'Help for trauma from the app stores?' A systematic review and standardised rating of apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Background: Mobile health applications (apps) are considered to complement traditional psychological treatments for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, the use for clinical practice and quality of available apps is unknown. Objective: To assess the general characteristics, therapeutic ba...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of psychotraumatology 2020-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1701788-1701788 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1701788 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1701788 |
container_title | European journal of psychotraumatology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Sander, Lasse Bosse Schorndanner, Johanna Terhorst, Yannik Spanhel, Kerstin Pryss, Rüdiger Baumeister, Harald Messner, Eva-Maria |
description | Background: Mobile health applications (apps) are considered to complement traditional psychological treatments for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, the use for clinical practice and quality of available apps is unknown.
Objective: To assess the general characteristics, therapeutic background, content, and quality of apps for PTSD and to examine their concordance with established PTSD treatment and self-help methods.
Method: A web crawler systematically searched for apps targeting PTSD in the British Google Play and Apple iTunes stores. Two independent researchers rated the apps using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). The content of high-quality apps was checked for concordance with psychological treatment and self-help methods extracted from current literature on PTSD treatment.
Results: Out of 555 identified apps, 69 met the inclusion criteria. The overall app quality based on the MARS was medium (M = 3.36, SD = 0.65). Most apps (50.7%) were based on cognitive behavioural therapy and offered a wide range of content, including established psychological PTSD treatment methods such as processing of trauma-related emotions and beliefs, relaxation exercises, and psychoeducation. Notably, data protection and privacy standards were poor in most apps and only one app (1.4%) was scientifically evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
Conclusions: High-quality apps based on established psychological treatment techniques for PTSD are available in commercial app stores. However, users are confronted with great difficulties in identifying useful high-quality apps and most apps lack an evidence-base. Commercial distribution channels do not exploit the potential of apps to complement the psychological treatment of PTSD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/20008198.2019.1701788 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350094385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cde84bc76fae49f4a0f409b7a386efed</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2350094385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-236a0b7e72345a86dea8299c9c5fe9e5a4cd4d9bd32e48166269a8107638aeb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1PHCEUhidNm2qsP6ENSS-0F7tlgGHgpq3RtpqY1MTtNTkDh3XMzLDCrGbv-8PLfmi0F00IX-c9Dwd4i-J9SaclVfQzo5SqUqspo6WeljUta6VeFfvr_YmiUr5-Nt8rDlO6zSsqc1P6bbHHc5CVXO4Xf47OsVsQHyIZIyx7ID6Gnow3SGCxIGkMEdPXI3JC0iqN2MPYWhLxvsUHAoPLgtxDdG1CR2KODnMS_Do3baBXIY2T2Ya8zrweMy6RszaF6DCS46vZ9dmnd8UbD13Cw914UPz-8X12ej65_PXz4vTkcmIrXY0TxiXQpsaacVGBkg5BMa2ttpVHjRUI64TTjeMMhSqlZFKDKmktuQJsan5QXGy5LsCtWcS2h7gyAVqz2QhxbiDmMjs01qESja2lBxTaC6BeUN3UwJVEjy6zvmxZi2XTo7M45PfrXkBfRob2xszDvZFaKsl0BhzvADHcLTGNpm-Txa6DAcMyGcYrSrXgqsrSj_9Ib8MyDvmpDBOaiboSgmdVtVXZGFKK6J-KKalZ28Y82sasbWN2tsl5H57f5Cnr0SRZ8G0raIf8pT08hNg5M8KqC9FHGGybDP__GX8BZh3SOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492475443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'Help for trauma from the app stores?' A systematic review and standardised rating of apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals</source><source>Co-Action Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sander, Lasse Bosse ; Schorndanner, Johanna ; Terhorst, Yannik ; Spanhel, Kerstin ; Pryss, Rüdiger ; Baumeister, Harald ; Messner, Eva-Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Sander, Lasse Bosse ; Schorndanner, Johanna ; Terhorst, Yannik ; Spanhel, Kerstin ; Pryss, Rüdiger ; Baumeister, Harald ; Messner, Eva-Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Mobile health applications (apps) are considered to complement traditional psychological treatments for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, the use for clinical practice and quality of available apps is unknown.
Objective: To assess the general characteristics, therapeutic background, content, and quality of apps for PTSD and to examine their concordance with established PTSD treatment and self-help methods.
Method: A web crawler systematically searched for apps targeting PTSD in the British Google Play and Apple iTunes stores. Two independent researchers rated the apps using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). The content of high-quality apps was checked for concordance with psychological treatment and self-help methods extracted from current literature on PTSD treatment.
Results: Out of 555 identified apps, 69 met the inclusion criteria. The overall app quality based on the MARS was medium (M = 3.36, SD = 0.65). Most apps (50.7%) were based on cognitive behavioural therapy and offered a wide range of content, including established psychological PTSD treatment methods such as processing of trauma-related emotions and beliefs, relaxation exercises, and psychoeducation. Notably, data protection and privacy standards were poor in most apps and only one app (1.4%) was scientifically evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
Conclusions: High-quality apps based on established psychological treatment techniques for PTSD are available in commercial app stores. However, users are confronted with great difficulties in identifying useful high-quality apps and most apps lack an evidence-base. Commercial distribution channels do not exploit the potential of apps to complement the psychological treatment of PTSD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2000-8066</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2000-8198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2000-8066</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1701788</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32002136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>aplicaciones (apps) ; apps ; eHealth ; eSalud ; mobile health ; Post traumatic stress disorder ; Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) ; Review ; revisión ; salud móvil ; Self help ; Systematic review ; The use of mobile health applications (apps) in clinical practice is linked with difficulties due to an unregulated commercial market not bound to standards in quality, data protection and privacy. 69 apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder were identified in a systematic search and rated in a standardized form. High-quality apps were found to offer a wide range of functionalities, including established treatment and self-help methods, but mostly lack an evidence-base ; trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) ; 创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD) ; 应用程序 ; 电子卫生保健 ; 移动健康 ; 综述</subject><ispartof>European journal of psychotraumatology, 2020-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1701788-1701788</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2020</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2020 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-236a0b7e72345a86dea8299c9c5fe9e5a4cd4d9bd32e48166269a8107638aeb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-236a0b7e72345a86dea8299c9c5fe9e5a4cd4d9bd32e48166269a8107638aeb73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6100-8354 ; 0000-0002-4222-9837 ; 0000-0002-2040-661X ; 0000-0001-8990-8995 ; 0000-0003-1522-785X ; 0000-0003-4091-5048 ; 0000-0002-4889-1274</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968629/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968629/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,27479,27901,27902,53766,53768,59116,59117</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sander, Lasse Bosse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schorndanner, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terhorst, Yannik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanhel, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pryss, Rüdiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumeister, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messner, Eva-Maria</creatorcontrib><title>'Help for trauma from the app stores?' A systematic review and standardised rating of apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)</title><title>European journal of psychotraumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Psychotraumatol</addtitle><description>Background: Mobile health applications (apps) are considered to complement traditional psychological treatments for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, the use for clinical practice and quality of available apps is unknown.
Objective: To assess the general characteristics, therapeutic background, content, and quality of apps for PTSD and to examine their concordance with established PTSD treatment and self-help methods.
Method: A web crawler systematically searched for apps targeting PTSD in the British Google Play and Apple iTunes stores. Two independent researchers rated the apps using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). The content of high-quality apps was checked for concordance with psychological treatment and self-help methods extracted from current literature on PTSD treatment.
Results: Out of 555 identified apps, 69 met the inclusion criteria. The overall app quality based on the MARS was medium (M = 3.36, SD = 0.65). Most apps (50.7%) were based on cognitive behavioural therapy and offered a wide range of content, including established psychological PTSD treatment methods such as processing of trauma-related emotions and beliefs, relaxation exercises, and psychoeducation. Notably, data protection and privacy standards were poor in most apps and only one app (1.4%) was scientifically evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
Conclusions: High-quality apps based on established psychological treatment techniques for PTSD are available in commercial app stores. However, users are confronted with great difficulties in identifying useful high-quality apps and most apps lack an evidence-base. Commercial distribution channels do not exploit the potential of apps to complement the psychological treatment of PTSD.</description><subject>aplicaciones (apps)</subject><subject>apps</subject><subject>eHealth</subject><subject>eSalud</subject><subject>mobile health</subject><subject>Post traumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>revisión</subject><subject>salud móvil</subject><subject>Self help</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>The use of mobile health applications (apps) in clinical practice is linked with difficulties due to an unregulated commercial market not bound to standards in quality, data protection and privacy. 69 apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder were identified in a systematic search and rated in a standardized form. High-quality apps were found to offer a wide range of functionalities, including established treatment and self-help methods, but mostly lack an evidence-base</subject><subject>trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT)</subject><subject>创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD)</subject><subject>应用程序</subject><subject>电子卫生保健</subject><subject>移动健康</subject><subject>综述</subject><issn>2000-8066</issn><issn>2000-8198</issn><issn>2000-8066</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1PHCEUhidNm2qsP6ENSS-0F7tlgGHgpq3RtpqY1MTtNTkDh3XMzLDCrGbv-8PLfmi0F00IX-c9Dwd4i-J9SaclVfQzo5SqUqspo6WeljUta6VeFfvr_YmiUr5-Nt8rDlO6zSsqc1P6bbHHc5CVXO4Xf47OsVsQHyIZIyx7ID6Gnow3SGCxIGkMEdPXI3JC0iqN2MPYWhLxvsUHAoPLgtxDdG1CR2KODnMS_Do3baBXIY2T2Ya8zrweMy6RszaF6DCS46vZ9dmnd8UbD13Cw914UPz-8X12ej65_PXz4vTkcmIrXY0TxiXQpsaacVGBkg5BMa2ttpVHjRUI64TTjeMMhSqlZFKDKmktuQJsan5QXGy5LsCtWcS2h7gyAVqz2QhxbiDmMjs01qESja2lBxTaC6BeUN3UwJVEjy6zvmxZi2XTo7M45PfrXkBfRob2xszDvZFaKsl0BhzvADHcLTGNpm-Txa6DAcMyGcYrSrXgqsrSj_9Ib8MyDvmpDBOaiboSgmdVtVXZGFKK6J-KKalZ28Y82sasbWN2tsl5H57f5Cnr0SRZ8G0raIf8pT08hNg5M8KqC9FHGGybDP__GX8BZh3SOA</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Sander, Lasse Bosse</creator><creator>Schorndanner, Johanna</creator><creator>Terhorst, Yannik</creator><creator>Spanhel, Kerstin</creator><creator>Pryss, Rüdiger</creator><creator>Baumeister, Harald</creator><creator>Messner, Eva-Maria</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-8354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-9837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-661X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-8995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-785X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-5048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4889-1274</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>'Help for trauma from the app stores?' A systematic review and standardised rating of apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)</title><author>Sander, Lasse Bosse ; Schorndanner, Johanna ; Terhorst, Yannik ; Spanhel, Kerstin ; Pryss, Rüdiger ; Baumeister, Harald ; Messner, Eva-Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-236a0b7e72345a86dea8299c9c5fe9e5a4cd4d9bd32e48166269a8107638aeb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>aplicaciones (apps)</topic><topic>apps</topic><topic>eHealth</topic><topic>eSalud</topic><topic>mobile health</topic><topic>Post traumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>revisión</topic><topic>salud móvil</topic><topic>Self help</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>The use of mobile health applications (apps) in clinical practice is linked with difficulties due to an unregulated commercial market not bound to standards in quality, data protection and privacy. 69 apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder were identified in a systematic search and rated in a standardized form. High-quality apps were found to offer a wide range of functionalities, including established treatment and self-help methods, but mostly lack an evidence-base</topic><topic>trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT)</topic><topic>创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD)</topic><topic>应用程序</topic><topic>电子卫生保健</topic><topic>移动健康</topic><topic>综述</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sander, Lasse Bosse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schorndanner, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terhorst, Yannik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanhel, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pryss, Rüdiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumeister, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messner, Eva-Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>European journal of psychotraumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sander, Lasse Bosse</au><au>Schorndanner, Johanna</au><au>Terhorst, Yannik</au><au>Spanhel, Kerstin</au><au>Pryss, Rüdiger</au><au>Baumeister, Harald</au><au>Messner, Eva-Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'Help for trauma from the app stores?' A systematic review and standardised rating of apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)</atitle><jtitle>European journal of psychotraumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Psychotraumatol</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1701788</spage><epage>1701788</epage><pages>1701788-1701788</pages><issn>2000-8066</issn><issn>2000-8198</issn><eissn>2000-8066</eissn><abstract>Background: Mobile health applications (apps) are considered to complement traditional psychological treatments for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, the use for clinical practice and quality of available apps is unknown.
Objective: To assess the general characteristics, therapeutic background, content, and quality of apps for PTSD and to examine their concordance with established PTSD treatment and self-help methods.
Method: A web crawler systematically searched for apps targeting PTSD in the British Google Play and Apple iTunes stores. Two independent researchers rated the apps using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). The content of high-quality apps was checked for concordance with psychological treatment and self-help methods extracted from current literature on PTSD treatment.
Results: Out of 555 identified apps, 69 met the inclusion criteria. The overall app quality based on the MARS was medium (M = 3.36, SD = 0.65). Most apps (50.7%) were based on cognitive behavioural therapy and offered a wide range of content, including established psychological PTSD treatment methods such as processing of trauma-related emotions and beliefs, relaxation exercises, and psychoeducation. Notably, data protection and privacy standards were poor in most apps and only one app (1.4%) was scientifically evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
Conclusions: High-quality apps based on established psychological treatment techniques for PTSD are available in commercial app stores. However, users are confronted with great difficulties in identifying useful high-quality apps and most apps lack an evidence-base. Commercial distribution channels do not exploit the potential of apps to complement the psychological treatment of PTSD.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>32002136</pmid><doi>10.1080/20008198.2019.1701788</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-8354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-9837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-661X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-8995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-785X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-5048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4889-1274</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2000-8066 |
ispartof | European journal of psychotraumatology, 2020-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1701788-1701788 |
issn | 2000-8066 2000-8198 2000-8066 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350094385 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals; Co-Action Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | aplicaciones (apps) apps eHealth eSalud mobile health Post traumatic stress disorder Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Review revisión salud móvil Self help Systematic review The use of mobile health applications (apps) in clinical practice is linked with difficulties due to an unregulated commercial market not bound to standards in quality, data protection and privacy. 69 apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder were identified in a systematic search and rated in a standardized form. High-quality apps were found to offer a wide range of functionalities, including established treatment and self-help methods, but mostly lack an evidence-base trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) 创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD) 应用程序 电子卫生保健 移动健康 综述 |
title | 'Help for trauma from the app stores?' A systematic review and standardised rating of apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='Help%20for%20trauma%20from%20the%20app%20stores?'%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20standardised%20rating%20of%20apps%20for%20Post-Traumatic%20Stress%20Disorder%20(PTSD)&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20psychotraumatology&rft.au=Sander,%20Lasse%20Bosse&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1701788&rft.epage=1701788&rft.pages=1701788-1701788&rft.issn=2000-8066&rft.eissn=2000-8066&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/20008198.2019.1701788&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350094385%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492475443&rft_id=info:pmid/32002136&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_cde84bc76fae49f4a0f409b7a386efed&rfr_iscdi=true |