Family, Firms, and Fertility: A Study of Social Interaction Effects
Research has indicated that fertility spreads through social networks and attributed this phenomenon to social interaction effects. It remains unclear, however, whether the findings of previous studies reflect the direct influence of network partners or contextual and selection factors, such as shar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Demography 2020-02, Vol.57 (1), p.243-266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 243 |
container_title | Demography |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Buyukkececi, Zafer Leopold, Thomas van Gaalen, Ruben Engelhardt, Henriette |
description | Research has indicated that fertility spreads through social networks and attributed this phenomenon to social interaction effects. It remains unclear, however, whether the findings of previous studies reflect the direct influence of network partners or contextual and selection factors, such as shared environment and common background characteristics. The present study uses instrumental variables to improve the identification of social interaction effects on fertility. Using data from the System of social statistical data sets (SSD) of Statistics Netherlands, we identify two networks—the network of colleagues at the workplace and the network of siblings in the family—to examine the influence of network partners on individual fertility decisions. Discretetime event-history models with random effects provide evidence for social interaction effects, showing that colleagues’ and siblings’ fertility have direct consequences for an individual’s fertility. Moreover, colleague effects are concentrated in female-female interactions, and women are more strongly influenced by their siblings, regardless of siblings’ gender. These results are the first to demonstrate spillover effects across network boundaries, suggesting that fertility effects accumulate through social ties not only within but also across different domains of interaction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13524-019-00841-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334215765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48681409</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48681409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e93a5b0149ace5bf4e3514048dc469e3bfd93a623149186ac17bddb375a6ebe13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTLyAqAy8eFn3TN2maowyrwsCLnkPaptLRPzPpDv32RjsnePCUQ37Pk_AQcs7glgHIO89QRJwCUxQg4YwOB2TKBCKVUsEhmQYEFFHChJx4vwYAxUV0TCbIFAQjp-QiNU1VD4t5WrnGL-amLeapdX1VV_1wSo5KU3t7tjtn5C19eF0-0dXL4_PyfkVzLnlPrUIjMmBcmdyKrOQWBePAkyLnsbKYlUUQcYRBsCQ2OZNZUWQohYltZhnOyM3Yu3Hdx9b6XjeVz21dm9Z2W68jRB4xIWMR6PUfuu62rg2_CypWMkKFMqhoVLnrvHe21BtXNcYNmoH-2k6P2-mwnf7eTg8hdLWr3maNLfaRn7ECwBH4cNW-W_f79r-1l2Nq7fvO7Vt5EidhJIWfwHiAxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369723937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family, Firms, and Fertility: A Study of Social Interaction Effects</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Buyukkececi, Zafer ; Leopold, Thomas ; van Gaalen, Ruben ; Engelhardt, Henriette</creator><creatorcontrib>Buyukkececi, Zafer ; Leopold, Thomas ; van Gaalen, Ruben ; Engelhardt, Henriette</creatorcontrib><description>Research has indicated that fertility spreads through social networks and attributed this phenomenon to social interaction effects. It remains unclear, however, whether the findings of previous studies reflect the direct influence of network partners or contextual and selection factors, such as shared environment and common background characteristics. The present study uses instrumental variables to improve the identification of social interaction effects on fertility. Using data from the System of social statistical data sets (SSD) of Statistics Netherlands, we identify two networks—the network of colleagues at the workplace and the network of siblings in the family—to examine the influence of network partners on individual fertility decisions. Discretetime event-history models with random effects provide evidence for social interaction effects, showing that colleagues’ and siblings’ fertility have direct consequences for an individual’s fertility. Moreover, colleague effects are concentrated in female-female interactions, and women are more strongly influenced by their siblings, regardless of siblings’ gender. These results are the first to demonstrate spillover effects across network boundaries, suggesting that fertility effects accumulate through social ties not only within but also across different domains of interaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0070-3370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-7790</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13524-019-00841-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31907797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Duke University Press</publisher><subject>Colleagues ; Demography ; Family research ; Fertility ; FERTILITY AND FERTILITY REGULATION ; Geography ; Medicine/Public Health ; Population Economics ; Random effects ; Siblings ; Social factors ; Social interaction ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Women ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Demography, 2020-02, Vol.57 (1), p.243-266</ispartof><rights>Population Association of America 2020</rights><rights>Demography is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e93a5b0149ace5bf4e3514048dc469e3bfd93a623149186ac17bddb375a6ebe13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e93a5b0149ace5bf4e3514048dc469e3bfd93a623149186ac17bddb375a6ebe13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48681409$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48681409$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907797$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buyukkececi, Zafer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leopold, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gaalen, Ruben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Henriette</creatorcontrib><title>Family, Firms, and Fertility: A Study of Social Interaction Effects</title><title>Demography</title><addtitle>Demography</addtitle><addtitle>Demography</addtitle><description>Research has indicated that fertility spreads through social networks and attributed this phenomenon to social interaction effects. It remains unclear, however, whether the findings of previous studies reflect the direct influence of network partners or contextual and selection factors, such as shared environment and common background characteristics. The present study uses instrumental variables to improve the identification of social interaction effects on fertility. Using data from the System of social statistical data sets (SSD) of Statistics Netherlands, we identify two networks—the network of colleagues at the workplace and the network of siblings in the family—to examine the influence of network partners on individual fertility decisions. Discretetime event-history models with random effects provide evidence for social interaction effects, showing that colleagues’ and siblings’ fertility have direct consequences for an individual’s fertility. Moreover, colleague effects are concentrated in female-female interactions, and women are more strongly influenced by their siblings, regardless of siblings’ gender. These results are the first to demonstrate spillover effects across network boundaries, suggesting that fertility effects accumulate through social ties not only within but also across different domains of interaction.</description><subject>Colleagues</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Family research</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>FERTILITY AND FERTILITY REGULATION</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Medicine/Public Health</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Random effects</subject><subject>Siblings</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0070-3370</issn><issn>1533-7790</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTLyAqAy8eFn3TN2maowyrwsCLnkPaptLRPzPpDv32RjsnePCUQ37Pk_AQcs7glgHIO89QRJwCUxQg4YwOB2TKBCKVUsEhmQYEFFHChJx4vwYAxUV0TCbIFAQjp-QiNU1VD4t5WrnGL-amLeapdX1VV_1wSo5KU3t7tjtn5C19eF0-0dXL4_PyfkVzLnlPrUIjMmBcmdyKrOQWBePAkyLnsbKYlUUQcYRBsCQ2OZNZUWQohYltZhnOyM3Yu3Hdx9b6XjeVz21dm9Z2W68jRB4xIWMR6PUfuu62rg2_CypWMkKFMqhoVLnrvHe21BtXNcYNmoH-2k6P2-mwnf7eTg8hdLWr3maNLfaRn7ECwBH4cNW-W_f79r-1l2Nq7fvO7Vt5EidhJIWfwHiAxA</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Buyukkececi, Zafer</creator><creator>Leopold, Thomas</creator><creator>van Gaalen, Ruben</creator><creator>Engelhardt, Henriette</creator><general>Duke University Press</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Duke University Press, NC & IL</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Family, Firms, and Fertility</title><author>Buyukkececi, Zafer ; Leopold, Thomas ; van Gaalen, Ruben ; Engelhardt, Henriette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e93a5b0149ace5bf4e3514048dc469e3bfd93a623149186ac17bddb375a6ebe13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Colleagues</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Family research</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>FERTILITY AND FERTILITY REGULATION</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Random effects</topic><topic>Siblings</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buyukkececi, Zafer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leopold, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gaalen, Ruben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Henriette</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Demography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buyukkececi, Zafer</au><au>Leopold, Thomas</au><au>van Gaalen, Ruben</au><au>Engelhardt, Henriette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family, Firms, and Fertility: A Study of Social Interaction Effects</atitle><jtitle>Demography</jtitle><stitle>Demography</stitle><addtitle>Demography</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>243-266</pages><issn>0070-3370</issn><eissn>1533-7790</eissn><abstract>Research has indicated that fertility spreads through social networks and attributed this phenomenon to social interaction effects. It remains unclear, however, whether the findings of previous studies reflect the direct influence of network partners or contextual and selection factors, such as shared environment and common background characteristics. The present study uses instrumental variables to improve the identification of social interaction effects on fertility. Using data from the System of social statistical data sets (SSD) of Statistics Netherlands, we identify two networks—the network of colleagues at the workplace and the network of siblings in the family—to examine the influence of network partners on individual fertility decisions. Discretetime event-history models with random effects provide evidence for social interaction effects, showing that colleagues’ and siblings’ fertility have direct consequences for an individual’s fertility. Moreover, colleague effects are concentrated in female-female interactions, and women are more strongly influenced by their siblings, regardless of siblings’ gender. These results are the first to demonstrate spillover effects across network boundaries, suggesting that fertility effects accumulate through social ties not only within but also across different domains of interaction.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Duke University Press</pub><pmid>31907797</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13524-019-00841-y</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0070-3370 |
ispartof | Demography, 2020-02, Vol.57 (1), p.243-266 |
issn | 0070-3370 1533-7790 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2334215765 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Colleagues Demography Family research Fertility FERTILITY AND FERTILITY REGULATION Geography Medicine/Public Health Population Economics Random effects Siblings Social factors Social interaction Social networks Social organization Social Sciences Sociology Women Workplaces |
title | Family, Firms, and Fertility: A Study of Social Interaction Effects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family,%20Firms,%20and%20Fertility:%20A%20Study%20of%20Social%20Interaction%20Effects&rft.jtitle=Demography&rft.au=Buyukkececi,%20Zafer&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=243-266&rft.issn=0070-3370&rft.eissn=1533-7790&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13524-019-00841-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48681409%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369723937&rft_id=info:pmid/31907797&rft_jstor_id=48681409&rfr_iscdi=true |