Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?
The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endosc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of surgical oncology 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.358-362 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 362 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 358 |
container_title | European journal of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Haak, Hester E. Maas, Monique Lambregts, Doenja M.J. Beets-Tan, Regina G.H. Beets, Geerard L. Melenhorst, Jarno Sande, Marit E. van der Westreenen, Henderik L. van Talsma, A.K. (Koen) Breukink, Stephanie O. Zimmerman, David D.E. Hilling, Denise E. Wilt, Johannes H.W. de Peeters, Koen C.M.J. Graaf, Eelco J.R. de Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Sonneveld, Dirk J.A. Komen, Niels Pronk, Apollo Intven, Martijn Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien) Hoff, Christiaan |
description | The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer.
Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score.
43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems.
W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2346287744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798320300056</els_id><sourcerecordid>2346287744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-14a32db53aa741b59f1df2d748e26e87606ea67072a36a2f72f43a64db6839bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVBbaP9AD8rGXBH_FTiQkhFALSEhc6Nma2GPVq2yy2F4Q_77eLu2R03y982rmIeQbZy1nXF-sW1znpRVMsJbxlrHuE1nxTopG8M4ckRUzqm_M0MsTcprzmjE2SDN8JieSD70QTK_I032mr1Dcbwqzr1ksFGiGgH9rDAFdiS9YJ2-0LLQkhEJTbcJEHcwOE40zXSZfky2UiHPJV1_IcYAp49f3eEZ-_fzxdHPXPDze3t9cPzROaV0arkAKP3YSwCg-dkPgPghfj0ahsTeaaQRtmBEgNYhgRFAStPKj7uUwjvKMfD_4btPyvMNc7CZmh9MEMy67bIVUWvTGKFWl4iB1ack5YbDbFDeQ3ixndk_Tru2ept3TtIzbSrMunb_778YN-v8r__BVweVBgPXLl4jJZlcROPRxz8j6JX7k_wdHloTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2346287744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Haak, Hester E. ; Maas, Monique ; Lambregts, Doenja M.J. ; Beets-Tan, Regina G.H. ; Beets, Geerard L. ; Melenhorst, Jarno ; Sande, Marit E. van der ; Westreenen, Henderik L. van ; Talsma, A.K. (Koen) ; Breukink, Stephanie O. ; Zimmerman, David D.E. ; Hilling, Denise E. ; Wilt, Johannes H.W. de ; Peeters, Koen C.M.J. ; Graaf, Eelco J.R. de ; Tuynman, Jurriaan B. ; Sonneveld, Dirk J.A. ; Komen, Niels ; Pronk, Apollo ; Intven, Martijn ; Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien) ; Hoff, Christiaan</creator><creatorcontrib>Haak, Hester E. ; Maas, Monique ; Lambregts, Doenja M.J. ; Beets-Tan, Regina G.H. ; Beets, Geerard L. ; Melenhorst, Jarno ; Sande, Marit E. van der ; Westreenen, Henderik L. van ; Talsma, A.K. (Koen) ; Breukink, Stephanie O. ; Zimmerman, David D.E. ; Hilling, Denise E. ; Wilt, Johannes H.W. de ; Peeters, Koen C.M.J. ; Graaf, Eelco J.R. de ; Tuynman, Jurriaan B. ; Sonneveld, Dirk J.A. ; Komen, Niels ; Pronk, Apollo ; Intven, Martijn ; Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien) ; Hoff, Christiaan ; the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium ; Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer.
Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score.
43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems.
W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31982206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Chemoradiation ; Functional outcomes ; Older patients ; Oncological outcomes ; Rectal cancer ; Watch-and-wait approach</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.358-362</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-14a32db53aa741b59f1df2d748e26e87606ea67072a36a2f72f43a64db6839bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-14a32db53aa741b59f1df2d748e26e87606ea67072a36a2f72f43a64db6839bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798320300056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31982206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haak, Hester E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambregts, Doenja M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets, Geerard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melenhorst, Jarno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sande, Marit E. van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westreenen, Henderik L. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talsma, A.K. (Koen)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breukink, Stephanie O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilling, Denise E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilt, Johannes H.W. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Koen C.M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf, Eelco J.R. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuynman, Jurriaan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komen, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pronk, Apollo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intven, Martijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Christiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer.
Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score.
43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems.
W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.</description><subject>Chemoradiation</subject><subject>Functional outcomes</subject><subject>Older patients</subject><subject>Oncological outcomes</subject><subject>Rectal cancer</subject><subject>Watch-and-wait approach</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVBbaP9AD8rGXBH_FTiQkhFALSEhc6Nma2GPVq2yy2F4Q_77eLu2R03y982rmIeQbZy1nXF-sW1znpRVMsJbxlrHuE1nxTopG8M4ckRUzqm_M0MsTcprzmjE2SDN8JieSD70QTK_I032mr1Dcbwqzr1ksFGiGgH9rDAFdiS9YJ2-0LLQkhEJTbcJEHcwOE40zXSZfky2UiHPJV1_IcYAp49f3eEZ-_fzxdHPXPDze3t9cPzROaV0arkAKP3YSwCg-dkPgPghfj0ahsTeaaQRtmBEgNYhgRFAStPKj7uUwjvKMfD_4btPyvMNc7CZmh9MEMy67bIVUWvTGKFWl4iB1ack5YbDbFDeQ3ixndk_Tru2ept3TtIzbSrMunb_778YN-v8r__BVweVBgPXLl4jJZlcROPRxz8j6JX7k_wdHloTg</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Haak, Hester E.</creator><creator>Maas, Monique</creator><creator>Lambregts, Doenja M.J.</creator><creator>Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.</creator><creator>Beets, Geerard L.</creator><creator>Melenhorst, Jarno</creator><creator>Sande, Marit E. van der</creator><creator>Westreenen, Henderik L. van</creator><creator>Talsma, A.K. (Koen)</creator><creator>Breukink, Stephanie O.</creator><creator>Zimmerman, David D.E.</creator><creator>Hilling, Denise E.</creator><creator>Wilt, Johannes H.W. de</creator><creator>Peeters, Koen C.M.J.</creator><creator>Graaf, Eelco J.R. de</creator><creator>Tuynman, Jurriaan B.</creator><creator>Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.</creator><creator>Komen, Niels</creator><creator>Pronk, Apollo</creator><creator>Intven, Martijn</creator><creator>Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)</creator><creator>Hoff, Christiaan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?</title><author>Haak, Hester E. ; Maas, Monique ; Lambregts, Doenja M.J. ; Beets-Tan, Regina G.H. ; Beets, Geerard L. ; Melenhorst, Jarno ; Sande, Marit E. van der ; Westreenen, Henderik L. van ; Talsma, A.K. (Koen) ; Breukink, Stephanie O. ; Zimmerman, David D.E. ; Hilling, Denise E. ; Wilt, Johannes H.W. de ; Peeters, Koen C.M.J. ; Graaf, Eelco J.R. de ; Tuynman, Jurriaan B. ; Sonneveld, Dirk J.A. ; Komen, Niels ; Pronk, Apollo ; Intven, Martijn ; Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien) ; Hoff, Christiaan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-14a32db53aa741b59f1df2d748e26e87606ea67072a36a2f72f43a64db6839bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chemoradiation</topic><topic>Functional outcomes</topic><topic>Older patients</topic><topic>Oncological outcomes</topic><topic>Rectal cancer</topic><topic>Watch-and-wait approach</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haak, Hester E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambregts, Doenja M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets, Geerard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melenhorst, Jarno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sande, Marit E. van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westreenen, Henderik L. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talsma, A.K. (Koen)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breukink, Stephanie O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilling, Denise E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilt, Johannes H.W. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Koen C.M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf, Eelco J.R. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuynman, Jurriaan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komen, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pronk, Apollo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intven, Martijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Christiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haak, Hester E.</au><au>Maas, Monique</au><au>Lambregts, Doenja M.J.</au><au>Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.</au><au>Beets, Geerard L.</au><au>Melenhorst, Jarno</au><au>Sande, Marit E. van der</au><au>Westreenen, Henderik L. van</au><au>Talsma, A.K. (Koen)</au><au>Breukink, Stephanie O.</au><au>Zimmerman, David D.E.</au><au>Hilling, Denise E.</au><au>Wilt, Johannes H.W. de</au><au>Peeters, Koen C.M.J.</au><au>Graaf, Eelco J.R. de</au><au>Tuynman, Jurriaan B.</au><au>Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.</au><au>Komen, Niels</au><au>Pronk, Apollo</au><au>Intven, Martijn</au><au>Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)</au><au>Hoff, Christiaan</au><aucorp>the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</aucorp><aucorp>Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>358</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>358-362</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer.
Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score.
43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems.
W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31982206</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-7983 |
ispartof | European journal of surgical oncology, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.358-362 |
issn | 0748-7983 1532-2157 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2346287744 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Chemoradiation Functional outcomes Older patients Oncological outcomes Rectal cancer Watch-and-wait approach |
title | Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20watch%20and%20wait%20a%20safe%20and%20effective%20way%20to%20treat%20rectal%20cancer%20in%20older%20patients?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Haak,%20Hester%20E.&rft.aucorp=the%20Dutch%20Watch-and-Wait%20Consortium&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=358&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=358-362&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2346287744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2346287744&rft_id=info:pmid/31982206&rft_els_id=S0748798320300056&rfr_iscdi=true |