Professional care team burden scale: cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version
Introduction Care teams in nursing homes have to meet the expectations of the people they care for, their relatives and the institutions. This affects the quality of the care. An increased care burden may negatively affect the quality of work, lives and the health of formal caregivers. Objectives Th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of caring sciences 2020-12, Vol.34 (4), p.971-978 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 978 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 971 |
| container_title | Scandinavian journal of caring sciences |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Kalanlar, Bilge Kuru Alici, Nilgün |
| description | Introduction
Care teams in nursing homes have to meet the expectations of the people they care for, their relatives and the institutions. This affects the quality of the care. An increased care burden may negatively affect the quality of work, lives and the health of formal caregivers.
Objectives
This methodological cross‐sectional study was conducted to adapt the Professional Care Team Burden (PCTB) Scale, which was developed to assess the difficulties experienced by caregivers working in long‐term care, to Turkish and test its validity and reliability.
Material and method
The study was conducted with 100 caregivers working at a nursing home and rehabilitation centre. The Caregiver Information Form and the Professional Care Team Burden Scale were used to collect data. The language and content validity, construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale were tested, respectively.
Results
The factor analysis showed that the Professional Care Team Burden Scale could be used in two dimensions. When the test–retest was done, the reliability of the scale was found to be high (0.982). The construct validity of the scale showed that the three‐factor model did not acceptably fit the data, while the two‐dimensional model obtained by removing some of the variables from the model did fit the data (RMSEA = 0.106, GFI = 0.933, CFI = 0.916, IFI = 0.919, RFI = 0.778 and RMR = 0.078). The factor loadings for the construct validity of the scale demonstrated that the two‐factor model showed an acceptable fit.
Conclusions
The study found that the two‐factor Turkish version of the Professional Care Team Burden Scale met the validity and reliability criteria. The scale, which has an important place in the assessment of the formal caregivers’ burden, can be used with healthcare professionals providing care for older adults. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/scs.12805 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334697847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2463151749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-ee57191e7c52a90832a307d4022179a01d95a63f4a30094e3af11b1df96f9d153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9KxDAQxoMouv45-AIS8KKHaqZpmsabLP4DQUE9l2w6ZavttmZaZW8-gs_okxh31YPgXAaG33wzfB9juyCOINQxOTqCOBNqhY0g0RClGuJVNhJxJiMjIdtgm0SPQgilBKyzjTCSQoIZMbr1bYlEVTuzNXfWI-_RNnwy-AJnnJyt8YQ73xJ9vL27oe4HH0Bb2K63fdjidlbwjuZu2jbY-8rxzrcd-r5C4m3J-yny-8E_VTTlL-i_Dm2ztdLWhDvffYs9nJ_djy-j65uLq_HpdeQkSBUhKg0GUDsVWyMyGVspdJGIOAZtrIDCKJvKMgljYRKUtgSYQFGatDQFKLnFDpa64aPnAanPm4oc1rWdYTtQHkuZpEZniQ7o_h_0sR18sCRQSSpBgU5MoA6X1MIPj2Xe-aqxfp6DyL-SyEMS-SKJwO59Kw6TBotf8sf6ABwvgdeqxvn_Svnd-G4p-Qk6O5Pd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463151749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Professional care team burden scale: cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Kalanlar, Bilge ; Kuru Alici, Nilgün</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalanlar, Bilge ; Kuru Alici, Nilgün</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Care teams in nursing homes have to meet the expectations of the people they care for, their relatives and the institutions. This affects the quality of the care. An increased care burden may negatively affect the quality of work, lives and the health of formal caregivers.
Objectives
This methodological cross‐sectional study was conducted to adapt the Professional Care Team Burden (PCTB) Scale, which was developed to assess the difficulties experienced by caregivers working in long‐term care, to Turkish and test its validity and reliability.
Material and method
The study was conducted with 100 caregivers working at a nursing home and rehabilitation centre. The Caregiver Information Form and the Professional Care Team Burden Scale were used to collect data. The language and content validity, construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale were tested, respectively.
Results
The factor analysis showed that the Professional Care Team Burden Scale could be used in two dimensions. When the test–retest was done, the reliability of the scale was found to be high (0.982). The construct validity of the scale showed that the three‐factor model did not acceptably fit the data, while the two‐dimensional model obtained by removing some of the variables from the model did fit the data (RMSEA = 0.106, GFI = 0.933, CFI = 0.916, IFI = 0.919, RFI = 0.778 and RMR = 0.078). The factor loadings for the construct validity of the scale demonstrated that the two‐factor model showed an acceptable fit.
Conclusions
The study found that the two‐factor Turkish version of the Professional Care Team Burden Scale met the validity and reliability criteria. The scale, which has an important place in the assessment of the formal caregivers’ burden, can be used with healthcare professionals providing care for older adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0283-9318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/scs.12805</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31830319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sweden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>caregiver ; Caregiver burden ; Caregivers ; Construct validity ; Factor analysis ; Health care ; Home health care ; Medical personnel ; methodology ; Nursing ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; Professional Care Team Burden Scale ; Quantitative psychology ; Rehabilitation ; Relatives ; Reliability ; Teams ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2020-12, Vol.34 (4), p.971-978</ispartof><rights>2019 Nordic College of Caring Science</rights><rights>2019 Nordic College of Caring Science.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Nordic College of Caring Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-ee57191e7c52a90832a307d4022179a01d95a63f4a30094e3af11b1df96f9d153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5200-6821 ; 0000-0001-5475-6725</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fscs.12805$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fscs.12805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalanlar, Bilge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuru Alici, Nilgün</creatorcontrib><title>Professional care team burden scale: cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version</title><title>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</title><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><description>Introduction
Care teams in nursing homes have to meet the expectations of the people they care for, their relatives and the institutions. This affects the quality of the care. An increased care burden may negatively affect the quality of work, lives and the health of formal caregivers.
Objectives
This methodological cross‐sectional study was conducted to adapt the Professional Care Team Burden (PCTB) Scale, which was developed to assess the difficulties experienced by caregivers working in long‐term care, to Turkish and test its validity and reliability.
Material and method
The study was conducted with 100 caregivers working at a nursing home and rehabilitation centre. The Caregiver Information Form and the Professional Care Team Burden Scale were used to collect data. The language and content validity, construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale were tested, respectively.
Results
The factor analysis showed that the Professional Care Team Burden Scale could be used in two dimensions. When the test–retest was done, the reliability of the scale was found to be high (0.982). The construct validity of the scale showed that the three‐factor model did not acceptably fit the data, while the two‐dimensional model obtained by removing some of the variables from the model did fit the data (RMSEA = 0.106, GFI = 0.933, CFI = 0.916, IFI = 0.919, RFI = 0.778 and RMR = 0.078). The factor loadings for the construct validity of the scale demonstrated that the two‐factor model showed an acceptable fit.
Conclusions
The study found that the two‐factor Turkish version of the Professional Care Team Burden Scale met the validity and reliability criteria. The scale, which has an important place in the assessment of the formal caregivers’ burden, can be used with healthcare professionals providing care for older adults.</description><subject>caregiver</subject><subject>Caregiver burden</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Construct validity</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Home health care</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Professional Care Team Burden Scale</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Relatives</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0283-9318</issn><issn>1471-6712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9KxDAQxoMouv45-AIS8KKHaqZpmsabLP4DQUE9l2w6ZavttmZaZW8-gs_okxh31YPgXAaG33wzfB9juyCOINQxOTqCOBNqhY0g0RClGuJVNhJxJiMjIdtgm0SPQgilBKyzjTCSQoIZMbr1bYlEVTuzNXfWI-_RNnwy-AJnnJyt8YQ73xJ9vL27oe4HH0Bb2K63fdjidlbwjuZu2jbY-8rxzrcd-r5C4m3J-yny-8E_VTTlL-i_Dm2ztdLWhDvffYs9nJ_djy-j65uLq_HpdeQkSBUhKg0GUDsVWyMyGVspdJGIOAZtrIDCKJvKMgljYRKUtgSYQFGatDQFKLnFDpa64aPnAanPm4oc1rWdYTtQHkuZpEZniQ7o_h_0sR18sCRQSSpBgU5MoA6X1MIPj2Xe-aqxfp6DyL-SyEMS-SKJwO59Kw6TBotf8sf6ABwvgdeqxvn_Svnd-G4p-Qk6O5Pd</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Kalanlar, Bilge</creator><creator>Kuru Alici, Nilgün</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5200-6821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5475-6725</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Professional care team burden scale: cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version</title><author>Kalanlar, Bilge ; Kuru Alici, Nilgün</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-ee57191e7c52a90832a307d4022179a01d95a63f4a30094e3af11b1df96f9d153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>caregiver</topic><topic>Caregiver burden</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Construct validity</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Home health care</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Professional Care Team Burden Scale</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Relatives</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalanlar, Bilge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuru Alici, Nilgün</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalanlar, Bilge</au><au>Kuru Alici, Nilgün</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Professional care team burden scale: cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>971</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>971-978</pages><issn>0283-9318</issn><eissn>1471-6712</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Care teams in nursing homes have to meet the expectations of the people they care for, their relatives and the institutions. This affects the quality of the care. An increased care burden may negatively affect the quality of work, lives and the health of formal caregivers.
Objectives
This methodological cross‐sectional study was conducted to adapt the Professional Care Team Burden (PCTB) Scale, which was developed to assess the difficulties experienced by caregivers working in long‐term care, to Turkish and test its validity and reliability.
Material and method
The study was conducted with 100 caregivers working at a nursing home and rehabilitation centre. The Caregiver Information Form and the Professional Care Team Burden Scale were used to collect data. The language and content validity, construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale were tested, respectively.
Results
The factor analysis showed that the Professional Care Team Burden Scale could be used in two dimensions. When the test–retest was done, the reliability of the scale was found to be high (0.982). The construct validity of the scale showed that the three‐factor model did not acceptably fit the data, while the two‐dimensional model obtained by removing some of the variables from the model did fit the data (RMSEA = 0.106, GFI = 0.933, CFI = 0.916, IFI = 0.919, RFI = 0.778 and RMR = 0.078). The factor loadings for the construct validity of the scale demonstrated that the two‐factor model showed an acceptable fit.
Conclusions
The study found that the two‐factor Turkish version of the Professional Care Team Burden Scale met the validity and reliability criteria. The scale, which has an important place in the assessment of the formal caregivers’ burden, can be used with healthcare professionals providing care for older adults.</abstract><cop>Sweden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31830319</pmid><doi>10.1111/scs.12805</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5200-6821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5475-6725</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0283-9318 |
| ispartof | Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2020-12, Vol.34 (4), p.971-978 |
| issn | 0283-9318 1471-6712 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334697847 |
| source | Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | caregiver Caregiver burden Caregivers Construct validity Factor analysis Health care Home health care Medical personnel methodology Nursing Nursing homes Older people Professional Care Team Burden Scale Quantitative psychology Rehabilitation Relatives Reliability Teams Validation studies Validity |
| title | Professional care team burden scale: cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Professional%20care%20team%20burden%20scale:%20cross%E2%80%90cultural%20adaptation%20and%20psychometric%20properties%20of%20the%20Turkish%20version&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20caring%20sciences&rft.au=Kalanlar,%20Bilge&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=971&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=971-978&rft.issn=0283-9318&rft.eissn=1471-6712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/scs.12805&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2463151749%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463151749&rft_id=info:pmid/31830319&rfr_iscdi=true |