Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next Generation Sequencing-Based Hematologic Malignancy Assays With Survey Material-Specific Differences in Variant Frequencies
As laboratories increasingly turn from single-analyte testing in hematologic malignancies to next-generation sequencing-based panel testing, there is a corresponding need for proficiency testing to ensure adequate performance of these next-generation sequencing assays for optimal patient care. To re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2020-08, Vol.144 (8), p.959-966 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 966 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 959 |
container_title | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Keegan, Alissa Bridge, Julia A Lindeman, Neal I Long, Thomas A Merker, Jason D Moncur, Joel T Montgomery, Nathan D Nagarajan, Rakesh Rothberg, Paul G Routbort, Mark J Vasalos, Patricia Xian, Rena Kim, Annette S |
description | As laboratories increasingly turn from single-analyte testing in hematologic malignancies to next-generation sequencing-based panel testing, there is a corresponding need for proficiency testing to ensure adequate performance of these next-generation sequencing assays for optimal patient care.
To report the performance of laboratories on proficiency testing from the first 4 College of American Pathologists Next-Generation Sequencing Hematologic Malignancy surveys.
College of American Pathologists proficiency testing results for 36 different engineered variants and/or allele fractions as well as a sample with no pathogenic variants were analyzed for accuracy and associated assay performance characteristics.
The overall sensitivity observed for all variants was 93.5% (2190 of 2341) with 99.8% specificity (22 800 of 22 840). The false-negative rate was 6.5% (151 of 2341), and the largest single cause of these errors was difficulty in identifying variants in the sequence of
that is rich in cytosines and guanines. False-positive results (0.18%; 40 of 22 840) were most likely the result of preanalytic or postanalytic errors. Interestingly, the variant allele fractions were almost uniformly lower than the engineered fraction (as measured by digital polymerase chain reaction). Extensive troubleshooting identified a multifactorial cause for the low variant allele fractions, a result of an interaction between the linearized nature of the plasmid and the Illumina TruSeq chemistry.
Laboratories demonstrated an overall accuracy of 99.2% (24 990 of 25 181) with 99.8% specificity and 93.5% sensitivity when examining 36 clinically relevant somatic single-nucleotide variants with a variant allele fraction of 10% or greater. The data also highlight an issue with artificial linearized plasmids as survey material for next-generation sequencing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5858/arpa.2019-0352-CP |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2347512648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A634503666</galeid><sourcerecordid>A634503666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-dd609dc109001918cb15d7a62b6d1863a3517371ef75f6928551b87290e90ed53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9u0zAUxiMEYmXwANwgS0iImxQ7jp3ksitsnTSgUgZcWq5zknpy7GInQHlX3gWHlT9DVSxFtn_nO5-OvyR5SvCclax8Jf1OzjNMqhRTlqXL9b1kRlhO04xwdj-ZYYxpWlUlO0kehXATt1WWkYfJCSVVyXHBZ8mPtXetVhqs2qNrCIO2HXItqgdpG-kb_R0aVMt-ZyCgeuu-BrTS3RZd2gG8kRvn5eD8Hi06D9CDHVDrPFoabbWSBr2DbwO6AAsR086iGj6PsVVskp7JEKVX0EcB4zqt0FtpdGfl5GQRgtwH9EkPW1SP_gvs423sqKVJ6x0oHT2j17ptwUe5aE1b9FHG62jg3B-aQHicPGilCfDk8D9NPpy_uV6u0qv3F5fLxVWqGC6HtGk4rhpFcIXjMEmpNoQ1heTZhjek5FRSRgpaEGgL1vIqKxkjm7LIKgxxNYyeJi9vdXfexd5hEL0OCoyRFtwYREbzgpGM52VEn_-H3rjR2-hOZDnN46I5_kt10oDQtnWDl2oSFQtOc4Yp5zxS6RGq-zVu4yy0Oh7f4edH-Pg10Gt1tODFPwVbkGbYBmfG6S3DXZDcgsq7EDy0Yud1L_1eECymrIopq2LKqpiyKpbrWPPsMIlx00Pzp-J3OOlPCrLm-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434434340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next Generation Sequencing-Based Hematologic Malignancy Assays With Survey Material-Specific Differences in Variant Frequencies</title><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Keegan, Alissa ; Bridge, Julia A ; Lindeman, Neal I ; Long, Thomas A ; Merker, Jason D ; Moncur, Joel T ; Montgomery, Nathan D ; Nagarajan, Rakesh ; Rothberg, Paul G ; Routbort, Mark J ; Vasalos, Patricia ; Xian, Rena ; Kim, Annette S</creator><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Alissa ; Bridge, Julia A ; Lindeman, Neal I ; Long, Thomas A ; Merker, Jason D ; Moncur, Joel T ; Montgomery, Nathan D ; Nagarajan, Rakesh ; Rothberg, Paul G ; Routbort, Mark J ; Vasalos, Patricia ; Xian, Rena ; Kim, Annette S</creatorcontrib><description>As laboratories increasingly turn from single-analyte testing in hematologic malignancies to next-generation sequencing-based panel testing, there is a corresponding need for proficiency testing to ensure adequate performance of these next-generation sequencing assays for optimal patient care.
To report the performance of laboratories on proficiency testing from the first 4 College of American Pathologists Next-Generation Sequencing Hematologic Malignancy surveys.
College of American Pathologists proficiency testing results for 36 different engineered variants and/or allele fractions as well as a sample with no pathogenic variants were analyzed for accuracy and associated assay performance characteristics.
The overall sensitivity observed for all variants was 93.5% (2190 of 2341) with 99.8% specificity (22 800 of 22 840). The false-negative rate was 6.5% (151 of 2341), and the largest single cause of these errors was difficulty in identifying variants in the sequence of
that is rich in cytosines and guanines. False-positive results (0.18%; 40 of 22 840) were most likely the result of preanalytic or postanalytic errors. Interestingly, the variant allele fractions were almost uniformly lower than the engineered fraction (as measured by digital polymerase chain reaction). Extensive troubleshooting identified a multifactorial cause for the low variant allele fractions, a result of an interaction between the linearized nature of the plasmid and the Illumina TruSeq chemistry.
Laboratories demonstrated an overall accuracy of 99.2% (24 990 of 25 181) with 99.8% specificity and 93.5% sensitivity when examining 36 clinically relevant somatic single-nucleotide variants with a variant allele fraction of 10% or greater. The data also highlight an issue with artificial linearized plasmids as survey material for next-generation sequencing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0352-CP</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31986076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Blood cancer ; Cancer ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Genes ; Janus kinase 2 ; Laboratories ; Malignancy ; Medical societies ; MyD88 protein ; Next-generation sequencing ; p53 Protein ; Plasmids ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Standard deviation ; Surveys ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2020-08, Vol.144 (8), p.959-966</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Aug 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-dd609dc109001918cb15d7a62b6d1863a3517371ef75f6928551b87290e90ed53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-dd609dc109001918cb15d7a62b6d1863a3517371ef75f6928551b87290e90ed53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31986076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Alissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridge, Julia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeman, Neal I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merker, Jason D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moncur, Joel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Nathan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarajan, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Paul G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Routbort, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasalos, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xian, Rena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Annette S</creatorcontrib><title>Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next Generation Sequencing-Based Hematologic Malignancy Assays With Survey Material-Specific Differences in Variant Frequencies</title><title>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>As laboratories increasingly turn from single-analyte testing in hematologic malignancies to next-generation sequencing-based panel testing, there is a corresponding need for proficiency testing to ensure adequate performance of these next-generation sequencing assays for optimal patient care.
To report the performance of laboratories on proficiency testing from the first 4 College of American Pathologists Next-Generation Sequencing Hematologic Malignancy surveys.
College of American Pathologists proficiency testing results for 36 different engineered variants and/or allele fractions as well as a sample with no pathogenic variants were analyzed for accuracy and associated assay performance characteristics.
The overall sensitivity observed for all variants was 93.5% (2190 of 2341) with 99.8% specificity (22 800 of 22 840). The false-negative rate was 6.5% (151 of 2341), and the largest single cause of these errors was difficulty in identifying variants in the sequence of
that is rich in cytosines and guanines. False-positive results (0.18%; 40 of 22 840) were most likely the result of preanalytic or postanalytic errors. Interestingly, the variant allele fractions were almost uniformly lower than the engineered fraction (as measured by digital polymerase chain reaction). Extensive troubleshooting identified a multifactorial cause for the low variant allele fractions, a result of an interaction between the linearized nature of the plasmid and the Illumina TruSeq chemistry.
Laboratories demonstrated an overall accuracy of 99.2% (24 990 of 25 181) with 99.8% specificity and 93.5% sensitivity when examining 36 clinically relevant somatic single-nucleotide variants with a variant allele fraction of 10% or greater. The data also highlight an issue with artificial linearized plasmids as survey material for next-generation sequencing.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Blood cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Janus kinase 2</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Medical societies</subject><subject>MyD88 protein</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>p53 Protein</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9u0zAUxiMEYmXwANwgS0iImxQ7jp3ksitsnTSgUgZcWq5zknpy7GInQHlX3gWHlT9DVSxFtn_nO5-OvyR5SvCclax8Jf1OzjNMqhRTlqXL9b1kRlhO04xwdj-ZYYxpWlUlO0kehXATt1WWkYfJCSVVyXHBZ8mPtXetVhqs2qNrCIO2HXItqgdpG-kb_R0aVMt-ZyCgeuu-BrTS3RZd2gG8kRvn5eD8Hi06D9CDHVDrPFoabbWSBr2DbwO6AAsR086iGj6PsVVskp7JEKVX0EcB4zqt0FtpdGfl5GQRgtwH9EkPW1SP_gvs423sqKVJ6x0oHT2j17ptwUe5aE1b9FHG62jg3B-aQHicPGilCfDk8D9NPpy_uV6u0qv3F5fLxVWqGC6HtGk4rhpFcIXjMEmpNoQ1heTZhjek5FRSRgpaEGgL1vIqKxkjm7LIKgxxNYyeJi9vdXfexd5hEL0OCoyRFtwYREbzgpGM52VEn_-H3rjR2-hOZDnN46I5_kt10oDQtnWDl2oSFQtOc4Yp5zxS6RGq-zVu4yy0Oh7f4edH-Pg10Gt1tODFPwVbkGbYBmfG6S3DXZDcgsq7EDy0Yud1L_1eECymrIopq2LKqpiyKpbrWPPsMIlx00Pzp-J3OOlPCrLm-g</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Keegan, Alissa</creator><creator>Bridge, Julia A</creator><creator>Lindeman, Neal I</creator><creator>Long, Thomas A</creator><creator>Merker, Jason D</creator><creator>Moncur, Joel T</creator><creator>Montgomery, Nathan D</creator><creator>Nagarajan, Rakesh</creator><creator>Rothberg, Paul G</creator><creator>Routbort, Mark J</creator><creator>Vasalos, Patricia</creator><creator>Xian, Rena</creator><creator>Kim, Annette S</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next Generation Sequencing-Based Hematologic Malignancy Assays With Survey Material-Specific Differences in Variant Frequencies</title><author>Keegan, Alissa ; Bridge, Julia A ; Lindeman, Neal I ; Long, Thomas A ; Merker, Jason D ; Moncur, Joel T ; Montgomery, Nathan D ; Nagarajan, Rakesh ; Rothberg, Paul G ; Routbort, Mark J ; Vasalos, Patricia ; Xian, Rena ; Kim, Annette S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-dd609dc109001918cb15d7a62b6d1863a3517371ef75f6928551b87290e90ed53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Blood cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Janus kinase 2</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Medical societies</topic><topic>MyD88 protein</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>p53 Protein</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Alissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridge, Julia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeman, Neal I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merker, Jason D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moncur, Joel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Nathan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarajan, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Paul G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Routbort, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasalos, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xian, Rena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Annette S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keegan, Alissa</au><au>Bridge, Julia A</au><au>Lindeman, Neal I</au><au>Long, Thomas A</au><au>Merker, Jason D</au><au>Moncur, Joel T</au><au>Montgomery, Nathan D</au><au>Nagarajan, Rakesh</au><au>Rothberg, Paul G</au><au>Routbort, Mark J</au><au>Vasalos, Patricia</au><au>Xian, Rena</au><au>Kim, Annette S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next Generation Sequencing-Based Hematologic Malignancy Assays With Survey Material-Specific Differences in Variant Frequencies</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>966</epage><pages>959-966</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><abstract>As laboratories increasingly turn from single-analyte testing in hematologic malignancies to next-generation sequencing-based panel testing, there is a corresponding need for proficiency testing to ensure adequate performance of these next-generation sequencing assays for optimal patient care.
To report the performance of laboratories on proficiency testing from the first 4 College of American Pathologists Next-Generation Sequencing Hematologic Malignancy surveys.
College of American Pathologists proficiency testing results for 36 different engineered variants and/or allele fractions as well as a sample with no pathogenic variants were analyzed for accuracy and associated assay performance characteristics.
The overall sensitivity observed for all variants was 93.5% (2190 of 2341) with 99.8% specificity (22 800 of 22 840). The false-negative rate was 6.5% (151 of 2341), and the largest single cause of these errors was difficulty in identifying variants in the sequence of
that is rich in cytosines and guanines. False-positive results (0.18%; 40 of 22 840) were most likely the result of preanalytic or postanalytic errors. Interestingly, the variant allele fractions were almost uniformly lower than the engineered fraction (as measured by digital polymerase chain reaction). Extensive troubleshooting identified a multifactorial cause for the low variant allele fractions, a result of an interaction between the linearized nature of the plasmid and the Illumina TruSeq chemistry.
Laboratories demonstrated an overall accuracy of 99.2% (24 990 of 25 181) with 99.8% specificity and 93.5% sensitivity when examining 36 clinically relevant somatic single-nucleotide variants with a variant allele fraction of 10% or greater. The data also highlight an issue with artificial linearized plasmids as survey material for next-generation sequencing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><pmid>31986076</pmid><doi>10.5858/arpa.2019-0352-CP</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9985 |
ispartof | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2020-08, Vol.144 (8), p.959-966 |
issn | 0003-9985 1543-2165 1543-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2347512648 |
source | Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accuracy Blood cancer Cancer Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Genes Janus kinase 2 Laboratories Malignancy Medical societies MyD88 protein Next-generation sequencing p53 Protein Plasmids Polymerase chain reaction Standard deviation Surveys Tumors |
title | Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next Generation Sequencing-Based Hematologic Malignancy Assays With Survey Material-Specific Differences in Variant Frequencies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A37%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proficiency%20Testing%20of%20Standardized%20Samples%20Shows%20High%20Interlaboratory%20Agreement%20for%20Clinical%20Next%20Generation%20Sequencing-Based%20Hematologic%20Malignancy%20Assays%20With%20Survey%20Material-Specific%20Differences%20in%20Variant%20Frequencies&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Keegan,%20Alissa&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=966&rft.pages=959-966&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/arpa.2019-0352-CP&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA634503666%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434434340&rft_id=info:pmid/31986076&rft_galeid=A634503666&rfr_iscdi=true |