Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord

Objective To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs. Study design Prospective study. Animals Six healthy research dogs. Methods Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary surgery 2020-06, Vol.49 (S1), p.O76-O85
Hauptverfasser: Guevar, Julien, Zidan, Natalia, Durand, Alexane, Olby, Natasha J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page O85
container_issue S1
container_start_page O76
container_title Veterinary surgery
container_volume 49
creator Guevar, Julien
Zidan, Natalia
Durand, Alexane
Olby, Natasha J.
description Objective To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs. Study design Prospective study. Animals Six healthy research dogs. Methods Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and spinal cord integrity. Minimally invasive surgery was performed at multiple sites. Access to the vertebral canal was achieved by means of foraminotomy, discectomy, and lateral minicorpectomy by using minimally invasive access and a surgical microscope. Sequential neurological examinations, pressure algometry pain quantification, and creatine kinase levels were evaluated before and after surgery for 7 days. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and histopathology were performed on day 6 postoperatively after animals were humanely killed to evaluate the impact of surgery on spinal cord, muscles, and bone. Results The vertebral canal was successfully accessed, and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord was identified at all sites. No neurological deterioration was observed. Postoperative pain was not different compared with baseline except in one dog on the day after surgery. Conclusion Minimally invasive spine surgery was a safe and feasible technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord in dogs. Findings supported postoperative pain benefits. Clinical significance Minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid surgical technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal at single or multiple sites in dogs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/vsu.13385
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2348809565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2348809565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-4d9c61e1d113b56ac0e5d0ed0cc14b8fbbb1ce4eef2c23cdf276c1d24b2589b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qqCwfB_4AstQLPQTs2A5xbwhRWomqhxbELfLHBIy88dZOFu2Rf87QUA6V6sNY43nm9WheQg44O-Z4TtZlOuZCtOodWXAl6kordvueLBhveCWk1ttkp5QHxpiWUnwg24Jr3erTZkGevochLE2MGxqGtSlhDbSswoBxyneQX56pT3flM71YmziZMaSBpp6O94iYHsYNNYOnPWCvDTFgjlWD9ZSNS3FaWpOpWa1yMu6ejmnuxC9MpC5lv0e2ehML7L_eu-T6y8Wv86_V1Y_Lb-dnV5UTbasq6bVrOHDPubCqMY6B8gw8c45L2_bWWu5AAvS1q4XzfX3aOO5raWvVasvFLjmadXGS3xOUsVuG4iBGM0CaSlcL2bZMq0Yh-vEf9CFNGQdGSjJdK4kwUp9myuVUSoa-W2VcZd50nHUvvnToS_fHF2QPXxUnuwT_Rv41AoGTGXgMETb_V-pufl7Pks_NNpnu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2409254234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Guevar, Julien ; Zidan, Natalia ; Durand, Alexane ; Olby, Natasha J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guevar, Julien ; Zidan, Natalia ; Durand, Alexane ; Olby, Natasha J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs. Study design Prospective study. Animals Six healthy research dogs. Methods Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and spinal cord integrity. Minimally invasive surgery was performed at multiple sites. Access to the vertebral canal was achieved by means of foraminotomy, discectomy, and lateral minicorpectomy by using minimally invasive access and a surgical microscope. Sequential neurological examinations, pressure algometry pain quantification, and creatine kinase levels were evaluated before and after surgery for 7 days. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and histopathology were performed on day 6 postoperatively after animals were humanely killed to evaluate the impact of surgery on spinal cord, muscles, and bone. Results The vertebral canal was successfully accessed, and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord was identified at all sites. No neurological deterioration was observed. Postoperative pain was not different compared with baseline except in one dog on the day after surgery. Conclusion Minimally invasive spine surgery was a safe and feasible technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord in dogs. Findings supported postoperative pain benefits. Clinical significance Minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid surgical technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal at single or multiple sites in dogs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-950X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13385</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31998976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Animals ; Back surgery ; Bone surgery ; Computed tomography ; Creatine ; Creatine kinase ; Dogs ; Evaluation ; Feasibility ; Histopathology ; Kinases ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Muscles ; Pain ; Safety ; Spinal cord ; Spine ; Surgery ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Veterinary surgery, 2020-06, Vol.49 (S1), p.O76-O85</ispartof><rights>2020 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons</rights><rights>2020 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-4d9c61e1d113b56ac0e5d0ed0cc14b8fbbb1ce4eef2c23cdf276c1d24b2589b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-4d9c61e1d113b56ac0e5d0ed0cc14b8fbbb1ce4eef2c23cdf276c1d24b2589b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9868-5703</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvsu.13385$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvsu.13385$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1413,27906,27907,45556,45557</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guevar, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zidan, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Alexane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olby, Natasha J.</creatorcontrib><title>Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord</title><title>Veterinary surgery</title><addtitle>Vet Surg</addtitle><description>Objective To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs. Study design Prospective study. Animals Six healthy research dogs. Methods Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and spinal cord integrity. Minimally invasive surgery was performed at multiple sites. Access to the vertebral canal was achieved by means of foraminotomy, discectomy, and lateral minicorpectomy by using minimally invasive access and a surgical microscope. Sequential neurological examinations, pressure algometry pain quantification, and creatine kinase levels were evaluated before and after surgery for 7 days. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and histopathology were performed on day 6 postoperatively after animals were humanely killed to evaluate the impact of surgery on spinal cord, muscles, and bone. Results The vertebral canal was successfully accessed, and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord was identified at all sites. No neurological deterioration was observed. Postoperative pain was not different compared with baseline except in one dog on the day after surgery. Conclusion Minimally invasive spine surgery was a safe and feasible technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord in dogs. Findings supported postoperative pain benefits. Clinical significance Minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid surgical technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal at single or multiple sites in dogs.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Creatine</subject><subject>Creatine kinase</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0161-3499</issn><issn>1532-950X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qqCwfB_4AstQLPQTs2A5xbwhRWomqhxbELfLHBIy88dZOFu2Rf87QUA6V6sNY43nm9WheQg44O-Z4TtZlOuZCtOodWXAl6kordvueLBhveCWk1ttkp5QHxpiWUnwg24Jr3erTZkGevochLE2MGxqGtSlhDbSswoBxyneQX56pT3flM71YmziZMaSBpp6O94iYHsYNNYOnPWCvDTFgjlWD9ZSNS3FaWpOpWa1yMu6ejmnuxC9MpC5lv0e2ehML7L_eu-T6y8Wv86_V1Y_Lb-dnV5UTbasq6bVrOHDPubCqMY6B8gw8c45L2_bWWu5AAvS1q4XzfX3aOO5raWvVasvFLjmadXGS3xOUsVuG4iBGM0CaSlcL2bZMq0Yh-vEf9CFNGQdGSjJdK4kwUp9myuVUSoa-W2VcZd50nHUvvnToS_fHF2QPXxUnuwT_Rv41AoGTGXgMETb_V-pufl7Pks_NNpnu</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Guevar, Julien</creator><creator>Zidan, Natalia</creator><creator>Durand, Alexane</creator><creator>Olby, Natasha J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-5703</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord</title><author>Guevar, Julien ; Zidan, Natalia ; Durand, Alexane ; Olby, Natasha J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-4d9c61e1d113b56ac0e5d0ed0cc14b8fbbb1ce4eef2c23cdf276c1d24b2589b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Creatine</topic><topic>Creatine kinase</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guevar, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zidan, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Alexane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olby, Natasha J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guevar, Julien</au><au>Zidan, Natalia</au><au>Durand, Alexane</au><au>Olby, Natasha J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Surg</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>O76</spage><epage>O85</epage><pages>O76-O85</pages><issn>0161-3499</issn><eissn>1532-950X</eissn><abstract>Objective To describe the safety and feasibility of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal in dogs. Study design Prospective study. Animals Six healthy research dogs. Methods Dogs were placed under anesthesia for MRI to evaluate vertebral column and spinal cord integrity. Minimally invasive surgery was performed at multiple sites. Access to the vertebral canal was achieved by means of foraminotomy, discectomy, and lateral minicorpectomy by using minimally invasive access and a surgical microscope. Sequential neurological examinations, pressure algometry pain quantification, and creatine kinase levels were evaluated before and after surgery for 7 days. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and histopathology were performed on day 6 postoperatively after animals were humanely killed to evaluate the impact of surgery on spinal cord, muscles, and bone. Results The vertebral canal was successfully accessed, and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord was identified at all sites. No neurological deterioration was observed. Postoperative pain was not different compared with baseline except in one dog on the day after surgery. Conclusion Minimally invasive spine surgery was a safe and feasible technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal and the ventral aspect of the spinal cord in dogs. Findings supported postoperative pain benefits. Clinical significance Minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid surgical technique to access the thoracolumbar vertebral canal at single or multiple sites in dogs.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31998976</pmid><doi>10.1111/vsu.13385</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-5703</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-3499
ispartof Veterinary surgery, 2020-06, Vol.49 (S1), p.O76-O85
issn 0161-3499
1532-950X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2348809565
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anesthesia
Animals
Back surgery
Bone surgery
Computed tomography
Creatine
Creatine kinase
Dogs
Evaluation
Feasibility
Histopathology
Kinases
Magnetic resonance imaging
Muscles
Pain
Safety
Spinal cord
Spine
Surgery
Vertebrae
title Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally%20invasive%20spine%20surgery%20in%20dogs:%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20safety%20and%20feasibility%20of%20a%20thoracolumbar%20approach%20to%20the%20spinal%20cord&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20surgery&rft.au=Guevar,%20Julien&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=O76&rft.epage=O85&rft.pages=O76-O85&rft.issn=0161-3499&rft.eissn=1532-950X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vsu.13385&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2348809565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2409254234&rft_id=info:pmid/31998976&rfr_iscdi=true