Re‐exposure to reinforcement in context a during treatment in context b reduces ABC renewal
Previous work from our laboratory showed that intermittently re‐exposing rats to reinforcement for lever pressing in a training (A) context, while eliminating lever pressing in a second (B) context, increased ABA renewal of lever pressing relative to rats that experienced only Context B during respo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2020-01, Vol.113 (1), p.141-152 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 152 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 141 |
| container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
| container_volume | 113 |
| creator | Craig, Andrew R. Sullivan, William E. Browning, Kaitlyn O. DeRosa, Nicole M. Roane, Henry S. |
| description | Previous work from our laboratory showed that intermittently re‐exposing rats to reinforcement for lever pressing in a training (A) context, while eliminating lever pressing in a second (B) context, increased ABA renewal of lever pressing relative to rats that experienced only Context B during response elimination. In the current study, we replicated these procedures while assessing renewal in the presence of a novel context (i.e., ABC renewal). Unlike the findings described above, renewal was reduced in the group that experienced re‐exposure to Context A during lever‐press elimination relative to rats that experienced only Context B. These findings suggest that alternating between contexts associated with reinforcement and extinction during treatment reduces the probability that organisms will respond in novel contexts. These outcomes may be the result of discrimination and/or generalization processes. Moreover, this training procedure may offer a potential mitigation strategy for ABC renewal. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jeab.569 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334696096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2342950162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-14e91748c53370a79f09f3338ea56641ae0648cfa3c8b169035dac5f3c85d2923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlbBJ5ABN26m5jLJTJZtqTcKguhSQiZzRqbMpSYztN35CD6jT2JKq0jBTXLC_-Xj8CN0TvCQYEyv56DTIRfyAPWJZEnIYkIOUd9HNOT-7KET5-Z-kCKmx6jHSMI4jWUfvT7B18cnrBaN6ywEbRNYKOq8sQYqqNugqAPT1C2s2kAHWWeL-i1oLeh2P039x6wz4ILReOLnGpa6PEVHuS4dnO3uAXq5mT5P7sLZ4-39ZDQLDYukDEkEksRRYjhjMdaxzLHMGWMJaC5ERDRg4dNcM5OkREjMeKYNz_2TZ1RSNkBXW-_CNu8duFZVhTNQlrqGpnOKMhYJKbAUHr3cQ-dNZ2u_naciKjkm4o_Q2MY5C7la2KLSdq0IVpvK1aZy5Sv36MVO2KUVZL_gT8ceCLfAsihh_a9IPUxH443wG6vfiig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2342950162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re‐exposure to reinforcement in context a during treatment in context b reduces ABC renewal</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Craig, Andrew R. ; Sullivan, William E. ; Browning, Kaitlyn O. ; DeRosa, Nicole M. ; Roane, Henry S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Craig, Andrew R. ; Sullivan, William E. ; Browning, Kaitlyn O. ; DeRosa, Nicole M. ; Roane, Henry S.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous work from our laboratory showed that intermittently re‐exposing rats to reinforcement for lever pressing in a training (A) context, while eliminating lever pressing in a second (B) context, increased ABA renewal of lever pressing relative to rats that experienced only Context B during response elimination. In the current study, we replicated these procedures while assessing renewal in the presence of a novel context (i.e., ABC renewal). Unlike the findings described above, renewal was reduced in the group that experienced re‐exposure to Context A during lever‐press elimination relative to rats that experienced only Context B. These findings suggest that alternating between contexts associated with reinforcement and extinction during treatment reduces the probability that organisms will respond in novel contexts. These outcomes may be the result of discrimination and/or generalization processes. Moreover, this training procedure may offer a potential mitigation strategy for ABC renewal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.569</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31835279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>extinction ; Extinction behavior ; operant behavior ; relapse ; relapse mitigation ; renewal ; Response elimination</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2020-01, Vol.113 (1), p.141-152</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>2019 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2020 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-14e91748c53370a79f09f3338ea56641ae0648cfa3c8b169035dac5f3c85d2923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-14e91748c53370a79f09f3338ea56641ae0648cfa3c8b169035dac5f3c85d2923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjeab.569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjeab.569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craig, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, Kaitlyn O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRosa, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roane, Henry S.</creatorcontrib><title>Re‐exposure to reinforcement in context a during treatment in context b reduces ABC renewal</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Previous work from our laboratory showed that intermittently re‐exposing rats to reinforcement for lever pressing in a training (A) context, while eliminating lever pressing in a second (B) context, increased ABA renewal of lever pressing relative to rats that experienced only Context B during response elimination. In the current study, we replicated these procedures while assessing renewal in the presence of a novel context (i.e., ABC renewal). Unlike the findings described above, renewal was reduced in the group that experienced re‐exposure to Context A during lever‐press elimination relative to rats that experienced only Context B. These findings suggest that alternating between contexts associated with reinforcement and extinction during treatment reduces the probability that organisms will respond in novel contexts. These outcomes may be the result of discrimination and/or generalization processes. Moreover, this training procedure may offer a potential mitigation strategy for ABC renewal.</description><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction behavior</subject><subject>operant behavior</subject><subject>relapse</subject><subject>relapse mitigation</subject><subject>renewal</subject><subject>Response elimination</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlbBJ5ABN26m5jLJTJZtqTcKguhSQiZzRqbMpSYztN35CD6jT2JKq0jBTXLC_-Xj8CN0TvCQYEyv56DTIRfyAPWJZEnIYkIOUd9HNOT-7KET5-Z-kCKmx6jHSMI4jWUfvT7B18cnrBaN6ywEbRNYKOq8sQYqqNugqAPT1C2s2kAHWWeL-i1oLeh2P039x6wz4ILReOLnGpa6PEVHuS4dnO3uAXq5mT5P7sLZ4-39ZDQLDYukDEkEksRRYjhjMdaxzLHMGWMJaC5ERDRg4dNcM5OkREjMeKYNz_2TZ1RSNkBXW-_CNu8duFZVhTNQlrqGpnOKMhYJKbAUHr3cQ-dNZ2u_naciKjkm4o_Q2MY5C7la2KLSdq0IVpvK1aZy5Sv36MVO2KUVZL_gT8ceCLfAsihh_a9IPUxH443wG6vfiig</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Craig, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Sullivan, William E.</creator><creator>Browning, Kaitlyn O.</creator><creator>DeRosa, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Roane, Henry S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Re‐exposure to reinforcement in context a during treatment in context b reduces ABC renewal</title><author>Craig, Andrew R. ; Sullivan, William E. ; Browning, Kaitlyn O. ; DeRosa, Nicole M. ; Roane, Henry S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-14e91748c53370a79f09f3338ea56641ae0648cfa3c8b169035dac5f3c85d2923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction behavior</topic><topic>operant behavior</topic><topic>relapse</topic><topic>relapse mitigation</topic><topic>renewal</topic><topic>Response elimination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craig, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, Kaitlyn O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRosa, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roane, Henry S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craig, Andrew R.</au><au>Sullivan, William E.</au><au>Browning, Kaitlyn O.</au><au>DeRosa, Nicole M.</au><au>Roane, Henry S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re‐exposure to reinforcement in context a during treatment in context b reduces ABC renewal</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>141-152</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><abstract>Previous work from our laboratory showed that intermittently re‐exposing rats to reinforcement for lever pressing in a training (A) context, while eliminating lever pressing in a second (B) context, increased ABA renewal of lever pressing relative to rats that experienced only Context B during response elimination. In the current study, we replicated these procedures while assessing renewal in the presence of a novel context (i.e., ABC renewal). Unlike the findings described above, renewal was reduced in the group that experienced re‐exposure to Context A during lever‐press elimination relative to rats that experienced only Context B. These findings suggest that alternating between contexts associated with reinforcement and extinction during treatment reduces the probability that organisms will respond in novel contexts. These outcomes may be the result of discrimination and/or generalization processes. Moreover, this training procedure may offer a potential mitigation strategy for ABC renewal.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31835279</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.569</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
| ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2020-01, Vol.113 (1), p.141-152 |
| issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334696096 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PubMed Central |
| subjects | extinction Extinction behavior operant behavior relapse relapse mitigation renewal Response elimination |
| title | Re‐exposure to reinforcement in context a during treatment in context b reduces ABC renewal |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re%E2%80%90exposure%20to%20reinforcement%20in%20context%20a%20during%20treatment%20in%20context%20b%20reduces%20ABC%20renewal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Craig,%20Andrew%20R.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=141-152&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2342950162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2342950162&rft_id=info:pmid/31835279&rfr_iscdi=true |