Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior

PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task. M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2020-01, Vol.52 (1), p.153-160
Hauptverfasser: KONINGS, MARCO J., FOULSHAM, TOM, MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC, HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 1
container_start_page 153
container_title Medicine and science in sports and exercise
container_volume 52
creator KONINGS, MARCO J.
FOULSHAM, TOM
MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC
HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.
description PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task. METHODSTwelve participants performed a 4-km time trial on a Velotron cycle ergometer in a randomized, counterbalanced order alone with no virtual opponent (NO), against a virtual opponent with no restrictions (low athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-IND]), or against a virtual opponent who the participant was permitted to overtake only once during the trial (high athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-DEP]). Information-seeking behavior was evaluated using an SMI eye tracker. Differences in pacing, performance, and information-seeking behavior were examined using repeated-measures ANOVA (P < 0.05). RESULTSNeither mean power output (NO, 298 ± 35 W; OP-IND, 297 ± 38 W; OP-DEP, 296 ± 37 W) nor finishing time (NO, 377.7 ± 17.4 s; OP-IND, 379.3 ± 19.5 s; OP-DEP, 378.5 ± 17.7 s) differed between experimental conditions. However, power output was lower in the first kilometer of OP-DEP compared with the other experimental conditions (NO, 332 ± 59 W; OP-IND, 325 ± 62 W; OP-DEP, 316 ± 58 W; both P < 0.05), and participants decided to wait longer before they overtook their opponent (OP-IND, 137 ± 130 s; OP-DEP, 255 ± 107 s; P = 0.040). Moreover, total fixation time spent on the avatar of the virtual opponent increased when participants were only allowed to overtake once (OP-IND, 23.3 ± 16.6 s; OP-DEP, 55.8 ± 32.7 s; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONA higher interdependency between athlete and opponent altered pacing behavior in terms of in-race adaptations based on opponent’s behavior, and it induced an increased attentional focus on the virtual opponent. Thus, in the context of exercise regulation, attentional cues are likely to be used in an adaptive way according to their availability and situational relevance, consistent with a decision-making framework based on the interdependence of perception and action.
doi_str_mv 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2340053849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2340053849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-f1b842eea25e5b6107497ff1e968427281d7754376a55254455c90a03080bb3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKw0AQhhdRtB7eQKSX3kRn9tBNLqt4AkWleh02ycRG003cTZXe-Q6-oU_i1qqIF7owLDN8_wx8jG0j7CGXyf7FaLQHPx5HwCXWQyUgAoFqmfUAExUlKHCNrXt_HyAtBK6yNYFCCoVxj10Pu3FNHb29vF62bWPJdv0z25ErqCVbkM1n_WEdet-_Mnll7_rGFoEoGzcxXdXYaET0MJ8f0Ng8VY3bZCulqT1tff4b7Pb46ObwNDq_PDk7HJ5HuZQaoxKzWHIiwxWpbICgZaLLEikZhLnmMRZaKyn0wCjFlZRK5QkYEBBDlolCbLDdxd7WNY9T8l06qXxOdW0sNVOfciEBlIhlElC5QHPXeO-oTFtXTYybpQjpXGYaZKa_ZYbYzueFaTah4jv0ZS8A8QJ4bj4UPdTTZ3LpmEzdjf_bLf-IzjGlB3HEgQNg6KJQqMU7SDSPmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2340053849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>KONINGS, MARCO J. ; FOULSHAM, TOM ; MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC ; HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creator><creatorcontrib>KONINGS, MARCO J. ; FOULSHAM, TOM ; MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC ; HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task. METHODSTwelve participants performed a 4-km time trial on a Velotron cycle ergometer in a randomized, counterbalanced order alone with no virtual opponent (NO), against a virtual opponent with no restrictions (low athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-IND]), or against a virtual opponent who the participant was permitted to overtake only once during the trial (high athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-DEP]). Information-seeking behavior was evaluated using an SMI eye tracker. Differences in pacing, performance, and information-seeking behavior were examined using repeated-measures ANOVA (P &lt; 0.05). RESULTSNeither mean power output (NO, 298 ± 35 W; OP-IND, 297 ± 38 W; OP-DEP, 296 ± 37 W) nor finishing time (NO, 377.7 ± 17.4 s; OP-IND, 379.3 ± 19.5 s; OP-DEP, 378.5 ± 17.7 s) differed between experimental conditions. However, power output was lower in the first kilometer of OP-DEP compared with the other experimental conditions (NO, 332 ± 59 W; OP-IND, 325 ± 62 W; OP-DEP, 316 ± 58 W; both P &lt; 0.05), and participants decided to wait longer before they overtook their opponent (OP-IND, 137 ± 130 s; OP-DEP, 255 ± 107 s; P = 0.040). Moreover, total fixation time spent on the avatar of the virtual opponent increased when participants were only allowed to overtake once (OP-IND, 23.3 ± 16.6 s; OP-DEP, 55.8 ± 32.7 s; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONA higher interdependency between athlete and opponent altered pacing behavior in terms of in-race adaptations based on opponent’s behavior, and it induced an increased attentional focus on the virtual opponent. Thus, in the context of exercise regulation, attentional cues are likely to be used in an adaptive way according to their availability and situational relevance, consistent with a decision-making framework based on the interdependence of perception and action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002101</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31343518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Athletic Performance - physiology ; Athletic Performance - psychology ; Attention ; Bicycling - physiology ; Bicycling - psychology ; Competitive Behavior - physiology ; Cues ; Decision Making ; Exercise Test ; Humans ; Information Seeking Behavior ; Middle Aged</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2020-01, Vol.52 (1), p.153-160</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2020 American College of Sports Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-f1b842eea25e5b6107497ff1e968427281d7754376a55254455c90a03080bb3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-f1b842eea25e5b6107497ff1e968427281d7754376a55254455c90a03080bb3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00005768-202001000-00017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4594,27903,27904,65210</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31343518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KONINGS, MARCO J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOULSHAM, TOM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creatorcontrib><title>Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task. METHODSTwelve participants performed a 4-km time trial on a Velotron cycle ergometer in a randomized, counterbalanced order alone with no virtual opponent (NO), against a virtual opponent with no restrictions (low athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-IND]), or against a virtual opponent who the participant was permitted to overtake only once during the trial (high athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-DEP]). Information-seeking behavior was evaluated using an SMI eye tracker. Differences in pacing, performance, and information-seeking behavior were examined using repeated-measures ANOVA (P &lt; 0.05). RESULTSNeither mean power output (NO, 298 ± 35 W; OP-IND, 297 ± 38 W; OP-DEP, 296 ± 37 W) nor finishing time (NO, 377.7 ± 17.4 s; OP-IND, 379.3 ± 19.5 s; OP-DEP, 378.5 ± 17.7 s) differed between experimental conditions. However, power output was lower in the first kilometer of OP-DEP compared with the other experimental conditions (NO, 332 ± 59 W; OP-IND, 325 ± 62 W; OP-DEP, 316 ± 58 W; both P &lt; 0.05), and participants decided to wait longer before they overtook their opponent (OP-IND, 137 ± 130 s; OP-DEP, 255 ± 107 s; P = 0.040). Moreover, total fixation time spent on the avatar of the virtual opponent increased when participants were only allowed to overtake once (OP-IND, 23.3 ± 16.6 s; OP-DEP, 55.8 ± 32.7 s; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONA higher interdependency between athlete and opponent altered pacing behavior in terms of in-race adaptations based on opponent’s behavior, and it induced an increased attentional focus on the virtual opponent. Thus, in the context of exercise regulation, attentional cues are likely to be used in an adaptive way according to their availability and situational relevance, consistent with a decision-making framework based on the interdependence of perception and action.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Athletic Performance - psychology</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Bicycling - physiology</subject><subject>Bicycling - psychology</subject><subject>Competitive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Seeking Behavior</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNtKw0AQhhdRtB7eQKSX3kRn9tBNLqt4AkWleh02ycRG003cTZXe-Q6-oU_i1qqIF7owLDN8_wx8jG0j7CGXyf7FaLQHPx5HwCXWQyUgAoFqmfUAExUlKHCNrXt_HyAtBK6yNYFCCoVxj10Pu3FNHb29vF62bWPJdv0z25ErqCVbkM1n_WEdet-_Mnll7_rGFoEoGzcxXdXYaET0MJ8f0Ng8VY3bZCulqT1tff4b7Pb46ObwNDq_PDk7HJ5HuZQaoxKzWHIiwxWpbICgZaLLEikZhLnmMRZaKyn0wCjFlZRK5QkYEBBDlolCbLDdxd7WNY9T8l06qXxOdW0sNVOfciEBlIhlElC5QHPXeO-oTFtXTYybpQjpXGYaZKa_ZYbYzueFaTah4jv0ZS8A8QJ4bj4UPdTTZ3LpmEzdjf_bLf-IzjGlB3HEgQNg6KJQqMU7SDSPmQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>KONINGS, MARCO J.</creator><creator>FOULSHAM, TOM</creator><creator>MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC</creator><creator>HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>American College of Sports Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior</title><author>KONINGS, MARCO J. ; FOULSHAM, TOM ; MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC ; HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-f1b842eea25e5b6107497ff1e968427281d7754376a55254455c90a03080bb3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Athletic Performance - psychology</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Bicycling - physiology</topic><topic>Bicycling - psychology</topic><topic>Competitive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Seeking Behavior</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KONINGS, MARCO J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOULSHAM, TOM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KONINGS, MARCO J.</au><au>FOULSHAM, TOM</au><au>MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC</au><au>HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>153-160</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><abstract>PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task. METHODSTwelve participants performed a 4-km time trial on a Velotron cycle ergometer in a randomized, counterbalanced order alone with no virtual opponent (NO), against a virtual opponent with no restrictions (low athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-IND]), or against a virtual opponent who the participant was permitted to overtake only once during the trial (high athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-DEP]). Information-seeking behavior was evaluated using an SMI eye tracker. Differences in pacing, performance, and information-seeking behavior were examined using repeated-measures ANOVA (P &lt; 0.05). RESULTSNeither mean power output (NO, 298 ± 35 W; OP-IND, 297 ± 38 W; OP-DEP, 296 ± 37 W) nor finishing time (NO, 377.7 ± 17.4 s; OP-IND, 379.3 ± 19.5 s; OP-DEP, 378.5 ± 17.7 s) differed between experimental conditions. However, power output was lower in the first kilometer of OP-DEP compared with the other experimental conditions (NO, 332 ± 59 W; OP-IND, 325 ± 62 W; OP-DEP, 316 ± 58 W; both P &lt; 0.05), and participants decided to wait longer before they overtook their opponent (OP-IND, 137 ± 130 s; OP-DEP, 255 ± 107 s; P = 0.040). Moreover, total fixation time spent on the avatar of the virtual opponent increased when participants were only allowed to overtake once (OP-IND, 23.3 ± 16.6 s; OP-DEP, 55.8 ± 32.7 s; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONA higher interdependency between athlete and opponent altered pacing behavior in terms of in-race adaptations based on opponent’s behavior, and it induced an increased attentional focus on the virtual opponent. Thus, in the context of exercise regulation, attentional cues are likely to be used in an adaptive way according to their availability and situational relevance, consistent with a decision-making framework based on the interdependence of perception and action.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>31343518</pmid><doi>10.1249/MSS.0000000000002101</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9131
ispartof Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2020-01, Vol.52 (1), p.153-160
issn 0195-9131
1530-0315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2340053849
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Athletic Performance - physiology
Athletic Performance - psychology
Attention
Bicycling - physiology
Bicycling - psychology
Competitive Behavior - physiology
Cues
Decision Making
Exercise Test
Humans
Information Seeking Behavior
Middle Aged
title Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A35%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Athlete%E2%80%93Opponent%20Interdependency%20Alters%20Pacing%20and%20Information-Seeking%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=KONINGS,%20MARCO%20J.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=153-160&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2340053849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2340053849&rft_id=info:pmid/31343518&rfr_iscdi=true