Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health & social care in the community 2020-09, Vol.28 (5), p.1343-1365 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1365 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1343 |
container_title | Health & social care in the community |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Rogers, Helen J. Hogan, Lily Coates, Dominiek Homer, Caroline S. E. Henry, Amanda |
description | Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as a public health priority. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of models of care in pregnancy or first 12 months postpartum for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in HIC. Care models were mapped in terms of (a) effectiveness at improving service access, (b) effectiveness at improving maternal and infant health outcomes, (c) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of women and (d) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of service providers. Using systematic scoping review methodology, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published in English 2008–2019 were included. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched between 27 February 2019 and updated 27 December 2019. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed narratively. Seventeen studies, involving 1,499 women and 203 service providers, were included. A diverse range of interventions were identified, including bilingual/bicultural workers, group antenatal care and specialised clinics. All identified interventions were acceptable to women, and improved access, however, few provided evidence of improved perinatal outcomes. Gaps identified for future research include the use of qualitative and quantitative approaches to ascertain the experiences of women, their families, service providers and impact on perinatal outcomes. Synthesis of the included studies indicates the key elements of acceptable and accessible models, which were as follows: culturally responsive care, continuity of care, effective communication, psychosocial and practical support, support to navigate systems, flexible and accessible services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/hsc.12950 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2348796346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429631193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f194fb96d4f57556f2b69ea14810b7f50c640f9309f0ef01d7e8c9b78a5174f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCgRdAlrjQQ1o7cZyYW7UCWqmoEn_OkeOME5fEDrbDam99BA48Bw_VJ6m7W3pAYi5z-eab0fwQekXJCU11OgR1QnNRkidoRQteZnmZs6doRQTnGWGUHKDDEK4JoUVOqufooKBCVIzTFfrzGcLsbGdsj6PDcQA8gBzjgC1AF7DTeOMmsFh7N-HJ9F7aiKXtsAe99AC4lep7791iu3B78_uT62DcjU0ygrcmbnf07EKcpY_LhJX0gI3Fg-mH25tfxqq0AKtkiN5AeIfPcNiGCElgFA7KzffHefhpYPMCPdNyDPDyoR-hbx_ef12fZ5dXHy_WZ5eZKuqaZJoKplvBO6bLqiy5zlsuQFJWU9JWuiSKM6JFQYQmoAntKqiVaKtalrRimhZH6O3eO3v3Y4EQm8kEBeMoLbglNHnB6krwgvGEvvkHvXaLt-m6Jmd5YigVRaKO95TyLoT0u2b2ZpJ-21DS3IfYpBCbXYiJff1gXNoJukfyb2oJON0DGzPC9v-m5vzLeq-8A8lJqtM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429631193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Rogers, Helen J. ; Hogan, Lily ; Coates, Dominiek ; Homer, Caroline S. E. ; Henry, Amanda</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Helen J. ; Hogan, Lily ; Coates, Dominiek ; Homer, Caroline S. E. ; Henry, Amanda</creatorcontrib><description>Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as a public health priority. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of models of care in pregnancy or first 12 months postpartum for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in HIC. Care models were mapped in terms of (a) effectiveness at improving service access, (b) effectiveness at improving maternal and infant health outcomes, (c) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of women and (d) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of service providers. Using systematic scoping review methodology, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published in English 2008–2019 were included. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched between 27 February 2019 and updated 27 December 2019. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed narratively. Seventeen studies, involving 1,499 women and 203 service providers, were included. A diverse range of interventions were identified, including bilingual/bicultural workers, group antenatal care and specialised clinics. All identified interventions were acceptable to women, and improved access, however, few provided evidence of improved perinatal outcomes. Gaps identified for future research include the use of qualitative and quantitative approaches to ascertain the experiences of women, their families, service providers and impact on perinatal outcomes. Synthesis of the included studies indicates the key elements of acceptable and accessible models, which were as follows: culturally responsive care, continuity of care, effective communication, psychosocial and practical support, support to navigate systems, flexible and accessible services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31997461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>access to care ; asylum seeker ; Background ; Bilingualism ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinics ; Community health care ; Comparative studies ; Continuity of care ; Cultural sensitivity ; culturally appropriate care ; Data ; Effectiveness ; Health care access ; Health needs ; Health problems ; Health services ; Health status ; Income ; Industrialized nations ; Intervention ; Maternal and infant welfare ; Maternal characteristics ; maternity care ; Migrants ; Perinatal ; Perinatal care ; postpartum ; Postpartum period ; Postpartum women ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Psychosocial factors ; Public health ; refugee ; Refugees ; Systematic review ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Health & social care in the community, 2020-09, Vol.28 (5), p.1343-1365</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f194fb96d4f57556f2b69ea14810b7f50c640f9309f0ef01d7e8c9b78a5174f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f194fb96d4f57556f2b69ea14810b7f50c640f9309f0ef01d7e8c9b78a5174f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4463-7615 ; 0000-0002-2896-8246 ; 0000-0002-7454-3011 ; 0000-0002-7351-8922</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhsc.12950$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhsc.12950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31997461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Helen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, Dominiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homer, Caroline S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Amanda</creatorcontrib><title>Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review</title><title>Health & social care in the community</title><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><description>Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as a public health priority. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of models of care in pregnancy or first 12 months postpartum for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in HIC. Care models were mapped in terms of (a) effectiveness at improving service access, (b) effectiveness at improving maternal and infant health outcomes, (c) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of women and (d) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of service providers. Using systematic scoping review methodology, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published in English 2008–2019 were included. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched between 27 February 2019 and updated 27 December 2019. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed narratively. Seventeen studies, involving 1,499 women and 203 service providers, were included. A diverse range of interventions were identified, including bilingual/bicultural workers, group antenatal care and specialised clinics. All identified interventions were acceptable to women, and improved access, however, few provided evidence of improved perinatal outcomes. Gaps identified for future research include the use of qualitative and quantitative approaches to ascertain the experiences of women, their families, service providers and impact on perinatal outcomes. Synthesis of the included studies indicates the key elements of acceptable and accessible models, which were as follows: culturally responsive care, continuity of care, effective communication, psychosocial and practical support, support to navigate systems, flexible and accessible services.</description><subject>access to care</subject><subject>asylum seeker</subject><subject>Background</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Community health care</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Cultural sensitivity</subject><subject>culturally appropriate care</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health needs</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Maternal and infant welfare</subject><subject>Maternal characteristics</subject><subject>maternity care</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Perinatal</subject><subject>Perinatal care</subject><subject>postpartum</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Postpartum women</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>refugee</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCgRdAlrjQQ1o7cZyYW7UCWqmoEn_OkeOME5fEDrbDam99BA48Bw_VJ6m7W3pAYi5z-eab0fwQekXJCU11OgR1QnNRkidoRQteZnmZs6doRQTnGWGUHKDDEK4JoUVOqufooKBCVIzTFfrzGcLsbGdsj6PDcQA8gBzjgC1AF7DTeOMmsFh7N-HJ9F7aiKXtsAe99AC4lep7791iu3B78_uT62DcjU0ygrcmbnf07EKcpY_LhJX0gI3Fg-mH25tfxqq0AKtkiN5AeIfPcNiGCElgFA7KzffHefhpYPMCPdNyDPDyoR-hbx_ef12fZ5dXHy_WZ5eZKuqaZJoKplvBO6bLqiy5zlsuQFJWU9JWuiSKM6JFQYQmoAntKqiVaKtalrRimhZH6O3eO3v3Y4EQm8kEBeMoLbglNHnB6krwgvGEvvkHvXaLt-m6Jmd5YigVRaKO95TyLoT0u2b2ZpJ-21DS3IfYpBCbXYiJff1gXNoJukfyb2oJON0DGzPC9v-m5vzLeq-8A8lJqtM</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Rogers, Helen J.</creator><creator>Hogan, Lily</creator><creator>Coates, Dominiek</creator><creator>Homer, Caroline S. E.</creator><creator>Henry, Amanda</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-7615</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2896-8246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-3011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-8922</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review</title><author>Rogers, Helen J. ; Hogan, Lily ; Coates, Dominiek ; Homer, Caroline S. E. ; Henry, Amanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f194fb96d4f57556f2b69ea14810b7f50c640f9309f0ef01d7e8c9b78a5174f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>access to care</topic><topic>asylum seeker</topic><topic>Background</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Community health care</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Cultural sensitivity</topic><topic>culturally appropriate care</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health needs</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Maternal and infant welfare</topic><topic>Maternal characteristics</topic><topic>maternity care</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Perinatal</topic><topic>Perinatal care</topic><topic>postpartum</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Postpartum women</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>refugee</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Helen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, Dominiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homer, Caroline S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Amanda</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogers, Helen J.</au><au>Hogan, Lily</au><au>Coates, Dominiek</au><au>Homer, Caroline S. E.</au><au>Henry, Amanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1343</spage><epage>1365</epage><pages>1343-1365</pages><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><abstract>Pregnant women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high‐income countries (HIC) are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women born in the host country. Women from migrant and refugee background have perinatal healthcare needs that are recognised internationally as a public health priority. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of models of care in pregnancy or first 12 months postpartum for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in HIC. Care models were mapped in terms of (a) effectiveness at improving service access, (b) effectiveness at improving maternal and infant health outcomes, (c) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of women and (d) acceptability and appropriateness from the perspective of service providers. Using systematic scoping review methodology, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published in English 2008–2019 were included. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched between 27 February 2019 and updated 27 December 2019. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed narratively. Seventeen studies, involving 1,499 women and 203 service providers, were included. A diverse range of interventions were identified, including bilingual/bicultural workers, group antenatal care and specialised clinics. All identified interventions were acceptable to women, and improved access, however, few provided evidence of improved perinatal outcomes. Gaps identified for future research include the use of qualitative and quantitative approaches to ascertain the experiences of women, their families, service providers and impact on perinatal outcomes. Synthesis of the included studies indicates the key elements of acceptable and accessible models, which were as follows: culturally responsive care, continuity of care, effective communication, psychosocial and practical support, support to navigate systems, flexible and accessible services.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>31997461</pmid><doi>10.1111/hsc.12950</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-7615</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2896-8246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-3011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-8922</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0966-0410 |
ispartof | Health & social care in the community, 2020-09, Vol.28 (5), p.1343-1365 |
issn | 0966-0410 1365-2524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2348796346 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | access to care asylum seeker Background Bilingualism Clinical outcomes Clinics Community health care Comparative studies Continuity of care Cultural sensitivity culturally appropriate care Data Effectiveness Health care access Health needs Health problems Health services Health status Income Industrialized nations Intervention Maternal and infant welfare Maternal characteristics maternity care Migrants Perinatal Perinatal care postpartum Postpartum period Postpartum women Pregnancy Prenatal care Psychosocial factors Public health refugee Refugees Systematic review Women Womens health |
title | Responding to the health needs of women from migrant and refugee backgrounds—Models of maternity and postpartum care in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A30%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responding%20to%20the%20health%20needs%20of%20women%20from%20migrant%20and%20refugee%20backgrounds%E2%80%94Models%20of%20maternity%20and%20postpartum%20care%20in%20high%E2%80%90income%20countries:%20A%20systematic%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Rogers,%20Helen%20J.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1343&rft.epage=1365&rft.pages=1343-1365&rft.issn=0966-0410&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hsc.12950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429631193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429631193&rft_id=info:pmid/31997461&rfr_iscdi=true |