Candel, Mayte, Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José, Urbieta-Sanz, Elena, Rentero-Redondo, Lorena, Onteniente-Candela, María, Iniesta-Navalón, Carles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 507
container_issue 2
container_start_page 500
container_title International journal of clinical pharmacy
container_volume 42
creator Gil-Candel, Mayte
Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José
Urbieta-Sanz, Elena
Rentero-Redondo, Lorena
Onteniente-Candela, María
Iniesta-Navalón, Carles
description Background Conventional therapy of inflammatory bowel disease with traditional immunosuppressant medication is increasingly being replaced by biological agents. However, the response to these biological agents may be lost over time, with discontinuation being a marker of loss of effectiveness. There are few published reports on the treatment drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Objective This study compared the drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab as first- and second-line treatments, identified factors associated with drug survival, and described reasons for treatment withdrawal. Setting A pharmacy department of a university hospital in Spain. Method A retrospective single-centre cohort study of all patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological agents between 2008 and 2017 at a regional referral hospital. The primary outcome was drug survival and associated factors during a follow-up of 52 months. Main outcome measure Drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab. Results One hundred thirty-four patients with inflammatory bowel disease (73.9% Crohn’s disease and 26.1% ulcerative colitis) were treated with biological therapy. The overall mean drug survival of first-line treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor agent was 18.6 months (SD 14.9), with mean values of 20.2 months (SD 16.6) for adalimumab and 17.1 months (SD 13.1) for infliximab. As a second-line treatment, the drug survival of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents was 17.9 months (SD 15.6), with mean values of 22.9 months (SD 17.1) for adalimumab and 12.5 months (SD 11.7) for infliximab. The difference in time to discontinuation at 52 months of follow-up between the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, as either first- or second-line treatment, was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.547 and p  = 0.676, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was the only factor associated with greater drug survival in first-line treatment (HR 0.27; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.15–0.50) and second-line treatment (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10–0.65). Secondary failure to treatment was the most frequent reason for withdrawal. Conclusion Infliximab and adalimumab showed similar drug survival as first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments. Therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with higher drug survival for both first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11096-020-00978-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350095134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350095134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-99ed7a6db4e239392e337155cbd13eb973a05d4773a4f9c7dc2a34cf80121ab83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqCDYP8ChstQLl7QzthOvj9UKWiSkXsqJg-XEE2SUxFt7w8e_ryELlTjUl7E1z7y2H8ZOEb4igP6WEcE0FQioAIxeV80HdiQEQqU14se3PchDtsr5DspSjcBafWKHUgA0qPCI3WziuHUp5Djx2HOf5lue53Qf7t3AW9o9EE08TP0QHsPoWu4mz513Qxjn52NYmm4c3S6mJ97GBxq4D5lcphN20Lsh02pfj9n1xfnvzc_q6tePy833q6pTCneVMeS1a3yrSEgjjSApNdZ113qU1BotHdRe6VJVbzrtO-Gk6vo1oEDXruUxO1tytyn-mSnv7BhyR8PgJopztkLWRVGNUhX0yzv0Ls5pKq8rlGlqrWrQhRIL1aWYc6LeblP5fXqyCPbZvl3s22Lfvti3TRn6vI-e25H828ir6wLIBcilNd1S-nf3f2L_Avymj0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2396574507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of drug survival between infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gil-Candel, Mayte ; Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José ; Urbieta-Sanz, Elena ; Rentero-Redondo, Lorena ; Onteniente-Candela, María ; Iniesta-Navalón, Carles</creator><creatorcontrib>Gil-Candel, Mayte ; Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José ; Urbieta-Sanz, Elena ; Rentero-Redondo, Lorena ; Onteniente-Candela, María ; Iniesta-Navalón, Carles</creatorcontrib><description>Background Conventional therapy of inflammatory bowel disease with traditional immunosuppressant medication is increasingly being replaced by biological agents. However, the response to these biological agents may be lost over time, with discontinuation being a marker of loss of effectiveness. There are few published reports on the treatment drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Objective This study compared the drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab as first- and second-line treatments, identified factors associated with drug survival, and described reasons for treatment withdrawal. Setting A pharmacy department of a university hospital in Spain. Method A retrospective single-centre cohort study of all patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological agents between 2008 and 2017 at a regional referral hospital. The primary outcome was drug survival and associated factors during a follow-up of 52 months. Main outcome measure Drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab. Results One hundred thirty-four patients with inflammatory bowel disease (73.9% Crohn’s disease and 26.1% ulcerative colitis) were treated with biological therapy. The overall mean drug survival of first-line treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor agent was 18.6 months (SD 14.9), with mean values of 20.2 months (SD 16.6) for adalimumab and 17.1 months (SD 13.1) for infliximab. As a second-line treatment, the drug survival of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents was 17.9 months (SD 15.6), with mean values of 22.9 months (SD 17.1) for adalimumab and 12.5 months (SD 11.7) for infliximab. The difference in time to discontinuation at 52 months of follow-up between the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, as either first- or second-line treatment, was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.547 and p  = 0.676, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was the only factor associated with greater drug survival in first-line treatment (HR 0.27; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.15–0.50) and second-line treatment (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10–0.65). Secondary failure to treatment was the most frequent reason for withdrawal. Conclusion Infliximab and adalimumab showed similar drug survival as first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments. Therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with higher drug survival for both first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-7703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-7711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-00978-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32006141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adalimumab - blood ; Adalimumab - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents - blood ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents - therapeutic use ; Cohort Studies ; Colon ; Crohn's disease ; Drug Monitoring - trends ; Drug withdrawal ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrointestinal Agents - blood ; Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Inflammatory bowel diseases ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - blood ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - drug therapy ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - epidemiology ; Infliximab ; Infliximab - blood ; Infliximab - therapeutic use ; Internal Medicine ; Intestine ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Patients ; Pharmacy ; Research Article ; Retrospective Studies ; Spain - epidemiology ; Statistical analysis ; Survival ; Therapeutic drug monitoring ; TNF inhibitors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha ; Tumor necrosis factor-TNF ; Tumor necrosis factor-α ; Tumors ; Ulcerative colitis</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020-04, Vol.42 (2), p.500-507</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-99ed7a6db4e239392e337155cbd13eb973a05d4773a4f9c7dc2a34cf80121ab83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-99ed7a6db4e239392e337155cbd13eb973a05d4773a4f9c7dc2a34cf80121ab83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7398-8350</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11096-020-00978-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11096-020-00978-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32006141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gil-Candel, Mayte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbieta-Sanz, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rentero-Redondo, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onteniente-Candela, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iniesta-Navalón, Carles</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of drug survival between infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease</title><title>International journal of clinical pharmacy</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Pharm</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Pharm</addtitle><description>Background Conventional therapy of inflammatory bowel disease with traditional immunosuppressant medication is increasingly being replaced by biological agents. However, the response to these biological agents may be lost over time, with discontinuation being a marker of loss of effectiveness. There are few published reports on the treatment drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Objective This study compared the drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab as first- and second-line treatments, identified factors associated with drug survival, and described reasons for treatment withdrawal. Setting A pharmacy department of a university hospital in Spain. Method A retrospective single-centre cohort study of all patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological agents between 2008 and 2017 at a regional referral hospital. The primary outcome was drug survival and associated factors during a follow-up of 52 months. Main outcome measure Drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab. Results One hundred thirty-four patients with inflammatory bowel disease (73.9% Crohn’s disease and 26.1% ulcerative colitis) were treated with biological therapy. The overall mean drug survival of first-line treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor agent was 18.6 months (SD 14.9), with mean values of 20.2 months (SD 16.6) for adalimumab and 17.1 months (SD 13.1) for infliximab. As a second-line treatment, the drug survival of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents was 17.9 months (SD 15.6), with mean values of 22.9 months (SD 17.1) for adalimumab and 12.5 months (SD 11.7) for infliximab. The difference in time to discontinuation at 52 months of follow-up between the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, as either first- or second-line treatment, was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.547 and p  = 0.676, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was the only factor associated with greater drug survival in first-line treatment (HR 0.27; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.15–0.50) and second-line treatment (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10–0.65). Secondary failure to treatment was the most frequent reason for withdrawal. Conclusion Infliximab and adalimumab showed similar drug survival as first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments. Therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with higher drug survival for both first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments.</description><subject>Adalimumab - blood</subject><subject>Adalimumab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - blood</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Crohn's disease</subject><subject>Drug Monitoring - trends</subject><subject>Drug withdrawal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Agents - blood</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel diseases</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - blood</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infliximab</subject><subject>Infliximab - blood</subject><subject>Infliximab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Therapeutic drug monitoring</subject><subject>TNF inhibitors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha</subject><subject>Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</subject><subject>Tumor necrosis factor-α</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ulcerative colitis</subject><issn>2210-7703</issn><issn>2210-7711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqCDYP8ChstQLl7QzthOvj9UKWiSkXsqJg-XEE2SUxFt7w8e_ryELlTjUl7E1z7y2H8ZOEb4igP6WEcE0FQioAIxeV80HdiQEQqU14se3PchDtsr5DspSjcBafWKHUgA0qPCI3WziuHUp5Djx2HOf5lue53Qf7t3AW9o9EE08TP0QHsPoWu4mz513Qxjn52NYmm4c3S6mJ97GBxq4D5lcphN20Lsh02pfj9n1xfnvzc_q6tePy833q6pTCneVMeS1a3yrSEgjjSApNdZ113qU1BotHdRe6VJVbzrtO-Gk6vo1oEDXruUxO1tytyn-mSnv7BhyR8PgJopztkLWRVGNUhX0yzv0Ls5pKq8rlGlqrWrQhRIL1aWYc6LeblP5fXqyCPbZvl3s22Lfvti3TRn6vI-e25H828ir6wLIBcilNd1S-nf3f2L_Avymj0w</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Gil-Candel, Mayte</creator><creator>Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José</creator><creator>Urbieta-Sanz, Elena</creator><creator>Rentero-Redondo, Lorena</creator><creator>Onteniente-Candela, María</creator><creator>Iniesta-Navalón, Carles</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-8350</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Comparison of drug survival between infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease</title><author>Gil-Candel, Mayte ; Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José ; Urbieta-Sanz, Elena ; Rentero-Redondo, Lorena ; Onteniente-Candela, María ; Iniesta-Navalón, Carles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-99ed7a6db4e239392e337155cbd13eb973a05d4773a4f9c7dc2a34cf80121ab83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adalimumab - blood</topic><topic>Adalimumab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - blood</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Crohn's disease</topic><topic>Drug Monitoring - trends</topic><topic>Drug withdrawal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Agents - blood</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel diseases</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - blood</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infliximab</topic><topic>Infliximab - blood</topic><topic>Infliximab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Therapeutic drug monitoring</topic><topic>TNF inhibitors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha</topic><topic>Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</topic><topic>Tumor necrosis factor-α</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ulcerative colitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gil-Candel, Mayte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbieta-Sanz, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rentero-Redondo, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onteniente-Candela, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iniesta-Navalón, Carles</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gil-Candel, Mayte</au><au>Gascón-Cánovas, Juan José</au><au>Urbieta-Sanz, Elena</au><au>Rentero-Redondo, Lorena</au><au>Onteniente-Candela, María</au><au>Iniesta-Navalón, Carles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of drug survival between infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical pharmacy</jtitle><stitle>Int J Clin Pharm</stitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Pharm</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>507</epage><pages>500-507</pages><issn>2210-7703</issn><eissn>2210-7711</eissn><abstract>Background Conventional therapy of inflammatory bowel disease with traditional immunosuppressant medication is increasingly being replaced by biological agents. However, the response to these biological agents may be lost over time, with discontinuation being a marker of loss of effectiveness. There are few published reports on the treatment drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Objective This study compared the drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab as first- and second-line treatments, identified factors associated with drug survival, and described reasons for treatment withdrawal. Setting A pharmacy department of a university hospital in Spain. Method A retrospective single-centre cohort study of all patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological agents between 2008 and 2017 at a regional referral hospital. The primary outcome was drug survival and associated factors during a follow-up of 52 months. Main outcome measure Drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab. Results One hundred thirty-four patients with inflammatory bowel disease (73.9% Crohn’s disease and 26.1% ulcerative colitis) were treated with biological therapy. The overall mean drug survival of first-line treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor agent was 18.6 months (SD 14.9), with mean values of 20.2 months (SD 16.6) for adalimumab and 17.1 months (SD 13.1) for infliximab. As a second-line treatment, the drug survival of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents was 17.9 months (SD 15.6), with mean values of 22.9 months (SD 17.1) for adalimumab and 12.5 months (SD 11.7) for infliximab. The difference in time to discontinuation at 52 months of follow-up between the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, as either first- or second-line treatment, was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.547 and p  = 0.676, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was the only factor associated with greater drug survival in first-line treatment (HR 0.27; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.15–0.50) and second-line treatment (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10–0.65). Secondary failure to treatment was the most frequent reason for withdrawal. Conclusion Infliximab and adalimumab showed similar drug survival as first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments. Therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with higher drug survival for both first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32006141</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11096-020-00978-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-8350</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2210-7703
ispartof International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020-04, Vol.42 (2), p.500-507
issn 2210-7703
2210-7711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350095134
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adalimumab - blood
Adalimumab - therapeutic use
Adult
Anti-Inflammatory Agents - blood
Anti-Inflammatory Agents - therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Colon
Crohn's disease
Drug Monitoring - trends
Drug withdrawal
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastrointestinal Agents - blood
Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use
Humans
Immunotherapy
Inflammatory bowel disease
Inflammatory bowel diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - blood
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - drug therapy
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - epidemiology
Infliximab
Infliximab - blood
Infliximab - therapeutic use
Internal Medicine
Intestine
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Monoclonal antibodies
Patients
Pharmacy
Research Article
Retrospective Studies
Spain - epidemiology
Statistical analysis
Survival
Therapeutic drug monitoring
TNF inhibitors
Treatment Outcome
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
Tumor necrosis factor-TNF
Tumor necrosis factor-α
Tumors
Ulcerative colitis
title Comparison of drug survival between infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A56%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20drug%20survival%20between%20infliximab%20and%20adalimumab%20in%20inflammatory%20bowel%20disease&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacy&rft.au=Gil-Candel,%20Mayte&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=507&rft.pages=500-507&rft.issn=2210-7703&rft.eissn=2210-7711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11096-020-00978-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350095134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2396574507&rft_id=info:pmid/32006141&rfr_iscdi=true