Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord
Objective To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs. Study design Prospective study. Animals Six healthy research dogs. Methods Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary surgery 2020-06, Vol.49 (S1), p.O76-O85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | O85 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | O76 |
container_title | Veterinary surgery |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Guevar, Julien Zidan, Natalia Durand, Alexane Olby, Natasha J. |
description | Objective
To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs.
Study design
Prospective study.
Animals
Six healthy research dogs.
Methods
Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and spinal cord integrity. Minimally invasive surgery was performed at multiple sites. Access to the vertebral canal was achieved by means of foraminotomy, discectomy, and lateral minicorpectomy by using minimally invasive access and a surgical microscope. Sequential neurological examinations, pressure algometry pain quantification, and creatine kinase levels were evaluated before and after surgery for 7 days. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and histopathology were performed on day 6 postoperatively after animals were humanely killed to evaluate the impact of surgery on spinal cord, muscles, and bone.
Results
The vertebral canal was successfully accessed, and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord was identified at all sites. No neurological deterioration was observed. Postoperative pain was not different compared with baseline except in one dog on the day after surgery.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive spine surgery was a safe and feasible technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord in dogs. Findings supported postoperative pain benefits.
Clinical significance
Minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid surgical technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal at single or multiple sites in dogs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/vsu.13385 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2348809565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2348809565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-4d9c61e1d113b56ac0e5d0ed0cc14b8fbbb1ce4eef2c23cdf276c1d24b2589b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qqCwfB_4AstQLPQTs2A5xbwhRWomqhxbELfLHBIy88dZOFu2Rf87QUA6V6sNY43nm9WheQg44O-Z4TtZlOuZCtOodWXAl6kordvueLBhveCWk1ttkp5QHxpiWUnwg24Jr3erTZkGevochLE2MGxqGtSlhDbSswoBxyneQX56pT3flM71YmziZMaSBpp6O94iYHsYNNYOnPWCvDTFgjlWD9ZSNS3FaWpOpWa1yMu6ejmnuxC9MpC5lv0e2ehML7L_eu-T6y8Wv86_V1Y_Lb-dnV5UTbasq6bVrOHDPubCqMY6B8gw8c45L2_bWWu5AAvS1q4XzfX3aOO5raWvVasvFLjmadXGS3xOUsVuG4iBGM0CaSlcL2bZMq0Yh-vEf9CFNGQdGSjJdK4kwUp9myuVUSoa-W2VcZd50nHUvvnToS_fHF2QPXxUnuwT_Rv41AoGTGXgMETb_V-pufl7Pks_NNpnu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2409254234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Guevar, Julien ; Zidan, Natalia ; Durand, Alexane ; Olby, Natasha J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guevar, Julien ; Zidan, Natalia ; Durand, Alexane ; Olby, Natasha J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs.
Study design
Prospective study.
Animals
Six healthy research dogs.
Methods
Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and spinal cord integrity. Minimally invasive surgery was performed at multiple sites. Access to the vertebral canal was achieved by means of foraminotomy, discectomy, and lateral minicorpectomy by using minimally invasive access and a surgical microscope. Sequential neurological examinations, pressure algometry pain quantification, and creatine kinase levels were evaluated before and after surgery for 7 days. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and histopathology were performed on day 6 postoperatively after animals were humanely killed to evaluate the impact of surgery on spinal cord, muscles, and bone.
Results
The vertebral canal was successfully accessed, and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord was identified at all sites. No neurological deterioration was observed. Postoperative pain was not different compared with baseline except in one dog on the day after surgery.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive spine surgery was a safe and feasible technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord in dogs. Findings supported postoperative pain benefits.
Clinical significance
Minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid surgical technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal at single or multiple sites in dogs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-950X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13385</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31998976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Animals ; Back surgery ; Bone surgery ; Computed tomography ; Creatine ; Creatine kinase ; Dogs ; Evaluation ; Feasibility ; Histopathology ; Kinases ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Muscles ; Pain ; Safety ; Spinal cord ; Spine ; Surgery ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Veterinary surgery, 2020-06, Vol.49 (S1), p.O76-O85</ispartof><rights>2020 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons</rights><rights>2020 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-4d9c61e1d113b56ac0e5d0ed0cc14b8fbbb1ce4eef2c23cdf276c1d24b2589b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-4d9c61e1d113b56ac0e5d0ed0cc14b8fbbb1ce4eef2c23cdf276c1d24b2589b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9868-5703</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvsu.13385$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvsu.13385$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1413,27906,27907,45556,45557</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guevar, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zidan, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Alexane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olby, Natasha J.</creatorcontrib><title>Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord</title><title>Veterinary surgery</title><addtitle>Vet Surg</addtitle><description>Objective
To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs.
Study design
Prospective study.
Animals
Six healthy research dogs.
Methods
Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and spinal cord integrity. Minimally invasive surgery was performed at multiple sites. Access to the vertebral canal was achieved by means of foraminotomy, discectomy, and lateral minicorpectomy by using minimally invasive access and a surgical microscope. Sequential neurological examinations, pressure algometry pain quantification, and creatine kinase levels were evaluated before and after surgery for 7 days. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and histopathology were performed on day 6 postoperatively after animals were humanely killed to evaluate the impact of surgery on spinal cord, muscles, and bone.
Results
The vertebral canal was successfully accessed, and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord was identified at all sites. No neurological deterioration was observed. Postoperative pain was not different compared with baseline except in one dog on the day after surgery.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive spine surgery was a safe and feasible technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord in dogs. Findings supported postoperative pain benefits.
Clinical significance
Minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid surgical technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal at single or multiple sites in dogs.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Creatine</subject><subject>Creatine kinase</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0161-3499</issn><issn>1532-950X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qqCwfB_4AstQLPQTs2A5xbwhRWomqhxbELfLHBIy88dZOFu2Rf87QUA6V6sNY43nm9WheQg44O-Z4TtZlOuZCtOodWXAl6kordvueLBhveCWk1ttkp5QHxpiWUnwg24Jr3erTZkGevochLE2MGxqGtSlhDbSswoBxyneQX56pT3flM71YmziZMaSBpp6O94iYHsYNNYOnPWCvDTFgjlWD9ZSNS3FaWpOpWa1yMu6ejmnuxC9MpC5lv0e2ehML7L_eu-T6y8Wv86_V1Y_Lb-dnV5UTbasq6bVrOHDPubCqMY6B8gw8c45L2_bWWu5AAvS1q4XzfX3aOO5raWvVasvFLjmadXGS3xOUsVuG4iBGM0CaSlcL2bZMq0Yh-vEf9CFNGQdGSjJdK4kwUp9myuVUSoa-W2VcZd50nHUvvnToS_fHF2QPXxUnuwT_Rv41AoGTGXgMETb_V-pufl7Pks_NNpnu</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Guevar, Julien</creator><creator>Zidan, Natalia</creator><creator>Durand, Alexane</creator><creator>Olby, Natasha J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-5703</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord</title><author>Guevar, Julien ; Zidan, Natalia ; Durand, Alexane ; Olby, Natasha J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-4d9c61e1d113b56ac0e5d0ed0cc14b8fbbb1ce4eef2c23cdf276c1d24b2589b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Creatine</topic><topic>Creatine kinase</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guevar, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zidan, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Alexane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olby, Natasha J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guevar, Julien</au><au>Zidan, Natalia</au><au>Durand, Alexane</au><au>Olby, Natasha J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Surg</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>O76</spage><epage>O85</epage><pages>O76-O85</pages><issn>0161-3499</issn><eissn>1532-950X</eissn><abstract>Objective
To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs.
Study design
Prospective study.
Animals
Six healthy research dogs.
Methods
Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and spinal cord integrity. Minimally invasive surgery was performed at multiple sites. Access to the vertebral canal was achieved by means of foraminotomy, discectomy, and lateral minicorpectomy by using minimally invasive access and a surgical microscope. Sequential neurological examinations, pressure algometry pain quantification, and creatine kinase levels were evaluated before and after surgery for 7 days. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and histopathology were performed on day 6 postoperatively after animals were humanely killed to evaluate the impact of surgery on spinal cord, muscles, and bone.
Results
The vertebral canal was successfully accessed, and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord was identified at all sites. No neurological deterioration was observed. Postoperative pain was not different compared with baseline except in one dog on the day after surgery.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive spine surgery was a safe and feasible technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord in dogs. Findings supported postoperative pain benefits.
Clinical significance
Minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid surgical technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal at single or multiple sites in dogs.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31998976</pmid><doi>10.1111/vsu.13385</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-5703</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-3499 |
ispartof | Veterinary surgery, 2020-06, Vol.49 (S1), p.O76-O85 |
issn | 0161-3499 1532-950X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2348809565 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Anesthesia Animals Back surgery Bone surgery Computed tomography Creatine Creatine kinase Dogs Evaluation Feasibility Histopathology Kinases Magnetic resonance imaging Muscles Pain Safety Spinal cord Spine Surgery Vertebrae |
title | Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally%20invasive%20spine%20surgery%20in%20dogs:%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20safety%20and%20feasibility%20of%20a%20thoracolumbar%20approach%20to%20the%20spinal%20cord&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20surgery&rft.au=Guevar,%20Julien&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=O76&rft.epage=O85&rft.pages=O76-O85&rft.issn=0161-3499&rft.eissn=1532-950X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vsu.13385&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2348809565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2409254234&rft_id=info:pmid/31998976&rfr_iscdi=true |