Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review

Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health & social care in the community 2020-09, Vol.28 (5), p.1343-1365
Hauptverfasser: Rogers, Helen J., Hogan, Lily, Coates, Dominiek, Homer, Caroline S. E., Henry, Amanda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1365
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1343
container_title Health & social care in the community
container_volume 28
creator Rogers, Helen J.
Hogan, Lily
Coates, Dominiek
Homer, Caroline S. E.
Henry, Amanda
description Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as a public health priority. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of models of care in pregnancy or first 12 months postpartum for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in HIC. Care models were mapped in terms of (a) effectiveness at improving service access, (b) effectiveness at improving maternal and infant health outcomes, (c) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of women and (d) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of service providers. Using systematic scoping review methodology, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published in English 2008–2019 were included. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched between 27 February 2019 and updated 27 December 2019. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed narratively. Seventeen studies, involving 1,499 women and 203 service providers, were included. A diverse range of interventions were identified, including bilingual/bicultural workers, group antenatal care and specialised clinics. All identified interventions were acceptable to women, and improved access, however, few provided evidence of improved perinatal outcomes. Gaps identified for future research include the use of qualitative and quantitative approaches to ascertain the experiences of women, their families, service providers and impact on perinatal outcomes. Synthesis of the included studies indicates the key elements of acceptable and accessible models, which were as follows: culturally responsive care, continuity of care, effective communication, psychosocial and practical support, support to navigate systems, flexible and accessible services.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/hsc.12950
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2348796346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429631193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f194fb96d4f57556f2b69ea14810b7f50c640f9309f0ef01d7e8c9b78a5174f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCgRdAlrjQQ1o7cZyYW7UCWqmoEn_OkeOME5fEDrbDam99BA48Bw_VJ6m7W3pAYi5z-eab0fwQekXJCU11OgR1QnNRkidoRQteZnmZs6doRQTnGWGUHKDDEK4JoUVOqufooKBCVIzTFfrzGcLsbGdsj6PDcQA8gBzjgC1AF7DTeOMmsFh7N-HJ9F7aiKXtsAe99AC4lep7791iu3B78_uT62DcjU0ygrcmbnf07EKcpY_LhJX0gI3Fg-mH25tfxqq0AKtkiN5AeIfPcNiGCElgFA7KzffHefhpYPMCPdNyDPDyoR-hbx_ef12fZ5dXHy_WZ5eZKuqaZJoKplvBO6bLqiy5zlsuQFJWU9JWuiSKM6JFQYQmoAntKqiVaKtalrRimhZH6O3eO3v3Y4EQm8kEBeMoLbglNHnB6krwgvGEvvkHvXaLt-m6Jmd5YigVRaKO95TyLoT0u2b2ZpJ-21DS3IfYpBCbXYiJff1gXNoJukfyb2oJON0DGzPC9v-m5vzLeq-8A8lJqtM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429631193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Rogers, Helen J. ; Hogan, Lily ; Coates, Dominiek ; Homer, Caroline S. E. ; Henry, Amanda</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Helen J. ; Hogan, Lily ; Coates, Dominiek ; Homer, Caroline S. E. ; Henry, Amanda</creatorcontrib><description>Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as a public health priority. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of models of care in pregnancy or first 12 months postpartum for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in HIC. Care models were mapped in terms of (a) effectiveness at improving service access, (b) effectiveness at improving maternal and infant health outcomes, (c) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of women and (d) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of service providers. Using systematic scoping review methodology, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published in English 2008–2019 were included. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched between 27 February 2019 and updated 27 December 2019. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed narratively. Seventeen studies, involving 1,499 women and 203 service providers, were included. A diverse range of interventions were identified, including bilingual/bicultural workers, group antenatal care and specialised clinics. All identified interventions were acceptable to women, and improved access, however, few provided evidence of improved perinatal outcomes. Gaps identified for future research include the use of qualitative and quantitative approaches to ascertain the experiences of women, their families, service providers and impact on perinatal outcomes. Synthesis of the included studies indicates the key elements of acceptable and accessible models, which were as follows: culturally responsive care, continuity of care, effective communication, psychosocial and practical support, support to navigate systems, flexible and accessible services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31997461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>access to care ; asylum seeker ; Background ; Bilingualism ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinics ; Community health care ; Comparative studies ; Continuity of care ; Cultural sensitivity ; culturally appropriate care ; Data ; Effectiveness ; Health care access ; Health needs ; Health problems ; Health services ; Health status ; Income ; Industrialized nations ; Intervention ; Maternal and infant welfare ; Maternal characteristics ; maternity care ; Migrants ; Perinatal ; Perinatal care ; postpartum ; Postpartum period ; Postpartum women ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Psychosocial factors ; Public health ; refugee ; Refugees ; Systematic review ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Health &amp; social care in the community, 2020-09, Vol.28 (5), p.1343-1365</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f194fb96d4f57556f2b69ea14810b7f50c640f9309f0ef01d7e8c9b78a5174f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f194fb96d4f57556f2b69ea14810b7f50c640f9309f0ef01d7e8c9b78a5174f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4463-7615 ; 0000-0002-2896-8246 ; 0000-0002-7454-3011 ; 0000-0002-7351-8922</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhsc.12950$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhsc.12950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31997461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Helen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, Dominiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homer, Caroline S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Amanda</creatorcontrib><title>Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review</title><title>Health &amp; social care in the community</title><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><description>Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as a public health priority. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of models of care in pregnancy or first 12 months postpartum for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in HIC. Care models were mapped in terms of (a) effectiveness at improving service access, (b) effectiveness at improving maternal and infant health outcomes, (c) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of women and (d) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of service providers. Using systematic scoping review methodology, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published in English 2008–2019 were included. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched between 27 February 2019 and updated 27 December 2019. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed narratively. Seventeen studies, involving 1,499 women and 203 service providers, were included. A diverse range of interventions were identified, including bilingual/bicultural workers, group antenatal care and specialised clinics. All identified interventions were acceptable to women, and improved access, however, few provided evidence of improved perinatal outcomes. Gaps identified for future research include the use of qualitative and quantitative approaches to ascertain the experiences of women, their families, service providers and impact on perinatal outcomes. Synthesis of the included studies indicates the key elements of acceptable and accessible models, which were as follows: culturally responsive care, continuity of care, effective communication, psychosocial and practical support, support to navigate systems, flexible and accessible services.</description><subject>access to care</subject><subject>asylum seeker</subject><subject>Background</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Community health care</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Cultural sensitivity</subject><subject>culturally appropriate care</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health needs</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Maternal and infant welfare</subject><subject>Maternal characteristics</subject><subject>maternity care</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Perinatal</subject><subject>Perinatal care</subject><subject>postpartum</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Postpartum women</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>refugee</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCgRdAlrjQQ1o7cZyYW7UCWqmoEn_OkeOME5fEDrbDam99BA48Bw_VJ6m7W3pAYi5z-eab0fwQekXJCU11OgR1QnNRkidoRQteZnmZs6doRQTnGWGUHKDDEK4JoUVOqufooKBCVIzTFfrzGcLsbGdsj6PDcQA8gBzjgC1AF7DTeOMmsFh7N-HJ9F7aiKXtsAe99AC4lep7791iu3B78_uT62DcjU0ygrcmbnf07EKcpY_LhJX0gI3Fg-mH25tfxqq0AKtkiN5AeIfPcNiGCElgFA7KzffHefhpYPMCPdNyDPDyoR-hbx_ef12fZ5dXHy_WZ5eZKuqaZJoKplvBO6bLqiy5zlsuQFJWU9JWuiSKM6JFQYQmoAntKqiVaKtalrRimhZH6O3eO3v3Y4EQm8kEBeMoLbglNHnB6krwgvGEvvkHvXaLt-m6Jmd5YigVRaKO95TyLoT0u2b2ZpJ-21DS3IfYpBCbXYiJff1gXNoJukfyb2oJON0DGzPC9v-m5vzLeq-8A8lJqtM</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Rogers, Helen J.</creator><creator>Hogan, Lily</creator><creator>Coates, Dominiek</creator><creator>Homer, Caroline S. E.</creator><creator>Henry, Amanda</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-7615</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2896-8246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-3011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-8922</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review</title><author>Rogers, Helen J. ; Hogan, Lily ; Coates, Dominiek ; Homer, Caroline S. E. ; Henry, Amanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f194fb96d4f57556f2b69ea14810b7f50c640f9309f0ef01d7e8c9b78a5174f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>access to care</topic><topic>asylum seeker</topic><topic>Background</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Community health care</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Cultural sensitivity</topic><topic>culturally appropriate care</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health needs</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Maternal and infant welfare</topic><topic>Maternal characteristics</topic><topic>maternity care</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Perinatal</topic><topic>Perinatal care</topic><topic>postpartum</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Postpartum women</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>refugee</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Helen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, Dominiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homer, Caroline S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Amanda</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health &amp; social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogers, Helen J.</au><au>Hogan, Lily</au><au>Coates, Dominiek</au><au>Homer, Caroline S. E.</au><au>Henry, Amanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Health &amp; social care in the community</jtitle><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1343</spage><epage>1365</epage><pages>1343-1365</pages><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><abstract>Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as a public health priority. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of models of care in pregnancy or first 12 months postpartum for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in HIC. Care models were mapped in terms of (a) effectiveness at improving service access, (b) effectiveness at improving maternal and infant health outcomes, (c) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of women and (d) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of service providers. Using systematic scoping review methodology, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published in English 2008–2019 were included. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched between 27 February 2019 and updated 27 December 2019. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed narratively. Seventeen studies, involving 1,499 women and 203 service providers, were included. A diverse range of interventions were identified, including bilingual/bicultural workers, group antenatal care and specialised clinics. All identified interventions were acceptable to women, and improved access, however, few provided evidence of improved perinatal outcomes. Gaps identified for future research include the use of qualitative and quantitative approaches to ascertain the experiences of women, their families, service providers and impact on perinatal outcomes. Synthesis of the included studies indicates the key elements of acceptable and accessible models, which were as follows: culturally responsive care, continuity of care, effective communication, psychosocial and practical support, support to navigate systems, flexible and accessible services.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>31997461</pmid><doi>10.1111/hsc.12950</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-7615</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2896-8246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-3011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-8922</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-0410
ispartof Health & social care in the community, 2020-09, Vol.28 (5), p.1343-1365
issn 0966-0410
1365-2524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2348796346
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects access to care
asylum seeker
Background
Bilingualism
Clinical outcomes
Clinics
Community health care
Comparative studies
Continuity of care
Cultural sensitivity
culturally appropriate care
Data
Effectiveness
Health care access
Health needs
Health problems
Health services
Health status
Income
Industrialized nations
Intervention
Maternal and infant welfare
Maternal characteristics
maternity care
Migrants
Perinatal
Perinatal care
postpartum
Postpartum period
Postpartum women
Pregnancy
Prenatal care
Psychosocial factors
Public health
refugee
Refugees
Systematic review
Women
Womens health
title Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A30%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responding%20to%20the%20health%20needs%20of%20women%20from%20migrant%20and%20refugee%20backgrounds%E2%80%94Models%20of%20maternity%20and%20postpartum%20care%20in%20high%E2%80%90income%20countries:%20A%20systematic%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Rogers,%20Helen%20J.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1343&rft.epage=1365&rft.pages=1343-1365&rft.issn=0966-0410&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hsc.12950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429631193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429631193&rft_id=info:pmid/31997461&rfr_iscdi=true