Imaging technology for myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography 2018 in Japan
Aim Recently, nuclear cardiology has dramatically advanced by a new technology development such as the device, short-term acquisition system, image reconstruction algorithm and image analysis. Although these innovations have been gradually employed in routine examinations, we did not investigate the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese journal of radiology 2020-03, Vol.38 (3), p.274-282 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 282 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 274 |
container_title | Japanese journal of radiology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Shibutani, Takayuki Okuda, Koichi Ichikawa, Hajime Kato, Toyohiro Miwa, Kenta Tsushima, Hiroyuki Onoguchi, Masahisa Nagaki, Akio |
description | Aim
Recently, nuclear cardiology has dramatically advanced by a new technology development such as the device, short-term acquisition system, image reconstruction algorithm and image analysis. Although these innovations have been gradually employed in routine examinations, we did not investigate the current use of image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image analysis with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS). We investigated the current status of MPS imaging technology in Japan.
Methods
We carried out a survey using a Web-based questionnaire system, the opening of which was announced via e-mail, and it was available on a website for 3 months. We collected data on the current use of MPS with
201
Tl and/or
99m
Tc agents with respect to routine protocols, image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image analysis.
Results
We received responses to the Web-based questionnaire from 178 and 174 people for
99m
Tc and
201
Tl MPS, respectively. The routine protocols of MPS of stress-rest and rest-stress MPS on 1-day protocols with
99m
Tc were 41.2% and 14.5%, respectively, and the rest-only scan response rate was 23.7%, whereas that of
201
Tl MPS was 65.9% with stress-rest MPS, 19.0% with rest-only MPS, and 10.9% with stress-rest MPS adding a rest scan 24 h after injection. The filtered back projection (FBP) method is most commonly used image reconstruction method, yielding 70.5% for
99m
Tc MPS and 76.8% for
201
Tl MPS, including combined FBP and ordered subset expectation maximization method. The results for no-correction (NC) images were 49.2% with
99m
Tc MPS and 55.2% with
201
Tl MPS including the response of NC and combined attenuation correction (AC) and scatter correction (SC) (i.e., ACSC) images. The AC or ACSC images of
99m
Tc and
201
Tl were provided by 30–40% of the institutions surveyed.
Conclusions
We investigated the current status of MPS imaging technology in Japan, and found that although the use of various technical developments has been reported, some of these technologies have not been utilized effectively. Hence, we expect that nuclear medicine technology will be used more effectively to improve diagnosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11604-019-00915-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2336246314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2336246314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-733051e9a864d6626b8e119694031f57a2b5826a55ab0403738376b26057826f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT9PwzAQxS0EoqXwBRiQJRaWwJ3t2MmIKv4KiQUktshJnDQoiYOdDP32mBaKxMBk-_l37073CDlFuEQAdeURJYgIMI0AUowjtkfmmEgVISRv-7u7whk58v4dQAouxCGZcUwxlVzOSfnQ6brpazqaYtXb1tZrWllHu7UttCsb3dLBuGryje2pD2BromFlx_AyXeM3cmG7YRpNSUfb2drpYbWmDDChTU8f9aD7Y3JQ6dabk-9zQV5vb16W99HT893D8vopKoSMx0hxDjGaVCdSlFIymScGw5ypAI5VrDTL44RJHcc6h6ApnnAlcyYhVkGv-IJcbH0HZz8m48csjFiYttW9sZPPGOeSCclRBPT8D_puJ9eH6QKlwpYUCBUotqUKZ713psoG13TarTOE7CuDbJtBFjLINhmE6gU5-7ae8s6Uu5KfpQeAbwEfvvrauN_e_9h-At5Ij9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2373447047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging technology for myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography 2018 in Japan</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shibutani, Takayuki ; Okuda, Koichi ; Ichikawa, Hajime ; Kato, Toyohiro ; Miwa, Kenta ; Tsushima, Hiroyuki ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Nagaki, Akio</creator><creatorcontrib>Shibutani, Takayuki ; Okuda, Koichi ; Ichikawa, Hajime ; Kato, Toyohiro ; Miwa, Kenta ; Tsushima, Hiroyuki ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Nagaki, Akio</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Recently, nuclear cardiology has dramatically advanced by a new technology development such as the device, short-term acquisition system, image reconstruction algorithm and image analysis. Although these innovations have been gradually employed in routine examinations, we did not investigate the current use of image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image analysis with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS). We investigated the current status of MPS imaging technology in Japan.
Methods
We carried out a survey using a Web-based questionnaire system, the opening of which was announced via e-mail, and it was available on a website for 3 months. We collected data on the current use of MPS with
201
Tl and/or
99m
Tc agents with respect to routine protocols, image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image analysis.
Results
We received responses to the Web-based questionnaire from 178 and 174 people for
99m
Tc and
201
Tl MPS, respectively. The routine protocols of MPS of stress-rest and rest-stress MPS on 1-day protocols with
99m
Tc were 41.2% and 14.5%, respectively, and the rest-only scan response rate was 23.7%, whereas that of
201
Tl MPS was 65.9% with stress-rest MPS, 19.0% with rest-only MPS, and 10.9% with stress-rest MPS adding a rest scan 24 h after injection. The filtered back projection (FBP) method is most commonly used image reconstruction method, yielding 70.5% for
99m
Tc MPS and 76.8% for
201
Tl MPS, including combined FBP and ordered subset expectation maximization method. The results for no-correction (NC) images were 49.2% with
99m
Tc MPS and 55.2% with
201
Tl MPS including the response of NC and combined attenuation correction (AC) and scatter correction (SC) (i.e., ACSC) images. The AC or ACSC images of
99m
Tc and
201
Tl were provided by 30–40% of the institutions surveyed.
Conclusions
We investigated the current status of MPS imaging technology in Japan, and found that although the use of various technical developments has been reported, some of these technologies have not been utilized effectively. Hence, we expect that nuclear medicine technology will be used more effectively to improve diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-1071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-108X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11604-019-00915-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31919636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Attenuation ; Cardiology ; Computed tomography ; Emission analysis ; Image acquisition ; Image analysis ; Image processing ; Image reconstruction ; Imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; New technology ; Nuclear Medicine ; Perfusion ; Photon emission ; Photons ; Questionnaires ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Rest ; Stress ; Technical Note ; Tomography ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of radiology, 2020-03, Vol.38 (3), p.274-282</ispartof><rights>Japan Radiological Society 2020</rights><rights>Japanese Journal of Radiology is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-733051e9a864d6626b8e119694031f57a2b5826a55ab0403738376b26057826f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-733051e9a864d6626b8e119694031f57a2b5826a55ab0403738376b26057826f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11604-019-00915-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11604-019-00915-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shibutani, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okuda, Koichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichikawa, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Toyohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miwa, Kenta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsushima, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagaki, Akio</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging technology for myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography 2018 in Japan</title><title>Japanese journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><description>Aim
Recently, nuclear cardiology has dramatically advanced by a new technology development such as the device, short-term acquisition system, image reconstruction algorithm and image analysis. Although these innovations have been gradually employed in routine examinations, we did not investigate the current use of image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image analysis with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS). We investigated the current status of MPS imaging technology in Japan.
Methods
We carried out a survey using a Web-based questionnaire system, the opening of which was announced via e-mail, and it was available on a website for 3 months. We collected data on the current use of MPS with
201
Tl and/or
99m
Tc agents with respect to routine protocols, image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image analysis.
Results
We received responses to the Web-based questionnaire from 178 and 174 people for
99m
Tc and
201
Tl MPS, respectively. The routine protocols of MPS of stress-rest and rest-stress MPS on 1-day protocols with
99m
Tc were 41.2% and 14.5%, respectively, and the rest-only scan response rate was 23.7%, whereas that of
201
Tl MPS was 65.9% with stress-rest MPS, 19.0% with rest-only MPS, and 10.9% with stress-rest MPS adding a rest scan 24 h after injection. The filtered back projection (FBP) method is most commonly used image reconstruction method, yielding 70.5% for
99m
Tc MPS and 76.8% for
201
Tl MPS, including combined FBP and ordered subset expectation maximization method. The results for no-correction (NC) images were 49.2% with
99m
Tc MPS and 55.2% with
201
Tl MPS including the response of NC and combined attenuation correction (AC) and scatter correction (SC) (i.e., ACSC) images. The AC or ACSC images of
99m
Tc and
201
Tl were provided by 30–40% of the institutions surveyed.
Conclusions
We investigated the current status of MPS imaging technology in Japan, and found that although the use of various technical developments has been reported, some of these technologies have not been utilized effectively. Hence, we expect that nuclear medicine technology will be used more effectively to improve diagnosis.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Photon emission</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Rest</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Technical Note</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1867-1071</issn><issn>1867-108X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT9PwzAQxS0EoqXwBRiQJRaWwJ3t2MmIKv4KiQUktshJnDQoiYOdDP32mBaKxMBk-_l37073CDlFuEQAdeURJYgIMI0AUowjtkfmmEgVISRv-7u7whk58v4dQAouxCGZcUwxlVzOSfnQ6brpazqaYtXb1tZrWllHu7UttCsb3dLBuGryje2pD2BromFlx_AyXeM3cmG7YRpNSUfb2drpYbWmDDChTU8f9aD7Y3JQ6dabk-9zQV5vb16W99HT893D8vopKoSMx0hxDjGaVCdSlFIymScGw5ypAI5VrDTL44RJHcc6h6ApnnAlcyYhVkGv-IJcbH0HZz8m48csjFiYttW9sZPPGOeSCclRBPT8D_puJ9eH6QKlwpYUCBUotqUKZ713psoG13TarTOE7CuDbJtBFjLINhmE6gU5-7ae8s6Uu5KfpQeAbwEfvvrauN_e_9h-At5Ij9c</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Shibutani, Takayuki</creator><creator>Okuda, Koichi</creator><creator>Ichikawa, Hajime</creator><creator>Kato, Toyohiro</creator><creator>Miwa, Kenta</creator><creator>Tsushima, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creator><creator>Nagaki, Akio</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Imaging technology for myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography 2018 in Japan</title><author>Shibutani, Takayuki ; Okuda, Koichi ; Ichikawa, Hajime ; Kato, Toyohiro ; Miwa, Kenta ; Tsushima, Hiroyuki ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Nagaki, Akio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-733051e9a864d6626b8e119694031f57a2b5826a55ab0403738376b26057826f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Photon emission</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Rest</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Technical Note</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shibutani, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okuda, Koichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichikawa, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Toyohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miwa, Kenta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsushima, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagaki, Akio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shibutani, Takayuki</au><au>Okuda, Koichi</au><au>Ichikawa, Hajime</au><au>Kato, Toyohiro</au><au>Miwa, Kenta</au><au>Tsushima, Hiroyuki</au><au>Onoguchi, Masahisa</au><au>Nagaki, Akio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging technology for myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography 2018 in Japan</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of radiology</jtitle><stitle>Jpn J Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>274</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>274-282</pages><issn>1867-1071</issn><eissn>1867-108X</eissn><abstract>Aim
Recently, nuclear cardiology has dramatically advanced by a new technology development such as the device, short-term acquisition system, image reconstruction algorithm and image analysis. Although these innovations have been gradually employed in routine examinations, we did not investigate the current use of image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image analysis with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS). We investigated the current status of MPS imaging technology in Japan.
Methods
We carried out a survey using a Web-based questionnaire system, the opening of which was announced via e-mail, and it was available on a website for 3 months. We collected data on the current use of MPS with
201
Tl and/or
99m
Tc agents with respect to routine protocols, image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image analysis.
Results
We received responses to the Web-based questionnaire from 178 and 174 people for
99m
Tc and
201
Tl MPS, respectively. The routine protocols of MPS of stress-rest and rest-stress MPS on 1-day protocols with
99m
Tc were 41.2% and 14.5%, respectively, and the rest-only scan response rate was 23.7%, whereas that of
201
Tl MPS was 65.9% with stress-rest MPS, 19.0% with rest-only MPS, and 10.9% with stress-rest MPS adding a rest scan 24 h after injection. The filtered back projection (FBP) method is most commonly used image reconstruction method, yielding 70.5% for
99m
Tc MPS and 76.8% for
201
Tl MPS, including combined FBP and ordered subset expectation maximization method. The results for no-correction (NC) images were 49.2% with
99m
Tc MPS and 55.2% with
201
Tl MPS including the response of NC and combined attenuation correction (AC) and scatter correction (SC) (i.e., ACSC) images. The AC or ACSC images of
99m
Tc and
201
Tl were provided by 30–40% of the institutions surveyed.
Conclusions
We investigated the current status of MPS imaging technology in Japan, and found that although the use of various technical developments has been reported, some of these technologies have not been utilized effectively. Hence, we expect that nuclear medicine technology will be used more effectively to improve diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>31919636</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11604-019-00915-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1867-1071 |
ispartof | Japanese journal of radiology, 2020-03, Vol.38 (3), p.274-282 |
issn | 1867-1071 1867-108X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2336246314 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Attenuation Cardiology Computed tomography Emission analysis Image acquisition Image analysis Image processing Image reconstruction Imaging Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health New technology Nuclear Medicine Perfusion Photon emission Photons Questionnaires Radiology Radiotherapy Rest Stress Technical Note Tomography Websites |
title | Imaging technology for myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography 2018 in Japan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A47%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20technology%20for%20myocardial%20perfusion%20single-photon%20emission%20computed%20tomography%202018%20in%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Shibutani,%20Takayuki&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=274&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=274-282&rft.issn=1867-1071&rft.eissn=1867-108X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11604-019-00915-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2336246314%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2373447047&rft_id=info:pmid/31919636&rfr_iscdi=true |