Boosting attachment security to cope with threats: Behavioral and ERPs findings

Attachment security describes a sense of safety and security felt by individuals and promotes mental health. The mechanism by which attachment security buffers against psychological threat remains unclear, however. Here, we explored how attachment security attenuates the response to threatening info...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of psychophysiology 2020-03, Vol.149, p.8-14
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Lili, Gu, Ruolei, Shi, Xiaoxuan, Wang, Beiyi, Zhang, Jianxin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue
container_start_page 8
container_title International journal of psychophysiology
container_volume 149
creator Wu, Lili
Gu, Ruolei
Shi, Xiaoxuan
Wang, Beiyi
Zhang, Jianxin
description Attachment security describes a sense of safety and security felt by individuals and promotes mental health. The mechanism by which attachment security buffers against psychological threat remains unclear, however. Here, we explored how attachment security attenuates the response to threatening information using a signal detection theory (SDT) and event-related potentials (ERPs) approach. Participants were assigned to an attachment security priming condition or a control condition. After a priming procedure, behavioral data and electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded while participants categorized threatening and neutral pictures. Our behavioral results revealed that attachment security biased participant responses to categorizing the two types of pictures; participants in the control condition exhibited a tendency to categorize stimuli as threatening, whereas those in the attachment security condition tended to categorize stimuli as neutral. Meanwhile, attachment security priming modulated early attention processes, reflected by an increased P200. The findings reported here suggest that attachment security buffers against external threats by modulating individual response preferences, the effects of which manifest in the early stages of attentional processing. •Used a signal detection theory (SDT) approach to separate the sensitivity from response bias•Attachment security priming increased response bias.•Attachment security priming modulated early attention processes, reflected by an increased P200.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.01.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2339788964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167876020300064</els_id><sourcerecordid>2339788964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-c5045127e8c11e4b98bdb58566330ec5f88f36725cf4df548a8af4571c28121b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BeQlmwQ7TmyHFbQqDwmpCMHacpwJcdXGxXZB_XtcFdiyms2Ze2cOQheU5JRQfrXI7WIdtqZ3eUEKkhOaE8IO0IhKUWSC1-IQjRIoMik4OUGnISwIIYLW9TE6YbQuSVmJEZpPnAvRDu9Yx6hNv4Ih4gBm423c4uiwcWvAXzb2OPYedAzXeAK9_rTO6yXWQ4tnL88Bd3ZoU0o4Q0edXgY4_5lj9HY3e50-ZE_z-8fp7VNmGJcxM1Wqp4UAaSiFsqll0zaVrDhnjICpOik7xkVRma5su6qUWuouHUxNIWlBGzZGl_vctXcfGwhRrWwwsFzqAdwmqIKxWkhZ8zKhfI8a70Lw0Km1tyvtt4oStZOpFupXptrJVISqJDMtXvx0bJoVtH9rv_YScLMHIH36acGrYCwMBlrrwUTVOvtfxzccPokA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339788964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Boosting attachment security to cope with threats: Behavioral and ERPs findings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wu, Lili ; Gu, Ruolei ; Shi, Xiaoxuan ; Wang, Beiyi ; Zhang, Jianxin</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lili ; Gu, Ruolei ; Shi, Xiaoxuan ; Wang, Beiyi ; Zhang, Jianxin</creatorcontrib><description>Attachment security describes a sense of safety and security felt by individuals and promotes mental health. The mechanism by which attachment security buffers against psychological threat remains unclear, however. Here, we explored how attachment security attenuates the response to threatening information using a signal detection theory (SDT) and event-related potentials (ERPs) approach. Participants were assigned to an attachment security priming condition or a control condition. After a priming procedure, behavioral data and electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded while participants categorized threatening and neutral pictures. Our behavioral results revealed that attachment security biased participant responses to categorizing the two types of pictures; participants in the control condition exhibited a tendency to categorize stimuli as threatening, whereas those in the attachment security condition tended to categorize stimuli as neutral. Meanwhile, attachment security priming modulated early attention processes, reflected by an increased P200. The findings reported here suggest that attachment security buffers against external threats by modulating individual response preferences, the effects of which manifest in the early stages of attentional processing. •Used a signal detection theory (SDT) approach to separate the sensitivity from response bias•Attachment security priming increased response bias.•Attachment security priming modulated early attention processes, reflected by an increased P200.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.01.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31940457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological - physiology ; Adult ; Attachment security priming ; Electroencephalography ; Event-related potentials (ERPs) ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Fear - physiology ; Female ; Helping Behavior ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Object Attachment ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Safety ; Signal detection theory (SDT) ; Signal Detection, Psychological ; Threat ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychophysiology, 2020-03, Vol.149, p.8-14</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-c5045127e8c11e4b98bdb58566330ec5f88f36725cf4df548a8af4571c28121b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-c5045127e8c11e4b98bdb58566330ec5f88f36725cf4df548a8af4571c28121b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876020300064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31940457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Ruolei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiaoxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Beiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianxin</creatorcontrib><title>Boosting attachment security to cope with threats: Behavioral and ERPs findings</title><title>International journal of psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><description>Attachment security describes a sense of safety and security felt by individuals and promotes mental health. The mechanism by which attachment security buffers against psychological threat remains unclear, however. Here, we explored how attachment security attenuates the response to threatening information using a signal detection theory (SDT) and event-related potentials (ERPs) approach. Participants were assigned to an attachment security priming condition or a control condition. After a priming procedure, behavioral data and electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded while participants categorized threatening and neutral pictures. Our behavioral results revealed that attachment security biased participant responses to categorizing the two types of pictures; participants in the control condition exhibited a tendency to categorize stimuli as threatening, whereas those in the attachment security condition tended to categorize stimuli as neutral. Meanwhile, attachment security priming modulated early attention processes, reflected by an increased P200. The findings reported here suggest that attachment security buffers against external threats by modulating individual response preferences, the effects of which manifest in the early stages of attentional processing. •Used a signal detection theory (SDT) approach to separate the sensitivity from response bias•Attachment security priming increased response bias.•Attachment security priming modulated early attention processes, reflected by an increased P200.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attachment security priming</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Event-related potentials (ERPs)</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Fear - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Helping Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Signal detection theory (SDT)</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-8760</issn><issn>1872-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BeQlmwQ7TmyHFbQqDwmpCMHacpwJcdXGxXZB_XtcFdiyms2Ze2cOQheU5JRQfrXI7WIdtqZ3eUEKkhOaE8IO0IhKUWSC1-IQjRIoMik4OUGnISwIIYLW9TE6YbQuSVmJEZpPnAvRDu9Yx6hNv4Ih4gBm423c4uiwcWvAXzb2OPYedAzXeAK9_rTO6yXWQ4tnL88Bd3ZoU0o4Q0edXgY4_5lj9HY3e50-ZE_z-8fp7VNmGJcxM1Wqp4UAaSiFsqll0zaVrDhnjICpOik7xkVRma5su6qUWuouHUxNIWlBGzZGl_vctXcfGwhRrWwwsFzqAdwmqIKxWkhZ8zKhfI8a70Lw0Km1tyvtt4oStZOpFupXptrJVISqJDMtXvx0bJoVtH9rv_YScLMHIH36acGrYCwMBlrrwUTVOvtfxzccPokA</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Wu, Lili</creator><creator>Gu, Ruolei</creator><creator>Shi, Xiaoxuan</creator><creator>Wang, Beiyi</creator><creator>Zhang, Jianxin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Boosting attachment security to cope with threats: Behavioral and ERPs findings</title><author>Wu, Lili ; Gu, Ruolei ; Shi, Xiaoxuan ; Wang, Beiyi ; Zhang, Jianxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-c5045127e8c11e4b98bdb58566330ec5f88f36725cf4df548a8af4571c28121b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attachment security priming</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Event-related potentials (ERPs)</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Fear - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Helping Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Signal detection theory (SDT)</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Ruolei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiaoxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Beiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianxin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Lili</au><au>Gu, Ruolei</au><au>Shi, Xiaoxuan</au><au>Wang, Beiyi</au><au>Zhang, Jianxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Boosting attachment security to cope with threats: Behavioral and ERPs findings</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>149</volume><spage>8</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>8-14</pages><issn>0167-8760</issn><eissn>1872-7697</eissn><abstract>Attachment security describes a sense of safety and security felt by individuals and promotes mental health. The mechanism by which attachment security buffers against psychological threat remains unclear, however. Here, we explored how attachment security attenuates the response to threatening information using a signal detection theory (SDT) and event-related potentials (ERPs) approach. Participants were assigned to an attachment security priming condition or a control condition. After a priming procedure, behavioral data and electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded while participants categorized threatening and neutral pictures. Our behavioral results revealed that attachment security biased participant responses to categorizing the two types of pictures; participants in the control condition exhibited a tendency to categorize stimuli as threatening, whereas those in the attachment security condition tended to categorize stimuli as neutral. Meanwhile, attachment security priming modulated early attention processes, reflected by an increased P200. The findings reported here suggest that attachment security buffers against external threats by modulating individual response preferences, the effects of which manifest in the early stages of attentional processing. •Used a signal detection theory (SDT) approach to separate the sensitivity from response bias•Attachment security priming increased response bias.•Attachment security priming modulated early attention processes, reflected by an increased P200.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31940457</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.01.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8760
ispartof International journal of psychophysiology, 2020-03, Vol.149, p.8-14
issn 0167-8760
1872-7697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2339788964
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adaptation, Psychological - physiology
Adult
Attachment security priming
Electroencephalography
Event-related potentials (ERPs)
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Fear - physiology
Female
Helping Behavior
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Object Attachment
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Safety
Signal detection theory (SDT)
Signal Detection, Psychological
Threat
Young Adult
title Boosting attachment security to cope with threats: Behavioral and ERPs findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Boosting%20attachment%20security%20to%20cope%20with%20threats:%20Behavioral%20and%20ERPs%20findings&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychophysiology&rft.au=Wu,%20Lili&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=149&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=8-14&rft.issn=0167-8760&rft.eissn=1872-7697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2339788964%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339788964&rft_id=info:pmid/31940457&rft_els_id=S0167876020300064&rfr_iscdi=true