Three‐dimensional‐printed intercalary prosthesis for the reconstruction of large bone defect after joint‐preserving tumor resection
Background Joint‐preserving intercalary tumor resection can result in better proprioception and a more normal joint function after reconstruction. However, most reported reconstruction techniques are usually associated with frequent complications. Therefore, the approach of reconstruction following...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2020-03, Vol.121 (3), p.570-577 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 577 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 570 |
container_title | Journal of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Liu, Weijian Shao, Zengwu Rai, Saroj Hu, Binwu Wu, Qiang Hu, Hongzhi Zhang, Shuo Wang, Baichuan |
description | Background
Joint‐preserving intercalary tumor resection can result in better proprioception and a more normal joint function after reconstruction. However, most reported reconstruction techniques are usually associated with frequent complications. Therefore, the approach of reconstruction following joint‐preserving tumor resection warrants further study.
Methods
Between September 2016 and October 2018, 12 patients with metaphyseal malignant bone tumors around the knee joint were treated by joint‐preserving intercalary resections with the aid of three‐dimensional (3D)‐printed osteotomy guide plates and reconstructions using 3D‐printed intercalary prostheses. We assessed the accuracy of the resection by comparing the cross sections at the resection plane with 3D‐printed matching surface of the prostheses. The functional outcomes, complications and oncological status were also evaluated.
Results
All patients were observed for 7 to 32 months with an average follow‐up of 22.5 months. The achieved resection was accurate, with accurate matching between the residual bone and prosthesis. The mean MSTS score was 28 (range, 26‐30). Superficial infection occurred in two patients. Local recurrence was observed in one patient, while pulmonary metastasis was identified in one patient.
Conclusions
The personalized osteotomy guide plate and prosthesis based on 3D printing technique facilitate joint‐preserving tumor resection and functional reconstruction. However, longer follow‐up and larger sample size are required to clarify its long‐term outcomes.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jso.25826 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333927255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2348869564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4196-5e38c70e90bd09a3a9764d281cc08f760ce722c6fbb80674f1c6e7b65813484d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQh62qqCy0h74AstRLOSyM_8Sxjwi1QIXEofQcJc4YskpisBMqbr321mfskzC7Szkg9WJ75G8-aX7D2EcBRwJAHq9yPJKFleYNWwhwZunA2bdsQX9yqUsHu2wv5xUAOGf0O7arhAMplFmw39e3CfHvrz9tN-CYuzjWPVV3qRsnbPn6TL7u6_TI71LM0y3mLvMQE6cnT-jjmKc0-4k6eQycyBvkTRyRtxjQT7wOpOCrSKqNGDOmh2684dM8kGZdb7rfs51Q9xk_PN_77MfXL9en58vLq7OL05PLpdeCRitQWV8COmhacLWqXWl0K63wHmwoDXgspfQmNI0FU-ogvMGyMYUVSlvdqn32eeulee5nzFM1dNlj39cjxjlXUinlZCmLgtBPr9BVnBMltKa0tcYVRhN1uKU8BZQThorSGyixSkC13k9F-6k2-yH24Nk4NwO2L-S_hRBwvAV-dj0-_t9Ufft-tVU-AcO7n6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2348869564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three‐dimensional‐printed intercalary prosthesis for the reconstruction of large bone defect after joint‐preserving tumor resection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Liu, Weijian ; Shao, Zengwu ; Rai, Saroj ; Hu, Binwu ; Wu, Qiang ; Hu, Hongzhi ; Zhang, Shuo ; Wang, Baichuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Weijian ; Shao, Zengwu ; Rai, Saroj ; Hu, Binwu ; Wu, Qiang ; Hu, Hongzhi ; Zhang, Shuo ; Wang, Baichuan</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Joint‐preserving intercalary tumor resection can result in better proprioception and a more normal joint function after reconstruction. However, most reported reconstruction techniques are usually associated with frequent complications. Therefore, the approach of reconstruction following joint‐preserving tumor resection warrants further study.
Methods
Between September 2016 and October 2018, 12 patients with metaphyseal malignant bone tumors around the knee joint were treated by joint‐preserving intercalary resections with the aid of three‐dimensional (3D)‐printed osteotomy guide plates and reconstructions using 3D‐printed intercalary prostheses. We assessed the accuracy of the resection by comparing the cross sections at the resection plane with 3D‐printed matching surface of the prostheses. The functional outcomes, complications and oncological status were also evaluated.
Results
All patients were observed for 7 to 32 months with an average follow‐up of 22.5 months. The achieved resection was accurate, with accurate matching between the residual bone and prosthesis. The mean MSTS score was 28 (range, 26‐30). Superficial infection occurred in two patients. Local recurrence was observed in one patient, while pulmonary metastasis was identified in one patient.
Conclusions
The personalized osteotomy guide plate and prosthesis based on 3D printing technique facilitate joint‐preserving tumor resection and functional reconstruction. However, longer follow‐up and larger sample size are required to clarify its long‐term outcomes.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.25826</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31902136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>3D printing technique ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Bone Diseases - surgery ; Bone Neoplasms - pathology ; Bone Neoplasms - surgery ; Cancer surgery ; Child ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; function ; Humans ; intercalary prosthesis ; joint‐preserving ; Knee Joint - surgery ; large bone defect ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organ Sparing Treatments - methods ; Osteotomy ; Patients ; Printing, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation ; Prognosis ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2020-03, Vol.121 (3), p.570-577</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4196-5e38c70e90bd09a3a9764d281cc08f760ce722c6fbb80674f1c6e7b65813484d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4196-5e38c70e90bd09a3a9764d281cc08f760ce722c6fbb80674f1c6e7b65813484d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2098-0515 ; 0000-0003-1616-8118 ; 0000-0002-0471-5594 ; 0000-0001-5231-3031 ; 0000-0001-6896-3928</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjso.25826$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjso.25826$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Weijian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Zengwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Saroj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Binwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hongzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Baichuan</creatorcontrib><title>Three‐dimensional‐printed intercalary prosthesis for the reconstruction of large bone defect after joint‐preserving tumor resection</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
Joint‐preserving intercalary tumor resection can result in better proprioception and a more normal joint function after reconstruction. However, most reported reconstruction techniques are usually associated with frequent complications. Therefore, the approach of reconstruction following joint‐preserving tumor resection warrants further study.
Methods
Between September 2016 and October 2018, 12 patients with metaphyseal malignant bone tumors around the knee joint were treated by joint‐preserving intercalary resections with the aid of three‐dimensional (3D)‐printed osteotomy guide plates and reconstructions using 3D‐printed intercalary prostheses. We assessed the accuracy of the resection by comparing the cross sections at the resection plane with 3D‐printed matching surface of the prostheses. The functional outcomes, complications and oncological status were also evaluated.
Results
All patients were observed for 7 to 32 months with an average follow‐up of 22.5 months. The achieved resection was accurate, with accurate matching between the residual bone and prosthesis. The mean MSTS score was 28 (range, 26‐30). Superficial infection occurred in two patients. Local recurrence was observed in one patient, while pulmonary metastasis was identified in one patient.
Conclusions
The personalized osteotomy guide plate and prosthesis based on 3D printing technique facilitate joint‐preserving tumor resection and functional reconstruction. However, longer follow‐up and larger sample size are required to clarify its long‐term outcomes.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study.</description><subject>3D printing technique</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>function</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intercalary prosthesis</subject><subject>joint‐preserving</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>large bone defect</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organ Sparing Treatments - methods</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQh62qqCy0h74AstRLOSyM_8Sxjwi1QIXEofQcJc4YskpisBMqbr321mfskzC7Szkg9WJ75G8-aX7D2EcBRwJAHq9yPJKFleYNWwhwZunA2bdsQX9yqUsHu2wv5xUAOGf0O7arhAMplFmw39e3CfHvrz9tN-CYuzjWPVV3qRsnbPn6TL7u6_TI71LM0y3mLvMQE6cnT-jjmKc0-4k6eQycyBvkTRyRtxjQT7wOpOCrSKqNGDOmh2684dM8kGZdb7rfs51Q9xk_PN_77MfXL9en58vLq7OL05PLpdeCRitQWV8COmhacLWqXWl0K63wHmwoDXgspfQmNI0FU-ogvMGyMYUVSlvdqn32eeulee5nzFM1dNlj39cjxjlXUinlZCmLgtBPr9BVnBMltKa0tcYVRhN1uKU8BZQThorSGyixSkC13k9F-6k2-yH24Nk4NwO2L-S_hRBwvAV-dj0-_t9Ufft-tVU-AcO7n6c</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Liu, Weijian</creator><creator>Shao, Zengwu</creator><creator>Rai, Saroj</creator><creator>Hu, Binwu</creator><creator>Wu, Qiang</creator><creator>Hu, Hongzhi</creator><creator>Zhang, Shuo</creator><creator>Wang, Baichuan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2098-0515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1616-8118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0471-5594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5231-3031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6896-3928</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Three‐dimensional‐printed intercalary prosthesis for the reconstruction of large bone defect after joint‐preserving tumor resection</title><author>Liu, Weijian ; Shao, Zengwu ; Rai, Saroj ; Hu, Binwu ; Wu, Qiang ; Hu, Hongzhi ; Zhang, Shuo ; Wang, Baichuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4196-5e38c70e90bd09a3a9764d281cc08f760ce722c6fbb80674f1c6e7b65813484d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>3D printing technique</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>function</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intercalary prosthesis</topic><topic>joint‐preserving</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>large bone defect</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organ Sparing Treatments - methods</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Weijian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Zengwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Saroj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Binwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hongzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Baichuan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Weijian</au><au>Shao, Zengwu</au><au>Rai, Saroj</au><au>Hu, Binwu</au><au>Wu, Qiang</au><au>Hu, Hongzhi</au><au>Zhang, Shuo</au><au>Wang, Baichuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three‐dimensional‐printed intercalary prosthesis for the reconstruction of large bone defect after joint‐preserving tumor resection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>570-577</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background
Joint‐preserving intercalary tumor resection can result in better proprioception and a more normal joint function after reconstruction. However, most reported reconstruction techniques are usually associated with frequent complications. Therefore, the approach of reconstruction following joint‐preserving tumor resection warrants further study.
Methods
Between September 2016 and October 2018, 12 patients with metaphyseal malignant bone tumors around the knee joint were treated by joint‐preserving intercalary resections with the aid of three‐dimensional (3D)‐printed osteotomy guide plates and reconstructions using 3D‐printed intercalary prostheses. We assessed the accuracy of the resection by comparing the cross sections at the resection plane with 3D‐printed matching surface of the prostheses. The functional outcomes, complications and oncological status were also evaluated.
Results
All patients were observed for 7 to 32 months with an average follow‐up of 22.5 months. The achieved resection was accurate, with accurate matching between the residual bone and prosthesis. The mean MSTS score was 28 (range, 26‐30). Superficial infection occurred in two patients. Local recurrence was observed in one patient, while pulmonary metastasis was identified in one patient.
Conclusions
The personalized osteotomy guide plate and prosthesis based on 3D printing technique facilitate joint‐preserving tumor resection and functional reconstruction. However, longer follow‐up and larger sample size are required to clarify its long‐term outcomes.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31902136</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.25826</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2098-0515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1616-8118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0471-5594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5231-3031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6896-3928</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4790 |
ispartof | Journal of surgical oncology, 2020-03, Vol.121 (3), p.570-577 |
issn | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333927255 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | 3D printing technique Adolescent Adult Bone Diseases - surgery Bone Neoplasms - pathology Bone Neoplasms - surgery Cancer surgery Child Female Follow-Up Studies function Humans intercalary prosthesis joint‐preserving Knee Joint - surgery large bone defect Male Middle Aged Organ Sparing Treatments - methods Osteotomy Patients Printing, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation Prognosis Prostheses Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Implantation Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Retrospective Studies Tumors |
title | Three‐dimensional‐printed intercalary prosthesis for the reconstruction of large bone defect after joint‐preserving tumor resection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%E2%80%90dimensional%E2%80%90printed%20intercalary%20prosthesis%20for%20the%20reconstruction%20of%20large%20bone%20defect%20after%20joint%E2%80%90preserving%20tumor%20resection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Liu,%20Weijian&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=570-577&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.25826&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2348869564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2348869564&rft_id=info:pmid/31902136&rfr_iscdi=true |