XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma
Objectives To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study include...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International ophthalmology 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1085-1093 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1093 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1085 |
container_title | International ophthalmology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Olgun, Ali Aktas, Zeynep Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel |
description | Objectives
To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
Methods
The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study included 114 eyes undergoing XEN implantation and 107 eyes undergoing GATT for treatment of OAG. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination consisting of best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, biomicroscopy, fundoscopy and gonioscopy was performed, and then, clinical findings, complications and number of antiglaucomatous medications were noted at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month postoperative visits. Surgical success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% ≥ IOP reduction from baseline with (qualified success) or without (complete success) further medication, and without any further IOP-lowering surgery.
Results
The mean ages were 65.8 ± 10.6 and 59.1 ± 14.3 in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.001). In XEN group, the percentage of IOP reduction and need of medication were significantly more improved than those in GATT group. The complete surgical success rates were 34.2% and 50.5% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.039), with a success rate of 41.1% in total. Qualified surgical success rates were 97.4% and 89.7% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.025), with a success rate of 93.7% in total. Transient hyphema, the most observed postoperative complication in both groups, cleared in a few days.
Conclusions
Both MIGS have good efficacy and safety outcomes in lowering IOP and need of medication in patients with OAG. XEN Gel Stent implantation may be preferred in patients with lower IOP values targeted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334225299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334225299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-eea2d90d10cb43c5e7c153487cbec22cd3fbe67a58a15f63fa5311c92287cb303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxa0KVBbaL8ChssSlFxf_WcfrY4W2UAmVC0i9WV5nkgY5cepJQPvt8bLQShw4WJbHv3lPM4-QU8G_Cc7NOQpurGRc2HKkEezxA1kIbRSTleIHZMFFpZk2XByRY8R7zrk1tvpIjpSw3FTWLMjwe_2LthBp14_RDxN9gIwz0jYNXcKQxi3ziB1OUNMp-wHj3HeDj7vHBsIc05T6LW1SptMfKFXwUw9FJzU0jTAwP7QRaBv9HFLvP5HDxkeEzy_3Cbn7sb69uGLXN5c_L75fs6CMnhiAl7XlteBhs1RBgwlCq-XKhOIpZahVs4HKeL3yQjeVarxWQgQr5Q5RXJ2Qr3vdMae_M-Dk-g4DxDIipBmdVGoppZbWFvTsDXqf5lxG3FG20mZVCVkouadCTogZGjfmrvd56wR3uzTcPg1X0nDPabjH0vTlRXre9FD_a3ldfwHUHsDyNbSQ_3u_I_sEz92Xwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2396578612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Olgun, Ali ; Aktas, Zeynep ; Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creator><creatorcontrib>Olgun, Ali ; Aktas, Zeynep ; Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
Methods
The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study included 114 eyes undergoing XEN implantation and 107 eyes undergoing GATT for treatment of OAG. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination consisting of best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, biomicroscopy, fundoscopy and gonioscopy was performed, and then, clinical findings, complications and number of antiglaucomatous medications were noted at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month postoperative visits. Surgical success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% ≥ IOP reduction from baseline with (qualified success) or without (complete success) further medication, and without any further IOP-lowering surgery.
Results
The mean ages were 65.8 ± 10.6 and 59.1 ± 14.3 in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.001). In XEN group, the percentage of IOP reduction and need of medication were significantly more improved than those in GATT group. The complete surgical success rates were 34.2% and 50.5% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.039), with a success rate of 41.1% in total. Qualified surgical success rates were 97.4% and 89.7% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.025), with a success rate of 93.7% in total. Transient hyphema, the most observed postoperative complication in both groups, cleared in a few days.
Conclusions
Both MIGS have good efficacy and safety outcomes in lowering IOP and need of medication in patients with OAG. XEN Gel Stent implantation may be preferred in patients with lower IOP values targeted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31907697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Complications ; Eye (anatomy) ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gels ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery ; Gonioscopy - methods ; Humans ; Implantation ; Implants ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Prostheses and Implants ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Surgery ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Surgical implants ; Surgical outcomes ; Trabeculectomy - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1085-1093</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-eea2d90d10cb43c5e7c153487cbec22cd3fbe67a58a15f63fa5311c92287cb303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-eea2d90d10cb43c5e7c153487cbec22cd3fbe67a58a15f63fa5311c92287cb303</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9945-793X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olgun, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creatorcontrib><title>XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
Methods
The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study included 114 eyes undergoing XEN implantation and 107 eyes undergoing GATT for treatment of OAG. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination consisting of best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, biomicroscopy, fundoscopy and gonioscopy was performed, and then, clinical findings, complications and number of antiglaucomatous medications were noted at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month postoperative visits. Surgical success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% ≥ IOP reduction from baseline with (qualified success) or without (complete success) further medication, and without any further IOP-lowering surgery.
Results
The mean ages were 65.8 ± 10.6 and 59.1 ± 14.3 in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.001). In XEN group, the percentage of IOP reduction and need of medication were significantly more improved than those in GATT group. The complete surgical success rates were 34.2% and 50.5% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.039), with a success rate of 41.1% in total. Qualified surgical success rates were 97.4% and 89.7% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.025), with a success rate of 93.7% in total. Transient hyphema, the most observed postoperative complication in both groups, cleared in a few days.
Conclusions
Both MIGS have good efficacy and safety outcomes in lowering IOP and need of medication in patients with OAG. XEN Gel Stent implantation may be preferred in patients with lower IOP values targeted.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Eye (anatomy)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery</subject><subject>Gonioscopy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Trabeculectomy - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxa0KVBbaL8ChssSlFxf_WcfrY4W2UAmVC0i9WV5nkgY5cepJQPvt8bLQShw4WJbHv3lPM4-QU8G_Cc7NOQpurGRc2HKkEezxA1kIbRSTleIHZMFFpZk2XByRY8R7zrk1tvpIjpSw3FTWLMjwe_2LthBp14_RDxN9gIwz0jYNXcKQxi3ziB1OUNMp-wHj3HeDj7vHBsIc05T6LW1SptMfKFXwUw9FJzU0jTAwP7QRaBv9HFLvP5HDxkeEzy_3Cbn7sb69uGLXN5c_L75fs6CMnhiAl7XlteBhs1RBgwlCq-XKhOIpZahVs4HKeL3yQjeVarxWQgQr5Q5RXJ2Qr3vdMae_M-Dk-g4DxDIipBmdVGoppZbWFvTsDXqf5lxG3FG20mZVCVkouadCTogZGjfmrvd56wR3uzTcPg1X0nDPabjH0vTlRXre9FD_a3ldfwHUHsDyNbSQ_3u_I_sEz92Xwg</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Olgun, Ali</creator><creator>Aktas, Zeynep</creator><creator>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-793X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma</title><author>Olgun, Ali ; Aktas, Zeynep ; Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-eea2d90d10cb43c5e7c153487cbec22cd3fbe67a58a15f63fa5311c92287cb303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Eye (anatomy)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery</topic><topic>Gonioscopy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Trabeculectomy - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olgun, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olgun, Ali</au><au>Aktas, Zeynep</au><au>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1085-1093</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
Methods
The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study included 114 eyes undergoing XEN implantation and 107 eyes undergoing GATT for treatment of OAG. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination consisting of best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, biomicroscopy, fundoscopy and gonioscopy was performed, and then, clinical findings, complications and number of antiglaucomatous medications were noted at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month postoperative visits. Surgical success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% ≥ IOP reduction from baseline with (qualified success) or without (complete success) further medication, and without any further IOP-lowering surgery.
Results
The mean ages were 65.8 ± 10.6 and 59.1 ± 14.3 in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.001). In XEN group, the percentage of IOP reduction and need of medication were significantly more improved than those in GATT group. The complete surgical success rates were 34.2% and 50.5% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.039), with a success rate of 41.1% in total. Qualified surgical success rates were 97.4% and 89.7% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively (
p
= 0.025), with a success rate of 93.7% in total. Transient hyphema, the most observed postoperative complication in both groups, cleared in a few days.
Conclusions
Both MIGS have good efficacy and safety outcomes in lowering IOP and need of medication in patients with OAG. XEN Gel Stent implantation may be preferred in patients with lower IOP values targeted.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>31907697</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-793X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-5701 |
ispartof | International ophthalmology, 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1085-1093 |
issn | 0165-5701 1573-2630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334225299 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acuity Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Complications Eye (anatomy) Female Follow-Up Studies Gels Glaucoma Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery Gonioscopy - methods Humans Implantation Implants Intraocular Pressure - physiology Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Ophthalmology Original Paper Patients Prostheses and Implants Retrospective Studies Stents Surgery Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods Surgical implants Surgical outcomes Trabeculectomy - methods Treatment Outcome Visual Acuity |
title | XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A55%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=XEN%20gel%20implant%20versus%20gonioscopy-assisted%20transluminal%20trabeculotomy%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20open-angle%20glaucoma&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Olgun,%20Ali&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1085-1093&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334225299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2396578612&rft_id=info:pmid/31907697&rfr_iscdi=true |