Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results

To describe our endoscopic aortic valve replacement (E-AVR) technique and to evaluate its early results regardless of the type of prosthetic valve implanted and the patients’ characteristics. From July 2013 to September 2018, 125 patients (76 males, mean age 68.8 ± 10.9 years, mean EuroScore II 1.51...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2020-01, Vol.32 (3), p.416-423
Hauptverfasser: Cresce, Giovanni Domenico, Sella, Massimo, Hinna Danesi, Tommaso, Favaro, Alessandro, Salvador, Loris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 423
container_issue 3
container_start_page 416
container_title Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
container_volume 32
creator Cresce, Giovanni Domenico
Sella, Massimo
Hinna Danesi, Tommaso
Favaro, Alessandro
Salvador, Loris
description To describe our endoscopic aortic valve replacement (E-AVR) technique and to evaluate its early results regardless of the type of prosthetic valve implanted and the patients’ characteristics. From July 2013 to September 2018, 125 patients (76 males, mean age 68.8 ± 10.9 years, mean EuroScore II 1.51 ± 1.39) underwent isolated E-AVR due to a severe stenosis in 99 cases and insufficiency in 26 cases. The surgical access was a 3–4 cm working port in the second right intercostal space with no rib-spreading and 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was achieved through a femoro-femoral cannulation. All patients successfully underwent E-AVR. Stended bioprostheses were implanted in 56 cases, Rapid Deployment and Sutureless valves in 23 and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and CPB times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively, and a significant difference between the types of prostheses was observed: 69.1 ± 15.1 and 106.2 ± 21.8 minutes (Sutureless) vs 93.2 ± 15.1 and 135.5 ± 21.8 minutes (Rapid Deployment) vs 100.6 ± 17.2 and 138.9 ± 21.9 minutes (Stented). Mean ventilation and ICU times and hospital stay were 10.9 ± 39.3 hours, 45.9 ± 58.4 hours, and 8.3 ± 9.3 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemaker implantation. No major neurologic events were observed. No paravalvular leakage was detected at discharge. E-AVR is associated with low mortality and few complications. Sutureless bioprostheses significantly reduce cross-clamping and CPB times. In dedicated centers, this approach may become a valid alternative to other minimally invasive techniques. One-hundred twenty-five patients underwent isolated endoscopic aortic valve replacement. The surgical access was a 3–4 cm minithoracotomy in the second right intercostal space; 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line are required. Stended bioprostheses, Rapid Deployment, and Sutureless valves were implanted in 56, 23, and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemake
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2344274138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1043067920300022</els_id><sourcerecordid>2344274138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-88156c38a9e5c5cf4c7f5b4854d98aa062bc4ea37b44702f6c0e2555995196303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_grJHL7vmcz-8iJSqhUpB1GvIZmchZb9M0oX-e1NbvXqaYXhmhvdB6JrghGDB7jaJg9br0SUUU5xgkmBMT9CUCEbjguf5aegxZzFOs2KCLpzbBIBkjJ2jCSNFRhkmU7R8NZ1pVdPsomU3KmdGiBZd1TvdD0ZHj731oXyqJszfYGiUhhY6fx-tB7DKm5-x2zbeXaKzWjUOro51hj6eFu_zl3i1fl7OH1exZqnwcZ4TkWqWqwKEFrrmOqtFyXPBqyJXCqe01BwUy0rOM0zrVGOgQoiiEKRIGWYzdHu4O9j-awvOy9Y4DU2jOui3TlLGOc04YXlAxQHVtnfOQi0HG8LanSRY7i3KjTxalHuLEhMZJIW9m-OLbdlC9bf1qy0ADwcAQtDRgJVOG-g0VMaC9rLqzT8vvgGE44Vt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2344274138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Cresce, Giovanni Domenico ; Sella, Massimo ; Hinna Danesi, Tommaso ; Favaro, Alessandro ; Salvador, Loris</creator><creatorcontrib>Cresce, Giovanni Domenico ; Sella, Massimo ; Hinna Danesi, Tommaso ; Favaro, Alessandro ; Salvador, Loris</creatorcontrib><description>To describe our endoscopic aortic valve replacement (E-AVR) technique and to evaluate its early results regardless of the type of prosthetic valve implanted and the patients’ characteristics. From July 2013 to September 2018, 125 patients (76 males, mean age 68.8 ± 10.9 years, mean EuroScore II 1.51 ± 1.39) underwent isolated E-AVR due to a severe stenosis in 99 cases and insufficiency in 26 cases. The surgical access was a 3–4 cm working port in the second right intercostal space with no rib-spreading and 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was achieved through a femoro-femoral cannulation. All patients successfully underwent E-AVR. Stended bioprostheses were implanted in 56 cases, Rapid Deployment and Sutureless valves in 23 and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and CPB times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively, and a significant difference between the types of prostheses was observed: 69.1 ± 15.1 and 106.2 ± 21.8 minutes (Sutureless) vs 93.2 ± 15.1 and 135.5 ± 21.8 minutes (Rapid Deployment) vs 100.6 ± 17.2 and 138.9 ± 21.9 minutes (Stented). Mean ventilation and ICU times and hospital stay were 10.9 ± 39.3 hours, 45.9 ± 58.4 hours, and 8.3 ± 9.3 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemaker implantation. No major neurologic events were observed. No paravalvular leakage was detected at discharge. E-AVR is associated with low mortality and few complications. Sutureless bioprostheses significantly reduce cross-clamping and CPB times. In dedicated centers, this approach may become a valid alternative to other minimally invasive techniques. One-hundred twenty-five patients underwent isolated endoscopic aortic valve replacement. The surgical access was a 3–4 cm minithoracotomy in the second right intercostal space; 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line are required. Stended bioprostheses, Rapid Deployment, and Sutureless valves were implanted in 56, 23, and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemaker implantation. No major neurologic events were observed. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-0679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31972301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bioprostheses ; Endoscopic aortic valve replacement ; Minimally invasive</subject><ispartof>Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020-01, Vol.32 (3), p.416-423</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-88156c38a9e5c5cf4c7f5b4854d98aa062bc4ea37b44702f6c0e2555995196303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-88156c38a9e5c5cf4c7f5b4854d98aa062bc4ea37b44702f6c0e2555995196303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067920300022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31972301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cresce, Giovanni Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sella, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinna Danesi, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favaro, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador, Loris</creatorcontrib><title>Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results</title><title>Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><description>To describe our endoscopic aortic valve replacement (E-AVR) technique and to evaluate its early results regardless of the type of prosthetic valve implanted and the patients’ characteristics. From July 2013 to September 2018, 125 patients (76 males, mean age 68.8 ± 10.9 years, mean EuroScore II 1.51 ± 1.39) underwent isolated E-AVR due to a severe stenosis in 99 cases and insufficiency in 26 cases. The surgical access was a 3–4 cm working port in the second right intercostal space with no rib-spreading and 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was achieved through a femoro-femoral cannulation. All patients successfully underwent E-AVR. Stended bioprostheses were implanted in 56 cases, Rapid Deployment and Sutureless valves in 23 and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and CPB times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively, and a significant difference between the types of prostheses was observed: 69.1 ± 15.1 and 106.2 ± 21.8 minutes (Sutureless) vs 93.2 ± 15.1 and 135.5 ± 21.8 minutes (Rapid Deployment) vs 100.6 ± 17.2 and 138.9 ± 21.9 minutes (Stented). Mean ventilation and ICU times and hospital stay were 10.9 ± 39.3 hours, 45.9 ± 58.4 hours, and 8.3 ± 9.3 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemaker implantation. No major neurologic events were observed. No paravalvular leakage was detected at discharge. E-AVR is associated with low mortality and few complications. Sutureless bioprostheses significantly reduce cross-clamping and CPB times. In dedicated centers, this approach may become a valid alternative to other minimally invasive techniques. One-hundred twenty-five patients underwent isolated endoscopic aortic valve replacement. The surgical access was a 3–4 cm minithoracotomy in the second right intercostal space; 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line are required. Stended bioprostheses, Rapid Deployment, and Sutureless valves were implanted in 56, 23, and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemaker implantation. No major neurologic events were observed. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Bioprostheses</subject><subject>Endoscopic aortic valve replacement</subject><subject>Minimally invasive</subject><issn>1043-0679</issn><issn>1532-9488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_grJHL7vmcz-8iJSqhUpB1GvIZmchZb9M0oX-e1NbvXqaYXhmhvdB6JrghGDB7jaJg9br0SUUU5xgkmBMT9CUCEbjguf5aegxZzFOs2KCLpzbBIBkjJ2jCSNFRhkmU7R8NZ1pVdPsomU3KmdGiBZd1TvdD0ZHj731oXyqJszfYGiUhhY6fx-tB7DKm5-x2zbeXaKzWjUOro51hj6eFu_zl3i1fl7OH1exZqnwcZ4TkWqWqwKEFrrmOqtFyXPBqyJXCqe01BwUy0rOM0zrVGOgQoiiEKRIGWYzdHu4O9j-awvOy9Y4DU2jOui3TlLGOc04YXlAxQHVtnfOQi0HG8LanSRY7i3KjTxalHuLEhMZJIW9m-OLbdlC9bf1qy0ADwcAQtDRgJVOG-g0VMaC9rLqzT8vvgGE44Vt</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Cresce, Giovanni Domenico</creator><creator>Sella, Massimo</creator><creator>Hinna Danesi, Tommaso</creator><creator>Favaro, Alessandro</creator><creator>Salvador, Loris</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results</title><author>Cresce, Giovanni Domenico ; Sella, Massimo ; Hinna Danesi, Tommaso ; Favaro, Alessandro ; Salvador, Loris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-88156c38a9e5c5cf4c7f5b4854d98aa062bc4ea37b44702f6c0e2555995196303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bioprostheses</topic><topic>Endoscopic aortic valve replacement</topic><topic>Minimally invasive</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cresce, Giovanni Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sella, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinna Danesi, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favaro, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador, Loris</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cresce, Giovanni Domenico</au><au>Sella, Massimo</au><au>Hinna Danesi, Tommaso</au><au>Favaro, Alessandro</au><au>Salvador, Loris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>416-423</pages><issn>1043-0679</issn><eissn>1532-9488</eissn><abstract>To describe our endoscopic aortic valve replacement (E-AVR) technique and to evaluate its early results regardless of the type of prosthetic valve implanted and the patients’ characteristics. From July 2013 to September 2018, 125 patients (76 males, mean age 68.8 ± 10.9 years, mean EuroScore II 1.51 ± 1.39) underwent isolated E-AVR due to a severe stenosis in 99 cases and insufficiency in 26 cases. The surgical access was a 3–4 cm working port in the second right intercostal space with no rib-spreading and 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was achieved through a femoro-femoral cannulation. All patients successfully underwent E-AVR. Stended bioprostheses were implanted in 56 cases, Rapid Deployment and Sutureless valves in 23 and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and CPB times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively, and a significant difference between the types of prostheses was observed: 69.1 ± 15.1 and 106.2 ± 21.8 minutes (Sutureless) vs 93.2 ± 15.1 and 135.5 ± 21.8 minutes (Rapid Deployment) vs 100.6 ± 17.2 and 138.9 ± 21.9 minutes (Stented). Mean ventilation and ICU times and hospital stay were 10.9 ± 39.3 hours, 45.9 ± 58.4 hours, and 8.3 ± 9.3 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemaker implantation. No major neurologic events were observed. No paravalvular leakage was detected at discharge. E-AVR is associated with low mortality and few complications. Sutureless bioprostheses significantly reduce cross-clamping and CPB times. In dedicated centers, this approach may become a valid alternative to other minimally invasive techniques. One-hundred twenty-five patients underwent isolated endoscopic aortic valve replacement. The surgical access was a 3–4 cm minithoracotomy in the second right intercostal space; 3 additional 5 mm miniports for the introduction of a 30-degree thoracoscope, the Chitwood clamp, and the vent line are required. Stended bioprostheses, Rapid Deployment, and Sutureless valves were implanted in 56, 23, and 46 cases, respectively. Mean cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 87.5 ± 22.1 and 126.1 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%. One patient (0.8%) needed a re-exploration for bleeding and 3 patients (2.4%) required a new permanent pacemaker implantation. No major neurologic events were observed. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31972301</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.01.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1043-0679
ispartof Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020-01, Vol.32 (3), p.416-423
issn 1043-0679
1532-9488
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2344274138
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Bioprostheses
Endoscopic aortic valve replacement
Minimally invasive
title Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A52%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally%20Invasive%20Endoscopic%20Aortic%20Valve%20Replacement:%20Operative%20Results&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Cresce,%20Giovanni%20Domenico&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=416-423&rft.issn=1043-0679&rft.eissn=1532-9488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2344274138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2344274138&rft_id=info:pmid/31972301&rft_els_id=S1043067920300022&rfr_iscdi=true