Environmental efficiency evaluation of China's iron and steel industry: A process-level data envelopment analysis

To resolve the increasingly higher energy and environmental pressures, the evaluation of environmental efficiency in China's iron and steel industry is essential for identifying a precise energy conservation and emission reduction path. However, current studies have only focused on the efficien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2020-03, Vol.707, p.135903-135903, Article 135903
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Yihan, Wen, Zongguo, Cao, Xin, Zheng, Zhaofang, Xu, Jinjing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135903
container_issue
container_start_page 135903
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 707
creator Wang, Yihan
Wen, Zongguo
Cao, Xin
Zheng, Zhaofang
Xu, Jinjing
description To resolve the increasingly higher energy and environmental pressures, the evaluation of environmental efficiency in China's iron and steel industry is essential for identifying a precise energy conservation and emission reduction path. However, current studies have only focused on the efficiency evaluation in national, regional, or enterprise level, lacking the analysis of different processes. Therefore, the objective of this research is to conduct a process-level data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the environmental efficiency of China's iron and steel industry. Totally, 54 enterprises are contained, as the input-output structure of 5 processes: sintering, coking, ironmaking, steelmaking, and steel rolling are set specifically in this study. In addition, to compare the effects to the efficiency results of different DEA methods, Banker, Charnes & Cooper (BCC) model, Slack-based Measure (SBM) model, and Bootstrap-DEA methods are adopted. Finally, a regression model is used to investigate the key environmental protection strategies influencing the environmental efficiency. The results show that: (1) Within different methods, the average efficiency scores from SBM model are lower than the ones from BCC model, and the Bootstrap-DEA method also has a negative modification. (2) Regional efficiency difference exists, as the enterprises in South China perform best in sintering and coking processes but have the lowest overall efficiency scores. (3) Most enterprises have one or more short board processes. 12 enterprises are the enterprises with individual low environmental efficiency process, while other 25 are the enterprises with imbalanced environmental performances. (4) The coefficient factor between environmental protection investment and the efficiency scores are positive, but the factors of proportion of environmental protection staffs, and whether the enterprise has environmental protection research are negative. In sum, this study is hoped to contribute to formulating more precise environmental management measures in China's iron and steel industry. [Display omitted] •We first conduct the process-level DEA research in China's iron and steel industry.•The input-output structures of 6 processes are designed specifically.•BCC model, SBM model, and Bootstrap-DEA method are adopted.•Tobit regression model is used to identify the factors that affect the efficiency.•Differentiated environmental management methods can be adopted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135903
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2344273776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004896971935898X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2344273776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-805fd9cddfda57cce24f5e052c03873f066a7d9b810c37c9c0df957eb633fbc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFuGyEURVGVKnHS_ELLLt2MA8PMMHRnWWkSKVI27RpheKhYGBxgRvLfl5HTbMuGBefe9zgIfaNkTQkd7vfrrF2JBcK8bgkVa8p6QdgntKIjFw0l7XCBVoR0YyMGwa_Qdc57Ug8f6SW6YlTwVhC-Qm8PYXYphgOEojwGa512EPQJw6z8pIqLAUeLt39cUHcZLyxWweBcADx2wUy5pNMPvMHHFDXk3HiY64tRReG6Hvh4XMprSPlTdvkL-myVz3D7ft-g3z8ffm2fmpfXx-ft5qXRHeOlGUlvjdDGWKN6rjW0ne2B9K0mbOTMkmFQ3IjdSIlmXAtNjBU9h93AmN3pkd2g7-feutfbBLnIg8savFcB4pRly7qu5YzzoaL8jOoUc05g5TG5g0onSYlcfMu9_PAtF9_y7Lsmv74PmXYHMB-5f4IrsDkDUL86O0hLUfULxiXQRZro_jvkL1TimMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2344273776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental efficiency evaluation of China's iron and steel industry: A process-level data envelopment analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wang, Yihan ; Wen, Zongguo ; Cao, Xin ; Zheng, Zhaofang ; Xu, Jinjing</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yihan ; Wen, Zongguo ; Cao, Xin ; Zheng, Zhaofang ; Xu, Jinjing</creatorcontrib><description>To resolve the increasingly higher energy and environmental pressures, the evaluation of environmental efficiency in China's iron and steel industry is essential for identifying a precise energy conservation and emission reduction path. However, current studies have only focused on the efficiency evaluation in national, regional, or enterprise level, lacking the analysis of different processes. Therefore, the objective of this research is to conduct a process-level data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the environmental efficiency of China's iron and steel industry. Totally, 54 enterprises are contained, as the input-output structure of 5 processes: sintering, coking, ironmaking, steelmaking, and steel rolling are set specifically in this study. In addition, to compare the effects to the efficiency results of different DEA methods, Banker, Charnes &amp; Cooper (BCC) model, Slack-based Measure (SBM) model, and Bootstrap-DEA methods are adopted. Finally, a regression model is used to investigate the key environmental protection strategies influencing the environmental efficiency. The results show that: (1) Within different methods, the average efficiency scores from SBM model are lower than the ones from BCC model, and the Bootstrap-DEA method also has a negative modification. (2) Regional efficiency difference exists, as the enterprises in South China perform best in sintering and coking processes but have the lowest overall efficiency scores. (3) Most enterprises have one or more short board processes. 12 enterprises are the enterprises with individual low environmental efficiency process, while other 25 are the enterprises with imbalanced environmental performances. (4) The coefficient factor between environmental protection investment and the efficiency scores are positive, but the factors of proportion of environmental protection staffs, and whether the enterprise has environmental protection research are negative. In sum, this study is hoped to contribute to formulating more precise environmental management measures in China's iron and steel industry. [Display omitted] •We first conduct the process-level DEA research in China's iron and steel industry.•The input-output structures of 6 processes are designed specifically.•BCC model, SBM model, and Bootstrap-DEA method are adopted.•Tobit regression model is used to identify the factors that affect the efficiency.•Differentiated environmental management methods can be adopted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135903</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31972907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bootstrap-DEA method ; Data envelopment analysis ; Environmental efficiency ; Iron and steel industry ; Regression analysis</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2020-03, Vol.707, p.135903-135903, Article 135903</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-805fd9cddfda57cce24f5e052c03873f066a7d9b810c37c9c0df957eb633fbc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-805fd9cddfda57cce24f5e052c03873f066a7d9b810c37c9c0df957eb633fbc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896971935898X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31972907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Zongguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhaofang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jinjing</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental efficiency evaluation of China's iron and steel industry: A process-level data envelopment analysis</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>To resolve the increasingly higher energy and environmental pressures, the evaluation of environmental efficiency in China's iron and steel industry is essential for identifying a precise energy conservation and emission reduction path. However, current studies have only focused on the efficiency evaluation in national, regional, or enterprise level, lacking the analysis of different processes. Therefore, the objective of this research is to conduct a process-level data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the environmental efficiency of China's iron and steel industry. Totally, 54 enterprises are contained, as the input-output structure of 5 processes: sintering, coking, ironmaking, steelmaking, and steel rolling are set specifically in this study. In addition, to compare the effects to the efficiency results of different DEA methods, Banker, Charnes &amp; Cooper (BCC) model, Slack-based Measure (SBM) model, and Bootstrap-DEA methods are adopted. Finally, a regression model is used to investigate the key environmental protection strategies influencing the environmental efficiency. The results show that: (1) Within different methods, the average efficiency scores from SBM model are lower than the ones from BCC model, and the Bootstrap-DEA method also has a negative modification. (2) Regional efficiency difference exists, as the enterprises in South China perform best in sintering and coking processes but have the lowest overall efficiency scores. (3) Most enterprises have one or more short board processes. 12 enterprises are the enterprises with individual low environmental efficiency process, while other 25 are the enterprises with imbalanced environmental performances. (4) The coefficient factor between environmental protection investment and the efficiency scores are positive, but the factors of proportion of environmental protection staffs, and whether the enterprise has environmental protection research are negative. In sum, this study is hoped to contribute to formulating more precise environmental management measures in China's iron and steel industry. [Display omitted] •We first conduct the process-level DEA research in China's iron and steel industry.•The input-output structures of 6 processes are designed specifically.•BCC model, SBM model, and Bootstrap-DEA method are adopted.•Tobit regression model is used to identify the factors that affect the efficiency.•Differentiated environmental management methods can be adopted.</description><subject>Bootstrap-DEA method</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Environmental efficiency</subject><subject>Iron and steel industry</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFuGyEURVGVKnHS_ELLLt2MA8PMMHRnWWkSKVI27RpheKhYGBxgRvLfl5HTbMuGBefe9zgIfaNkTQkd7vfrrF2JBcK8bgkVa8p6QdgntKIjFw0l7XCBVoR0YyMGwa_Qdc57Ug8f6SW6YlTwVhC-Qm8PYXYphgOEojwGa512EPQJw6z8pIqLAUeLt39cUHcZLyxWweBcADx2wUy5pNMPvMHHFDXk3HiY64tRReG6Hvh4XMprSPlTdvkL-myVz3D7ft-g3z8ffm2fmpfXx-ft5qXRHeOlGUlvjdDGWKN6rjW0ne2B9K0mbOTMkmFQ3IjdSIlmXAtNjBU9h93AmN3pkd2g7-feutfbBLnIg8savFcB4pRly7qu5YzzoaL8jOoUc05g5TG5g0onSYlcfMu9_PAtF9_y7Lsmv74PmXYHMB-5f4IrsDkDUL86O0hLUfULxiXQRZro_jvkL1TimMw</recordid><startdate>20200310</startdate><enddate>20200310</enddate><creator>Wang, Yihan</creator><creator>Wen, Zongguo</creator><creator>Cao, Xin</creator><creator>Zheng, Zhaofang</creator><creator>Xu, Jinjing</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200310</creationdate><title>Environmental efficiency evaluation of China's iron and steel industry: A process-level data envelopment analysis</title><author>Wang, Yihan ; Wen, Zongguo ; Cao, Xin ; Zheng, Zhaofang ; Xu, Jinjing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-805fd9cddfda57cce24f5e052c03873f066a7d9b810c37c9c0df957eb633fbc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bootstrap-DEA method</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Environmental efficiency</topic><topic>Iron and steel industry</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Zongguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhaofang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jinjing</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Yihan</au><au>Wen, Zongguo</au><au>Cao, Xin</au><au>Zheng, Zhaofang</au><au>Xu, Jinjing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental efficiency evaluation of China's iron and steel industry: A process-level data envelopment analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2020-03-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>707</volume><spage>135903</spage><epage>135903</epage><pages>135903-135903</pages><artnum>135903</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>To resolve the increasingly higher energy and environmental pressures, the evaluation of environmental efficiency in China's iron and steel industry is essential for identifying a precise energy conservation and emission reduction path. However, current studies have only focused on the efficiency evaluation in national, regional, or enterprise level, lacking the analysis of different processes. Therefore, the objective of this research is to conduct a process-level data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the environmental efficiency of China's iron and steel industry. Totally, 54 enterprises are contained, as the input-output structure of 5 processes: sintering, coking, ironmaking, steelmaking, and steel rolling are set specifically in this study. In addition, to compare the effects to the efficiency results of different DEA methods, Banker, Charnes &amp; Cooper (BCC) model, Slack-based Measure (SBM) model, and Bootstrap-DEA methods are adopted. Finally, a regression model is used to investigate the key environmental protection strategies influencing the environmental efficiency. The results show that: (1) Within different methods, the average efficiency scores from SBM model are lower than the ones from BCC model, and the Bootstrap-DEA method also has a negative modification. (2) Regional efficiency difference exists, as the enterprises in South China perform best in sintering and coking processes but have the lowest overall efficiency scores. (3) Most enterprises have one or more short board processes. 12 enterprises are the enterprises with individual low environmental efficiency process, while other 25 are the enterprises with imbalanced environmental performances. (4) The coefficient factor between environmental protection investment and the efficiency scores are positive, but the factors of proportion of environmental protection staffs, and whether the enterprise has environmental protection research are negative. In sum, this study is hoped to contribute to formulating more precise environmental management measures in China's iron and steel industry. [Display omitted] •We first conduct the process-level DEA research in China's iron and steel industry.•The input-output structures of 6 processes are designed specifically.•BCC model, SBM model, and Bootstrap-DEA method are adopted.•Tobit regression model is used to identify the factors that affect the efficiency.•Differentiated environmental management methods can be adopted.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31972907</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135903</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2020-03, Vol.707, p.135903-135903, Article 135903
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2344273776
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bootstrap-DEA method
Data envelopment analysis
Environmental efficiency
Iron and steel industry
Regression analysis
title Environmental efficiency evaluation of China's iron and steel industry: A process-level data envelopment analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20efficiency%20evaluation%20of%20China's%20iron%20and%20steel%20industry:%20A%20process-level%20data%20envelopment%20analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Wang,%20Yihan&rft.date=2020-03-10&rft.volume=707&rft.spage=135903&rft.epage=135903&rft.pages=135903-135903&rft.artnum=135903&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135903&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2344273776%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2344273776&rft_id=info:pmid/31972907&rft_els_id=S004896971935898X&rfr_iscdi=true