Comparison of Therapeutic Benefit of Bupivacaine HCl Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway versus Traditional Oral and Intravenous Pain Control after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), when combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, have been proven to reduce the length of stay (LOS) and improve quality outcomes. Nonopioid pain management is an essential component of this pathway, leading to a reduction in immobility, postoperative i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2019-12, Vol.85 (12), p.1363-1368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1368 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1363 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Damadi, Amir A. Lax, Elizabeth A. Smithson, Lauren Pearlman, Ralph D. |
description | Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), when combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, have been proven to reduce the length of stay (LOS) and improve quality outcomes. Nonopioid pain management is an essential component of this pathway, leading to a reduction in immobility, postoperative ileus, and an increase in patient satisfaction. TAP block variations have been studied in general and gynecologic surgery. This study evaluates the effectiveness of laparoscopic TAP blocks in conjunction with the benefit of an ERP. One hundred thirty-seven consecutive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted Colorectal Surgery patients received TAP blocks under laparoscopic guidance while under anesthesia, randomized to a placebo, bupivacaine TAP block, or bupivacaine TAP block with an ERP arm of the trial. Patient demographics, operative techniques, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using statistical analysis software. Our main objective was to determine short-term benefits of TAP blocks on reducing total narcotic consumption. Secondary objectives included effects of TAP blocks on time to ambulation, time to bowel function, and LOS. To isolate the effect of the TAP blocks, no efforts were made to control nursing or patient education in patients managed without an ERP. Of 137 patients, 14 were withdrawn. All cases were elective, with the main diagnosis colon cancer or dysplastic polyps (47.1%). The median age in each group was comparable (P = 0.12), with female majority in both groups (58.5%). Most procedures were segmental colon resections (74.7%). Thirty-one patients received a placebo, 41 bupivacaine TAP, and 51 bupivacaine TAP plus ERP. In terms of primary endpoints, the bupivacaine plus ERP arm used statistically significant less IV narcotics on postoperative day 1 and in total (P = 0.001, P = 0.008). All patients ambulated on average within the first 24 hours postoperatively, with the TAP plus ERP group approximately 0.5 days sooner (P = 0.001). The TAP plus ERP group also had a return of bowel function and LOS approximately 24 hours early (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001). This study shows that a laparoscopically placed bupivacaine TAP block when used as part of an ERP can reduce LOS, postoperative narcotics, time to ambulation and bowel function, and LOS. Defined pain regimens with auxiliary staff teaching can add to the improvement in quality outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and, with the addition of the TAP block, can add to patient satisfaction and |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313481908501230 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334269914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000313481908501230</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2334269914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-70de787c244c2d3eed12f4bedae81b22586b1330c00269a2f44e622cae10d7583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt9v0zAQxwMCsTJ444kHZImXIS3MP5Im4a0tg00aWjXKc-TYl9XDtYOdFJW_nstaQAKJF1u--3y_5ztdkrxk9C1jRXFGKRVMZCWraJlTxgV9mExYnudpVXLxKJmMQDoSR8nTGO_wmU1z9iQ5EqOEs2ry4MXCbzoZTPSO-Jas1hBkB0NvFJmDg9b0Y3g-dGYrlTQOyMXCklWQLm4hxCGSWaP9xjgTydJKzJ-sZss3ZG69-kokBmW4t5COnLu1dAo0uQHlUb3DZL_-LnfkYIW22vTGO2nJdcBDOk0uXR_kFpwfRjPjyMJjxGOy7SGQT1h6I63dIbiV0WwBAesDqB4NPg_hFgu9IzOyDD52GEXilNygM_76B-hT8t4PjYV0bg1WWwUj7bPkcStthOeH-zj58uF8tbhIr64_Xi5mV6kSBevTgmooykLxLFNcCwDNeJs1oCWUrOE8L6cNE4IqSvm0kpjLYMq5ksCoLvJSHCcne98u-G8DxL7emKjAjnPEdmsuRIbKimWIvv4LvfNDwEHdU1NBs7LKkeJ7SmGzMUBbdwGnE3Y1o_W4M_W_O4OiVwfrodmA_i35tSQInO2BKG_hT93_WP4EWUjMeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2336304895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Therapeutic Benefit of Bupivacaine HCl Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway versus Traditional Oral and Intravenous Pain Control after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Damadi, Amir A. ; Lax, Elizabeth A. ; Smithson, Lauren ; Pearlman, Ralph D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Damadi, Amir A. ; Lax, Elizabeth A. ; Smithson, Lauren ; Pearlman, Ralph D.</creatorcontrib><description>Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), when combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, have been proven to reduce the length of stay (LOS) and improve quality outcomes. Nonopioid pain management is an essential component of this pathway, leading to a reduction in immobility, postoperative ileus, and an increase in patient satisfaction. TAP block variations have been studied in general and gynecologic surgery. This study evaluates the effectiveness of laparoscopic TAP blocks in conjunction with the benefit of an ERP. One hundred thirty-seven consecutive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted Colorectal Surgery patients received TAP blocks under laparoscopic guidance while under anesthesia, randomized to a placebo, bupivacaine TAP block, or bupivacaine TAP block with an ERP arm of the trial. Patient demographics, operative techniques, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using statistical analysis software. Our main objective was to determine short-term benefits of TAP blocks on reducing total narcotic consumption. Secondary objectives included effects of TAP blocks on time to ambulation, time to bowel function, and LOS. To isolate the effect of the TAP blocks, no efforts were made to control nursing or patient education in patients managed without an ERP. Of 137 patients, 14 were withdrawn. All cases were elective, with the main diagnosis colon cancer or dysplastic polyps (47.1%). The median age in each group was comparable (P = 0.12), with female majority in both groups (58.5%). Most procedures were segmental colon resections (74.7%). Thirty-one patients received a placebo, 41 bupivacaine TAP, and 51 bupivacaine TAP plus ERP. In terms of primary endpoints, the bupivacaine plus ERP arm used statistically significant less IV narcotics on postoperative day 1 and in total (P = 0.001, P = 0.008). All patients ambulated on average within the first 24 hours postoperatively, with the TAP plus ERP group approximately 0.5 days sooner (P = 0.001). The TAP plus ERP group also had a return of bowel function and LOS approximately 24 hours early (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001). This study shows that a laparoscopically placed bupivacaine TAP block when used as part of an ERP can reduce LOS, postoperative narcotics, time to ambulation and bowel function, and LOS. Defined pain regimens with auxiliary staff teaching can add to the improvement in quality outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and, with the addition of the TAP block, can add to patient satisfaction and lower hospital costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481908501230</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31908219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Abdominal Muscles - innervation ; Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Local ; Bupivacaine ; Colon ; Colon cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal surgery ; Colorectal Surgery - methods ; Demographics ; Demography ; Double-Blind Method ; Double-blind studies ; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ; Event-related potentials ; Female ; Hospital costs ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Intestine ; Intravenous administration ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Narcotics ; Narcotics - administration & dosage ; Narcotics - therapeutic use ; Nerve Block - methods ; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ; Nursing ; Pain ; Pain management ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Polyps ; Randomization ; Recovery (Medical) ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2019-12, Vol.85 (12), p.1363-1368</ispartof><rights>2019 Southeastern Surgical Congress</rights><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-70de787c244c2d3eed12f4bedae81b22586b1330c00269a2f44e622cae10d7583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-70de787c244c2d3eed12f4bedae81b22586b1330c00269a2f44e622cae10d7583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/000313481908501230$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000313481908501230$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Damadi, Amir A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lax, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smithson, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Ralph D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Therapeutic Benefit of Bupivacaine HCl Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway versus Traditional Oral and Intravenous Pain Control after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), when combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, have been proven to reduce the length of stay (LOS) and improve quality outcomes. Nonopioid pain management is an essential component of this pathway, leading to a reduction in immobility, postoperative ileus, and an increase in patient satisfaction. TAP block variations have been studied in general and gynecologic surgery. This study evaluates the effectiveness of laparoscopic TAP blocks in conjunction with the benefit of an ERP. One hundred thirty-seven consecutive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted Colorectal Surgery patients received TAP blocks under laparoscopic guidance while under anesthesia, randomized to a placebo, bupivacaine TAP block, or bupivacaine TAP block with an ERP arm of the trial. Patient demographics, operative techniques, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using statistical analysis software. Our main objective was to determine short-term benefits of TAP blocks on reducing total narcotic consumption. Secondary objectives included effects of TAP blocks on time to ambulation, time to bowel function, and LOS. To isolate the effect of the TAP blocks, no efforts were made to control nursing or patient education in patients managed without an ERP. Of 137 patients, 14 were withdrawn. All cases were elective, with the main diagnosis colon cancer or dysplastic polyps (47.1%). The median age in each group was comparable (P = 0.12), with female majority in both groups (58.5%). Most procedures were segmental colon resections (74.7%). Thirty-one patients received a placebo, 41 bupivacaine TAP, and 51 bupivacaine TAP plus ERP. In terms of primary endpoints, the bupivacaine plus ERP arm used statistically significant less IV narcotics on postoperative day 1 and in total (P = 0.001, P = 0.008). All patients ambulated on average within the first 24 hours postoperatively, with the TAP plus ERP group approximately 0.5 days sooner (P = 0.001). The TAP plus ERP group also had a return of bowel function and LOS approximately 24 hours early (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001). This study shows that a laparoscopically placed bupivacaine TAP block when used as part of an ERP can reduce LOS, postoperative narcotics, time to ambulation and bowel function, and LOS. Defined pain regimens with auxiliary staff teaching can add to the improvement in quality outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and, with the addition of the TAP block, can add to patient satisfaction and lower hospital costs.</description><subject>Abdominal Muscles - innervation</subject><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Narcotics - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Narcotics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polyps</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt9v0zAQxwMCsTJ444kHZImXIS3MP5Im4a0tg00aWjXKc-TYl9XDtYOdFJW_nstaQAKJF1u--3y_5ztdkrxk9C1jRXFGKRVMZCWraJlTxgV9mExYnudpVXLxKJmMQDoSR8nTGO_wmU1z9iQ5EqOEs2ry4MXCbzoZTPSO-Jas1hBkB0NvFJmDg9b0Y3g-dGYrlTQOyMXCklWQLm4hxCGSWaP9xjgTydJKzJ-sZss3ZG69-kokBmW4t5COnLu1dAo0uQHlUb3DZL_-LnfkYIW22vTGO2nJdcBDOk0uXR_kFpwfRjPjyMJjxGOy7SGQT1h6I63dIbiV0WwBAesDqB4NPg_hFgu9IzOyDD52GEXilNygM_76B-hT8t4PjYV0bg1WWwUj7bPkcStthOeH-zj58uF8tbhIr64_Xi5mV6kSBevTgmooykLxLFNcCwDNeJs1oCWUrOE8L6cNE4IqSvm0kpjLYMq5ksCoLvJSHCcne98u-G8DxL7emKjAjnPEdmsuRIbKimWIvv4LvfNDwEHdU1NBs7LKkeJ7SmGzMUBbdwGnE3Y1o_W4M_W_O4OiVwfrodmA_i35tSQInO2BKG_hT93_WP4EWUjMeQ</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Damadi, Amir A.</creator><creator>Lax, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Smithson, Lauren</creator><creator>Pearlman, Ralph D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Therapeutic Benefit of Bupivacaine HCl Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway versus Traditional Oral and Intravenous Pain Control after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial</title><author>Damadi, Amir A. ; Lax, Elizabeth A. ; Smithson, Lauren ; Pearlman, Ralph D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-70de787c244c2d3eed12f4bedae81b22586b1330c00269a2f44e622cae10d7583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Muscles - innervation</topic><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Narcotics - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Narcotics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polyps</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Damadi, Amir A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lax, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smithson, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Ralph D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Damadi, Amir A.</au><au>Lax, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Smithson, Lauren</au><au>Pearlman, Ralph D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Therapeutic Benefit of Bupivacaine HCl Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway versus Traditional Oral and Intravenous Pain Control after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1363</spage><epage>1368</epage><pages>1363-1368</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), when combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, have been proven to reduce the length of stay (LOS) and improve quality outcomes. Nonopioid pain management is an essential component of this pathway, leading to a reduction in immobility, postoperative ileus, and an increase in patient satisfaction. TAP block variations have been studied in general and gynecologic surgery. This study evaluates the effectiveness of laparoscopic TAP blocks in conjunction with the benefit of an ERP. One hundred thirty-seven consecutive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted Colorectal Surgery patients received TAP blocks under laparoscopic guidance while under anesthesia, randomized to a placebo, bupivacaine TAP block, or bupivacaine TAP block with an ERP arm of the trial. Patient demographics, operative techniques, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using statistical analysis software. Our main objective was to determine short-term benefits of TAP blocks on reducing total narcotic consumption. Secondary objectives included effects of TAP blocks on time to ambulation, time to bowel function, and LOS. To isolate the effect of the TAP blocks, no efforts were made to control nursing or patient education in patients managed without an ERP. Of 137 patients, 14 were withdrawn. All cases were elective, with the main diagnosis colon cancer or dysplastic polyps (47.1%). The median age in each group was comparable (P = 0.12), with female majority in both groups (58.5%). Most procedures were segmental colon resections (74.7%). Thirty-one patients received a placebo, 41 bupivacaine TAP, and 51 bupivacaine TAP plus ERP. In terms of primary endpoints, the bupivacaine plus ERP arm used statistically significant less IV narcotics on postoperative day 1 and in total (P = 0.001, P = 0.008). All patients ambulated on average within the first 24 hours postoperatively, with the TAP plus ERP group approximately 0.5 days sooner (P = 0.001). The TAP plus ERP group also had a return of bowel function and LOS approximately 24 hours early (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001). This study shows that a laparoscopically placed bupivacaine TAP block when used as part of an ERP can reduce LOS, postoperative narcotics, time to ambulation and bowel function, and LOS. Defined pain regimens with auxiliary staff teaching can add to the improvement in quality outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and, with the addition of the TAP block, can add to patient satisfaction and lower hospital costs.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31908219</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481908501230</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2019-12, Vol.85 (12), p.1363-1368 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334269914 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
subjects | Abdominal Muscles - innervation Administration, Oral Adult Analgesics Anesthesia Anesthetics, Local Bupivacaine Colon Colon cancer Colorectal cancer Colorectal surgery Colorectal Surgery - methods Demographics Demography Double-Blind Method Double-blind studies Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Event-related potentials Female Hospital costs Humans Infusions, Intravenous Intestine Intravenous administration Laparoscopy Male Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods Narcotics Narcotics - administration & dosage Narcotics - therapeutic use Nerve Block - methods Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Nursing Pain Pain management Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control Patient satisfaction Patients Polyps Randomization Recovery (Medical) Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Statistical analysis Surgery |
title | Comparison of Therapeutic Benefit of Bupivacaine HCl Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway versus Traditional Oral and Intravenous Pain Control after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A50%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Therapeutic%20Benefit%20of%20Bupivacaine%20HCl%20Transversus%20Abdominis%20Plane%20(TAP)%20Block%20as%20Part%20of%20an%20Enhanced%20Recovery%20Pathway%20versus%20Traditional%20Oral%20and%20Intravenous%20Pain%20Control%20after%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Colorectal%20Surgery:%20A%20Prospective,%20Randomized,%20Double-Blind%20Trial&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Damadi,%20Amir%20A.&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1363&rft.epage=1368&rft.pages=1363-1368&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481908501230&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334269914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2336304895&rft_id=info:pmid/31908219&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000313481908501230&rfr_iscdi=true |