Serial Transient Elastography Examinations to Monitor Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background and Aims Type 2 diabetes is an important risk factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and advanced fibrosis. Current international guidelines recommend the use of noninvasive tests as initial assessments for NAFLD, but the role of noninvasive tests as monitoring tools has not...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2020-10, Vol.72 (4), p.1230-1241
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Hye Won, Wong, Grace Lai‐Hung, Kwok, Raymond, Choi, Kai Chow, Chan, Carmen Ka‐Man, Shu, Sally She‐Ting, Leung, Julie Ka‐Yu, Chim, Angel Mei‐Ling, Luk, Andrea On‐Yan, Ma, Ronald Ching‐Wan, Chan, Henry Lik‐Yuen, Chan, Juliana Chung‐Ngor, Kong, Alice Pik‐Shan, Wong, Vincent Wai‐Sun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aims Type 2 diabetes is an important risk factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and advanced fibrosis. Current international guidelines recommend the use of noninvasive tests as initial assessments for NAFLD, but the role of noninvasive tests as monitoring tools has not been established. We aimed to study the role of transient elastography as a monitoring tool in patients with type 2 diabetes. Approach and Results We recruited patients with type 2 diabetes without viral hepatitis or excessive alcohol intake from a complication screening facility in Hong Kong in 2013‐2014 and repeated the assessments in 2016‐2018. The primary endpoint was an increase of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) to ≥10 kPa. The secondary endpoint was the change in the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). A total of 611 patients with type 2 diabetes and a valid LSM (mean age, 57.7 ± 10.9 years; 342 men [56.0%]) were included in this study (568 also had a valid CAP). Overall, there was moderate correlation between the baseline and follow‐up LSM (r = 0.689, P 
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.31142