Influence of different surface treatments on two-body wear and fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics
Objectives To investigate two-body wear (2BW) and fracture load (FL) of monolithic ceramics after different surface pretreatments. Materials and methods Zirconia (MOZ), lithium-disilicate (LIT), and leucite-reinforced (LEU) specimens ( n = 60/group) were manufactured with CAD/CAM-technology and und...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2020-09, Vol.24 (9), p.3049-3060 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3060 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 3049 |
| container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Wiedenmann, Felicitas Böhm, Denise Eichberger, Marlis Edelhoff, Daniel Stawarczyk, Bogna |
| description | Objectives
To investigate two-body wear (2BW) and fracture load (FL) of monolithic ceramics after different surface pretreatments.
Materials and methods
Zirconia (MOZ), lithium-disilicate (LIT), and leucite-reinforced (LEU) specimens (
n
= 60/group) were manufactured with CAD/CAM-technology and underwent (
n
= 15/subgroup): 1) grinding + polishing (GrPo), 2) grinding + glazing (GrGz), 3) grinding (Gr), or 4) glazing (Gz). Scanning electron microscope (
n
= 3/subgroup) and 3D measurements of the ceramic crowns and antagonists (
N
= 180) were performed to determine 2BW before and after 120,000/1,200,000 masticatory cycles. FL was examined for all specimens (
N
= 180). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé post hoc, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and Wilcoxon (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-019-03173-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2336996983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2336996983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-2c2c73b850b1401e33c46ef0457bf767a376db114efe06ba88ddfab2d5e52dc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1vFDEMhiNERUvhD3BAkbhwCU3G2SRzXG35qNSKS3uOMokDU2aSJZlR1X9PtluExMW27EevbL-EvBP8k-BcX9QWjGRc9IyD0MDMC3ImJCgGWouXT3XHVG_EKXld6z3nQioNr8gpCAOqF-qM_LpKcVoxeaQ50jDGiAXTQutaomvNpaBb5tapNCe6PGQ25PBIH9AV6lKgsTi_rAXplF04SMw55Wlcfo6e7raXF7vtDfVY3Dz6-oacRDdVfPucz8ndl8-3u2_s-vvXq932mu07AQvrfOc1DGbDByG5QAAvFUYuN3qIWmkHWoVBCIkRuRqcMSFEN3Rhg5sueAPn5ONRd1_y7xXrYuexepwmlzCv1XbQju_bX6ChH_5D7_NaUtvOdhKkkKbvD4Lvn6l1mDHYfRlnVx7t3zc2AI5AbaP0A8s_GcHtwSx7NMs2s-yTWdbAH3DXhK8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434148998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of different surface treatments on two-body wear and fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Wiedenmann, Felicitas ; Böhm, Denise ; Eichberger, Marlis ; Edelhoff, Daniel ; Stawarczyk, Bogna</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiedenmann, Felicitas ; Böhm, Denise ; Eichberger, Marlis ; Edelhoff, Daniel ; Stawarczyk, Bogna</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Objectives
To investigate two-body wear (2BW) and fracture load (FL) of monolithic ceramics after different surface pretreatments.
Materials and methods
Zirconia (MOZ), lithium-disilicate (LIT), and leucite-reinforced (LEU) specimens (
n
= 60/group) were manufactured with CAD/CAM-technology and underwent (
n
= 15/subgroup): 1) grinding + polishing (GrPo), 2) grinding + glazing (GrGz), 3) grinding (Gr), or 4) glazing (Gz). Scanning electron microscope (
n
= 3/subgroup) and 3D measurements of the ceramic crowns and antagonists (
N
= 180) were performed to determine 2BW before and after 120,000/1,200,000 masticatory cycles. FL was examined for all specimens (
N
= 180). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé post hoc, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and Wilcoxon (
p
< 0.05).
Results
MOZ presented the highest FL independent on pretreatment (6960–9250 N), while LEU (1405–2320 N) showed the lowest (
p
< 0.001). Ceramic and antagonist wear increased between 120,000 and 1,200,000 masticatory cycles (
p
< 0.001). For pretreatments GrPo, GrGz, and Gz, MOZ showed the lowest wear of the ceramic, while causing the highest antagonist wear (
p
< 0.001). GrPo resulted in the lowest wear for MOZ (
p
< 0.001), with Gr leading to the highest antagonist wear (
p
= 0.008). LIT specimens presented the highest wear of the ceramic and antagonist after Gz (
p
< 0.001), while GrPo resulted in the lowest antagonist wear (
p
< 0.001). GrGz led to the highest antagonist wear for LEU (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
With FL exceeding maximum masticatory forces, the three tested ceramics can be recommended for restorations, even in posterior regions. While glazing resulted in higher wear and impaired FL, polishing improved mechanical properties while largely preserving the antagonist.
Clinical relevance
While surface pretreatment after grinding is vital to ensure a ceramic’s optimal mechanical properties, glazing and polishing varies with regard to material properties, costs, and time.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03173-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31836916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Antagonists ; Ceramics ; Computer-Aided Design ; Dental Porcelain ; Dentistry ; Kruskal-Wallis test ; Lithium ; Mastication ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical properties ; Medicine ; Original Article ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Surface Properties ; Zirconia ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2020-09, Vol.24 (9), p.3049-3060</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-2c2c73b850b1401e33c46ef0457bf767a376db114efe06ba88ddfab2d5e52dc83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0089-9995</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-019-03173-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-019-03173-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31836916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiedenmann, Felicitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichberger, Marlis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of different surface treatments on two-body wear and fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Objectives
To investigate two-body wear (2BW) and fracture load (FL) of monolithic ceramics after different surface pretreatments.
Materials and methods
Zirconia (MOZ), lithium-disilicate (LIT), and leucite-reinforced (LEU) specimens (
n
= 60/group) were manufactured with CAD/CAM-technology and underwent (
n
= 15/subgroup): 1) grinding + polishing (GrPo), 2) grinding + glazing (GrGz), 3) grinding (Gr), or 4) glazing (Gz). Scanning electron microscope (
n
= 3/subgroup) and 3D measurements of the ceramic crowns and antagonists (
N
= 180) were performed to determine 2BW before and after 120,000/1,200,000 masticatory cycles. FL was examined for all specimens (
N
= 180). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé post hoc, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and Wilcoxon (
p
< 0.05).
Results
MOZ presented the highest FL independent on pretreatment (6960–9250 N), while LEU (1405–2320 N) showed the lowest (
p
< 0.001). Ceramic and antagonist wear increased between 120,000 and 1,200,000 masticatory cycles (
p
< 0.001). For pretreatments GrPo, GrGz, and Gz, MOZ showed the lowest wear of the ceramic, while causing the highest antagonist wear (
p
< 0.001). GrPo resulted in the lowest wear for MOZ (
p
< 0.001), with Gr leading to the highest antagonist wear (
p
= 0.008). LIT specimens presented the highest wear of the ceramic and antagonist after Gz (
p
< 0.001), while GrPo resulted in the lowest antagonist wear (
p
< 0.001). GrGz led to the highest antagonist wear for LEU (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
With FL exceeding maximum masticatory forces, the three tested ceramics can be recommended for restorations, even in posterior regions. While glazing resulted in higher wear and impaired FL, polishing improved mechanical properties while largely preserving the antagonist.
Clinical relevance
While surface pretreatment after grinding is vital to ensure a ceramic’s optimal mechanical properties, glazing and polishing varies with regard to material properties, costs, and time.]]></description><subject>Antagonists</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Kruskal-Wallis test</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Mastication</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Zirconia</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1vFDEMhiNERUvhD3BAkbhwCU3G2SRzXG35qNSKS3uOMokDU2aSJZlR1X9PtluExMW27EevbL-EvBP8k-BcX9QWjGRc9IyD0MDMC3ImJCgGWouXT3XHVG_EKXld6z3nQioNr8gpCAOqF-qM_LpKcVoxeaQ50jDGiAXTQutaomvNpaBb5tapNCe6PGQ25PBIH9AV6lKgsTi_rAXplF04SMw55Wlcfo6e7raXF7vtDfVY3Dz6-oacRDdVfPucz8ndl8-3u2_s-vvXq932mu07AQvrfOc1DGbDByG5QAAvFUYuN3qIWmkHWoVBCIkRuRqcMSFEN3Rhg5sueAPn5ONRd1_y7xXrYuexepwmlzCv1XbQju_bX6ChH_5D7_NaUtvOdhKkkKbvD4Lvn6l1mDHYfRlnVx7t3zc2AI5AbaP0A8s_GcHtwSx7NMs2s-yTWdbAH3DXhK8</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Wiedenmann, Felicitas</creator><creator>Böhm, Denise</creator><creator>Eichberger, Marlis</creator><creator>Edelhoff, Daniel</creator><creator>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-9995</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Influence of different surface treatments on two-body wear and fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics</title><author>Wiedenmann, Felicitas ; Böhm, Denise ; Eichberger, Marlis ; Edelhoff, Daniel ; Stawarczyk, Bogna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-2c2c73b850b1401e33c46ef0457bf767a376db114efe06ba88ddfab2d5e52dc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antagonists</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Kruskal-Wallis test</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Mastication</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Zirconia</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiedenmann, Felicitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichberger, Marlis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiedenmann, Felicitas</au><au>Böhm, Denise</au><au>Eichberger, Marlis</au><au>Edelhoff, Daniel</au><au>Stawarczyk, Bogna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of different surface treatments on two-body wear and fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3049</spage><epage>3060</epage><pages>3049-3060</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Objectives
To investigate two-body wear (2BW) and fracture load (FL) of monolithic ceramics after different surface pretreatments.
Materials and methods
Zirconia (MOZ), lithium-disilicate (LIT), and leucite-reinforced (LEU) specimens (
n
= 60/group) were manufactured with CAD/CAM-technology and underwent (
n
= 15/subgroup): 1) grinding + polishing (GrPo), 2) grinding + glazing (GrGz), 3) grinding (Gr), or 4) glazing (Gz). Scanning electron microscope (
n
= 3/subgroup) and 3D measurements of the ceramic crowns and antagonists (
N
= 180) were performed to determine 2BW before and after 120,000/1,200,000 masticatory cycles. FL was examined for all specimens (
N
= 180). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé post hoc, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and Wilcoxon (
p
< 0.05).
Results
MOZ presented the highest FL independent on pretreatment (6960–9250 N), while LEU (1405–2320 N) showed the lowest (
p
< 0.001). Ceramic and antagonist wear increased between 120,000 and 1,200,000 masticatory cycles (
p
< 0.001). For pretreatments GrPo, GrGz, and Gz, MOZ showed the lowest wear of the ceramic, while causing the highest antagonist wear (
p
< 0.001). GrPo resulted in the lowest wear for MOZ (
p
< 0.001), with Gr leading to the highest antagonist wear (
p
= 0.008). LIT specimens presented the highest wear of the ceramic and antagonist after Gz (
p
< 0.001), while GrPo resulted in the lowest antagonist wear (
p
< 0.001). GrGz led to the highest antagonist wear for LEU (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
With FL exceeding maximum masticatory forces, the three tested ceramics can be recommended for restorations, even in posterior regions. While glazing resulted in higher wear and impaired FL, polishing improved mechanical properties while largely preserving the antagonist.
Clinical relevance
While surface pretreatment after grinding is vital to ensure a ceramic’s optimal mechanical properties, glazing and polishing varies with regard to material properties, costs, and time.]]></abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31836916</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-019-03173-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-9995</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1432-6981 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2020-09, Vol.24 (9), p.3049-3060 |
| issn | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2336996983 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Antagonists Ceramics Computer-Aided Design Dental Porcelain Dentistry Kruskal-Wallis test Lithium Mastication Materials Testing Mechanical properties Medicine Original Article Scanning electron microscopy Surface Properties Zirconia Zirconium |
| title | Influence of different surface treatments on two-body wear and fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20different%20surface%20treatments%20on%20two-body%20wear%20and%20fracture%20load%20of%20monolithic%20CAD/CAM%20ceramics&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Wiedenmann,%20Felicitas&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3049&rft.epage=3060&rft.pages=3049-3060&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-019-03173-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2336996983%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434148998&rft_id=info:pmid/31836916&rfr_iscdi=true |