XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma

Objectives To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study include...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International ophthalmology 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1085-1093
Hauptverfasser: Olgun, Ali, Aktas, Zeynep, Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1093
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1085
container_title International ophthalmology
container_volume 40
creator Olgun, Ali
Aktas, Zeynep
Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel
description Objectives To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study included 114 eyes undergoing XEN implantation and 107 eyes undergoing GATT for treatment of OAG. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination consisting of best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, biomicroscopy, fundoscopy and gonioscopy was performed, and then, clinical findings, complications and number of antiglaucomatous medications were noted at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month postoperative visits. Surgical success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% ≥ IOP reduction from baseline with (qualified success) or without (complete success) further medication, and without any further IOP-lowering surgery. Results The mean ages were 65.8 ± 10.6 and 59.1 ± 14.3 in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.001). In XEN group, the percentage of IOP reduction and need of medication were significantly more improved than those in GATT group. The complete surgical success rates were 34.2% and 50.5% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.039), with a success rate of 41.1% in total. Qualified surgical success rates were 97.4% and 89.7% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.025), with a success rate of 93.7% in total. Transient hyphema, the most observed postoperative complication in both groups, cleared in a few days. Conclusions Both MIGS have good efficacy and safety outcomes in lowering IOP and need of medication in patients with OAG. XEN Gel Stent implantation may be preferred in patients with lower IOP values targeted.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334225299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334225299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-eea2d90d10cb43c5e7c153487cbec22cd3fbe67a58a15f63fa5311c92287cb303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxa0KVBbaL8ChssSlFxf_WcfrY4W2UAmVC0i9WV5nkgY5cepJQPvt8bLQShw4WJbHv3lPM4-QU8G_Cc7NOQpurGRc2HKkEezxA1kIbRSTleIHZMFFpZk2XByRY8R7zrk1tvpIjpSw3FTWLMjwe_2LthBp14_RDxN9gIwz0jYNXcKQxi3ziB1OUNMp-wHj3HeDj7vHBsIc05T6LW1SptMfKFXwUw9FJzU0jTAwP7QRaBv9HFLvP5HDxkeEzy_3Cbn7sb69uGLXN5c_L75fs6CMnhiAl7XlteBhs1RBgwlCq-XKhOIpZahVs4HKeL3yQjeVarxWQgQr5Q5RXJ2Qr3vdMae_M-Dk-g4DxDIipBmdVGoppZbWFvTsDXqf5lxG3FG20mZVCVkouadCTogZGjfmrvd56wR3uzTcPg1X0nDPabjH0vTlRXre9FD_a3ldfwHUHsDyNbSQ_3u_I_sEz92Xwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2396578612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Olgun, Ali ; Aktas, Zeynep ; Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creator><creatorcontrib>Olgun, Ali ; Aktas, Zeynep ; Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study included 114 eyes undergoing XEN implantation and 107 eyes undergoing GATT for treatment of OAG. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination consisting of best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, biomicroscopy, fundoscopy and gonioscopy was performed, and then, clinical findings, complications and number of antiglaucomatous medications were noted at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month postoperative visits. Surgical success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% ≥ IOP reduction from baseline with (qualified success) or without (complete success) further medication, and without any further IOP-lowering surgery. Results The mean ages were 65.8 ± 10.6 and 59.1 ± 14.3 in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.001). In XEN group, the percentage of IOP reduction and need of medication were significantly more improved than those in GATT group. The complete surgical success rates were 34.2% and 50.5% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.039), with a success rate of 41.1% in total. Qualified surgical success rates were 97.4% and 89.7% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.025), with a success rate of 93.7% in total. Transient hyphema, the most observed postoperative complication in both groups, cleared in a few days. Conclusions Both MIGS have good efficacy and safety outcomes in lowering IOP and need of medication in patients with OAG. XEN Gel Stent implantation may be preferred in patients with lower IOP values targeted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31907697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Complications ; Eye (anatomy) ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gels ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery ; Gonioscopy - methods ; Humans ; Implantation ; Implants ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Prostheses and Implants ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Surgery ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Surgical implants ; Surgical outcomes ; Trabeculectomy - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1085-1093</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-eea2d90d10cb43c5e7c153487cbec22cd3fbe67a58a15f63fa5311c92287cb303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-eea2d90d10cb43c5e7c153487cbec22cd3fbe67a58a15f63fa5311c92287cb303</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9945-793X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olgun, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creatorcontrib><title>XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Objectives To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study included 114 eyes undergoing XEN implantation and 107 eyes undergoing GATT for treatment of OAG. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination consisting of best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, biomicroscopy, fundoscopy and gonioscopy was performed, and then, clinical findings, complications and number of antiglaucomatous medications were noted at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month postoperative visits. Surgical success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% ≥ IOP reduction from baseline with (qualified success) or without (complete success) further medication, and without any further IOP-lowering surgery. Results The mean ages were 65.8 ± 10.6 and 59.1 ± 14.3 in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.001). In XEN group, the percentage of IOP reduction and need of medication were significantly more improved than those in GATT group. The complete surgical success rates were 34.2% and 50.5% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.039), with a success rate of 41.1% in total. Qualified surgical success rates were 97.4% and 89.7% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.025), with a success rate of 93.7% in total. Transient hyphema, the most observed postoperative complication in both groups, cleared in a few days. Conclusions Both MIGS have good efficacy and safety outcomes in lowering IOP and need of medication in patients with OAG. XEN Gel Stent implantation may be preferred in patients with lower IOP values targeted.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Eye (anatomy)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery</subject><subject>Gonioscopy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Trabeculectomy - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxa0KVBbaL8ChssSlFxf_WcfrY4W2UAmVC0i9WV5nkgY5cepJQPvt8bLQShw4WJbHv3lPM4-QU8G_Cc7NOQpurGRc2HKkEezxA1kIbRSTleIHZMFFpZk2XByRY8R7zrk1tvpIjpSw3FTWLMjwe_2LthBp14_RDxN9gIwz0jYNXcKQxi3ziB1OUNMp-wHj3HeDj7vHBsIc05T6LW1SptMfKFXwUw9FJzU0jTAwP7QRaBv9HFLvP5HDxkeEzy_3Cbn7sb69uGLXN5c_L75fs6CMnhiAl7XlteBhs1RBgwlCq-XKhOIpZahVs4HKeL3yQjeVarxWQgQr5Q5RXJ2Qr3vdMae_M-Dk-g4DxDIipBmdVGoppZbWFvTsDXqf5lxG3FG20mZVCVkouadCTogZGjfmrvd56wR3uzTcPg1X0nDPabjH0vTlRXre9FD_a3ldfwHUHsDyNbSQ_3u_I_sEz92Xwg</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Olgun, Ali</creator><creator>Aktas, Zeynep</creator><creator>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-793X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma</title><author>Olgun, Ali ; Aktas, Zeynep ; Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-eea2d90d10cb43c5e7c153487cbec22cd3fbe67a58a15f63fa5311c92287cb303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Eye (anatomy)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery</topic><topic>Gonioscopy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Trabeculectomy - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olgun, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olgun, Ali</au><au>Aktas, Zeynep</au><au>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1085-1093</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Objectives To compare successes and complications of XEN GEL Stent implantation and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods The multicentre, non-randomized, comparative, interventional, retrospective chart review study included 114 eyes undergoing XEN implantation and 107 eyes undergoing GATT for treatment of OAG. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination consisting of best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, biomicroscopy, fundoscopy and gonioscopy was performed, and then, clinical findings, complications and number of antiglaucomatous medications were noted at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month postoperative visits. Surgical success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% ≥ IOP reduction from baseline with (qualified success) or without (complete success) further medication, and without any further IOP-lowering surgery. Results The mean ages were 65.8 ± 10.6 and 59.1 ± 14.3 in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.001). In XEN group, the percentage of IOP reduction and need of medication were significantly more improved than those in GATT group. The complete surgical success rates were 34.2% and 50.5% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.039), with a success rate of 41.1% in total. Qualified surgical success rates were 97.4% and 89.7% in XEN and GATT groups, respectively ( p  = 0.025), with a success rate of 93.7% in total. Transient hyphema, the most observed postoperative complication in both groups, cleared in a few days. Conclusions Both MIGS have good efficacy and safety outcomes in lowering IOP and need of medication in patients with OAG. XEN Gel Stent implantation may be preferred in patients with lower IOP values targeted.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>31907697</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-793X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5701
ispartof International ophthalmology, 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1085-1093
issn 0165-5701
1573-2630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334225299
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acuity
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Complications
Eye (anatomy)
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gels
Glaucoma
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery
Gonioscopy - methods
Humans
Implantation
Implants
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Ophthalmology
Original Paper
Patients
Prostheses and Implants
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Surgery
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Surgical implants
Surgical outcomes
Trabeculectomy - methods
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
title XEN gel implant versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A55%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=XEN%20gel%20implant%20versus%20gonioscopy-assisted%20transluminal%20trabeculotomy%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20open-angle%20glaucoma&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Olgun,%20Ali&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1085-1093&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-019-01271-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334225299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2396578612&rft_id=info:pmid/31907697&rfr_iscdi=true