Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?

The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endosc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.358-362
Hauptverfasser: Haak, Hester E., Maas, Monique, Lambregts, Doenja M.J., Beets-Tan, Regina G.H., Beets, Geerard L., Melenhorst, Jarno, Sande, Marit E. van der, Westreenen, Henderik L. van, Talsma, A.K. (Koen), Breukink, Stephanie O., Zimmerman, David D.E., Hilling, Denise E., Wilt, Johannes H.W. de, Peeters, Koen C.M.J., Graaf, Eelco J.R. de, Tuynman, Jurriaan B., Sonneveld, Dirk J.A., Komen, Niels, Pronk, Apollo, Intven, Martijn, Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien), Hoff, Christiaan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 362
container_issue 3
container_start_page 358
container_title European journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 46
creator Haak, Hester E.
Maas, Monique
Lambregts, Doenja M.J.
Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.
Beets, Geerard L.
Melenhorst, Jarno
Sande, Marit E. van der
Westreenen, Henderik L. van
Talsma, A.K. (Koen)
Breukink, Stephanie O.
Zimmerman, David D.E.
Hilling, Denise E.
Wilt, Johannes H.W. de
Peeters, Koen C.M.J.
Graaf, Eelco J.R. de
Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.
Komen, Niels
Pronk, Apollo
Intven, Martijn
Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)
Hoff, Christiaan
description The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score. 43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems. W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2346287744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798320300056</els_id><sourcerecordid>2346287744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-14a32db53aa741b59f1df2d748e26e87606ea67072a36a2f72f43a64db6839bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVBbaP9AD8rGXBH_FTiQkhFALSEhc6Nma2GPVq2yy2F4Q_77eLu2R03y982rmIeQbZy1nXF-sW1znpRVMsJbxlrHuE1nxTopG8M4ckRUzqm_M0MsTcprzmjE2SDN8JieSD70QTK_I032mr1Dcbwqzr1ksFGiGgH9rDAFdiS9YJ2-0LLQkhEJTbcJEHcwOE40zXSZfky2UiHPJV1_IcYAp49f3eEZ-_fzxdHPXPDze3t9cPzROaV0arkAKP3YSwCg-dkPgPghfj0ahsTeaaQRtmBEgNYhgRFAStPKj7uUwjvKMfD_4btPyvMNc7CZmh9MEMy67bIVUWvTGKFWl4iB1ack5YbDbFDeQ3ixndk_Tru2ept3TtIzbSrMunb_778YN-v8r__BVweVBgPXLl4jJZlcROPRxz8j6JX7k_wdHloTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2346287744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Haak, Hester E. ; Maas, Monique ; Lambregts, Doenja M.J. ; Beets-Tan, Regina G.H. ; Beets, Geerard L. ; Melenhorst, Jarno ; Sande, Marit E. van der ; Westreenen, Henderik L. van ; Talsma, A.K. (Koen) ; Breukink, Stephanie O. ; Zimmerman, David D.E. ; Hilling, Denise E. ; Wilt, Johannes H.W. de ; Peeters, Koen C.M.J. ; Graaf, Eelco J.R. de ; Tuynman, Jurriaan B. ; Sonneveld, Dirk J.A. ; Komen, Niels ; Pronk, Apollo ; Intven, Martijn ; Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien) ; Hoff, Christiaan</creator><creatorcontrib>Haak, Hester E. ; Maas, Monique ; Lambregts, Doenja M.J. ; Beets-Tan, Regina G.H. ; Beets, Geerard L. ; Melenhorst, Jarno ; Sande, Marit E. van der ; Westreenen, Henderik L. van ; Talsma, A.K. (Koen) ; Breukink, Stephanie O. ; Zimmerman, David D.E. ; Hilling, Denise E. ; Wilt, Johannes H.W. de ; Peeters, Koen C.M.J. ; Graaf, Eelco J.R. de ; Tuynman, Jurriaan B. ; Sonneveld, Dirk J.A. ; Komen, Niels ; Pronk, Apollo ; Intven, Martijn ; Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien) ; Hoff, Christiaan ; the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium ; Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&amp;W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Patients were included in a W&amp;W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score. 43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&amp;W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems. W&amp;W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31982206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Chemoradiation ; Functional outcomes ; Older patients ; Oncological outcomes ; Rectal cancer ; Watch-and-wait approach</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.358-362</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-14a32db53aa741b59f1df2d748e26e87606ea67072a36a2f72f43a64db6839bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-14a32db53aa741b59f1df2d748e26e87606ea67072a36a2f72f43a64db6839bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798320300056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31982206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haak, Hester E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambregts, Doenja M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets, Geerard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melenhorst, Jarno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sande, Marit E. van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westreenen, Henderik L. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talsma, A.K. (Koen)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breukink, Stephanie O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilling, Denise E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilt, Johannes H.W. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Koen C.M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf, Eelco J.R. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuynman, Jurriaan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komen, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pronk, Apollo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intven, Martijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Christiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&amp;W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Patients were included in a W&amp;W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score. 43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&amp;W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems. W&amp;W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.</description><subject>Chemoradiation</subject><subject>Functional outcomes</subject><subject>Older patients</subject><subject>Oncological outcomes</subject><subject>Rectal cancer</subject><subject>Watch-and-wait approach</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVBbaP9AD8rGXBH_FTiQkhFALSEhc6Nma2GPVq2yy2F4Q_77eLu2R03y982rmIeQbZy1nXF-sW1znpRVMsJbxlrHuE1nxTopG8M4ckRUzqm_M0MsTcprzmjE2SDN8JieSD70QTK_I032mr1Dcbwqzr1ksFGiGgH9rDAFdiS9YJ2-0LLQkhEJTbcJEHcwOE40zXSZfky2UiHPJV1_IcYAp49f3eEZ-_fzxdHPXPDze3t9cPzROaV0arkAKP3YSwCg-dkPgPghfj0ahsTeaaQRtmBEgNYhgRFAStPKj7uUwjvKMfD_4btPyvMNc7CZmh9MEMy67bIVUWvTGKFWl4iB1ack5YbDbFDeQ3ixndk_Tru2ept3TtIzbSrMunb_778YN-v8r__BVweVBgPXLl4jJZlcROPRxz8j6JX7k_wdHloTg</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Haak, Hester E.</creator><creator>Maas, Monique</creator><creator>Lambregts, Doenja M.J.</creator><creator>Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.</creator><creator>Beets, Geerard L.</creator><creator>Melenhorst, Jarno</creator><creator>Sande, Marit E. van der</creator><creator>Westreenen, Henderik L. van</creator><creator>Talsma, A.K. (Koen)</creator><creator>Breukink, Stephanie O.</creator><creator>Zimmerman, David D.E.</creator><creator>Hilling, Denise E.</creator><creator>Wilt, Johannes H.W. de</creator><creator>Peeters, Koen C.M.J.</creator><creator>Graaf, Eelco J.R. de</creator><creator>Tuynman, Jurriaan B.</creator><creator>Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.</creator><creator>Komen, Niels</creator><creator>Pronk, Apollo</creator><creator>Intven, Martijn</creator><creator>Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)</creator><creator>Hoff, Christiaan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?</title><author>Haak, Hester E. ; Maas, Monique ; Lambregts, Doenja M.J. ; Beets-Tan, Regina G.H. ; Beets, Geerard L. ; Melenhorst, Jarno ; Sande, Marit E. van der ; Westreenen, Henderik L. van ; Talsma, A.K. (Koen) ; Breukink, Stephanie O. ; Zimmerman, David D.E. ; Hilling, Denise E. ; Wilt, Johannes H.W. de ; Peeters, Koen C.M.J. ; Graaf, Eelco J.R. de ; Tuynman, Jurriaan B. ; Sonneveld, Dirk J.A. ; Komen, Niels ; Pronk, Apollo ; Intven, Martijn ; Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien) ; Hoff, Christiaan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-14a32db53aa741b59f1df2d748e26e87606ea67072a36a2f72f43a64db6839bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chemoradiation</topic><topic>Functional outcomes</topic><topic>Older patients</topic><topic>Oncological outcomes</topic><topic>Rectal cancer</topic><topic>Watch-and-wait approach</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haak, Hester E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambregts, Doenja M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beets, Geerard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melenhorst, Jarno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sande, Marit E. van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westreenen, Henderik L. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talsma, A.K. (Koen)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breukink, Stephanie O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilling, Denise E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilt, Johannes H.W. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Koen C.M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf, Eelco J.R. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuynman, Jurriaan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komen, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pronk, Apollo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intven, Martijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Christiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haak, Hester E.</au><au>Maas, Monique</au><au>Lambregts, Doenja M.J.</au><au>Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.</au><au>Beets, Geerard L.</au><au>Melenhorst, Jarno</au><au>Sande, Marit E. van der</au><au>Westreenen, Henderik L. van</au><au>Talsma, A.K. (Koen)</au><au>Breukink, Stephanie O.</au><au>Zimmerman, David D.E.</au><au>Hilling, Denise E.</au><au>Wilt, Johannes H.W. de</au><au>Peeters, Koen C.M.J.</au><au>Graaf, Eelco J.R. de</au><au>Tuynman, Jurriaan B.</au><au>Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.</au><au>Komen, Niels</au><au>Pronk, Apollo</au><au>Intven, Martijn</au><au>Schreurs, W.H. (Hermien)</au><au>Hoff, Christiaan</au><aucorp>the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</aucorp><aucorp>Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>358</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>358-362</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&amp;W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Patients were included in a W&amp;W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score. 43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&amp;W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems. W&amp;W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31982206</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-7983
ispartof European journal of surgical oncology, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.358-362
issn 0748-7983
1532-2157
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2346287744
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Chemoradiation
Functional outcomes
Older patients
Oncological outcomes
Rectal cancer
Watch-and-wait approach
title Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20watch%20and%20wait%20a%20safe%20and%20effective%20way%20to%20treat%20rectal%20cancer%20in%20older%20patients?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Haak,%20Hester%20E.&rft.aucorp=the%20Dutch%20Watch-and-Wait%20Consortium&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=358&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=358-362&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2346287744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2346287744&rft_id=info:pmid/31982206&rft_els_id=S0748798320300056&rfr_iscdi=true