First-line Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Non–small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

This study aimed to comprehensively review the available evidence regarding the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab for advanced/metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to compare pembrolizumab monotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. A search of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical lung cancer 2019-09, Vol.20 (5), p.331-338.e4
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Ryul, Keam, Bhumsuk, Hahn, Seokyung, Ock, Chan-Young, Kim, Miso, Kim, Tae Min, Kim, Dong-Wan, Heo, Dae Seog
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to comprehensively review the available evidence regarding the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab for advanced/metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to compare pembrolizumab monotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2018, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings (2015-2018) were reviewed. Summaries of the results were pooled using a random-effect model to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A network meta-analysis was used to indirectly compare pembrolizumab monotherapy with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. A total of 4 relevant phase III trials comprising 2754 patients were identified. Pembrolizumab (with or without chemotherapy) led to significant improvements in OS and PFS, irrespective of the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS). In particular, for the subgroup with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, the HR of PFS was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.76; P = .001), and that of OS was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73; P < .001). In terms of PFS, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to pembrolizumab monotherapy with an HR of PFS 0.52 (95% CI, 0.27-0.99; P = .048) for the subgroup with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. For patients with NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has a better PFS than pembrolizumab monotherapy in this meta-analysis. To confirm this finding, a prospective phase III trial that directly compares the treatments is warranted. Immunotherapy has revolutionized lung cancer management. Our study focused on the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab for treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer by summarizing 4 phase III clinical trials. This analysis revealed that pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy exhibited better survival outcome than pembrolizumab monotherapy.
ISSN:1525-7304
1938-0690
DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2019.05.009