Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior
PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task. M...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2020-01, Vol.52 (1), p.153-160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 160 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Medicine and science in sports and exercise |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | KONINGS, MARCO J. FOULSHAM, TOM MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J. |
description | PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task.
METHODSTwelve participants performed a 4-km time trial on a Velotron cycle ergometer in a randomized, counterbalanced order alone with no virtual opponent (NO), against a virtual opponent with no restrictions (low athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-IND]), or against a virtual opponent who the participant was permitted to overtake only once during the trial (high athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-DEP]). Information-seeking behavior was evaluated using an SMI eye tracker. Differences in pacing, performance, and information-seeking behavior were examined using repeated-measures ANOVA (P < 0.05).
RESULTSNeither mean power output (NO, 298 ± 35 W; OP-IND, 297 ± 38 W; OP-DEP, 296 ± 37 W) nor finishing time (NO, 377.7 ± 17.4 s; OP-IND, 379.3 ± 19.5 s; OP-DEP, 378.5 ± 17.7 s) differed between experimental conditions. However, power output was lower in the first kilometer of OP-DEP compared with the other experimental conditions (NO, 332 ± 59 W; OP-IND, 325 ± 62 W; OP-DEP, 316 ± 58 W; both P < 0.05), and participants decided to wait longer before they overtook their opponent (OP-IND, 137 ± 130 s; OP-DEP, 255 ± 107 s; P = 0.040). Moreover, total fixation time spent on the avatar of the virtual opponent increased when participants were only allowed to overtake once (OP-IND, 23.3 ± 16.6 s; OP-DEP, 55.8 ± 32.7 s; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONA higher interdependency between athlete and opponent altered pacing behavior in terms of in-race adaptations based on opponent’s behavior, and it induced an increased attentional focus on the virtual opponent. Thus, in the context of exercise regulation, attentional cues are likely to be used in an adaptive way according to their availability and situational relevance, consistent with a decision-making framework based on the interdependence of perception and action. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002101 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2340053849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2340053849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-f1b842eea25e5b6107497ff1e968427281d7754376a55254455c90a03080bb3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKw0AQhhdRtB7eQKSX3kRn9tBNLqt4AkWleh02ycRG003cTZXe-Q6-oU_i1qqIF7owLDN8_wx8jG0j7CGXyf7FaLQHPx5HwCXWQyUgAoFqmfUAExUlKHCNrXt_HyAtBK6yNYFCCoVxj10Pu3FNHb29vF62bWPJdv0z25ErqCVbkM1n_WEdet-_Mnll7_rGFoEoGzcxXdXYaET0MJ8f0Ng8VY3bZCulqT1tff4b7Pb46ObwNDq_PDk7HJ5HuZQaoxKzWHIiwxWpbICgZaLLEikZhLnmMRZaKyn0wCjFlZRK5QkYEBBDlolCbLDdxd7WNY9T8l06qXxOdW0sNVOfciEBlIhlElC5QHPXeO-oTFtXTYybpQjpXGYaZKa_ZYbYzueFaTah4jv0ZS8A8QJ4bj4UPdTTZ3LpmEzdjf_bLf-IzjGlB3HEgQNg6KJQqMU7SDSPmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2340053849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>KONINGS, MARCO J. ; FOULSHAM, TOM ; MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC ; HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creator><creatorcontrib>KONINGS, MARCO J. ; FOULSHAM, TOM ; MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC ; HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task.
METHODSTwelve participants performed a 4-km time trial on a Velotron cycle ergometer in a randomized, counterbalanced order alone with no virtual opponent (NO), against a virtual opponent with no restrictions (low athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-IND]), or against a virtual opponent who the participant was permitted to overtake only once during the trial (high athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-DEP]). Information-seeking behavior was evaluated using an SMI eye tracker. Differences in pacing, performance, and information-seeking behavior were examined using repeated-measures ANOVA (P < 0.05).
RESULTSNeither mean power output (NO, 298 ± 35 W; OP-IND, 297 ± 38 W; OP-DEP, 296 ± 37 W) nor finishing time (NO, 377.7 ± 17.4 s; OP-IND, 379.3 ± 19.5 s; OP-DEP, 378.5 ± 17.7 s) differed between experimental conditions. However, power output was lower in the first kilometer of OP-DEP compared with the other experimental conditions (NO, 332 ± 59 W; OP-IND, 325 ± 62 W; OP-DEP, 316 ± 58 W; both P < 0.05), and participants decided to wait longer before they overtook their opponent (OP-IND, 137 ± 130 s; OP-DEP, 255 ± 107 s; P = 0.040). Moreover, total fixation time spent on the avatar of the virtual opponent increased when participants were only allowed to overtake once (OP-IND, 23.3 ± 16.6 s; OP-DEP, 55.8 ± 32.7 s; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONA higher interdependency between athlete and opponent altered pacing behavior in terms of in-race adaptations based on opponent’s behavior, and it induced an increased attentional focus on the virtual opponent. Thus, in the context of exercise regulation, attentional cues are likely to be used in an adaptive way according to their availability and situational relevance, consistent with a decision-making framework based on the interdependence of perception and action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002101</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31343518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Athletic Performance - physiology ; Athletic Performance - psychology ; Attention ; Bicycling - physiology ; Bicycling - psychology ; Competitive Behavior - physiology ; Cues ; Decision Making ; Exercise Test ; Humans ; Information Seeking Behavior ; Middle Aged</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2020-01, Vol.52 (1), p.153-160</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2020 American College of Sports Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-f1b842eea25e5b6107497ff1e968427281d7754376a55254455c90a03080bb3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-f1b842eea25e5b6107497ff1e968427281d7754376a55254455c90a03080bb3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00005768-202001000-00017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4594,27903,27904,65210</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31343518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KONINGS, MARCO J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOULSHAM, TOM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creatorcontrib><title>Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task.
METHODSTwelve participants performed a 4-km time trial on a Velotron cycle ergometer in a randomized, counterbalanced order alone with no virtual opponent (NO), against a virtual opponent with no restrictions (low athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-IND]), or against a virtual opponent who the participant was permitted to overtake only once during the trial (high athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-DEP]). Information-seeking behavior was evaluated using an SMI eye tracker. Differences in pacing, performance, and information-seeking behavior were examined using repeated-measures ANOVA (P < 0.05).
RESULTSNeither mean power output (NO, 298 ± 35 W; OP-IND, 297 ± 38 W; OP-DEP, 296 ± 37 W) nor finishing time (NO, 377.7 ± 17.4 s; OP-IND, 379.3 ± 19.5 s; OP-DEP, 378.5 ± 17.7 s) differed between experimental conditions. However, power output was lower in the first kilometer of OP-DEP compared with the other experimental conditions (NO, 332 ± 59 W; OP-IND, 325 ± 62 W; OP-DEP, 316 ± 58 W; both P < 0.05), and participants decided to wait longer before they overtook their opponent (OP-IND, 137 ± 130 s; OP-DEP, 255 ± 107 s; P = 0.040). Moreover, total fixation time spent on the avatar of the virtual opponent increased when participants were only allowed to overtake once (OP-IND, 23.3 ± 16.6 s; OP-DEP, 55.8 ± 32.7 s; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONA higher interdependency between athlete and opponent altered pacing behavior in terms of in-race adaptations based on opponent’s behavior, and it induced an increased attentional focus on the virtual opponent. Thus, in the context of exercise regulation, attentional cues are likely to be used in an adaptive way according to their availability and situational relevance, consistent with a decision-making framework based on the interdependence of perception and action.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Athletic Performance - psychology</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Bicycling - physiology</subject><subject>Bicycling - psychology</subject><subject>Competitive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Seeking Behavior</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNtKw0AQhhdRtB7eQKSX3kRn9tBNLqt4AkWleh02ycRG003cTZXe-Q6-oU_i1qqIF7owLDN8_wx8jG0j7CGXyf7FaLQHPx5HwCXWQyUgAoFqmfUAExUlKHCNrXt_HyAtBK6yNYFCCoVxj10Pu3FNHb29vF62bWPJdv0z25ErqCVbkM1n_WEdet-_Mnll7_rGFoEoGzcxXdXYaET0MJ8f0Ng8VY3bZCulqT1tff4b7Pb46ObwNDq_PDk7HJ5HuZQaoxKzWHIiwxWpbICgZaLLEikZhLnmMRZaKyn0wCjFlZRK5QkYEBBDlolCbLDdxd7WNY9T8l06qXxOdW0sNVOfciEBlIhlElC5QHPXeO-oTFtXTYybpQjpXGYaZKa_ZYbYzueFaTah4jv0ZS8A8QJ4bj4UPdTTZ3LpmEzdjf_bLf-IzjGlB3HEgQNg6KJQqMU7SDSPmQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>KONINGS, MARCO J.</creator><creator>FOULSHAM, TOM</creator><creator>MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC</creator><creator>HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>American College of Sports Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior</title><author>KONINGS, MARCO J. ; FOULSHAM, TOM ; MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC ; HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-f1b842eea25e5b6107497ff1e968427281d7754376a55254455c90a03080bb3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Athletic Performance - psychology</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Bicycling - physiology</topic><topic>Bicycling - psychology</topic><topic>Competitive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Seeking Behavior</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KONINGS, MARCO J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOULSHAM, TOM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KONINGS, MARCO J.</au><au>FOULSHAM, TOM</au><au>MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC</au><au>HETTINGA, FLORENTINA J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>153-160</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><abstract>PURPOSEThe influence of interdependency between competitors on pacing decision-making and information-seeking behavior has been explored. This has been done by only altering instructions, and thereby action possibilities, while controlling environment (i.e., competitor behavior) and exercise task.
METHODSTwelve participants performed a 4-km time trial on a Velotron cycle ergometer in a randomized, counterbalanced order alone with no virtual opponent (NO), against a virtual opponent with no restrictions (low athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-IND]), or against a virtual opponent who the participant was permitted to overtake only once during the trial (high athlete–opponent interdependency [OP-DEP]). Information-seeking behavior was evaluated using an SMI eye tracker. Differences in pacing, performance, and information-seeking behavior were examined using repeated-measures ANOVA (P < 0.05).
RESULTSNeither mean power output (NO, 298 ± 35 W; OP-IND, 297 ± 38 W; OP-DEP, 296 ± 37 W) nor finishing time (NO, 377.7 ± 17.4 s; OP-IND, 379.3 ± 19.5 s; OP-DEP, 378.5 ± 17.7 s) differed between experimental conditions. However, power output was lower in the first kilometer of OP-DEP compared with the other experimental conditions (NO, 332 ± 59 W; OP-IND, 325 ± 62 W; OP-DEP, 316 ± 58 W; both P < 0.05), and participants decided to wait longer before they overtook their opponent (OP-IND, 137 ± 130 s; OP-DEP, 255 ± 107 s; P = 0.040). Moreover, total fixation time spent on the avatar of the virtual opponent increased when participants were only allowed to overtake once (OP-IND, 23.3 ± 16.6 s; OP-DEP, 55.8 ± 32.7 s; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONA higher interdependency between athlete and opponent altered pacing behavior in terms of in-race adaptations based on opponent’s behavior, and it induced an increased attentional focus on the virtual opponent. Thus, in the context of exercise regulation, attentional cues are likely to be used in an adaptive way according to their availability and situational relevance, consistent with a decision-making framework based on the interdependence of perception and action.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>31343518</pmid><doi>10.1249/MSS.0000000000002101</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-9131 |
ispartof | Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2020-01, Vol.52 (1), p.153-160 |
issn | 0195-9131 1530-0315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2340053849 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Athletic Performance - physiology Athletic Performance - psychology Attention Bicycling - physiology Bicycling - psychology Competitive Behavior - physiology Cues Decision Making Exercise Test Humans Information Seeking Behavior Middle Aged |
title | Athlete–Opponent Interdependency Alters Pacing and Information-Seeking Behavior |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A35%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Athlete%E2%80%93Opponent%20Interdependency%20Alters%20Pacing%20and%20Information-Seeking%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=KONINGS,%20MARCO%20J.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=153-160&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2340053849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2340053849&rft_id=info:pmid/31343518&rfr_iscdi=true |