Discovery and Validation of Prediction Algorithms for Psychosis in Youths at Clinical High Risk

In the past 2 to 3 decades, clinicians have used the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigm to better understand factors that contribute to the onset of psychotic disorders. While this paradigm is useful to identify individuals at risk, the CHR-P criteria are not sufficient to predict out...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 2020-08, Vol.5 (8), p.738-747
Hauptverfasser: Worthington, Michelle A., Cao, Hengyi, Cannon, Tyrone D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 747
container_issue 8
container_start_page 738
container_title Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging
container_volume 5
creator Worthington, Michelle A.
Cao, Hengyi
Cannon, Tyrone D.
description In the past 2 to 3 decades, clinicians have used the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigm to better understand factors that contribute to the onset of psychotic disorders. While this paradigm is useful to identify individuals at risk, the CHR-P criteria are not sufficient to predict outcomes from the CHR-P population. Because approximately 25% of the CHR-P population will ultimately convert to psychosis, more precise methods of prediction are needed to account for heterogeneity in both risk factors and outcomes in the CHR-P population. To this end, several groups in recent years have used data-driven approaches to refine predictive algorithms to predict both conversion to psychosis and functional outcomes. These models have generally used either clinical and behavioral data, including demographics and measures of symptom severity, neurocognitive functioning, and social functioning, or neuroimaging data, including structural and functional measures, to predict conversion to psychosis in CHR-P samples. This review focuses on the empirical models that have been derived within each of these lines of research and evaluates the performance and methodology of these models. This review also serves to inform best practices for data-driven approaches and directions moving forward to improve our prediction of psychotic disorders and associated outcomes. Because sample size is still the most critical consideration in the current models, we urge that algorithms to predict conversion be conducted using multisite data in order to obtain the power necessary to conclusively determine predictive accuracy without overfitting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333928903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2451902219302708</els_id><sourcerecordid>2333928903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f1654c9fa17129b98ae9234a53427e68864be2cd5909ff4aec83fc770fcbedb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPAjEUhRujEYP8ARemSzdgHzPDNHFD8IEJicSoiaum07mF4jDFdoaEf28RZOnqvs45yf0QuqJkQAnNbpeDYh30gBEq4mJASHaCLliS0r4gnJwee8Y6qBfCkpDoIoQLeo46nMZDmpMLJO9t0G4DfotVXeIPVdlSNdbV2Bk881Ba_TuNqrnztlmsAjbO41nY6oULNmBb40_XNouAVYPHla2tVhWe2PkCv9rwdYnOjKoC9A61i94fH97Gk_705el5PJr2NU-zpm9oliZaGEWHlIlC5AoE44lKecKGkOV5lhTAdJkKIoxJFOicGz0cEqMLKAvOu-hmn7v27ruF0MhVfAyqStXg2iAZ51ywPLKJUraXau9C8GDk2tuV8ltJidyxlUu5Yyt3bHe7yDaarg_5bbGC8mj5IxkFd3sBxC83FrwM2kKtI0EPupGls__l_wCDKIrC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333928903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discovery and Validation of Prediction Algorithms for Psychosis in Youths at Clinical High Risk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Worthington, Michelle A. ; Cao, Hengyi ; Cannon, Tyrone D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Michelle A. ; Cao, Hengyi ; Cannon, Tyrone D.</creatorcontrib><description>In the past 2 to 3 decades, clinicians have used the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigm to better understand factors that contribute to the onset of psychotic disorders. While this paradigm is useful to identify individuals at risk, the CHR-P criteria are not sufficient to predict outcomes from the CHR-P population. Because approximately 25% of the CHR-P population will ultimately convert to psychosis, more precise methods of prediction are needed to account for heterogeneity in both risk factors and outcomes in the CHR-P population. To this end, several groups in recent years have used data-driven approaches to refine predictive algorithms to predict both conversion to psychosis and functional outcomes. These models have generally used either clinical and behavioral data, including demographics and measures of symptom severity, neurocognitive functioning, and social functioning, or neuroimaging data, including structural and functional measures, to predict conversion to psychosis in CHR-P samples. This review focuses on the empirical models that have been derived within each of these lines of research and evaluates the performance and methodology of these models. This review also serves to inform best practices for data-driven approaches and directions moving forward to improve our prediction of psychotic disorders and associated outcomes. Because sample size is still the most critical consideration in the current models, we urge that algorithms to predict conversion be conducted using multisite data in order to obtain the power necessary to conclusively determine predictive accuracy without overfitting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2451-9022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2451-9030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31902580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Algorithms ; Clinical high risk ; Humans ; Machine learning ; Neuroimaging ; Predictive models ; Psychosis ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Risk Factors ; Risk prediction</subject><ispartof>Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2020-08, Vol.5 (8), p.738-747</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f1654c9fa17129b98ae9234a53427e68864be2cd5909ff4aec83fc770fcbedb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f1654c9fa17129b98ae9234a53427e68864be2cd5909ff4aec83fc770fcbedb33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Michelle A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Hengyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannon, Tyrone D.</creatorcontrib><title>Discovery and Validation of Prediction Algorithms for Psychosis in Youths at Clinical High Risk</title><title>Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging</title><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging</addtitle><description>In the past 2 to 3 decades, clinicians have used the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigm to better understand factors that contribute to the onset of psychotic disorders. While this paradigm is useful to identify individuals at risk, the CHR-P criteria are not sufficient to predict outcomes from the CHR-P population. Because approximately 25% of the CHR-P population will ultimately convert to psychosis, more precise methods of prediction are needed to account for heterogeneity in both risk factors and outcomes in the CHR-P population. To this end, several groups in recent years have used data-driven approaches to refine predictive algorithms to predict both conversion to psychosis and functional outcomes. These models have generally used either clinical and behavioral data, including demographics and measures of symptom severity, neurocognitive functioning, and social functioning, or neuroimaging data, including structural and functional measures, to predict conversion to psychosis in CHR-P samples. This review focuses on the empirical models that have been derived within each of these lines of research and evaluates the performance and methodology of these models. This review also serves to inform best practices for data-driven approaches and directions moving forward to improve our prediction of psychotic disorders and associated outcomes. Because sample size is still the most critical consideration in the current models, we urge that algorithms to predict conversion be conducted using multisite data in order to obtain the power necessary to conclusively determine predictive accuracy without overfitting.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Clinical high risk</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Predictive models</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk prediction</subject><issn>2451-9022</issn><issn>2451-9030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPAjEUhRujEYP8ARemSzdgHzPDNHFD8IEJicSoiaum07mF4jDFdoaEf28RZOnqvs45yf0QuqJkQAnNbpeDYh30gBEq4mJASHaCLliS0r4gnJwee8Y6qBfCkpDoIoQLeo46nMZDmpMLJO9t0G4DfotVXeIPVdlSNdbV2Bk881Ba_TuNqrnztlmsAjbO41nY6oULNmBb40_XNouAVYPHla2tVhWe2PkCv9rwdYnOjKoC9A61i94fH97Gk_705el5PJr2NU-zpm9oliZaGEWHlIlC5AoE44lKecKGkOV5lhTAdJkKIoxJFOicGz0cEqMLKAvOu-hmn7v27ruF0MhVfAyqStXg2iAZ51ywPLKJUraXau9C8GDk2tuV8ltJidyxlUu5Yyt3bHe7yDaarg_5bbGC8mj5IxkFd3sBxC83FrwM2kKtI0EPupGls__l_wCDKIrC</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Worthington, Michelle A.</creator><creator>Cao, Hengyi</creator><creator>Cannon, Tyrone D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Discovery and Validation of Prediction Algorithms for Psychosis in Youths at Clinical High Risk</title><author>Worthington, Michelle A. ; Cao, Hengyi ; Cannon, Tyrone D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f1654c9fa17129b98ae9234a53427e68864be2cd5909ff4aec83fc770fcbedb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Clinical high risk</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Predictive models</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk prediction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Michelle A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Hengyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannon, Tyrone D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worthington, Michelle A.</au><au>Cao, Hengyi</au><au>Cannon, Tyrone D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discovery and Validation of Prediction Algorithms for Psychosis in Youths at Clinical High Risk</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>747</epage><pages>738-747</pages><issn>2451-9022</issn><eissn>2451-9030</eissn><abstract>In the past 2 to 3 decades, clinicians have used the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigm to better understand factors that contribute to the onset of psychotic disorders. While this paradigm is useful to identify individuals at risk, the CHR-P criteria are not sufficient to predict outcomes from the CHR-P population. Because approximately 25% of the CHR-P population will ultimately convert to psychosis, more precise methods of prediction are needed to account for heterogeneity in both risk factors and outcomes in the CHR-P population. To this end, several groups in recent years have used data-driven approaches to refine predictive algorithms to predict both conversion to psychosis and functional outcomes. These models have generally used either clinical and behavioral data, including demographics and measures of symptom severity, neurocognitive functioning, and social functioning, or neuroimaging data, including structural and functional measures, to predict conversion to psychosis in CHR-P samples. This review focuses on the empirical models that have been derived within each of these lines of research and evaluates the performance and methodology of these models. This review also serves to inform best practices for data-driven approaches and directions moving forward to improve our prediction of psychotic disorders and associated outcomes. Because sample size is still the most critical consideration in the current models, we urge that algorithms to predict conversion be conducted using multisite data in order to obtain the power necessary to conclusively determine predictive accuracy without overfitting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31902580</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2451-9022
ispartof Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2020-08, Vol.5 (8), p.738-747
issn 2451-9022
2451-9030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333928903
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Algorithms
Clinical high risk
Humans
Machine learning
Neuroimaging
Predictive models
Psychosis
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis
Risk Factors
Risk prediction
title Discovery and Validation of Prediction Algorithms for Psychosis in Youths at Clinical High Risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discovery%20and%20Validation%20of%20Prediction%20Algorithms%20for%20Psychosis%20in%20Youths%20at%20Clinical%20High%20Risk&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychiatry%20:%20cognitive%20neuroscience%20and%20neuroimaging&rft.au=Worthington,%20Michelle%20A.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=747&rft.pages=738-747&rft.issn=2451-9022&rft.eissn=2451-9030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2333928903%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333928903&rft_id=info:pmid/31902580&rft_els_id=S2451902219302708&rfr_iscdi=true