Associations Between Personal Protective Measures and Self-Reported Tick-Borne Disease Diagnosis in Indiana Residents

Several personal protective measures (PPMs) are recommended to prevent tick-borne diseases (TBD). We aimed to quantify the strength of seven PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis associations and to understand what variables modify these associations. In June–July 2018, with a cross-sectional study d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of community health 2020-08, Vol.45 (4), p.739-750
Hauptverfasser: Kianersi, Sina, Luetke, Maya, Wolfe, Caryn Gail, Clark, William Alexander, Omodior, OgheneKaro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 750
container_issue 4
container_start_page 739
container_title Journal of community health
container_volume 45
creator Kianersi, Sina
Luetke, Maya
Wolfe, Caryn Gail
Clark, William Alexander
Omodior, OgheneKaro
description Several personal protective measures (PPMs) are recommended to prevent tick-borne diseases (TBD). We aimed to quantify the strength of seven PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis associations and to understand what variables modify these associations. In June–July 2018, with a cross-sectional study design, we surveyed a sample of adult Indiana state residents. Overall, 2927 participants were eligible for this analysis. All data were self-reported. We used the double robust approach of stabilized inverse probability weighting and propensity score adjustment to obtain ORs. Approximately 5% of participants (n = 142) self-reported TBD diagnosis. Practicing different PPMs ranged from 48% for treating outdoor clothing with special bug-spray to 83% for walking on established trails. Using insect repellent on exposed skin was protective against TBD diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 0.55 (0.35, 0.88)]. A thorough body/clothes check after being outdoors was also protective against TBD diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 0.40 (0.25, 0.67)]. In stratified analyses, TBD knowledge, safety worry because of ticks, avoiding outdoors because of ticks, and pet TBD risk modified the associations between different PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis. In the state of Indiana, thorough body/clothes check after being outdoors and use of insect repellent on exposed skin might be strongly effective in preventing TBD. The protective effect of different PPMs might be stronger among people with high TBD knowledge, high safety worry because of ticks, high avoidance of being outdoors because of ticks, and low pet TBD risk. These results might be useful in the design of intervention programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10900-020-00789-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2335177211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416299781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6c34ea68bb88ef8b35c179066f91a705abdd4ab8295bce72b8981493d78d57383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAlrhwMbXjJLaP_eCjUlGrUs6WY08ql6y9eBJW_Hu83UIlDhysOfiZd0bzEPJa8PeCc3WEghvOGW_q40obtn1CVqJTksle8KdkxblpWSfa7oC8QLzjnAuu-ufkQAojeqHMiizHiNlHN8eckJ7AvAVI9AoK5uQmelXyDH6OP4F-AYdLAaQuBfoVppFdwyaXGQK9if47O8klAT2LWLlddbcpY0QaEz1PIbrk6DVgDJBmfEmejW5CePVQD8m3jx9uTj-zi8tP56fHF8xL1c2s97IF1-th0BpGPcjO16V5349GOMU7N4TQukE3phs8qGbQRovWyKB0qGfQ8pC82-duSv6xAM52HdHDNLkEeUHbSNkJpRohKvr2H_QuL6XeoFKt6BtjlN5RzZ7yJSMWGO2mxLUrv6zgdifF7qXYKsXeS7Hb2vTmIXoZ1hD-tvyxUAG5B7B-pVsoj7P_E_sbGDmYWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416299781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associations Between Personal Protective Measures and Self-Reported Tick-Borne Disease Diagnosis in Indiana Residents</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Kianersi, Sina ; Luetke, Maya ; Wolfe, Caryn Gail ; Clark, William Alexander ; Omodior, OgheneKaro</creator><creatorcontrib>Kianersi, Sina ; Luetke, Maya ; Wolfe, Caryn Gail ; Clark, William Alexander ; Omodior, OgheneKaro</creatorcontrib><description>Several personal protective measures (PPMs) are recommended to prevent tick-borne diseases (TBD). We aimed to quantify the strength of seven PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis associations and to understand what variables modify these associations. In June–July 2018, with a cross-sectional study design, we surveyed a sample of adult Indiana state residents. Overall, 2927 participants were eligible for this analysis. All data were self-reported. We used the double robust approach of stabilized inverse probability weighting and propensity score adjustment to obtain ORs. Approximately 5% of participants (n = 142) self-reported TBD diagnosis. Practicing different PPMs ranged from 48% for treating outdoor clothing with special bug-spray to 83% for walking on established trails. Using insect repellent on exposed skin was protective against TBD diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 0.55 (0.35, 0.88)]. A thorough body/clothes check after being outdoors was also protective against TBD diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 0.40 (0.25, 0.67)]. In stratified analyses, TBD knowledge, safety worry because of ticks, avoiding outdoors because of ticks, and pet TBD risk modified the associations between different PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis. In the state of Indiana, thorough body/clothes check after being outdoors and use of insect repellent on exposed skin might be strongly effective in preventing TBD. The protective effect of different PPMs might be stronger among people with high TBD knowledge, high safety worry because of ticks, high avoidance of being outdoors because of ticks, and low pet TBD risk. These results might be useful in the design of intervention programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10900-020-00789-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31916179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Arachnids ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diagnosis ; Ethics ; Female ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Humans ; Indiana ; Insects ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Paper ; Outdoors ; Parasitic diseases ; Protective clothing ; Safety ; Self Report ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tick-borne diseases ; Tick-Borne Diseases - diagnosis ; Tick-Borne Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Ticks</subject><ispartof>Journal of community health, 2020-08, Vol.45 (4), p.739-750</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6c34ea68bb88ef8b35c179066f91a705abdd4ab8295bce72b8981493d78d57383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6c34ea68bb88ef8b35c179066f91a705abdd4ab8295bce72b8981493d78d57383</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6918-1917</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10900-020-00789-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10900-020-00789-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31916179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kianersi, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luetke, Maya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Caryn Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, William Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omodior, OgheneKaro</creatorcontrib><title>Associations Between Personal Protective Measures and Self-Reported Tick-Borne Disease Diagnosis in Indiana Residents</title><title>Journal of community health</title><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><description>Several personal protective measures (PPMs) are recommended to prevent tick-borne diseases (TBD). We aimed to quantify the strength of seven PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis associations and to understand what variables modify these associations. In June–July 2018, with a cross-sectional study design, we surveyed a sample of adult Indiana state residents. Overall, 2927 participants were eligible for this analysis. All data were self-reported. We used the double robust approach of stabilized inverse probability weighting and propensity score adjustment to obtain ORs. Approximately 5% of participants (n = 142) self-reported TBD diagnosis. Practicing different PPMs ranged from 48% for treating outdoor clothing with special bug-spray to 83% for walking on established trails. Using insect repellent on exposed skin was protective against TBD diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 0.55 (0.35, 0.88)]. A thorough body/clothes check after being outdoors was also protective against TBD diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 0.40 (0.25, 0.67)]. In stratified analyses, TBD knowledge, safety worry because of ticks, avoiding outdoors because of ticks, and pet TBD risk modified the associations between different PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis. In the state of Indiana, thorough body/clothes check after being outdoors and use of insect repellent on exposed skin might be strongly effective in preventing TBD. The protective effect of different PPMs might be stronger among people with high TBD knowledge, high safety worry because of ticks, high avoidance of being outdoors because of ticks, and low pet TBD risk. These results might be useful in the design of intervention programs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arachnids</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Outdoors</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Protective clothing</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tick-borne diseases</subject><subject>Tick-Borne Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tick-Borne Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Ticks</subject><issn>0094-5145</issn><issn>1573-3610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAlrhwMbXjJLaP_eCjUlGrUs6WY08ql6y9eBJW_Hu83UIlDhysOfiZd0bzEPJa8PeCc3WEghvOGW_q40obtn1CVqJTksle8KdkxblpWSfa7oC8QLzjnAuu-ufkQAojeqHMiizHiNlHN8eckJ7AvAVI9AoK5uQmelXyDH6OP4F-AYdLAaQuBfoVppFdwyaXGQK9if47O8klAT2LWLlddbcpY0QaEz1PIbrk6DVgDJBmfEmejW5CePVQD8m3jx9uTj-zi8tP56fHF8xL1c2s97IF1-th0BpGPcjO16V5349GOMU7N4TQukE3phs8qGbQRovWyKB0qGfQ8pC82-duSv6xAM52HdHDNLkEeUHbSNkJpRohKvr2H_QuL6XeoFKt6BtjlN5RzZ7yJSMWGO2mxLUrv6zgdifF7qXYKsXeS7Hb2vTmIXoZ1hD-tvyxUAG5B7B-pVsoj7P_E_sbGDmYWg</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Kianersi, Sina</creator><creator>Luetke, Maya</creator><creator>Wolfe, Caryn Gail</creator><creator>Clark, William Alexander</creator><creator>Omodior, OgheneKaro</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6918-1917</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Associations Between Personal Protective Measures and Self-Reported Tick-Borne Disease Diagnosis in Indiana Residents</title><author>Kianersi, Sina ; Luetke, Maya ; Wolfe, Caryn Gail ; Clark, William Alexander ; Omodior, OgheneKaro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6c34ea68bb88ef8b35c179066f91a705abdd4ab8295bce72b8981493d78d57383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arachnids</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Outdoors</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Protective clothing</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tick-borne diseases</topic><topic>Tick-Borne Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tick-Borne Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Ticks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kianersi, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luetke, Maya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Caryn Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, William Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omodior, OgheneKaro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology &amp; Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kianersi, Sina</au><au>Luetke, Maya</au><au>Wolfe, Caryn Gail</au><au>Clark, William Alexander</au><au>Omodior, OgheneKaro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associations Between Personal Protective Measures and Self-Reported Tick-Borne Disease Diagnosis in Indiana Residents</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle><stitle>J Community Health</stitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>739</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>739-750</pages><issn>0094-5145</issn><eissn>1573-3610</eissn><abstract>Several personal protective measures (PPMs) are recommended to prevent tick-borne diseases (TBD). We aimed to quantify the strength of seven PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis associations and to understand what variables modify these associations. In June–July 2018, with a cross-sectional study design, we surveyed a sample of adult Indiana state residents. Overall, 2927 participants were eligible for this analysis. All data were self-reported. We used the double robust approach of stabilized inverse probability weighting and propensity score adjustment to obtain ORs. Approximately 5% of participants (n = 142) self-reported TBD diagnosis. Practicing different PPMs ranged from 48% for treating outdoor clothing with special bug-spray to 83% for walking on established trails. Using insect repellent on exposed skin was protective against TBD diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 0.55 (0.35, 0.88)]. A thorough body/clothes check after being outdoors was also protective against TBD diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 0.40 (0.25, 0.67)]. In stratified analyses, TBD knowledge, safety worry because of ticks, avoiding outdoors because of ticks, and pet TBD risk modified the associations between different PPMs and self-reported TBD diagnosis. In the state of Indiana, thorough body/clothes check after being outdoors and use of insect repellent on exposed skin might be strongly effective in preventing TBD. The protective effect of different PPMs might be stronger among people with high TBD knowledge, high safety worry because of ticks, high avoidance of being outdoors because of ticks, and low pet TBD risk. These results might be useful in the design of intervention programs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31916179</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10900-020-00789-w</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6918-1917</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-5145
ispartof Journal of community health, 2020-08, Vol.45 (4), p.739-750
issn 0094-5145
1573-3610
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2335177211
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Education Source; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Animals
Arachnids
Community and Environmental Psychology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diagnosis
Ethics
Female
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Humans
Indiana
Insects
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Paper
Outdoors
Parasitic diseases
Protective clothing
Safety
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tick-borne diseases
Tick-Borne Diseases - diagnosis
Tick-Borne Diseases - prevention & control
Ticks
title Associations Between Personal Protective Measures and Self-Reported Tick-Borne Disease Diagnosis in Indiana Residents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T03%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associations%20Between%20Personal%20Protective%20Measures%20and%20Self-Reported%20Tick-Borne%20Disease%20Diagnosis%20in%20Indiana%20Residents&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20health&rft.au=Kianersi,%20Sina&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=739&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=739-750&rft.issn=0094-5145&rft.eissn=1573-3610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10900-020-00789-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416299781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416299781&rft_id=info:pmid/31916179&rfr_iscdi=true