The association of robotic lobectomy volume and nodal upstaging in non-small cell lung cancer

Robotic lung resection for lung cancer has gained popularity over the last 10 years. As with many surgical techniques, there are improvements in outcomes associated with increased operative volume. We sought to investigate lymph-node harvest and upstaging rates for robotic lobectomies performed at h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of robotic surgery 2020-10, Vol.14 (5), p.709-715
Hauptverfasser: Okusanya, Olugbenga T., Lutfi, Waseem, Baker, Nicholas, Dhupar, Rajeev, Christie, Neil A., Levy, Ryan M., Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre, Siripong, Nalyn, Luketich, James D., Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 715
container_issue 5
container_start_page 709
container_title Journal of robotic surgery
container_volume 14
creator Okusanya, Olugbenga T.
Lutfi, Waseem
Baker, Nicholas
Dhupar, Rajeev
Christie, Neil A.
Levy, Ryan M.
Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre
Siripong, Nalyn
Luketich, James D.
Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
description Robotic lung resection for lung cancer has gained popularity over the last 10 years. As with many surgical techniques, there are improvements in outcomes associated with increased operative volume. We sought to investigate lymph-node harvest and upstaging rates for robotic lobectomies performed at hospitals with varying robotic experience. The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who received lobectomy between 2010 and 2015. Hospitals were stratified into volume categories based on the number of robotic resections performed, as a proxy for robotic experience: low at  ≤ 12, low–middle 13–26, middle–high 27–52, and high volume at greater than or equal to 53. Lymph-node counts and nodal upstaging were compared among these volume categories. 8360 robotic lobectomies were performed. Mean lymph-node counts were for low, low–middle, middle–high, and high-volume robotic lobectomies were 9.8, 11.4, 12.9, and 12.6, respectively ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11701-020-01044-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2341631799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2341631799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ced93a96b6450d45894e37834fb0a1151a64b2aab1875aa7c436515d39abce903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVD7aP8ABWeLSS4onY8fxsUK0RULiAkdkTRzvNiixt3ZSafn1GJZSqQcutjV-5p3Rw9gJiK8ghD7PAFpAJWpRCRBSVo8f2CG0DVa1NLD39m7xgB3l_CCE0grhIztAMEog1ofs_vaX55RzdAPNQww8rniKXZwHx8fYeTfHacv_xHGZChd6HmJPI182eab1ENZ8CKUUqjzROHLnyzEupewoOJ8-sf0Vjdl_fr2P2d33y9uLn9X1zY-ri2_XlZMS5sr53iCZpmukEr1UrZEedYty1QkCUECN7GqiDlqtiLST2ChQPRrqnDcCj9mXXe4mxd-Lz7Odhvy8DAUfl2xrlNAgaGMKevYf-hCXFMp2tjYlH7RGLFS9o1yKOSe_sps0TJS2FoR9lm938m2Rb1_k28fSdPoavXST799a_touAO6AXL7C2qd_s9-JfQLCwo9d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918717733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The association of robotic lobectomy volume and nodal upstaging in non-small cell lung cancer</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Okusanya, Olugbenga T. ; Lutfi, Waseem ; Baker, Nicholas ; Dhupar, Rajeev ; Christie, Neil A. ; Levy, Ryan M. ; Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre ; Siripong, Nalyn ; Luketich, James D. ; Sarkaria, Inderpal S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Okusanya, Olugbenga T. ; Lutfi, Waseem ; Baker, Nicholas ; Dhupar, Rajeev ; Christie, Neil A. ; Levy, Ryan M. ; Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre ; Siripong, Nalyn ; Luketich, James D. ; Sarkaria, Inderpal S.</creatorcontrib><description>Robotic lung resection for lung cancer has gained popularity over the last 10 years. As with many surgical techniques, there are improvements in outcomes associated with increased operative volume. We sought to investigate lymph-node harvest and upstaging rates for robotic lobectomies performed at hospitals with varying robotic experience. The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who received lobectomy between 2010 and 2015. Hospitals were stratified into volume categories based on the number of robotic resections performed, as a proxy for robotic experience: low at  ≤ 12, low–middle 13–26, middle–high 27–52, and high volume at greater than or equal to 53. Lymph-node counts and nodal upstaging were compared among these volume categories. 8360 robotic lobectomies were performed. Mean lymph-node counts were for low, low–middle, middle–high, and high-volume robotic lobectomies were 9.8, 11.4, 12.9, and 12.6, respectively ( P   &lt; 0.001), while nodal-upstaging rates were 10.3%, 10.2%, 12.8%, and 13.4%, respectively ( P  &lt; 0.001). Compared to low-volume hospitals, on multivariable analysis, high-volume robotic centers had increased nodal harvest ( P  &lt; 0.001) and nodal-upstaging rates ( P  &lt; 0.001). Robotic lobectomies performed at high-volume hospitals have greater lymph-node harvest and upstaging than low-volume hospitals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01044-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31950332</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Cancer therapies ; Education ; Histology ; Hospitals ; Lung cancer ; Lymph ; Lymphatic system ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Nodes ; Original Article ; Patients ; Regression analysis ; Robotic surgery ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Thoracic surgery ; Urology ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of robotic surgery, 2020-10, Vol.14 (5), p.709-715</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ced93a96b6450d45894e37834fb0a1151a64b2aab1875aa7c436515d39abce903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ced93a96b6450d45894e37834fb0a1151a64b2aab1875aa7c436515d39abce903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11701-020-01044-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918717733?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,21389,27924,27925,33530,33531,33744,33745,41488,42557,43659,43805,51319,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31950332$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okusanya, Olugbenga T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutfi, Waseem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhupar, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Neil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siripong, Nalyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luketich, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkaria, Inderpal S.</creatorcontrib><title>The association of robotic lobectomy volume and nodal upstaging in non-small cell lung cancer</title><title>Journal of robotic surgery</title><addtitle>J Robotic Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><description>Robotic lung resection for lung cancer has gained popularity over the last 10 years. As with many surgical techniques, there are improvements in outcomes associated with increased operative volume. We sought to investigate lymph-node harvest and upstaging rates for robotic lobectomies performed at hospitals with varying robotic experience. The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who received lobectomy between 2010 and 2015. Hospitals were stratified into volume categories based on the number of robotic resections performed, as a proxy for robotic experience: low at  ≤ 12, low–middle 13–26, middle–high 27–52, and high volume at greater than or equal to 53. Lymph-node counts and nodal upstaging were compared among these volume categories. 8360 robotic lobectomies were performed. Mean lymph-node counts were for low, low–middle, middle–high, and high-volume robotic lobectomies were 9.8, 11.4, 12.9, and 12.6, respectively ( P   &lt; 0.001), while nodal-upstaging rates were 10.3%, 10.2%, 12.8%, and 13.4%, respectively ( P  &lt; 0.001). Compared to low-volume hospitals, on multivariable analysis, high-volume robotic centers had increased nodal harvest ( P  &lt; 0.001) and nodal-upstaging rates ( P  &lt; 0.001). Robotic lobectomies performed at high-volume hospitals have greater lymph-node harvest and upstaging than low-volume hospitals.</description><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lymph</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1863-2483</issn><issn>1863-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVD7aP8ABWeLSS4onY8fxsUK0RULiAkdkTRzvNiixt3ZSafn1GJZSqQcutjV-5p3Rw9gJiK8ghD7PAFpAJWpRCRBSVo8f2CG0DVa1NLD39m7xgB3l_CCE0grhIztAMEog1ofs_vaX55RzdAPNQww8rniKXZwHx8fYeTfHacv_xHGZChd6HmJPI182eab1ENZ8CKUUqjzROHLnyzEupewoOJ8-sf0Vjdl_fr2P2d33y9uLn9X1zY-ri2_XlZMS5sr53iCZpmukEr1UrZEedYty1QkCUECN7GqiDlqtiLST2ChQPRrqnDcCj9mXXe4mxd-Lz7Odhvy8DAUfl2xrlNAgaGMKevYf-hCXFMp2tjYlH7RGLFS9o1yKOSe_sps0TJS2FoR9lm938m2Rb1_k28fSdPoavXST799a_touAO6AXL7C2qd_s9-JfQLCwo9d</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Okusanya, Olugbenga T.</creator><creator>Lutfi, Waseem</creator><creator>Baker, Nicholas</creator><creator>Dhupar, Rajeev</creator><creator>Christie, Neil A.</creator><creator>Levy, Ryan M.</creator><creator>Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre</creator><creator>Siripong, Nalyn</creator><creator>Luketich, James D.</creator><creator>Sarkaria, Inderpal S.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>The association of robotic lobectomy volume and nodal upstaging in non-small cell lung cancer</title><author>Okusanya, Olugbenga T. ; Lutfi, Waseem ; Baker, Nicholas ; Dhupar, Rajeev ; Christie, Neil A. ; Levy, Ryan M. ; Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre ; Siripong, Nalyn ; Luketich, James D. ; Sarkaria, Inderpal S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ced93a96b6450d45894e37834fb0a1151a64b2aab1875aa7c436515d39abce903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lymph</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okusanya, Olugbenga T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutfi, Waseem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhupar, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Neil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siripong, Nalyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luketich, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkaria, Inderpal S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okusanya, Olugbenga T.</au><au>Lutfi, Waseem</au><au>Baker, Nicholas</au><au>Dhupar, Rajeev</au><au>Christie, Neil A.</au><au>Levy, Ryan M.</au><au>Martinez-Meehan, Deirdre</au><au>Siripong, Nalyn</au><au>Luketich, James D.</au><au>Sarkaria, Inderpal S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The association of robotic lobectomy volume and nodal upstaging in non-small cell lung cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Robotic Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>709</spage><epage>715</epage><pages>709-715</pages><issn>1863-2483</issn><eissn>1863-2491</eissn><abstract>Robotic lung resection for lung cancer has gained popularity over the last 10 years. As with many surgical techniques, there are improvements in outcomes associated with increased operative volume. We sought to investigate lymph-node harvest and upstaging rates for robotic lobectomies performed at hospitals with varying robotic experience. The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who received lobectomy between 2010 and 2015. Hospitals were stratified into volume categories based on the number of robotic resections performed, as a proxy for robotic experience: low at  ≤ 12, low–middle 13–26, middle–high 27–52, and high volume at greater than or equal to 53. Lymph-node counts and nodal upstaging were compared among these volume categories. 8360 robotic lobectomies were performed. Mean lymph-node counts were for low, low–middle, middle–high, and high-volume robotic lobectomies were 9.8, 11.4, 12.9, and 12.6, respectively ( P   &lt; 0.001), while nodal-upstaging rates were 10.3%, 10.2%, 12.8%, and 13.4%, respectively ( P  &lt; 0.001). Compared to low-volume hospitals, on multivariable analysis, high-volume robotic centers had increased nodal harvest ( P  &lt; 0.001) and nodal-upstaging rates ( P  &lt; 0.001). Robotic lobectomies performed at high-volume hospitals have greater lymph-node harvest and upstaging than low-volume hospitals.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>31950332</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11701-020-01044-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-2483
ispartof Journal of robotic surgery, 2020-10, Vol.14 (5), p.709-715
issn 1863-2483
1863-2491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2341631799
source ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central
subjects Cancer therapies
Education
Histology
Hospitals
Lung cancer
Lymph
Lymphatic system
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Nodes
Original Article
Patients
Regression analysis
Robotic surgery
Surgeons
Surgery
Thoracic surgery
Urology
Variables
title The association of robotic lobectomy volume and nodal upstaging in non-small cell lung cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A16%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20association%20of%20robotic%20lobectomy%20volume%20and%20nodal%20upstaging%20in%20non-small%20cell%20lung%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20robotic%20surgery&rft.au=Okusanya,%20Olugbenga%20T.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=709&rft.epage=715&rft.pages=709-715&rft.issn=1863-2483&rft.eissn=1863-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11701-020-01044-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2341631799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918717733&rft_id=info:pmid/31950332&rfr_iscdi=true