Insights into hookworm prevalence in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction Hookworm infections are neglected tropical diseases of humans and animals worldwide. A meta-analysis and systematic review was designed to evaluate the prevalence of hookworm infection in animal and human hosts in Asia until July 2018. Methods The available online articles of f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020-02, Vol.114 (3), p.141-154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Zibaei, Mohammad Nosrati, Mohammad Reza Chaechi Shadnoosh, Farnosh Houshmand, Elham Karami, Maryam Fasihi Rafsanjani, Mandana Khorsandi Majidiani, Hamidreza Ghaffarifar, Fatemeh Cortes, Hélder Carola Espiguinha Dalvand, Sahar Badri, Milad |
description | Abstract
Introduction
Hookworm infections are neglected tropical diseases of humans and animals worldwide. A meta-analysis and systematic review was designed to evaluate the prevalence of hookworm infection in animal and human hosts in Asia until July 2018.
Methods
The available online articles of five English databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were explored.
Results
The most parasitized carnivores were jackal (48%, CI: 4 to 91%), followed by dog (41%, CI: 29 to 53%), cat (26%, CI: 14 to 38%) and the red fox (19%, CI: 13 to 24%). The weighted prevalence of Ancylostoma braziliensis, A. caninum, A. ceylanicum, A. tubaeforme and Uncinaria stenocephala isolated from different canids were found to be 27% (CI: 21 to 33%), 23% (CI: 7.0 to 53%), 24% (CI: 12 to 35%), 44% (CI: 37 to 51%) and 37% (CI: 18 to 55%), respectively. In total, 98 records were obtained for human hookworms from 3209 760 examined individuals and the calculated weighted prevalence in this population was 19% (CI: 17 to 20%).
Conclusions
These findings highlight a desirable ecological milieu for parasite survival and transmission in such territories, which implicates revisiting control programs and public health infrastructures in those areas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/trstmh/trz115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2335172163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/trstmh/trz115</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2335172163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-32bcce69d8ca7c84668d89ec042afa128dce731edf73b41acb4facd57ebbe0513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EoqUwsiKPLAE_4jzYqopHpUowwBzdODfUkMTFdqjKrycoPEamM5xP50gfIaecXXCWy8vgfGjXQ3xwrvbIlGdpFknF5D6ZMiZVlAsmJ-TI-xfGhOIqPyQTyXOexkJOycOy8-Z5HTw1XbB0be3r1rqWbhy-Q4OdxqGgc2_gigL1Ox-whWA0HXqDWwpdRVsMEEEHzc4bf0wOamg8nnznjDzdXD8u7qLV_e1yMV9FWookRFKUWmOSV5mGVGdxkmRVlqNmsYAauMgqjankWNWpLGMOuoxr0JVKsSyRKS5n5Hzc3Tj71qMPRWu8xqaBDm3vCyGl4qngiRzQaES1s947rIuNMy24XcFZ8SWxGCUWo8SBP_ue7ssWq1_6x9rft-03_2x9Aqgjf6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2335172163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insights into hookworm prevalence in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zibaei, Mohammad ; Nosrati, Mohammad Reza Chaechi ; Shadnoosh, Farnosh ; Houshmand, Elham ; Karami, Maryam Fasihi ; Rafsanjani, Mandana Khorsandi ; Majidiani, Hamidreza ; Ghaffarifar, Fatemeh ; Cortes, Hélder Carola Espiguinha ; Dalvand, Sahar ; Badri, Milad</creator><creatorcontrib>Zibaei, Mohammad ; Nosrati, Mohammad Reza Chaechi ; Shadnoosh, Farnosh ; Houshmand, Elham ; Karami, Maryam Fasihi ; Rafsanjani, Mandana Khorsandi ; Majidiani, Hamidreza ; Ghaffarifar, Fatemeh ; Cortes, Hélder Carola Espiguinha ; Dalvand, Sahar ; Badri, Milad</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Introduction
Hookworm infections are neglected tropical diseases of humans and animals worldwide. A meta-analysis and systematic review was designed to evaluate the prevalence of hookworm infection in animal and human hosts in Asia until July 2018.
Methods
The available online articles of five English databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were explored.
Results
The most parasitized carnivores were jackal (48%, CI: 4 to 91%), followed by dog (41%, CI: 29 to 53%), cat (26%, CI: 14 to 38%) and the red fox (19%, CI: 13 to 24%). The weighted prevalence of Ancylostoma braziliensis, A. caninum, A. ceylanicum, A. tubaeforme and Uncinaria stenocephala isolated from different canids were found to be 27% (CI: 21 to 33%), 23% (CI: 7.0 to 53%), 24% (CI: 12 to 35%), 44% (CI: 37 to 51%) and 37% (CI: 18 to 55%), respectively. In total, 98 records were obtained for human hookworms from 3209 760 examined individuals and the calculated weighted prevalence in this population was 19% (CI: 17 to 20%).
Conclusions
These findings highlight a desirable ecological milieu for parasite survival and transmission in such territories, which implicates revisiting control programs and public health infrastructures in those areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-9203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3503</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trz115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31917423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020-02, Vol.114 (3), p.141-154</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-32bcce69d8ca7c84668d89ec042afa128dce731edf73b41acb4facd57ebbe0513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-32bcce69d8ca7c84668d89ec042afa128dce731edf73b41acb4facd57ebbe0513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zibaei, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosrati, Mohammad Reza Chaechi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadnoosh, Farnosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houshmand, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karami, Maryam Fasihi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafsanjani, Mandana Khorsandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majidiani, Hamidreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaffarifar, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Hélder Carola Espiguinha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalvand, Sahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badri, Milad</creatorcontrib><title>Insights into hookworm prevalence in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene</title><addtitle>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg</addtitle><description>Abstract
Introduction
Hookworm infections are neglected tropical diseases of humans and animals worldwide. A meta-analysis and systematic review was designed to evaluate the prevalence of hookworm infection in animal and human hosts in Asia until July 2018.
Methods
The available online articles of five English databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were explored.
Results
The most parasitized carnivores were jackal (48%, CI: 4 to 91%), followed by dog (41%, CI: 29 to 53%), cat (26%, CI: 14 to 38%) and the red fox (19%, CI: 13 to 24%). The weighted prevalence of Ancylostoma braziliensis, A. caninum, A. ceylanicum, A. tubaeforme and Uncinaria stenocephala isolated from different canids were found to be 27% (CI: 21 to 33%), 23% (CI: 7.0 to 53%), 24% (CI: 12 to 35%), 44% (CI: 37 to 51%) and 37% (CI: 18 to 55%), respectively. In total, 98 records were obtained for human hookworms from 3209 760 examined individuals and the calculated weighted prevalence in this population was 19% (CI: 17 to 20%).
Conclusions
These findings highlight a desirable ecological milieu for parasite survival and transmission in such territories, which implicates revisiting control programs and public health infrastructures in those areas.</description><issn>0035-9203</issn><issn>1878-3503</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EoqUwsiKPLAE_4jzYqopHpUowwBzdODfUkMTFdqjKrycoPEamM5xP50gfIaecXXCWy8vgfGjXQ3xwrvbIlGdpFknF5D6ZMiZVlAsmJ-TI-xfGhOIqPyQTyXOexkJOycOy8-Z5HTw1XbB0be3r1rqWbhy-Q4OdxqGgc2_gigL1Ox-whWA0HXqDWwpdRVsMEEEHzc4bf0wOamg8nnznjDzdXD8u7qLV_e1yMV9FWookRFKUWmOSV5mGVGdxkmRVlqNmsYAauMgqjankWNWpLGMOuoxr0JVKsSyRKS5n5Hzc3Tj71qMPRWu8xqaBDm3vCyGl4qngiRzQaES1s947rIuNMy24XcFZ8SWxGCUWo8SBP_ue7ssWq1_6x9rft-03_2x9Aqgjf6Y</recordid><startdate>20200207</startdate><enddate>20200207</enddate><creator>Zibaei, Mohammad</creator><creator>Nosrati, Mohammad Reza Chaechi</creator><creator>Shadnoosh, Farnosh</creator><creator>Houshmand, Elham</creator><creator>Karami, Maryam Fasihi</creator><creator>Rafsanjani, Mandana Khorsandi</creator><creator>Majidiani, Hamidreza</creator><creator>Ghaffarifar, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Cortes, Hélder Carola Espiguinha</creator><creator>Dalvand, Sahar</creator><creator>Badri, Milad</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200207</creationdate><title>Insights into hookworm prevalence in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Zibaei, Mohammad ; Nosrati, Mohammad Reza Chaechi ; Shadnoosh, Farnosh ; Houshmand, Elham ; Karami, Maryam Fasihi ; Rafsanjani, Mandana Khorsandi ; Majidiani, Hamidreza ; Ghaffarifar, Fatemeh ; Cortes, Hélder Carola Espiguinha ; Dalvand, Sahar ; Badri, Milad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-32bcce69d8ca7c84668d89ec042afa128dce731edf73b41acb4facd57ebbe0513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zibaei, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosrati, Mohammad Reza Chaechi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadnoosh, Farnosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houshmand, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karami, Maryam Fasihi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafsanjani, Mandana Khorsandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majidiani, Hamidreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaffarifar, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Hélder Carola Espiguinha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalvand, Sahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badri, Milad</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zibaei, Mohammad</au><au>Nosrati, Mohammad Reza Chaechi</au><au>Shadnoosh, Farnosh</au><au>Houshmand, Elham</au><au>Karami, Maryam Fasihi</au><au>Rafsanjani, Mandana Khorsandi</au><au>Majidiani, Hamidreza</au><au>Ghaffarifar, Fatemeh</au><au>Cortes, Hélder Carola Espiguinha</au><au>Dalvand, Sahar</au><au>Badri, Milad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insights into hookworm prevalence in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg</addtitle><date>2020-02-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>141-154</pages><issn>0035-9203</issn><eissn>1878-3503</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Introduction
Hookworm infections are neglected tropical diseases of humans and animals worldwide. A meta-analysis and systematic review was designed to evaluate the prevalence of hookworm infection in animal and human hosts in Asia until July 2018.
Methods
The available online articles of five English databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were explored.
Results
The most parasitized carnivores were jackal (48%, CI: 4 to 91%), followed by dog (41%, CI: 29 to 53%), cat (26%, CI: 14 to 38%) and the red fox (19%, CI: 13 to 24%). The weighted prevalence of Ancylostoma braziliensis, A. caninum, A. ceylanicum, A. tubaeforme and Uncinaria stenocephala isolated from different canids were found to be 27% (CI: 21 to 33%), 23% (CI: 7.0 to 53%), 24% (CI: 12 to 35%), 44% (CI: 37 to 51%) and 37% (CI: 18 to 55%), respectively. In total, 98 records were obtained for human hookworms from 3209 760 examined individuals and the calculated weighted prevalence in this population was 19% (CI: 17 to 20%).
Conclusions
These findings highlight a desirable ecological milieu for parasite survival and transmission in such territories, which implicates revisiting control programs and public health infrastructures in those areas.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31917423</pmid><doi>10.1093/trstmh/trz115</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-9203 |
ispartof | Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020-02, Vol.114 (3), p.141-154 |
issn | 0035-9203 1878-3503 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2335172163 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Insights into hookworm prevalence in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insights%20into%20hookworm%20prevalence%20in%20Asia:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20Tropical%20Medicine%20and%20Hygiene&rft.au=Zibaei,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2020-02-07&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=141-154&rft.issn=0035-9203&rft.eissn=1878-3503&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/trstmh/trz115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2335172163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2335172163&rft_id=info:pmid/31917423&rft_oup_id=10.1093/trstmh/trz115&rfr_iscdi=true |