The GAMMA concept (gastrointestinal activity manipulation to modulate appetite) preliminary proofs of the concept of local vibrational gastric mechanical stimulation
Background Mechanical stimulation of the stretch receptors of the gastric wall can simulate the presence of indigested food leading to reduced food intake. We report the preliminary experimental results of an innovative concept of localized mechanical gastric stimulation. Methods In a first survival...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2020-12, Vol.34 (12), p.5346-5353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 5346 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Legner, Andras Kong, Seong-Ho Liu, Yu-Yin Shabat, Galyna Halvax, Peter Saadi, Alend Worreth, Marc Marescaux, Jacques Swanström, Lee Diana, Michele |
description | Background
Mechanical stimulation of the stretch receptors of the gastric wall can simulate the presence of indigested food leading to reduced food intake. We report the preliminary experimental results of an innovative concept of localized mechanical gastric stimulation.
Methods
In a first survival study, a biocompatible bulking agent was injected either in the greater curvature (
n
= 8) or in the cardia wall (
n
= 8) of Wistar rats. Six animals served as sham. Changes of bulking volume, leptin levels and weight gain were monitored for 3 months. In a second acute study, a micro-motor (
n
= 10; MM) or a size-paired inactive device (
n
= 10; ID) where applied on the cardia, while 10 additional rats served as sham. Serum ghrelin and leptin were measured at baseline and every hour (T0–T1–T2–T3), during 3 h. In a third study, 24 implants of various shapes and sizes were introduced into the gastric subserosa of 6 Yucatan pigs. Monthly CT scans and gastroscopies were done for 6 months.
Results
Weight gain in the CW group was significant lower after 2 weeks and 3 months when compared to the shame and GC (
p
= 0.01/
p
= 0.01 and
p
= 0.048/
p
= 0.038 respectively). Significant lower increase of leptin production occurred at 2 weeks (
p
= 0.01) and 3 months (
p
= 0.008) in CW vs. SG. In the MM group
s
ignificant reduction of the serum ghrelin was seen after 3 h. Leptin was significantly increased in both MM and ID groups after 3 h, while it was significantly reduced in sham rats. The global device retention was 43.5%. Devices with lower profile and with a biocompatible coating remained more likely in place without complications.
Conclusions
Gastric mechanical stimulation induced a reduced weight gain and hormonal changes. Low profile and coated devices inserted within the gastric wall are more likely to be integrated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-019-07325-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334226777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471552626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9df28edab109c57fb5155824a7d2bf006e89e04d8ec3580a6759517f86a6a98f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EoreFF2CBLLFpFwH_xHa8vKqgILViU9aW49itqyQOtlOpD8R7MvenILFg5bHmm3M8Pgi9o-QjJUR9KoS0sm0I1Q1RnIlGvEAb2nLWMEa7l2hDNCcNU7o9QaelPBDgNRWv0Qmnmigp6Qb9ur33-Gp7c7PFLs3OLxWf39lSc4pz9aXG2Y7YuhofY33Ck53jso62xjTjmvCUht3NY7ssvsbqL_CS_RgnGMtPUKcUCk4BV3B51ofrmBzIPsY-76Wg3ntGhyfv7sFk1wbz6ej1Br0Kdiz-7fE8Qz--fL69_Npcf7_6drm9bhxXojZ6CKzzg-0p0U6o0AsqRMdaqwbWB0Kk77Qn7dB5x0VHrFRCC6pCJ620ugv8DJ0fdOHlP1dY30yxOD-OdvZpLYZx3jImlVKAfvgHfUhrhlWAahX4MskkUOxAuZxKyT6YJccJ_sZQYnYhmkOIBkI0-xCNgKH3R-m1n_zwZ-Q5NQD4ASjQmu98_uv9H9nfpe6q4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471552626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The GAMMA concept (gastrointestinal activity manipulation to modulate appetite) preliminary proofs of the concept of local vibrational gastric mechanical stimulation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Legner, Andras ; Kong, Seong-Ho ; Liu, Yu-Yin ; Shabat, Galyna ; Halvax, Peter ; Saadi, Alend ; Worreth, Marc ; Marescaux, Jacques ; Swanström, Lee ; Diana, Michele</creator><creatorcontrib>Legner, Andras ; Kong, Seong-Ho ; Liu, Yu-Yin ; Shabat, Galyna ; Halvax, Peter ; Saadi, Alend ; Worreth, Marc ; Marescaux, Jacques ; Swanström, Lee ; Diana, Michele</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Mechanical stimulation of the stretch receptors of the gastric wall can simulate the presence of indigested food leading to reduced food intake. We report the preliminary experimental results of an innovative concept of localized mechanical gastric stimulation.
Methods
In a first survival study, a biocompatible bulking agent was injected either in the greater curvature (
n
= 8) or in the cardia wall (
n
= 8) of Wistar rats. Six animals served as sham. Changes of bulking volume, leptin levels and weight gain were monitored for 3 months. In a second acute study, a micro-motor (
n
= 10; MM) or a size-paired inactive device (
n
= 10; ID) where applied on the cardia, while 10 additional rats served as sham. Serum ghrelin and leptin were measured at baseline and every hour (T0–T1–T2–T3), during 3 h. In a third study, 24 implants of various shapes and sizes were introduced into the gastric subserosa of 6 Yucatan pigs. Monthly CT scans and gastroscopies were done for 6 months.
Results
Weight gain in the CW group was significant lower after 2 weeks and 3 months when compared to the shame and GC (
p
= 0.01/
p
= 0.01 and
p
= 0.048/
p
= 0.038 respectively). Significant lower increase of leptin production occurred at 2 weeks (
p
= 0.01) and 3 months (
p
= 0.008) in CW vs. SG. In the MM group
s
ignificant reduction of the serum ghrelin was seen after 3 h. Leptin was significantly increased in both MM and ID groups after 3 h, while it was significantly reduced in sham rats. The global device retention was 43.5%. Devices with lower profile and with a biocompatible coating remained more likely in place without complications.
Conclusions
Gastric mechanical stimulation induced a reduced weight gain and hormonal changes. Low profile and coated devices inserted within the gastric wall are more likely to be integrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07325-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31907661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Appetite ; Endoscopy ; Food ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hormones ; Hypotheses ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Motility ; Obesity ; Peptides ; Physiology ; Proctology ; Rodents ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2020-12, Vol.34 (12), p.5346-5353</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9df28edab109c57fb5155824a7d2bf006e89e04d8ec3580a6759517f86a6a98f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9df28edab109c57fb5155824a7d2bf006e89e04d8ec3580a6759517f86a6a98f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1390-8486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-019-07325-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-019-07325-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Legner, Andras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Seong-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu-Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabat, Galyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvax, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadi, Alend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worreth, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marescaux, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanström, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Michele</creatorcontrib><title>The GAMMA concept (gastrointestinal activity manipulation to modulate appetite) preliminary proofs of the concept of local vibrational gastric mechanical stimulation</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Mechanical stimulation of the stretch receptors of the gastric wall can simulate the presence of indigested food leading to reduced food intake. We report the preliminary experimental results of an innovative concept of localized mechanical gastric stimulation.
Methods
In a first survival study, a biocompatible bulking agent was injected either in the greater curvature (
n
= 8) or in the cardia wall (
n
= 8) of Wistar rats. Six animals served as sham. Changes of bulking volume, leptin levels and weight gain were monitored for 3 months. In a second acute study, a micro-motor (
n
= 10; MM) or a size-paired inactive device (
n
= 10; ID) where applied on the cardia, while 10 additional rats served as sham. Serum ghrelin and leptin were measured at baseline and every hour (T0–T1–T2–T3), during 3 h. In a third study, 24 implants of various shapes and sizes were introduced into the gastric subserosa of 6 Yucatan pigs. Monthly CT scans and gastroscopies were done for 6 months.
Results
Weight gain in the CW group was significant lower after 2 weeks and 3 months when compared to the shame and GC (
p
= 0.01/
p
= 0.01 and
p
= 0.048/
p
= 0.038 respectively). Significant lower increase of leptin production occurred at 2 weeks (
p
= 0.01) and 3 months (
p
= 0.008) in CW vs. SG. In the MM group
s
ignificant reduction of the serum ghrelin was seen after 3 h. Leptin was significantly increased in both MM and ID groups after 3 h, while it was significantly reduced in sham rats. The global device retention was 43.5%. Devices with lower profile and with a biocompatible coating remained more likely in place without complications.
Conclusions
Gastric mechanical stimulation induced a reduced weight gain and hormonal changes. Low profile and coated devices inserted within the gastric wall are more likely to be integrated.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Appetite</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hormones</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EoreFF2CBLLFpFwH_xHa8vKqgILViU9aW49itqyQOtlOpD8R7MvenILFg5bHmm3M8Pgi9o-QjJUR9KoS0sm0I1Q1RnIlGvEAb2nLWMEa7l2hDNCcNU7o9QaelPBDgNRWv0Qmnmigp6Qb9ur33-Gp7c7PFLs3OLxWf39lSc4pz9aXG2Y7YuhofY33Ck53jso62xjTjmvCUht3NY7ssvsbqL_CS_RgnGMtPUKcUCk4BV3B51ofrmBzIPsY-76Wg3ntGhyfv7sFk1wbz6ej1Br0Kdiz-7fE8Qz--fL69_Npcf7_6drm9bhxXojZ6CKzzg-0p0U6o0AsqRMdaqwbWB0Kk77Qn7dB5x0VHrFRCC6pCJ620ugv8DJ0fdOHlP1dY30yxOD-OdvZpLYZx3jImlVKAfvgHfUhrhlWAahX4MskkUOxAuZxKyT6YJccJ_sZQYnYhmkOIBkI0-xCNgKH3R-m1n_zwZ-Q5NQD4ASjQmu98_uv9H9nfpe6q4A</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Legner, Andras</creator><creator>Kong, Seong-Ho</creator><creator>Liu, Yu-Yin</creator><creator>Shabat, Galyna</creator><creator>Halvax, Peter</creator><creator>Saadi, Alend</creator><creator>Worreth, Marc</creator><creator>Marescaux, Jacques</creator><creator>Swanström, Lee</creator><creator>Diana, Michele</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1390-8486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>The GAMMA concept (gastrointestinal activity manipulation to modulate appetite) preliminary proofs of the concept of local vibrational gastric mechanical stimulation</title><author>Legner, Andras ; Kong, Seong-Ho ; Liu, Yu-Yin ; Shabat, Galyna ; Halvax, Peter ; Saadi, Alend ; Worreth, Marc ; Marescaux, Jacques ; Swanström, Lee ; Diana, Michele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9df28edab109c57fb5155824a7d2bf006e89e04d8ec3580a6759517f86a6a98f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Appetite</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hormones</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Legner, Andras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Seong-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu-Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabat, Galyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvax, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadi, Alend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worreth, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marescaux, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanström, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Michele</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Legner, Andras</au><au>Kong, Seong-Ho</au><au>Liu, Yu-Yin</au><au>Shabat, Galyna</au><au>Halvax, Peter</au><au>Saadi, Alend</au><au>Worreth, Marc</au><au>Marescaux, Jacques</au><au>Swanström, Lee</au><au>Diana, Michele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The GAMMA concept (gastrointestinal activity manipulation to modulate appetite) preliminary proofs of the concept of local vibrational gastric mechanical stimulation</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5346</spage><epage>5353</epage><pages>5346-5353</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Mechanical stimulation of the stretch receptors of the gastric wall can simulate the presence of indigested food leading to reduced food intake. We report the preliminary experimental results of an innovative concept of localized mechanical gastric stimulation.
Methods
In a first survival study, a biocompatible bulking agent was injected either in the greater curvature (
n
= 8) or in the cardia wall (
n
= 8) of Wistar rats. Six animals served as sham. Changes of bulking volume, leptin levels and weight gain were monitored for 3 months. In a second acute study, a micro-motor (
n
= 10; MM) or a size-paired inactive device (
n
= 10; ID) where applied on the cardia, while 10 additional rats served as sham. Serum ghrelin and leptin were measured at baseline and every hour (T0–T1–T2–T3), during 3 h. In a third study, 24 implants of various shapes and sizes were introduced into the gastric subserosa of 6 Yucatan pigs. Monthly CT scans and gastroscopies were done for 6 months.
Results
Weight gain in the CW group was significant lower after 2 weeks and 3 months when compared to the shame and GC (
p
= 0.01/
p
= 0.01 and
p
= 0.048/
p
= 0.038 respectively). Significant lower increase of leptin production occurred at 2 weeks (
p
= 0.01) and 3 months (
p
= 0.008) in CW vs. SG. In the MM group
s
ignificant reduction of the serum ghrelin was seen after 3 h. Leptin was significantly increased in both MM and ID groups after 3 h, while it was significantly reduced in sham rats. The global device retention was 43.5%. Devices with lower profile and with a biocompatible coating remained more likely in place without complications.
Conclusions
Gastric mechanical stimulation induced a reduced weight gain and hormonal changes. Low profile and coated devices inserted within the gastric wall are more likely to be integrated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31907661</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-019-07325-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1390-8486</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2020-12, Vol.34 (12), p.5346-5353 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334226777 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Appetite Endoscopy Food Gastroenterology Gastrointestinal surgery Gynecology Hepatology Hormones Hypotheses Medicine Medicine & Public Health Motility Obesity Peptides Physiology Proctology Rodents Surgery |
title | The GAMMA concept (gastrointestinal activity manipulation to modulate appetite) preliminary proofs of the concept of local vibrational gastric mechanical stimulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T13%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20GAMMA%20concept%20(gastrointestinal%20activity%20manipulation%20to%20modulate%20appetite)%20preliminary%20proofs%20of%20the%20concept%20of%20local%20vibrational%20gastric%20mechanical%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Legner,%20Andras&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5346&rft.epage=5353&rft.pages=5346-5353&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-019-07325-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2471552626%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471552626&rft_id=info:pmid/31907661&rfr_iscdi=true |